Search

Objective: Several publications on the exchangeability of antiepileptic drugs in clinical settings revealed an increased risk for seizure recurrence after changing the manufacturer of anti-seizure drugs (ASD) in adults, possibly due to a decline of adherence. It is unclear whether this holds true in children and adolescents., Methods: Patient data of children and adolescents (<18 years) were collected anonymously from 236 German pediatricians and pediatric neurologists between January 2011 and December 2018 using the IMS® Disease Analyzer database (IQVIA, Frankfurt, Germany). Patients with epilepsy were included if at least 2 prescriptions within 360 days and 1 within 180 days prior to the index date were available. The cohort was separated into a seizure group and seizure-free controls. Both groups were matched 1:1 according to age, gender, insurance status, and treating pediatrician. The risk for seizure recurrence after a manufacturer switch of the same ASD at the last prescription before the index date was analyzed using a multivariate regression model., Results: A total of 678 children and adolescents with epilepsy were included (each group: n = 339; age: 9.6 ± 4.4 years). Comparing both groups, the risk for seizures recurrence was not increased after a manufacturer switch had occurred. Albeit changes during the last prescription before the index date had occurred more often in the seizure-free group, neither change of branded and generic products nor substances reached significance. Only change of ASD strength showed a significantly reduced odds ratio for seizures (OR 0.40, 95% CI 0.24-0.65, p < 0.001)., Significance: In contrast to the available evidence in adults, changing the manufacturer did not appear to increase the risk for seizure recurrence in previously seizure-free children and adolescents with epilepsy., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest Lang JD served on the Speakers’ Bureau of Eisai. Kostev K is an employee of IQVIA, a company that focuses on analyses of pharmacy records and runs the database used in this analysis. This study, however, was not part of any business project. Reindl C, Müller T, Stritzelberger J, and Westermayer V have nothing to declare. Gollwitzer S has served on the Scientific Advisory Board or on the Speakers’ Bureau or received grants from of Desitin, Eisai, and UCB Pharma. Trollmann R has served on the Scientific Advisory Board of Novartis, Desitin, PTC Therapeutics, and Biogen. She served on the Speakers’ Bureau of Novartis and PTC Therapeutics and received an unrestricted grant from Pfizer. Hamer HM has served on the Scientific Advisory Board of Arvelle, Bial, Desitin, Eisai, facetoface, GW, Novartis, Sandoz, and UCB Pharma. He served on the Speakers’ Bureau of or received unrestricted grants from Amgen, Ad-Tech, Bial, Bracco, Desitin, Eisai, GW, Nihon Kohden, Novartis, Pfizer, and UCB Pharma., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background and purpose: Previous studies in neurological emergency rooms (nERs) have reported many non‐acute, self‐presenting patients, patients with delayed presentation of stroke, and frequent visits of persons with seizures (PWS). The aim of this study was to evaluate trends during the last decade, with special focus on PWS. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed patients who presented to our specialized nER during the course of 5 months in 2017 and 2019, and included information on admission/referral, hospitalization, discharge diagnosis, and diagnostic tests/treatment in the nER. Results: A total of 2791 patients (46.6% male, mean age 57 ± 21 years) were included. The most common diagnoses were cerebrovascular events (26.3%), headache (14.1%), and seizures (10.5%). Most patients presented with symptoms lasting >48 h (41.3%). The PWS group included the largest proportion of patients presenting within 4.5 h of symptom onset (171/293, 58.4%), whereas only 37.1% of stroke patients presented within this time frame (273/735). Self‐presentation was the most common admission pathway (31.1%), followed by emergency service referral (30.4%, including the majority of PWS: 197/293, 67.2%). Despite known diagnosis of epilepsy in 49.2%, PWS more often underwent accessory diagnostic testing including cerebral imaging, compared to the overall cohort (accessory diagnostics 93.9% vs. 85.4%; cerebral imaging 70.1% vs. 64.1%). Electroencephalography in the nER was only performed in 20/111 patients (18.0%) with a first seizure. Nearly half of the patients (46.7%) were discharged home after nER work‐up, including most self‐presenters (632/869, 72.7%) and headache patients (377/393, 88.3%), as well as 37.2% (109/293) of PWS. Conclusion: After 10 years, nER overuse remains a problem. Stroke patients still do not present early enough, whereas PWS, even those with known epilepsy, often seek acute and extensive assessment, indicating gaps in pre‐hospital management and possible over‐assessment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: Epilepsy is a common comorbidity of glioblastoma. Seizures may occur in various phases of the disease. We aimed to assess potential risk factors for seizures in accordance with the point in time at which they occurred. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed medical files of adult patients with de novo glioblastoma treated at our institution between January 2006 and January 2020. We categorized seizures as preoperative seizures (POS), early postoperative seizures (EPS; before initiation of radio[chemo]therapy [RCT]), seizures during radiotherapy (SDR; during or <30 days after RCT), and posttherapeutic seizures (PTS; ≥30 days after completion of RCT). We addressed associations between patients' characteristics and their seizures. Results: In the final cohort (N = 520), 292 patients experienced seizures. POS, EPS, SDR, and/or PTS occurred in 29.6% (154/520), 6.0% (31/520), 13.8% (70/509), and 36.1% (152/421) of patients, respectively. POS occurred more frequently in patients with higher Karnofsky Performance Scale scores (odds ratio [OR] = 3.27, p =.001) and tumor location in the temporal lobe (OR = 1.51, p =.034). None of the parameters we analyzed was related to the occurrence of EPS. SDR were independently associated with tumor location (parietal lobe, OR = 1.86, p =.027) and POS, but not EPS, and were independent of RCT. PTS were independently associated with tumor progression (OR = 2.32, p <.001) and with occurrence of SDR (OR = 3.36, p <.001), and negatively correlated with temporal lobe location (OR =.58, p <.014). In patients with tumors exclusively located in the temporal lobe, complete tumor resection was associated with a decreased risk of postoperative seizures. Significance: Seizures in glioblastoma patients have various, time‐dependent risk factors. Temporal lobe localization was a risk factor for preoperative seizures; surgery may have had a protective effect in these patients. RCT did not have dose‐dependent pro‐ or anticonvulsive effects. PTS were associated with tumor progression. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]