Search

Early HIV detection and treatment decreases morbidity and mortality and reduces high-risk behaviors. Many Emergency Departments (EDs) have HIV screening programs as recommended by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Recent federal legislation includes incentives for electronic health record (EHR) adoption. Our objective was to analyze the impact of conversion to EHR on a mature ED-based HIV screening program. A retrospective pre- and post-EHR implementation cohort study was conducted in a large urban, academic ED. Medical records were reviewed for HIV screening rates from August 2008 through October 2013. On 1 November 2010, a comprehensive EHR system was implemented throughout the hospital. Before EHR implementation, labs were requested by providers by paper orders with HIV-1/2 automatically pre-selected on every form. This universal ordering protocol was not duplicated in the new EHR; rather it required a provider to manually enter the order. Using a chi-squared test, we compared HIV testing in the 6 months before and after EHR implementation; 55,054 patients presented before, and 50,576 after EHR implementation. Age, sex, race, acuity of presenting condition, and HIV seropositivity rates were similar pre- and post-EHR, and there were no major patient or provider changes during this period. Average HIV testing rate was 37.7% of all ED patients pre-, and 22.3% post-EHR, a 41% decline (p < 0.0001), leading to 167 missed new diagnoses after EHR. The rate of HIV screening in the ED decreased after EHR implementation, and could have been improved with more thoughtful inclusion of existing human processes in its design. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]

Aims: To assess, according to age groups, patients' characteristics according to region of origin, the chronic therapeutic management, prognostic utility of clinical variables, and natriuretic peptides.Methods and Results: The GREAT registry consisted of patients identified as presenting with acute heart failure at the emergency department. Four groups of patients were defined according to age: the young patient group (<65 years); 'middle-old' (65-74 years), 'old-old' (75-84 years) and the 'oldest-old' (85-94 years). Follow-up at 1 year was performed via personal contact or national data registries at 1 year. Dataset consisted of 14 758 patients aged up to 95 years, with the 'oldest-old' group being more prevalent in North America and Western Europe. The 30-day mortality rate were, respectively, 8.1%, 8.9%, 10.3%, and 16.3% among the four age groups and 1-year mortality rates were, respectively, 3.1%, 17.1%, 24.7%, and 39.9%. Chronic heart failure treatment was less frequently administered with age (percentage of the 'fully treated' group was 14% in the 'young' compared with 2% in the 'oldest-old' patient group). Reduced left ventricular ejection fraction was present in 70%, 62.3%, 52.5%, and 46.8% among the four age groups, respectively. The prognostic utility of most variables for short- and long-term outcome was attenuated with age, with the exception of natriuretic peptides.Conclusion: This study found a large heterogeneity in age among geographic regions and that the eldest are less likely to be treated in accordance with recommendations of current heart failure guidelines. Natriuretic peptide concentrations retained prognostic value in patients across age strata. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]