Search

Background: Driving is one of the most important issues for patients with seizures. The 2009 European directive provides a framework for evaluating standard situations in assessing the ability to drive. Such a framework may not be sufficient for individual scenarios., Aims of the Study: To analyse current data on seizure recurrence risks (RcRs) focusing on their potential implications for car driving issues (group 1)., Methods: We evaluated current studies and meta-analyses on RcR., Results: A meta-analysis of seizure-free patients who withdrew their medication (Lamberink et al Lancet Neurology 2017;16:523) created a nomogram and a web-based tool that allow estimating RcR in individual patients and thus to identify those in whom medication withdrawal is possible without the common driving ban during withdrawal. The 2-year prediction model of that meta-analysis has been recently externally tested and confirmed. A meta-analysis of patients with a first unprovoked seizure (Bonnett et al PloS ONE 2014;9:e99063) determined to which extent RcRs depend on established risk factors. The seizure-free period required to restart driving could be tailored according to the individual RcR., Conclusion: These current studies allow estimating individual RcR more precisely and thus modifying periods of driving bans beyond the existing guidelines., (© 2020 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Objective: To calculate the chance of a seizure in the next year (COSY) for seizures with impaired awareness in those experiencing auras only, those with no seizures and those with continuing seizures. Epilepsy surgery is an effective treatment for refractory focal epilepsy. Driving is an important factor affecting quality of life. In the UK, driving is not permitted if focal seizures with no impairment of awareness (auras, simple partial seizures) continue, if there is a prior history of seizures with impaired awareness, as will invariably be the case in those having epilepsy surgery. Current UK driving regulations allow driving if COSY is less than 20%., Method: We calculated COSY in 819 epilepsy surgery patients with up to 25 years follow-up. Each patient year was graded on the The International League against Epilepsy surgery outcome scale., Results: Patients who were entirely seizure-free for 1, 2 and 3 years had COSY of 4.9%, 3.5% and 2.4% respectively. Patients with only auras within the last 1, 2 or 3 years had a COSY of 11.3%, 9.2% and 7.8% respectively., Conclusions: Individuals with auras only after epilepsy surgery had a higher COSY than those who were seizure-free. If a COSY of below 20% is regarded as an acceptable risk, it may be suggested that those with auras only in a given year be allowed to drive. The relative risk of these patients causing accidents is lower than population groups such as those aged <25 or >75 years, who are permitted to drive., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.)

Abstract: Driving for the person with epilepsy (PWE) remains an important issue. Requirements for reporting PWE to driving authorities vary across the United States. We studied the prior experiences of PWE regarding counseling for driving in a reporting state (37% in New Jersey) and a nonreporting state (52% in Arizona). A prospective voluntary anonymous survey was conducted among patients with new-onset epilepsy at two epilepsy referral centers. Subjects were queried about prior interactions with health care professionals regarding attitudes toward and knowledge of driving regulations. Practitioners caring for PWE are in the position to provide advice and counsel regarding driving regulations. Fifty percent or fewer subjects were appropriately counseled, regardless of residence requirements. PWE felt they were honest with their physician and 10% of subjects have driven against medical advice. A performance gap exists in the appropriate counseling regarding driving for PWE that has potentially significant safety and legal implications. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]