Search

Background Clinician-administered measures of negative symptoms may not capture patients' subjective experiences. The Self-Evaluation of Negative Symptoms (SNS) has shown good psychometric properties when used in outpatients with higher-level functioning schizophrenia. We aimed to evaluate the psychometric properties of the SNS in low functioning participants with treatment-resistant schizophrenia (TRS). Methods Participants were assessed using the following measures at two time-points; time-point 1: SNS, Wide Range Achievement Test, 4th Edition Reading Subtest (WRAT-4), and Brief Assessment of Cognition in Schizophrenia (BACS). Time-point 2 (within a week of time-point 1): SNS, Negative Symptom Assessment 16 items (NSA-16), Scale to Assess Unawareness in Mental Disorder-Abbreviated (SUMD-A), Clinical Global Impression Severity Scale (CGI-S), Simpson Angus Scale (SAS), Calgary Depression Scale for Schizophrenia (CDSS), and the Patient Feasibility Questionnaire. Results Fifty participants with TRS were enrolled, a mean age of 43.8 years (SD = 11.19, min = 25, max = 64), a mean IQ of 80.62 (SD = 17.12, min = 65, max = 110), and a mean BACS Composite T-Score of 14.08 (SD = 17.16, min = −27, max = 49). Participants responded to SNS prompts with moderate consistency across two time-points. There were no significant correlations between the SNS and the NSA-16 Global Symptom score (Pearson r = 0.207, p = .150, Spearman r = 0.101, p = .483), NSA-16 Global Functioning score (Pearson r = 0.209, p = .145, Spearman r = 0.126, p = .384), nor the NSA-16 total score (Pearson r = 0.149, p = .302, Spearman r = 0.116, p = .421). However, when participants were stratified by BACS Composite T-score, there was a significant positive correlation between the SNS total and the NSA-16 Global Functioning score (Pearson r = 0.500, p = .048, Spearman r = 0.546, p = .029) among participants who demonstrated higher cognitive functioning. Conclusion Participants with TRS and low functioning were able to respond to questions on the SNS regarding their subjective assessment of negative symptoms. However, self-reported and clinician-rated negative symptoms were not equivalent, except in a subgroup with higher cognitive functioning. This discrepant self-reporting appeared to relate to their low levels of insight and cognitive impairments.

This review of research utilizing the Schizophrenia Cognition Rating Scale (SCoRS) outlines the development, evaluation, validation, and implementation of the SCoRS to assess whether the scale meets the criteria as a functional co-primary as defined by the MATRICS-CT initiative. Interview-based co-primary assessments should be: 1) practical and easy to administer for a clinician or researcher; 2) validated in individuals with schizophrenia; 3) contain the relevant areas of cognition and functioning applicable to schizophrenia; 4) able to assess all phases and severity levels of schizophrenia; 5) capable of monitoring disease progression; 6) minimal burden to patients; and 7) sensitive to assess treatment effects. A review of the literature was conducted to present information on the development, psychometric properties and usage of the SCoRS. Review of the development of the SCoRS followed the parameters outlined for scale development on content expert validation and feedback. The SCoRS shows good psychometric properties in various studies, and demonstrates low burden on clinicians and patients. The items measure global concepts that do not require notable cultural modification, making international use feasible. While multiple performance-based tests in cognition and functional outcomes are available, there is a need for a multi-domain, interview-based assessment of cognitive progression and treatment response in clinical trials. The SCoRS appears to meet many of the criteria for an optimal co-primary measure for schizophrenia cognition clinical trials as defined in the MATRICS-CT initiative.

The MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery (MCCB) was developed to assess cognitive treatment effects in schizophrenia clinical trials, and is considered the FDA gold standard outcome measure for that purpose. The aim of the present study was to establish pre-treatment psychometric characteristics of the MCCB in a large pooled sample. The dataset included 2616 stable schizophrenia patients enrolled in 15 different clinical trials between 2007 and 2016 within the United States (94%) and Canada (6%). The MCCB was administered twice prior to the initiation of treatment in 1908 patients. Test-retest reliability and practice effects of the cognitive composite score, the neurocognitive composite score, which excludes the domain Social Cognition, and the subtests/domains were examined using Intra-Class Correlations (ICC) and Cohen's d. Simulated regression models explored which domains explained the greatest portion of variance in composite scores. Test-retest reliability was high (ICC=0.88) for both composite scores. Practice effects were small for the cognitive (d=0.15) and neurocognitive (d=0.17) composites. Simulated bootstrap regression analyses revealed that 3 of the 7 domains explained 86% of the variance for both composite scores. The domains that entered most frequently in the top 3 positions of the regression models were Speed of Processing, Working Memory, and Visual Learning. Findings provide definitive psychometric characteristics and a benchmark comparison for clinical trials using the MCCB. The test-retest reliability of the MCCB composite scores is considered excellent and the learning effects are small, fulfilling two of the key criteria for outcome measures in cognition clinical trials.

Background The Virtual Reality Functional Capacity Assessment Tool (VRFCAT) is an “applied” game-based assessment that uses a multi-level functional task to assess instrumental activities of daily living (iADL). This study examines the feasibility, convergent validity, and predictive ability of the VRFCAT in a sample of inpatients with chronic schizophrenia. Methods Inpatients with a DSM-5 diagnosis of schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder, completed the VRFCAT prior to discharge. The UPSA-B, SLOF, and PSP were administered, both at baseline and after four-weeks in the community. VRFCAT performance scores were compared to published data from the VRFCAT validation study. Results All 62 participants completed the VRFCAT. Compared to the performance of stable outpatients, participants performed 1.50 SDs below the VRFCAT mean adjusted total time (ATT) (Validation study: Mean T Score = 32.5, SD = 16.59) with more errors. The VRFCAT ATT T-score was significantly correlated with baseline UPSA-B total score (p = 0.005) and PSP Global score (p = 0.010). 34 participants completed the follow-up period (55%), and 28 were lost to follow-up. There were no statistically significant differences in VRFCAT scores between these two groups (all p > 0.29). The VRFCAT composite score at baseline was significantly associated with the UPSA-B total score (p = 0.010) and the PSP total score (p = 0.008) at four-weeks, as was the PSP Socially Useful Activities subscale score (p = 0.006). Conclusion The VRFCAT is a valid measure of iADLs in inpatients with chronic schizophrenia. The VRFCAT predicted instrumental functioning four-weeks post-discharge. Future studies should examine other moderators of measures of functional capacity pre-discharge, predicting function later in the community.

As part of a project to translate and validate scales used in the diagnosis and treatment of Arab patients with schizophrenia, this study aimed to explore the experience of clinical research coordinators (CRCs) while administering the Arabic version of the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) on Arab schizophrenia patients. We previously reported that the Arabic version of PANSS is a valid and reliable tool to assess Arab patients with schizophrenia. Five CRCs and the principal investigator attended focus group discussions on cultural issues in administering the PANSS. A thematic analysis approach was utilized for data coding and analysis. The results identified issues related to the translation of the instrument, the structure of the interview, the cultural sensitivity of some questions, and the procedures for rating items of the PANSS. Qualitative analysis also identified four main themes relevant to clinical assessment of patients from Middle Eastern cultures: religion, beliefs and values, gender, and semantic expressions. In conclusion, researchers or clinicians administering the PANSS scale interview in Arabic should be trained to consider the roles of local dialects, familiarity with abstract thinking, religion, and social constructs when assessing psychosis.

Virtual Reality (VR) approaches have had considerable success in measurement of functional capacity. However, it is not clear if factors other than cognitive impairment influence performance on VR measures. Many people with schizophrenia have significant negative symptoms and they could reduce engagement in assessment. 158 patients with schizophrenia performed the VRFCAT, were tested with the MCCB, were rated with the PANSS, and were rated on everyday functioning. Scores for reduced emotional experience and reduced expression were derived. Reduced emotional experience, but not reduced expression, was correlated with socially relevant VRFCAT subtasks and real-world social functioning. Performance on the socially relevant subtasks, but not the solitary subtasks, shared variance with work outcomes. MCCB performance was associated with both subdomains, but socially relevant subtasks shared more variance. Patients with higher reduced emotional experience validly engaged in socially relevant VR simulations, as indexed by correlations with outcome measures. These patients had poorer performance on socially relevant tasks than on solitary tasks. The differential validity of solitary vs. socially relevant simulations was supported by differences in correlates, suggesting that assessments with a focus on performance of simulated socially relevant tasks could be developed.

Background: Negative symptoms and cognitive deficits have a substantial predictive value for functional deficits and recovery in schizophrenia. However, the relationship between negative symptoms and cognitive abnormalities is unclear possibly due to the heterogeneity of negative symptoms. This study used the model of expressive and experiential negative symptoms subfactors to decrease this heterogeneity. It examined these subfactors and cognition before and after treatment with computerized cognitive remediation training (CRT) in chronically-hospitalized individuals with psychosis and predominant negative symptoms. Methods: Seventy-eight adult participants with a DSM-IV-TR diagnosis of schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder were enrolled in a 12-week CRT program. Assessments of demographic and illness variables, baseline and endpoint assessments of psychopathology (Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale) and cognition (MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery - MCCB) were conducted. Results: The baseline expressive negative subfactor was associated with Processing Speed (r = −0.352, p ≤ 0.001) and Reasoning/Problem Solving (r = −0.338, p ≤ 0.001). Following CRT, there was a significant decrease in the experiential negative subfactor (p

Background Transcranial direct-current stimulation (tDCS), a non-invasive neurostimulation treatment, has been reported in a number of sham-controlled studies to show significant improvements in treatment-resistant auditory hallucinations in schizophrenia patients, primarily in ambulatory and higher-functioning patients, but little is known of the effects of tDCS on hospitalized, low-functioning inpatients. Objective/Hypothesis The purpose of this study was to examine the efficacy and safety of tDCS for auditory hallucinations in hospitalized ultra-treatment-resistant schizophrenia (TRS) and to evaluate the effects of tDCS on cognitive functions. We hypothesized that treatment non-response reported in previous tDCS studies may have been due to the insufficient duration of direct-current stimulation. Methods Inpatient participants with DSM-V schizophrenia, long-standing treatment-resistance, and auditory verbal hallucinations (AVH) participated in this 4-week sham-controlled, randomized trial. Assessments included the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) and MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery (MCCB) at baseline and endpoint (at the end of Week 4), and the Auditory Hallucinations Rating Scale (AHRS) administered at baseline, endpoint, and weekly throughout the study. Participants were randomized to receive active vs. sham tDCS treatments twice daily for 4 weeks. Results Twenty-eight participants were enrolled (tDCS, n = 15; control, n = 13) and 21 participants completed all 4 weeks of the trial. Results showed a significant reduction for the auditory hallucination total score (p ≤ 0.05). We found a 21.9% decrease in AHRS Total Score for the tDCS group and a 12.6% decrease in AHRS Total Score for the control group. Significant reductions in frequency, number of voices over time, length of auditory hallucinations, and overall psychopathology were also observed for the tDCS group. When assessing cognitive functioning, only Working Memory showed improvement for the tDCS group. Conclusion Although there was only a small improvement noted in auditory hallucination scores for the tDCS group, this improvement was meaningful when compared to no standard treatment of the control group. While this makes the interpretation of clinical significance debatable, it does confirm that tDCS combined with pharmacological intervention can provide clinical gains over pharmacological intervention alone. Therefore, tDCS treatment appears to be effective not only for ambulatory, higher-functioning patients, but also for patients with ultra-treatment-resistant schizophrenia.

Objectives Cognitive remediation therapy (CRT) has shown significant improvement in cognition in schizophrenia. However, effect sizes of CRT have been reported to be modest raising the issue how to augment the effects of CRT on neurocognition and social cognition. Our aim was to examine whether the addition of computerized social cognition training would enhance the effects on neurocognition and social cognition as compared to CRT alone. Methods This is a 12-week, parallel group trial of 131 in- and out-patients with schizophrenia randomized to CRT (COGPACK or Brain Fitness) with computerized social cognition training (MRIGE), or CRT alone for 36 sessions. Participants were assessed at baseline and after 12 weeks of treatment. Assessments included neurocognition, social cognition, psychopathology, and functioning. Results The combined intervention, CRT + MRIGE, showed greater improvements in the MCCB indices of Visual Learning, Working Memory, Reasoning and Problem-Solving, and the neurocognitive composite score compared to CRT alone (Bonferroni adjusted p = 0.004, p = 0.005, p = 0.01, respectively), as did social cognition measures (Bonferroni adjusted p = 0.006, p = 0.005, respectively). Conclusions Supplementing CRT with computerized social cognition training produced greater benefits in neurocognition, including visual learning, memory, executive functions, and social cognition relative to cognitive training alone. These findings favoring the combined training may be contributed to both the greater overall amount of cognitive practice, as well as the specific cognitive functions engaged by the social cognition training.

Objective Current dopamine-blocking antipsychotic drugs have little impact on the cognitive deficits associated with schizophrenia. We evaluated whether MIN-101, a molecule that combines sigma-2 antagonism and 5-HT2A antagonism, might improve cognitive deficits in individuals with moderate to severe negative symptoms in schizophrenia. Methods Individuals (N = 244) aged 18 to 60 years with stable symptoms of DSM-5-defined schizophrenia and moderate to severe negative symptoms were randomized to placebo (n = 83), MIN-101 32 mg (n = 78), or MIN-101 64 mg (n = 83) in a 12-week, phase 2b, prospective, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group trial between May 2015 and December 2015. In a post hoc analysis, mean z and T score changes from baseline at 12 weeks of treatment in the cognitive composite score and individual tests on the Brief Assessment of Cognition in Schizophrenia (BACS) Battery were compared between MIN-101 and placebo. Results A total of 79 patients (95.2%) from the placebo group, 76 (97.4%) from the MIN-101 32 mg group, and 79 (95.2%) from the MIN-101 64 mg group completed the BACS at baseline. The BACS token motor (P = .04), verbal fluency (P = .01), and composite z scores (P = .05) showed significant improvements in the MIN-101 32 mg group compared to the placebo group. At week 4, the clinical improvements from baseline in the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) negative factor showed a significant correlation with improvements from baseline on the BACS composite in the 64 mg group (r = -0.292, P = .020). At week 12, improvement in the PANSS negative factor showed significant correlations with improvements in the BACS composite (r = -0.408, P = .002), Trail Making Test (r = -0.394, P = .003), and verbal memory (r = -0.322, P = .017) for the 64 mg group. Conclusions Results suggest a possible benefit of MIN-101 on cognitive performance in individuals with schizophrenia with stable positive symptoms and concurrent clinically significant negative symptoms. Trial registration EU Clinical Trials Register identifier: 2014-004878-42​.

International Society for CNS Clinical Trials and Methodology convened an expert working-group that assembled consistency/inconsistency flags for the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS). Twenty-four flags were identified and divided based on extent to which they represent error (Possibly, Probably, Very probably or definitely). The flags were applied to assessments derived from the NEWMEDS data repository and the CATIE clinical trial data. Almost 40% of ratings had at least one inconsistency flag raised and 10% had two. Application of flags to clinical rating can improve reliability and validity of trials.

Background The Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) assesses multiple domains of schizophrenia. Evaluation of each of these domains was conducted to assess differences in the characteristics of psychopathology and their relative predominance in sub-populations. Method Subjects (N = 1,832) with DSM-IV schizophrenia were represented in three sub-populations: First Episodes, n = 305, Chronic Inpatients, n = 694, and Ambulatory Outpatients, n = 833. Nonparametric Item Response Analysis (IRT) was performed with Option Characteristic Curves (OCC), Item Characteristic Curves (ICC), slopes and item biserial correlation. Items were characterized as Very Good, Good, or Weak based on specified operational criteria for item selection. Results First episode patients were represented by negative, disorganized hostility and anxiety. Some negative domain items (Poor Rapport, Passive/Apathetic Social Withdrawal) and most positive domain items were scored as Weak. For chronic inpatients, all items of the anxiety domain and some items of the positive domain (Suspiciousness/Persecution, Stereotyped Thinking, Somatic Concerns) were Weak; for all other domains, items were Very Good or Good. For ambulatory outpatients, most items in the anxiety and hostility domain were scored as Weak. The majority of PANSS items were either Very Good or Good at assessing the overall illness severity: chronic inpatients (73.33%, 22 items), first episodes (60.00%, 18 items), and only 46.67% (14 items) in the ambulatory group. Conclusion Findings confirm differences in symptom presentation and predominance of particular domains in subpopulations of schizophrenia. Identifying symptom domains characteristic of subpopulations may be more useful in assessing efficacy endpoints than total or subscale scores.

Background Transcranial direct-current stimulation (tDCS), a noninvasive neurostimulation treatment, has been reported to show improvements in treatment-resistant auditory hallucinations in patients with schizophrenia. tDCS administered over a limited number of sessions effectively produced lasting attenuation of auditory hallucinations in otherwise stable outpatients. It has also been shown that tDCS may be a useful intervention for ameliorating cognitive deficits in patients with chronic schizophrenia. The purpose of this study was to test tDCS for auditory hallucinations in ultra-treatment resistant schizophrenia to assess if this form of neurostimulation can alleviate treatment-refractory auditory hallucination symptoms up to 4 weeks after the final treatment. In addition, we also wanted to examine the effects of tDCS on cognitive functions. Methods 28 inpatients with DSM-V schizophrenia and long-standing treatment resistance and persistent auditory verbal hallucinations were recruited. Each individual participated in behavioral assessments at baseline, endpoint and follow-up [PANSS and Auditory Hallucinations Rating Scale (AHRS) and MCCB cognitive battery] and were randomized to receive active vs. sham tDCS treatments. For active treatment, patients had the inhibitory (cathodal) tDCS electrode placed over left auditory cortex relative to an excitatory (anodal) electrode placed over frontal cortex on the right side. tDCS treatments took place for 20 min twice daily for 5 consecutive days. Assessment batteries were repeated following the 4 weeks of treatment. The Chattanooga, dual channel CHA-1335 stimulator with two 7 × 5 cm (35 cm2) sponge electrodes soaked in a saline solution (0.9% NaCl) was used for the delivery of 2 mA current. Results A total of 28 subjects were enrolled (tDCS, n = 13; Control, n = 15). 20 subjects completed the trial. 3 subjects dropped out of the active tDCS treatment group, while 4 subjects did not complete the control treatment due to early discharge from the hospital. Most subjects were male (tDCS n = 10, 76.9%; Control n = 6, 40.0%). Length of present psychiatric admission ranged from 1–25 months, with a mode of 2 months (n = 12) and average of 2.9 months. Participating inpatients were on clozapine, haloperidol, paliperidone depot, fluphenazine decanoate, paliperidone, olanzapine, and risperidone as primary medications. Repeated Measures ANOVA showed a significant difference for the auditory hallucination total score, frequency and number of voices over time (p < 0.05) with greater reduction in scores observed for the tDCS group. Improvements were maintained after 4 weeks. There was no significant change over time observed for the PANSS positive symptoms or total score, or for the PANSS Hallucinatory Behavior item score. When assessing cognitive functioning, only Working Memory change was significant (p = 0.048) between the tDCS and the Control group with the tDCS group showing significant improvement in T-Score as compared to the Control group. Discussion Subjects who received tDCS treatment showed a significant reduction in the frequency, number of voices, and total scores of their auditory hallucination. Additionally, subjects in the tDCS group showed significant improvement in the Working Memory. Our results indicate that patients who have been ultra-resistant to antipsychotic treatments and who received tDCS treatment presented with robust diminution of their auditory hallucinations. We conclude that tDCS seems to be effective not only for ambulatory, higher functioning patients, but also for much lower functioning patients with medication-refractory auditory verbal hallucinations.

Background Debate persists with regard to how best to categorize the syndromal dimension of negative symptoms in schizophrenia. The aim was to first review published Principle Components Analysis (PCA) of the PANSS, and extract items most frequently included in the negative domain, and secondly, to examine the quality of items using Item Response Theory (IRT) to select items that best represent a measurable dimension (or dimensions) of negative symptoms. Methods First, 22 factor analyses and PCA met were included. Second, using a large dataset (n = 7187) of participants in clinical trials with chronic schizophrenia, we extracted items loading on one or more PCA. Third, items not loading with a value of ≥ 0.5, or loading on more than one component with values of ≥ 0.5 were discarded. Fourth, resulting items were included in a non-parametric IRT and retained based on Option Characteristic Curves (OCCs) and Item Characteristic Curves (ICCs). Results 15 items loaded on a negative domain in at least one study, with Emotional Withdrawal loading on all studies. Non-parametric IRT retained nine items as an Integrated Negative Factor: Emotional Withdrawal, Blunted Affect, Passive/Apathetic Social Withdrawal, Poor Rapport, Lack of Spontaneity/Conversation Flow, Active Social Avoidance, Disturbance of Volition, Stereotyped Thinking and Difficulty in Abstract Thinking. Conclusions This is the first study to use a psychometric IRT process to arrive at a set of negative symptom items. Future steps will include further examination of these nine items in terms of their stability, sensitivity to change, and correlations with functional and cognitive outcomes.

Background: The Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) is a widely used assessment for patients with schizophrenia across clinical and research settings. This scale allows the classification of the psychotic symptoms to better understand the psychopathology in patients with schizophrenia. There are no available data on the different components of psychopathology in Arab patients with schizophrenia. Objectives: This study examined the factor structure of the validated Arabic version of the PANSS in a sample of Arab patients with schizophrenia. Methods: The Arabic version of the PANSS was administered to 101 patients with schizophrenia, and principal component analysis (PCA) was carried out after the cross-cultural adaptation and validation of this version. Results: This sample had more males (66.3%) than females (33.7%) with a mean age of 35.03 years (SD = 9.99). PCA showed that 28 items loaded on 5 components: cognitive, negative, excited, depressed and positive. These factors explained 63.19% of variance. The 2 remaining items, grandiosity and somatic concerns, did not load well on any of these components. Conclusion: Our results support the common 5-dimension PANSS model shown in other cultures with different languages. Nevertheless, there were minor differences, which could reflect cultural or semantic differences.

Background Patients with schizophrenia commonly show both depressive and negative symptoms that can differentially affect the prognosis and course of treatment. The Calgary Depression Scale for Schizophrenia (CDSS) was designed to distinguish between depression and negative symptoms in patients with schizophrenia. The purpose of this study is to validate an Arabic version of the CDSS among patients with schizophrenia. Methods The diagnosis of schizophrenia was confirmed using the Arabic Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview 6 (MINI 6). A standardized translation back-translation process was adopted. One rater administered the Arabic CDSS to subjects with schizophrenia as well as to a control group who should not have any psychiatric disorder except for depression. Another rater, blinded to the results administered the already validated Arabic version of Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II). Results We recruited 102 patients and 102 controls subjects. The CDSS showed good internal consistency in the active group (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.82). The Intraclass Coefficient correlations (ICC) for the inter-rater reliability (n = 21) was 0.90, p

This study aims to examine the effects of change in neurocognition on functional outcomes and to examine predictors of change in social functions following a 12-week course of cognitive remediation in patients with schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder with severe cognitive impairments.Level of social functioning was assessed using a performance based measure of functional capacity (PSP) in patients prior to and after the completion of 12-week cognitive remediation treatment (CRT). Participants completed a neuropsychological battery (MCCB-MATRICS) and clinical measures at both time points.63 subjects with a mean age of 41.4 (SD=12.2) and with 12.2years of education (SD=2.4) were enrolled. There were significant improvements in overall PSP score from baseline to endpoint (p=0.021) as well as in PSP domain A (socially useful activities) (p≤0.001), domain B (personal and social relationships) (p=0.009), and domain D (disturbing and aggressive behaviors) (p=0.003). There was a significant improvement in the composite MCCB score (p=0.020) and the Working Memory (p0.046). Stepwise logistic regression yielded a significant association for baseline Visual Learning (Wald=6.537, p=0.011, OR=1.195), Speed of Processing (Wald=4.112, p=0.043, OR=0.850) and level of PANSS positive symptoms (Wald=4.087, p=0.043, OR=0.739) with PSP overall improvement.Faster speed of processing, better visual and verbal learning and less prominent positive symptoms were associated with greater functional improvement after a systematic cognitive intervention within a rehabilitative setting.

Background: The Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) is widely used for patients with schizophrenia. This scale is reliable and valid. The PANSS was translated and validated in several languages. Objective: The aim of this study was to translate and validate the PANSS in the Arab population. Subjects and Methods: The PANSS was translated into formal Arabic language using the back-translation method. 101 Arab patients with schizophrenia and 98 Arabs with no diagnosis of any mental disorder were recruited. The Arabic version of the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI-6) was used as a diagnostic tool to confirm the diagnosis of schizophrenia or rule out any diagnosis for the healthy control group. Reliability of the scale was assessed by calculating internal consistency, interrater reliability and test-retest reliability. Construct validity was assessed using the Arabic version of the MINI-6. PANSS total scores were correlated with the Clinical Global Impression-Severity scale. Results: Our findings showed that the internal consistency was good (0.92). Scores on the PANSS of the patients were much higher than those of the healthy controls. The PANSS showed good interrater reliability and test-retest reliability (0.92 and 0.75, respectively). In comparison with the MINI-6, the PANSS showed good sensitivity and specificity, which implies good construct validity of this version. Conclusion: In conclusion, the Arabic version of the PANSS is a reliable and valid instrument for the assessment of patients with schizophrenia in the Arab population.

Background The metabolic syndrome (MetS) and cognitive impairments are common in schizophrenia. Both are associated with poor outcomes, which have received increasing medical and mental health attention. Whether MetS is associated with impaired cognitive functions in schizophrenia has not been thoroughly addressed. The aim of this study was to compare the association between patients with and without MetS and its contributing components with neurocognitive performance. We hypothesized that patients with MetS would be associated with more impaired cognitive performance. Methods 159 patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder, with available metabolic data were included in the study. Patients were classified as either having or not having MetS as defined by the NCEP Adult Panel-III criteria. All patients completed neurocognitive and metabolic tests. Results Of the 159 patients, 43.34% had MetS. Patients without the MetS performed significantly better on tests measuring processing speed (p = 0.050), attention/vigilance (p = 0.040), working memory (p = 0.041) and problem solving/reasoning (p = 0.050) compared with those with MetS. Patients with MetS showed significantly lower cognitive domain scores. After Bonferroni correction greater waist circumference was associated with lower scores on attention/vigilance (β = − 0.551; p ≤ .0083), HDL was positively associated with scores on attention/vigilance (β = 0.900, p ≤ .0083) and higher triglycerides were associated with lower scores on attention/vigilance (β = − 1.004, p ≤ .0083). Conclusions Schizophrenia patients with MetS showed significant cognitive impairments in three key cognitive domains. Aggressive medical treatment of the constituent components of MetS may provide the potential for important beneficial effects on patients' cognitive functioning.

Background: Social cognition is significantly impaired in schizophrenia and contributes to poor community functioning. This study examined whether cognitive remediation (CR; COGPACK), shown to improve neurocognition, improves an integral component of social cognition, emotion perception, compared with CR combined with a computerized Emotion Perception intervention (Mind Reading: Interactive Guide to Emotions [MRIGE]).

Despite numerous studies of diabetes mellitus type II (DM-II) in schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder, there have been no studies on the glycemic effects of switching patients with long-standing symptomatic DM-II from their current antipsychotic regimen to ziprasidone.An open-label, prospective inpatient study was conducted with 26 suboptimally responding inpatients with DSM-IV diagnoses of schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder and comorbid DM-II who were switched to ziprasidone monotherapy and followed for 8 weeks. Outcome measures were fasting glucose, triglycerides, cholesterol, insulin levels, capillary blood glucose levels and weight. After a 3-week cross-titration period, patients were treated with ziprasidone up to a dose of 320 mg daily.Of the 26 study participants, 16 completed the entire study period of 63 days and 10 (38.46%) discontinued participation, primarily due to psychotic relapse. There was a statistically significant reduction in fasting glucose (F=4.43, p=0.05; 14.68 mg/dL mean reduction), capillary blood glucose levels (F=8.90, p=0.01; 25.36 mg/dL mean reduction), weight (F=4.46, p=0.05; 4.68 lb mean weight loss) and Body Mass Index (F=4.40, p=0.05; 3.62 kg/m(2) mean reduction). There was also a reduction in the use of antidiabetic medications after the switch to ziprasidone. Nine (34.62%) patients met criteria for metabolic syndrome (MetS) at baseline, as compared to 4 (15.38%) at endpoint. No change was observed in positive symptoms (F=0.62, p=0.44), negative symptoms (F=1.47, p=0.24) and in total PANSS score (F=0.12, p=0.74).This study suggests significant improvement in metabolic side effects and MetS in the subset of the patients who were able to tolerate switching from a polypharmacy regimen to ziprasidone. There was a large discontinuation rate, which limited the sustained beneficial effects of ziprasidone. The decision to switch to ziprasidone in patients with prior suboptimal response has to balance the potential metabolic benefits and the potential relapse risks of the individual patient first and foremost.

Quetiapine is often prescribed at doses higher than those approved by regulatory authorities, with limited evidence from controlled trials. The objective of this study was to assess the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of high-dose quetiapine (1200 mg/d) compared with a standard dose of 600 mg/d among patients with Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition, schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder hospitalized at 2 state-operated psychiatric facilities. In order to be eligible for randomization, subjects were required to prospectively fail to demonstrate an initial therapeutic response during a 4-week run-in phase with quetiapine at 600 mg/d (immediate release and dosed twice a day). Lack of an adequate initial response was defined a 15% or lower decrease in the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale total score. Patients were then randomized to either continue quetiapine at 600 mg/d for an additional 8 weeks or to receive 1200 mg/d quetiapine instead. No significant differences were observed between the high dose (n = 29) and standard dose (n = 31) groups in change from baseline to endpoint on extrapyramidal symptoms, electrocardiographic changes, or most laboratory measures between groups. There was a significant difference between groups for triglycerides (P = 0.035), and post hoc tests revealed a decrease in triglycerides from baseline (mean [SD], 162.7 [59.3] mg/dL) to endpoint (mean [SD], 134.8 [ 62.7] mg/dL) for the 600 mg/d group (P = 0.019). The mean change in the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale total score did not differ between groups. In conclusion, quetiapine at 1200 mg/d, although reasonably tolerated, did not confer any advantages over quetiapine at 600 mg/d among patients who had failed to demonstrate an adequate response to a prospective 4-week trial of 600 mg/d.

Background Primary negative symptoms of schizophrenia contribute heavily to functional disability. Treatment of these symptoms continues to be a major unmet need, even when positive symptoms are controlled. Recent factor analyses of negative symptoms using the PANSS and other symptom assessments in patients with schizophrenia have identified two factors of negative symptoms: expressive and experiential deficits. These two factors most likely have very different clinical, neurocognitive and neurobiological correlates. This study examines the clinical and cognitive correlates associated with expressive and experiential deficits in a large cohort of patients with psychosis before and after computerized cognitive remediation. Methods This is a secondary data analysis of subjects enrolled in a cognitive remediation program for 12 weeks. One hundred fifty-one subjects age 18 - 55 with a DSM IV-TR diagnosis of schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder or bipolar disorder were enrolled. Assessments of demographic, psychopathology (PANSS), cognition (MCBB), and daily living skills (UPSA-Brief) were conducted at baseline and endpoint. Exploratory (EFA) and confirmatory (CFA) factor analyses of PANSS items as well as Pearson’s correlations between factors, demographics, MCCB, and UPSA-Brief scores were examined at baseline and endpoint. Results EFA baseline PANSS data resulted in the five-factor model of the PANSS with seven items attributed to the Negative Symptom Factor (NSF; N1, blunted affect; N2, emotional withdrawal; N3, poor rapport; N4, passive social withdrawal; N6, lack of spontaneity and flow of conversation; G7, motor retardation; and G16, active social avoidance). CFA of the NSF revealed a two-factor model consisting of an Expressive Deficit (N1, N3, N6, G7), and an Experiential Deficit (N2, N4, and G16). Difference tests comparing the one-factor and two-factor models found that the two-factor model exhibited significantly better fit than the one-factor model (χ2 = 67.117, df = 1, p ≤ 0.001; CFI = 0.92; Tucker–Lewis index TLI = 0.91; root mean square error of approximation RMSEA = 0.040; and Goodness of Fit index GFI = 0.93). There were significant correlations between the Expressive Deficit factor score and cognition: TMT- A (r=-0.259, p=0.001), BACS Symbol coding (r=-0.287, p=0.001), Category Fluency (r=-0.342, p=0.001), Hopkins Verbal Learning Test – revised (HTLV-R) (r=-0.236, p=0.05), Letter Number Sequencing (r=-0.256, P=0.001), and NAB Mazes (r=-0.409, p=0.001). The Expressive Deficit factor was also significantly correlated with the neurocognitive domains of Processing Speed (r=-0.352, p=0.001) and Reasoning/Problem Solving (r=-0.338, p=0.001). There were no significant correlations between either factor and UPSA-Brief or the MCCB cognitive composite. There were no significant correlations for change from baseline to endpoint in negative symptoms. Discussion Our results support the negative symptom two-factor model of Expressive Deficit and Experiential Deficit domains. Only the Expressive Deficit factor was associated with baseline deficits in Working Memory, Processing Speed, Reasoning/Problem Solving and Verbal Learning. The association of the Expressive Deficit factor with significant cognitive impairments supports a more profound neurobiological dysfunction in contrast to the Experiential Deficit factor and may represent an important treatment challenge. The relevance of these findings for the treatment of negative symptoms in schizophrenia will be discussed.

OBJECTIVE Primary negative symptoms are intrinsic to the pathology of schizophrenia and are associated with significant deficits in motivation, verbal and nonverbal communication, affect, and cognitive and social functioning. Overall, atypical antipsychotic medications have been found to be more efficacious than conventional antipsychotics in the treatment of negative symptoms, based on studies with acute patients. Results have been confounded by concomitant improvements in positive, depressive, and extrapyramidal symptoms. This 12-week, double-blind, controlled study aimed to examine the effects of the atypical antipsychotic olanzapine versus haloperidol on persistent, primary negative symptoms and neurocognitive functions in stable schizophrenic patients with the deficit syndrome and low levels of concomitant positive, depressive, and extrapyramidal symptoms. METHOD Thirty-five patients with DSM-IV-TR schizophrenia and predominant negative symptoms were randomly assigned in a 12-week double-blind study to either olanzapine (15-20 mg/day) or haloperidol (15-20 mg/day). Patients taking haloperidol received additional blinded benztropine. Inclusion criteria were Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) negative score of >or=20, PANSS positive score < 20, and fulfilling the criteria for the Schedule for the Deficit Syndrome. The PANSS, Clinical Global Impressions, Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D), Simpson-Angus Scale, and Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale were assessed at regular subsequent intervals. A neuropsychological battery examining declarative verbal learning memory, attention and processing speed, executive functioning, and simple motor functioning domains of cognition was assessed at baseline and endpoint. The study ran from September 1998 through May 2005. RESULTS CLINICAL RESULTS There was a statistically significant difference for PANSS negative symptoms (F = 5.44, df = 1,15; p

A functional polymorphism of the catechol-O-methyltransferase (COMT) gene (Val158Met) partially appears to influence cognitive performance in schizophrenia subjects and healthy controls by modulating prefrontal dopaminergic activity. This study evaluated the association of the COMT Val108/158 Met genotype with response to computerized neurocognitive remediation (CRT).145 subjects with DSM-IV-TR schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder were genotyped via saliva sampling. Subjects were evaluated on neurocognitive assessments (MATRICS) and clinical symptoms (PANSS) at baseline and endpoint after 12weeks of CRT. "Improvement" was defined as ≥67% of cognitive domains (≥4) showing performance increases. If ≤67% (≤2) of domains improved, the change was defined as "minimal improvement." A general linear model was conducted for change of each cognitive domain.Of 145 subjects, data from 138 subjects were usable. Distribution of COMT genotype: Met/Met: 28 (20.29%), Val/Met: 61 (44.20%), and Val/Val: 49 (35.51%). No significant differences were seen among genotype groups at baseline or across genotype group for "Improvement" vs. "Minimal Improvement." GLM analysis showed significant differences in Verbal Learning (p=0.003), Visual Learning (p=0.014) and Attention/Vigilance (p=0.011) favoring Met/Met and Val/Met groups.The low activity Met allele (Met/Met; Val/Met) was associated with significantly greater improvements in the MATRICS domains of Verbal Learning, Visual Learning and Attention/Vigilance after CRT.

Background: Significant cognitive impairment is already seen in first-episode psychosis (FEP) and degree of impairment is a moderator of long-term outcomes. Does specialized FEP treatment improve cognitive functioning? The NIMH sponsored RAISE-ETP study allows comparison of NAVIGATE, a coordinated specialty care intervention designed for FEP, to Community Care (CC) in a randomized clinical trial. (RCT)

BACKGROUND Considering the increasing attention to the study of failed clinical trials, the goal of this study was to identify the sources of unreliability in a failed clinical trial by assessing scores on the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS). METHODS This study is a substudy from a failed phase 2 double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of schizophrenia. Using the generalizability theory, this substudy assesses reliability on 3 conditions: raters, time points (PANSS evaluations, 1 week apart), subjects for 3 groups (placebo responders, placebo nonresponders, and treatment group). RESULTS The placebo response rate was 40.07% (32/71). For all PANSS positive symptom items, the most variability was for raters (range, 33%-72%) for the placebo responders, 31% to 68% for the placebo nonresponders, and 29% to 60% for the treatment group. The variability of the interaction of rater and time point was the second source of unreliability, with an average of 12.28% compared to 12.00% for the placebo nonresponders and 10.00% for the treatment group. All items of the negative symptom subscale showed the most percent variability for raters, for all groups. For general psychopathology items (except preoccupation), raters accounted for the most variability in the scores for placebo responders with an average of 51.00% across items. A similar pattern was observed for the placebo nonresponders and for the treatment group; for the treatment group, the interaction between rater and time point accounted for the most variability for somatic concern and anxiety. CONCLUSIONS Results confirm the efficacy of applying the generalizability theory to the estimation of reliability to identify a source of unreliability and provide evidence for the relationship between low reliability and failed trials. Findings can be used to guide data monitoring, rater training, and identification of PANSS items, which may require supplementary training.

Background Nonparametric item response theory (IRT) was used to examine (a) the performance of the 30 Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) items and their options ((levels of severity), (b) the effectiveness of various subscales to discriminate among differences in symptom severity, and (c) the development of an abbreviated PANSS (Mini-PANSS) based on IRT and a method to link scores to the original PANSS. Methods Baseline PANSS scores from 7,187 patients with Schizophrenia or Schizoaffective disorder who were enrolled between 1995 and 2005 in psychopharmacology trials were obtained. Option characteristic curves (OCCs) and Item Characteristic Curves (ICCs) were constructed to examine the probability of rating each of seven options within each of 30 PANSS items as a function of subscale severity, and summed-score linking was applied to items selected for the Mini-PANSS. Results The majority of items forming the Positive and Negative subscales (i.e. 19 items) performed very well and discriminate better along symptom severity compared to the General Psychopathology subscale. Six of the seven Positive Symptom items, six of the seven Negative Symptom items, and seven out of the 16 General Psychopathology items were retained for inclusion in the Mini-PANSS. Summed score linking and linear interpolation was able to produce a translation table for comparing total subscale scores of the Mini-PANSS to total subscale scores on the original PANSS. Results show scores on the subscales of the Mini-PANSS can be linked to scores on the original PANSS subscales, with very little bias. Conclusions The study demonstrated the utility of non-parametric IRT in examining the item properties of the PANSS and to allow selection of items for an abbreviated PANSS scale. The comparisons between the 30-item PANSS and the Mini-PANSS revealed that the shorter version is comparable to the 30-item PANSS, but when applying IRT, the Mini-PANSS is also a good indicator of illness severity.

Background Galantamine, a reversible cholinesterase inhibitor with effects on nicotinic receptors, has shown mixed effects on cognitive impairments in patients with schizophrenia. Given these mixed results we examined whether galantamine compared to adjunctive placebo may improve cognitive functions in patients treated concomitantly with a long acting atypical antipsychotic. Method The parent study was a 52-week double-blind, randomized study of treatment with long-acting injectable risperidone 25 mg or 50 mg every two weeks. Adjunctive galantamine or placebo treatment was administered from Month 6 to 12. Outcome measures were neurocognitive, psychopathology, social and quality of life functions. Patients were randomized to blinded galantamine up to 24 mg/day or matching placebo tablets. All patients were maintained on their randomized long-acting injectable risperidone regimen for the duration of the trial. Results 32 patients were included in the intent-to-treat analysis. No statistically significant differences were found for Attention Vigilance, Declarative Memory, Processing Speed, Reasoning/Problem Solving, Working Memory domains and the Neurocognitive Composite Score. Group specific analysis showed a statistically significant group interaction ( p = 0.043) with the Social Cognition domain showing in the galantamine group significantly lower scores at endpoint than placebo patients. The PANSS general psychopathology subscale showed significantly higher scores in the galantamine group at endpoint ( p = 0.05). ANCOVA model for within treatment group comparisons showed a significant increase of 7.3 points for the total PANSS score for the galantamine group. Conclusion Galantamine showed no ameliorative effects on cognitive measures in this 6 month, double-blind study of patients with schizophrenia treated with an assured and stable antipsychotic medication delivery system. Galantamine may not be an appropriate augmentation agent for cognitive impairments in patients with schizophrenia at the dose used.

It is generally accepted that between 10 and 60% of patients with schizophrenia respond poorly or only partially to antipsychotic treatment, even if they take their antipsychotic medication reliably.

Background Comparisons of diabetic potential, glucose related metabolic levels, and insulin resistance between olanzapine and risperidone have produced variable results in cross-sectional and epidemiologic studies. Randomized prospective studies of metabolic effects during treatment with these drugs may provide results that are more informative. Method Hospitalized patients with chronic schizophrenia (DSM-IV), most of whom had been treated with multiple antipsychotics in the past, were randomly assigned to treatment with a single antipsychotic, olanzapine or risperidone, for a period of 5 months. At baseline and every treatment month thereafter, fasting glucose, insulin, insulin-related metabolic measures, and prolactin were assessed, and an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) was performed during baseline and months 1, 2, and 5 of treatment. Weight was assessed monthly, and waist and hip measures were taken at baseline and month 5. Data were analyzed on 23 patients randomly assigned to risperidone and 23 patients randomly assigned to olanzapine. The study was conducted from February 2003 to August 2007. Results Most patients were overweight or obese at baseline (mean body mass index [BMI] = 29.4), but there were no differential drug effects on weight change and no differences between drug groups at the 5-month time point. There were no overall drug treatment differences in fasting glucose or glycohemoglobin or 2-hour glucose levels in OGTT and no differences between the two drug groups at the 5-month time point. There were no consistent drug treatment differences in the number of patients who developed borderline or diabetic glucose levels. Olanzapine-treated patients showed a significantly greater increase than risperidone-treated patients in a fasting measure of insulin resistance (P = .041), and olanzapine patients showed greater decreases in insulin sensitivity during OGTT (P = .023) compared to risperidone-treated patients. Olanzapine-treated patients had a significantly greater increase in 1-hour glucose and insulin levels during OGTT in subsequent months compared to baseline and greater increase in glucose and insulin area under the curve over time than the risperdone-treated patients. Prolactin levels decreased in olanzapine patients and increased in risperidone patients (P values approximately .02). There were no significant drug treatment differences in C-peptide levels or 2 indices proposed as measures of insulin secretion or beta-cell function (homeostasis model assessment of beta-cell function [HOMA-B], BIGTT-acute insulin response surrogate measure [BIGTT-AIR]). Changes in insulin resistance over time were not strongly related to changes in BMI or waist circumference during study drug treatment. Conclusions The increase in insulin levels during olanzapine treatment may compensate for the increase in insulin resistance and serve to reduce fasting and postprandial glucose levels. This may contribute to the lack of differences between olanzapine and risperidone in indices of diabetic or prediabetic glucose levels or glycohemoglobin. How many years this compensatory mechanism will persist needs further investigation. Periodic OGTT tests measuring glucose and insulin levels would be helpful in assessing the status of beta-cell insulin reserve in patients treated with olanzapine and other second-generation antipsychotics and assessing an individual patient's risk for conversion to type 2 diabetes. Trial registration clinicaltrials.gov Identifier NCT00287820.

A key problem in schizophrenia research is how to assess the effects of treatment interventions given the spectrum of schizophrenia symptoms and patients' functioning. Measuring symptoms is complex, because these symptoms cover a wide variety of psychopathologic domains. The commonly recognized domains are the positive, negative, cognitive, excitement, and depression domains. This article critically reviews some of the available assessment tools of these domains together with other associated syndromes. The instruments discussed cover the broad range of psychopathology found in patients who have schizophrenia.

The pharmacological choices for the treatment of schizophrenia have been greatly expanded with the availability of the atypical compounds clozapine (Clozaril, Novartis), risperidone (Risperdal, Janssen-Cilag), olanzapine (Zyprexa, Eli Lilly & Co.), quetiapine (Seroquel, AstraZeneca), ziprasidone (Geodon, Pfizer Inc.) and aripiprazole (Abilify, Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd). In this article, the effects of the newer antipsychotics and their side effects are reviewed. Key issues in acute and maintenance treatment, often lifelong, will be reviewed. Side-effect management to ensure adherence to an optimal treatment regimen will be discussed. Coexisting syndromes must be treated in concordance with the patient's clinical presentation. For treatment-resistant patients, atypical compounds are generally more effective than their typical counterparts but medication augmentation strategies are frequently recommended. Finally, the results of recent meta-analyses comparing the effects of atypical versus typical compounds will be critically reviewed and remaining gaps in the current pharmacotherapy of schizophrenia will be explored.

Objectives Developing empirically sound measures for social cognition is a key step in improving the factors that contribute to deficits in social functioning in schizophrenia. Investigating the psychometric properties and acceptability of social cognitive instruments may contribute to identification of a reliable and valid instrument for schizophrenia patients. Aims To investigate the psychometric properties and acceptability of a dynamic social cognition scale (DSCB) compared to three common social cognition instruments in schizophrenia. Methods 41 patients with schizophrenia were evaluated to assess acceptability, internal consistency and validity of five social cognition measures: DSCB, Emotion Recognition-40 (ER-40), Facial Emotion Identification Task (FEIT), Tone Matching Task and MSCEIT. Multiple linear regressions were conducted to identify variables which perform well as social cognition determinants. Results The DSCB and FEIT showed good acceptability, evidenced by shorter administration time, completion and patient preference for the DSCB. Good levels of internal consistency were found for the DSCB (α = 0.851), ER-40 (α = 0.803), and FEIT (α = 0.782). Confirmatory Factor Analysis indicated sufficient to good model fit. The DSCB and the ER-40 demonstrated a good model fit. The correlations for the DSCB were significant for the ER-40 ( r = 0.512) and FEIT ( r = 0.500). Conclusions Findings suggest that DSCB is the preferred instrument to evaluate social cognition, due to its dynamic nature and short administration time. Further research is needed to develop and improve these measurements. Additionally, the DSCB, FEIT and ER-40 show adequate to good reliability and validity.

Background Patients with schizophrenia are known to have higher rates of mortality and morbidity when compared to the general population. Suicidality is a major contributor to increased mortality. The International Suicide Prevention Trial (InterSePT) Scale for Suicidal Thinking (ISST) is a validated tool to assess current suicidal ideation in patients with schizophrenia. The aims of the study were to culturally adapt the Arabic translation of ISST and to examine the psychometric characteristics of the Arabic version of the ISST among patients with schizophrenia in Qatar. Methods ISST was translated and adapted into formal Arabic using the back translation method. Patients diagnosed with schizophrenia were randomly recruited from the department of Psychiatry, Rumailah Hospital, Doha, Qatar. Healthy controls were randomly recruited from two primary health care centers in Doha, Qatar. The Arabic version of Module B for suicidality in Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview was used as the gold standard to which the Arabic ISST was compared. Results The study sample (n = 199) was composed of 100 patients diagnosed with schizophrenia (age 35.30 ± 10.04 years; M/F is 2/1) and 99 controls (age 33.98 ± 8.33 years; M/F is 2/3). The mean score on the ISST was 3.03 ± 4.75 vs. 0.47 ± 1.44 for the schizophrenia and control groups, respectively. Inter-rater reliability coefficient was 0.95, p > 0.001. The overall Cronbach’s alpha was 0.92. Principal Component Analysis produced 3 factors explaining a total of 73.8% of variance. Conclusions This is the first study in the Arab countries to validate the Arabic version of the ISST. The psychometric properties indicate that the Arabic ISST is a valid tool to assess the severity of suicidal ideation in Arabic patients with schizophrenia.