Search

Background and purpose: Previous studies in neurological emergency rooms (nERs) have reported many non‐acute, self‐presenting patients, patients with delayed presentation of stroke, and frequent visits of persons with seizures (PWS). The aim of this study was to evaluate trends during the last decade, with special focus on PWS. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed patients who presented to our specialized nER during the course of 5 months in 2017 and 2019, and included information on admission/referral, hospitalization, discharge diagnosis, and diagnostic tests/treatment in the nER. Results: A total of 2791 patients (46.6% male, mean age 57 ± 21 years) were included. The most common diagnoses were cerebrovascular events (26.3%), headache (14.1%), and seizures (10.5%). Most patients presented with symptoms lasting >48 h (41.3%). The PWS group included the largest proportion of patients presenting within 4.5 h of symptom onset (171/293, 58.4%), whereas only 37.1% of stroke patients presented within this time frame (273/735). Self‐presentation was the most common admission pathway (31.1%), followed by emergency service referral (30.4%, including the majority of PWS: 197/293, 67.2%). Despite known diagnosis of epilepsy in 49.2%, PWS more often underwent accessory diagnostic testing including cerebral imaging, compared to the overall cohort (accessory diagnostics 93.9% vs. 85.4%; cerebral imaging 70.1% vs. 64.1%). Electroencephalography in the nER was only performed in 20/111 patients (18.0%) with a first seizure. Nearly half of the patients (46.7%) were discharged home after nER work‐up, including most self‐presenters (632/869, 72.7%) and headache patients (377/393, 88.3%), as well as 37.2% (109/293) of PWS. Conclusion: After 10 years, nER overuse remains a problem. Stroke patients still do not present early enough, whereas PWS, even those with known epilepsy, often seek acute and extensive assessment, indicating gaps in pre‐hospital management and possible over‐assessment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: Discrimination against persons with epilepsy (PWEs) may persist. The aim of this study was to examine whether epilepsy is an obstacle to desired friendship. Methods: A factorial survey (vignettes), which is less biased by social desirability, was applied to PWEs, their relatives, and lay persons. The vignettes described a person who was varied by the dimensions of age (younger, same age, older), gender (male, female), disease (healthy, mild epilepsy, severe epilepsy [generalized tonic–clonic seizures], diabetes), origin (German, non‐German), contact (phone/internet, activities at home, activities outside), frequency of contacts (weekly, monthly), and distance (around the corner, 10 km away). Respondents rated their willingness to befriend the person on a 10‐point Likert scale. Multivariate regression determined the contribution of each dimension on the judgment. Results: Participants were 64 PWEs (age = 37.1 ± 14.0 years), 64 relatives of PWEs (age = 45.1 ± 13.6 years), and 98 controls without contact with PWEs (age = 24.4 ± 10.1 years). Controls were less interested in a friendship with a PWE with mild epilepsy (−3.4%) and even more avoided PWEs with severe epilepsy (−11.7%), whereas in PWEs with tonic–clonic seizures, a mild form of epilepsy was actually conducive to friendship (+7.0%). Controls preferred females (+5.0%) and disliked younger people (−12.3%) and contacts via the internet or telephone (−7.3%). PWEs were also less interested in younger people (−5.8%), and relatives of PWEs had a lower preference for friendships with longer distance (−2.3%). Significance: PWEs still suffer from a risk of social avoidance, and this becomes more evident with generalized motor seizures. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Recent studies have shown that inflammatory processes might play a role in epileptogenesis. Their role in ictogenesis is much less clear. The aim of this study was to investigate peri-ictal changes of the innate immune system by analyzing changes of immune cells, as well as pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines. Methods: Patients with active epilepsy admitted for video-EEG monitoring for presurgical evaluation were included. Blood was sampled every 20 min for 5 h on 3 consecutive days until a seizure occurred. After a seizure, additional samples were drawn immediately, as well as 1 and 24 h later. To analyze the different populations of peripheral blood mononuclear cells, all samples underwent FACS for CD3, CD4, CD8, CD56, CD14, CD16, and CD19. For cytokine analysis, we used a custom bead-based multiplex immunoassay for IFN-γ, IL-1β, IL-1RA, IL-4, IL-6, IL-10, IL-12, IL-17, MCP-1, MIP-1α, and TNFα. Results: Fourteen patients with focal seizures during the sampling period were included. Natural killer (NK) cells showed a negative correlation (ρ = −0.3362, p = 0.0195) before seizure onset and an immediate increase to 1.95-fold afterward. T helper (TH) and B cells decreased by 2 and 8%, respectively, in the immediate postictal interval. Nonclassical and intermediate monocytes decreased not until 1 day after the seizures, and cytotoxic T (TC) cells showed a long-lasting postictal increase by 4%. IL-10 and MCP-1 increased significantly after seizures, and IL-12 decreased in the postictal phase. Discussion/Conclusion: Our study argues for a role of the innate immune system in the pre- and postictal phases. NK cells might be involved in preictal changes or be altered as an epiphenomenon in the immediate preictal interval. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• ASD are effective in children and adolescents with epilepsy. • Changing the manufacturer of ASD did not increase the risk for recurrent seizures. • This was true for branded and generic drugs and for old and new anti-seizure drugs. Several publications on the exchangeability of antiepileptic drugs in clinical settings revealed an increased risk for seizure recurrence after changing the manufacturer of anti-seizure drugs (ASD) in adults, possibly due to a decline of adherence. It is unclear whether this holds true in children and adolescents. Patient data of children and adolescents (<18 years) were collected anonymously from 236 German pediatricians and pediatric neurologists between January 2011 and December 2018 using the IMS® Disease Analyzer database (IQVIA, Frankfurt, Germany). Patients with epilepsy were included if at least 2 prescriptions within 360 days and 1 within 180 days prior to the index date were available. The cohort was separated into a seizure group and seizure-free controls. Both groups were matched 1:1 according to age, gender, insurance status, and treating pediatrician. The risk for seizure recurrence after a manufacturer switch of the same ASD at the last prescription before the index date was analyzed using a multivariate regression model. A total of 678 children and adolescents with epilepsy were included (each group: n = 339; age: 9.6 ± 4.4 years). Comparing both groups, the risk for seizures recurrence was not increased after a manufacturer switch had occurred. Albeit changes during the last prescription before the index date had occurred more often in the seizure-free group, neither change of branded and generic products nor substances reached significance. Only change of ASD strength showed a significantly reduced odds ratio for seizures (OR 0.40, 95% CI 0.24–0.65, p < 0.001). In contrast to the available evidence in adults, changing the manufacturer did not appear to increase the risk for seizure recurrence in previously seizure-free children and adolescents with epilepsy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]