18 results
Search Results
2. Equivalence of electronic and paper-based patient-reported outcome measures.
- Author
-
Campbell N, Ali F, Finlay AY, and Salek SS
- Subjects
- Computer Systems, Humans, Paper, Quality of Life, Pain Measurement methods, Patient Outcome Assessment, Self Report, Software Validation
- Abstract
Aim: Electronic formats (ePROs) of paper-based patient-reported outcomes (PROs) should be validated before they can be reliably used. This review aimed to examine studies investigating measurement equivalence between ePROs and their paper originals to identify methodologies used and to determine the extent of such validation., Methods: Three databases (OvidSP, Web of Science and PubMed) were searched using a set of keywords. Results were examined for compliance with inclusion criteria. Articles or abstracts that directly compared screen-based electronic versions of PROs with their validated paper-based originals, with regard to their measurement equivalence, were included. Publications were excluded if the only instruments reported were stand-alone visual analogue scales or interactive voice response formats. Papers published before 2007 were excluded, as a previous meta-analysis examined papers published before this time., Results: Fifty-five studies investigating 79 instruments met the inclusion criteria. 53 % of the 79 instruments studied were condition specific. Several instruments, such as the SF-36, were reported in more than one publication. The most frequently reported formats for ePROs were Web-based versions. In 78 % of the publications, there was evidence of equivalence or comparability between the two formats as judged by study authors. Of the 30 publications that provided preference data, 87 % found that overall participants preferred the electronic format., Conclusions: When examining equivalence between paper and electronic versions of PROs, formats are usually judged by authors to be equivalent. Participants prefer electronic formats. This literature review gives encouragement to the further widespread development and use of ePROs.
- Published
- 2015
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
3. Interformat reliability of digital psychiatric self-report questionnaires: a systematic review.
- Author
-
Alfonsson S, Maathz P, and Hursti T
- Subjects
- Humans, Paper, Reproducibility of Results, Internet, Mental Disorders therapy, Psychotherapy methods, Self Report, Surveys and Questionnaires
- Abstract
Background: Research on Internet-based interventions typically use digital versions of pen and paper self-report symptom scales. However, adaptation into the digital format could affect the psychometric properties of established self-report scales. Several studies have investigated differences between digital and pen and paper versions of instruments, but no systematic review of the results has yet been done., Objective: This review aims to assess the interformat reliability of self-report symptom scales used in digital or online psychotherapy research., Methods: Three databases (MEDLINE, Embase, and PsycINFO) were systematically reviewed for studies investigating the reliability between digital and pen and paper versions of psychiatric symptom scales., Results: From a total of 1504 publications, 33 were included in the review, and interformat reliability of 40 different symptom scales was assessed. Significant differences in mean total scores between formats were found in 10 of 62 analyses. These differences were found in just a few studies, which indicates that the results were due to study effects and sample effects rather than unreliable instruments. The interformat reliability ranged from r=.35 to r=.99; however, the majority of instruments showed a strong correlation between format scores. The quality of the included studies varied, and several studies had insufficient power to detect small differences between formats., Conclusions: When digital versions of self-report symptom scales are compared to pen and paper versions, most scales show high interformat reliability. This supports the reliability of results obtained in psychotherapy research on the Internet and the comparability of the results to traditional psychotherapy research. There are, however, some instruments that consistently show low interformat reliability, suggesting that these conclusions cannot be generalized to all questionnaires. Most studies had at least some methodological issues with insufficient statistical power being the most common issue. Future studies should preferably provide information about the transformation of the instrument into digital format and the procedure for data collection in more detail.
- Published
- 2014
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
4. Electronic versus paper-based assessment of health-related quality of life specific to HIV disease: reliability study of the PROQOL-HIV questionnaire.
- Author
-
Duracinsky M, Lalanne C, Goujard C, Herrmann S, Cheung-Lung C, Brosseau JP, Schwartz Y, and Chassany O
- Subjects
- Adult, Analysis of Variance, Computers, Cross-Over Studies, Electronic Health Records, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Paper, Reproducibility of Results, User-Computer Interface, HIV Infections, Internet, Psychometrics, Quality of Life, Self Report, Surveys and Questionnaires
- Abstract
Background: Electronic patient-reported outcomes (PRO) provide quick and usually reliable assessments of patients' health-related quality of life (HRQL)., Objective: An electronic version of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Quality of Life-human immunodeficiency virus (PROQOL-HIV) questionnaire was developed, and its face validity and reliability were assessed using standard psychometric methods., Methods: A sample of 80 French outpatients (66% male, 52/79; mean age 46.7 years, SD 10.9) were recruited. Paper-based and electronic questionnaires were completed in a randomized crossover design (2-7 day interval). Biomedical data were collected. Questionnaire version and order effects were tested on full-scale scores in a 2-way ANOVA with patients as random effects. Test-retest reliability was evaluated using Pearson and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC, with 95% confidence interval) for each dimension. Usability testing was carried out from patients' survey reports, specifically, general satisfaction, ease of completion, quality and clarity of user interface, and motivation to participate in follow-up PROQOL-HIV electronic assessments., Results: Questionnaire version and administration order effects (N=59 complete cases) were not significant at the 5% level, and no interaction was found between these 2 factors (P=.94). Reliability indexes were acceptable, with Pearson correlations greater than .7 and ICCs ranging from .708 to .939; scores were not statistically different between the two versions. A total of 63 (79%) complete patients' survey reports were available, and 55% of patients (30/55) reported being satisfied and interested in electronic assessment of their HRQL in clinical follow-up. Individual ratings of PROQOL-HIV user interface (85%-100% of positive responses) confirmed user interface clarity and usability., Conclusions: The electronic PROQOL-HIV introduces minor modifications to the original paper-based version, following International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research (ISPOR) ePRO Task Force guidelines, and shows good reliability and face validity. Patients can complete the computerized PROQOL-HIV questionnaire and the scores from the paper or electronic versions share comparable accuracy and interpretation.
- Published
- 2014
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
5. Is There Equivalence Between the Electronic and Paper Version of the Questionnaires for Assessment of Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain?
- Author
-
Diego Giulliano Destro Christofaro, Crystian B. Oliveira, Bruna Rabelo Azevedo, Tatiana M. Damato, Rafael Z. Pinto, Fernanda G. Silva, Giulia Marcondes D Araujo, Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp), and Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)
- Subjects
Adult ,Male ,Paper ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Cross-sectional study ,Intraclass correlation ,scales ,Random Allocation ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Rating scale ,Surveys and Questionnaires ,Epidemiology ,medicine ,Electronic Health Records ,Humans ,Orthopedics and Sports Medicine ,Exercise ,Equivalence (measure theory) ,low back pain ,Pain Measurement ,030222 orthopedics ,business.industry ,electronic ,paper ,questionnaire ,Reproducibility of Results ,Fear ,Evidence-based medicine ,Middle Aged ,Confidence interval ,Cross-Sectional Studies ,Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire ,Physical therapy ,Female ,Self Report ,Neurology (clinical) ,Chronic Pain ,business ,Low Back Pain ,030217 neurology & neurosurgery - Abstract
Made available in DSpace on 2020-12-10T20:03:52Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 Previous issue date: 2020-03-15 Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP) Study Design. Cross-sectional study. Objective. To investigate the equivalence of electronic and paper version of self-report questionnaires for the assessment of disability, pain, fear of movement, depression, and physical activity of patients with chronic low back pain (LBP). Summary of Background Data. Paper and electronic versions of self-report questionnaires are commonly used for assessment of patients with LBP. However, the equivalence of self-report questionnaires commonly used for assessment of patients with chronic LBP remains unclear. Methods. Seventy-nine individuals with chronic LBP seeking physiotherapy care were recruited. Participants attended the clinic twice with an interval of 1 week and completed the self-reported questionnaires in a random order. The following questionnaires were administered: Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ); 11-point numerical rating scale (NRS); Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia (TSK); Center for Epidemiological Studies-Depression (CES-D), and Baecke Habitual Physical Activity Questionnaire (BPAQ). To investigate the equivalence between the two questionnaire versions, intraclass correlation coefficient with 95% confidence interval and Bland-Altman plotting was used. Results. The paper and electronic versions of the RMDQ, TSK, and CES-D showed good reliability and the showed moderate reliability. In contrast, the NRS showed poor reliability between the electronic and paper versions. Conclusion. Our findings support that the electronic version of the RMDQ, TSK, CES-D, and BPAQ can be administered in clinical and research settings for assessment of patients with chronic LBP. Nevertheless, electronic version of the NRS for assessment of pain intensity should not be used interchangeably in clinical practice in patients with chronic LBP. Univ Estadual Paulista, Dept Fisioterapia, Fac Ciencias & Tecnol, Presidente Prudente, Brazil Univ Fed Minas Gerais UFMG, Dept Phys Therapy, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil Univ Estadual Paulista, Dept Educ Fis, Fac Ciencias & Tecnol, Presidente Prudente, Brazil Univ Estadual Paulista, Dept Fisioterapia, Fac Ciencias & Tecnol, Presidente Prudente, Brazil Univ Estadual Paulista, Dept Educ Fis, Fac Ciencias & Tecnol, Presidente Prudente, Brazil FAPESP: 2017/21336-8 FAPESP: 2016/03826-5 FAPESP: 2017/12246-5
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
6. Help-seeking behaviour in newly diagnosed lung cancer patients: Assessing the role of perceived stigma
- Author
-
Shiho Rose, Brian Kelly, Kerrin Palazzi, Christine Paul, Martine Cox, and Allison Boyes
- Subjects
Adult ,Male ,Paper ,Lung Neoplasms ,Social Stigma ,Experimental and Cognitive Psychology ,group identification ,03 medical and health sciences ,Social support ,Help-Seeking Behavior ,0302 clinical medicine ,Surveys and Questionnaires ,medicine ,Humans ,Outpatient clinic ,030212 general & internal medicine ,Perceived stigma ,Lung cancer ,Support services ,business.industry ,Australia ,Middle Aged ,Patient Acceptance of Health Care ,social support ,medicine.disease ,Help-seeking ,Group identification ,3. Good health ,Stigma (anatomy) ,lung cancer ,Psychiatry and Mental health ,Social Perception ,Oncology ,perceived legitimacy ,stigma ,030220 oncology & carcinogenesis ,Papers ,Female ,Self Report ,business ,Attitude to Health ,help‐seeking ,support services ,Clinical psychology - Abstract
Objective This study explored help‐seeking behaviours, group identification, and perceived legitimacy of discrimination, and its potential relationship with perceived lung cancer stigma. Methods Consecutive consenting adults (n = 274) with a primary diagnosis of lung cancer within the previous 4 months were recruited at 31 outpatient clinics in Australia. A self‐report survey assessed help‐seeking, group identification, perceived legitimacy of discrimination, and perceived lung cancer stigma. Results Services providing assistance from health professionals (69.5%) and informational support (68.5%) were more frequently used than emotional‐based support. Only a small proportion (2.6%) of participants were unlikely to seek help from anyone, with the most popular sources of help being the general practitioner (91.0%), and oncologist/treating clinician (81.3%). One‐fifth (21.1%) indicated they identified with being a lung cancer patient, and most did not perceive discrimination against lung cancer patients. Higher perceived lung cancer stigma was significantly associated with greater perceived legitimacy of discrimination (P
- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
7. Chronic Rhinosinusitis Related to Occupational Exposure
- Author
-
Anne Kristin Møller Fell, Kjell Torén, Johny Kongerud, Johan Hellgren, Ulrika K E Clarhed, Linus Schiöler, and Martin Veel Svendsen
- Subjects
Adult ,Male ,Paper ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Adolescent ,Chronic rhinosinusitis ,Detergents ,Physical Exertion ,MEDLINE ,Young Adult ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Occupational Exposure ,Internal medicine ,Prevalence ,medicine ,Animals ,Humans ,Sinusitis ,Young adult ,030223 otorhinolaryngology ,Self report ,Rhinitis ,Norway ,business.industry ,Fungi ,Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health ,Dust ,Middle Aged ,Health Surveys ,030228 respiratory system ,Metals ,Animals, Domestic ,Chronic Disease ,Population study ,Female ,Self Report ,Occupational exposure ,Random population ,business - Abstract
Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate the association between occupational exposure and chronic rhinosinusitis. Methods: A random population from the region of Telemark, aged 16 to 50 years, answered a respiratory questionnaire including questions on chronic rhinosinusitis and exposure in the occupational environment. Results: A total of 16,099/48,142 subjects responded. The prevalence of chronic rhinosinusitis was 9%. Exposure associated with chronic rhinosinusitis comprised paper dust [odds ratio (OR) 1.3, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 1.1 to 1.5], cleaning agents (OR 1.2, 95% CI 1.0 to 1.3), metal dust (OR 1.3, 95% CI 1.1 to 1.6), animals (OR 1.2, 95% CI 1.0 to 1.5), moisture/mould/mildew (OR 1.3, 95% CI 1.1 to 1.5), and physically strenuous work (OR 1.4, 95% CI 1.2 to 1.7). Conclusion: Occupational exposure to paper dust, cleaning agents, metal dust, animals, moisture/mould/mildew, and physically strenuous work was independently related to having chronic rhinosinusitis. An occupational history should be reviewed when assessing patients with chronic rhinosinusitis.
- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
8. Cocreated internet-based stepped care for individuals with cancer and concurrent symptoms of anxiety and depression : Results from the U-CARE AdultCan randomized controlled trial
- Author
-
Helena Igelström, Birgitta Johansson, Louise von Essen, Anna Hauffman, Susanne Mattsson, Marina Forslund, Peter Nygren, Sven Alfonsson, Anna Bill-Axelson, and Leif Bergkvist
- Subjects
Male ,medicine.medical_treatment ,Anxiety ,Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale ,law.invention ,Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic ,0302 clinical medicine ,Randomized controlled trial ,Quality of life ,law ,Neoplasms ,Medicine ,030212 general & internal medicine ,technology-based interventions ,Depression (differential diagnoses) ,Depression ,Middle Aged ,anxiety ,Telemedicine ,Cognitive behavioral therapy ,Psychiatry and Mental health ,Treatment Outcome ,030220 oncology & carcinogenesis ,Papers ,depression ,oncology ,Female ,medicine.symptom ,Paper ,Adult ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Randomization ,Experimental and Cognitive Psychology ,Nursing ,psychosocial intervention ,technology‐based interventions ,03 medical and health sciences ,Psychoeducation ,Humans ,cancer ,Internet ,Cancer och onkologi ,Cognitive Behavioral Therapy ,business.industry ,Omvårdnad ,psycho‐oncology ,Cancer and Oncology ,randomized controlled trial ,Physical therapy ,Quality of Life ,psycho-oncology ,eHealth ,Self Report ,internet ,business - Abstract
Objective The aim was to evaluate the effects of cocreated internet-based stepped care (iCAN-DO) on anxiety, depression, posttraumatic stress, and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in individuals with cancer and self-reported anxiety and/or depression symptoms, compared with standard care. Methods Clinically recruited individuals with breast, colorectal, or prostate cancer underwent online screening with the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). Those with anxiety and/or depression symptoms (>7 on any of the HADS subscales) were randomized to iCAN-DO or standard care. iCAN-DO comprised psychoeducation and self-care strategies (step 1) and internet-based cognitive behavioral therapy (iCBT, step 2). Data were collected before randomization and at 1, 4, 7, and 10 months and analyzed with intention-to-treat regression analysis and randomization tests. Results Online screening identified 245 (27%) of 909 individuals who reported anxiety and/or depression symptoms. They were randomized to iCAN-DO (n = 124) or standard care (n = 121). Of them 49% completed the 10-month assessment, and in the iCAN-DO group 85% accessed step 1 and 13% underwent iCBT. iCAN-DO decreased the levels of symptoms of depression (−0.54, 95% confidence interval: −1.08 to −0.01, P < .05) and the proportion of individuals with symptoms of depression (P < .01) at 10 months, compared with standard care, according to HADS. There were no significant effects on anxiety, posttraumatic stress, or HRQoL. Conclusion Internet-based stepped care improves symptoms of depression in individuals with cancer. Further studies are needed to gain knowledge on how to optimize and implement internet-based support in oncology care.
- Published
- 2020
9. Self-reported cognitive outcomes among adolescent and young adult patients with noncentral nervous system cancers
- Author
-
Jaclyn Jia Jun Mah, Alexandre Chan, Chia Jie Tan, Wei Lin Goh, Eileen Poon, and Mohamad Farid Bin Harunal Rashid
- Subjects
Nervous system ,Male ,Pediatrics ,FACT-Cog ,distress thermometer ,Anxiety ,0302 clinical medicine ,Cognition ,Cancer Survivors ,Neoplasms ,Medicine ,Psychology ,030212 general & internal medicine ,Young adult ,Cognitive impairment ,Fatigue ,Minimal clinically important difference ,Middle Aged ,humanities ,Psychiatry and Mental health ,medicine.anatomical_structure ,030220 oncology & carcinogenesis ,Papers ,oncology ,Female ,medicine.symptom ,Paper ,medicine.medical_specialty ,FACT‐Cog ,Adolescent ,Clinical Sciences ,Oncology and Carcinogenesis ,Psycho-oncology ,Experimental and Cognitive Psychology ,03 medical and health sciences ,Young Adult ,cancer ,Humans ,Cognitive Dysfunction ,Oncology & Carcinogenesis ,cognitive impairment ,business.industry ,Cancer ,medicine.disease ,psycho‐oncology ,psycho-oncology ,Self Report ,business - Abstract
Author(s): Tan, Chia Jie; Mah, Jaclyn Jia Jun; Goh, Wei Lin; Poon, Eileen; Harunal Rashid, Mohamad Farid; Chan, Alexandre | Abstract: ObjectiveCancer-related cognitive impairment (CRCI) among adolescent and young adult (AYA) cancer patients with noncentral nervous system (CNS) cancers has not been well studied. In this study, we aimed to describe CRCI-associated trends and characteristics among AYA cancer patients.MethodsIn a longitudinal cohort of AYA cancer patients without CNS disease, CRCI was evaluated over 1 year using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Cognitive Function Instrument, a self-reported cognitive outcome measure. CRCI prevalence was quantified using the previously established minimal clinically important difference. CRCI-associated longitudinal trends and factors were evaluated with mixed-effects model analysis.ResultsNinety-one patients (mean age = 28.4 ± 6.7 years) were included. Approximately one-third (34.1%) experienced CRCI at least once during the study follow-up. Female gender (P = .02), Indian ethnicity (P l .01), current smokers (P l .01), anxiety/depressive symptoms (P l .01) and fatigue (P l .01) were found to be associated with poorer cognitive function among AYAs.ConclusionsAlthough AYA cancer patients were relatively young and without CNS disease involvement, a significant proportion of them experienced clinically important decline in cognitive function. With improved understanding of this subject, effective strategies can be formulated to promote awareness of CRCI and mitigate its negative effects among AYA cancer patients.
- Published
- 2019
10. Reducing Sensitive Survey Response Bias in Research on Adolescents: A Comparison of Web-Based and Paper-and-Pencil Administration
- Author
-
Lloyd Bond and David L. Wyrick
- Subjects
Male ,Paper ,Health (social science) ,Adolescent ,Writing ,Disclosure ,Bias ,Humans ,Web application ,Medicine ,Child ,Students ,Pencil (mathematics) ,Internet ,Schools ,Data collection ,business.industry ,Data Collection ,Research ,Stressor ,Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health ,Response bias ,Female ,Health education ,Self Report ,Analysis of variance ,business ,Administration (government) ,Clinical psychology - Abstract
Purpose. Using the Problem Oriented Screening Instrument for Teenagers (POSIT), the effect of mode of administration on (1) students' willingness to disclose sensitive information and (2) response rates was investigated. Design. A2 × 2 unequal N factorial analysis of variance (ANOVA) design was employed. Mode of administration (paper-and-pencil vs. Web-based) was crossed with grade level (middle vs. high school). Setting. The study was conducted in two middle and two high schools. Subjects. A total of 628 middle and high school students completed the survey. Measures. The POSIT is a self-report measure with 139 yes/no items that identifies stressors in 10 functional areas (e.g., Substance Use). Analysis. An unequal N 2 (mode) × 2 (grade level) factorial ANOVA was employed. Results. No statistically significant differences were found for self-reported risk across modes of administration. Students completing the Web-based version of the survey were four times more likely to skip an item. Conclusions. Effect of Mode on Reporting of Sensitive Information—Students completed the Web-based surveys in computer labs with other students. The intent of the Web-based survey was to increase perceived privacy but the environment likely negated any effect. Effect of Mode on Response Rates—The higher response rate for the paper-and-pencil survey was the opposite of what was expected and revealed that students were more likely to skip sensitive items on the Web survey. (Am J Health Promot 2011;25[5]:349-352.)
- Published
- 2011
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
11. Internet Administration of Paper-and-Pencil Questionnaires Used in Couple Research
- Author
-
Rebecca L. Brock, Robin A. Barry, Jodi Dey, Jaci Rolffs, and Erika Lawrence
- Subjects
Adult ,Male ,Paper ,Personality Tests ,Adolescent ,Psychometrics ,Writing ,Statistics as Topic ,Interpersonal communication ,Young Adult ,Interpersonal relationship ,Predictive Value of Tests ,Surveys and Questionnaires ,Humans ,Interpersonal Relations ,Marriage ,Equivalence (measure theory) ,Applied Psychology ,Analysis of Variance ,Family Characteristics ,Internet ,business.industry ,Context effect ,Reproducibility of Results ,Clinical Psychology ,Female ,The Internet ,Self Report ,business ,Psychology ,Emotional intimacy ,Intrapersonal communication ,Clinical psychology - Abstract
This study examined the psychometric equivalence of paper-and-pencil and Internet formats of key questionnaires used in couple research. Self-report questionnaires assessing interpersonal constructs (relationship satisfaction, communication/conflict management, partner support, emotional intimacy) and intrapersonal constructs (individual traits, psychological symptoms, contextual influences) were administered to young adults in committed dating relationships. The same measures were administered twice via paper-and-pencil and/or Internet methods over a 2-week period. Method order was counterbalanced among participants, and temporal stability was controlled. Intrapersonal and interpersonal measures generally remained reliable when administered online and demonstrated quantitative and qualitative equivalence across methods. The implications of online administration of questionnaires are discussed, and specific recommendations are made for researchers who wish to transition to online data collection.
- Published
- 2010
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
12. Agreement between touch-screen and paper-based patient-reported outcomes for patients with fibromyalgia: a randomized cross-over reproducibility study
- Author
-
Else Marie Bartels, Kirstine Amris, Robin Christensen, Henning Bliddal, Eva Ejlersen Wæhrens, Bente Danneskiold-Samsøe, and Henrik Gudbergsen
- Subjects
Adult ,Paper ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Quality of Life/psychology ,Generalized anxiety disorder ,Fibromyalgia ,Major Depression Inventory ,Health Status ,Immunology ,Fibromyalgia/psychology ,Random Allocation ,Patient satisfaction ,Rheumatology ,Surveys and Questionnaires ,medicine ,Immunology and Allergy ,Humans ,Cross over ,Reproducibility ,Cross-Over Studies ,business.industry ,Computers ,Reproducibility of Results ,General Medicine ,Middle Aged ,medicine.disease ,Crossover study ,Patient Satisfaction ,Physical therapy ,Quality of Life ,Population study ,Female ,Self Report ,business - Abstract
To compare data based on computerized and paper versions of health status questionnaires (HSQs) for sampling patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in patients with fibromyalgia (FM). In addition, to examine associations between patient characteristics (age, education, computer experience) and differences between versions. Finally, to evaluate the acceptability of computer-based questionnaires among patients with FM.Method: The study population comprised female patients diagnosed with FM. All patients completed six HSQs: the Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQ), the Major Depression Inventory (MDI), the 36-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36), the painDETECT questionnaire (PDQ), the Coping Strategies Questionnaire (CSQ), and the Generalized Anxiety Disorder Self-Assessment Questionnaire (GAD-10), both on paper and using a touch screen. One HSQ was tested at a time in a repeated randomized cross-over design. The two versions were completed with a 5-min interval and between each HSQ the participants had a 5-min break. Means, mean differences with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), medians, median differences, and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were calculated for all HSQs, including relevant subscales. Associations between patient characteristics and differences between versions were explored using Spearmans correlation coefficients.Results: Twenty women, mean age 48.4 years, participated in the study. Except for one item, ICCs between touch-screen and paper versions of the HSQs examined indicated acceptable agreement (ICC = 0.71-0.99). Overall, mean and median differences revealed no differences between versions. No significant associations were observed for patient characteristics. None of the participants preferred paper questionnaires over computerized versions.Conclusions: The computerized HSQs using a touch screen gave comparable results to answers given on paper and were generally preferred by the participants.
- Published
- 2015
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
13. Paper and electronic diaries: Too early for conclusions on compliance rates and their effects--Comment on Green, Rafaeli, Bolger, Shrout, and Reis (2006)
- Author
-
Joan E. Broderick and Arthur A. Stone
- Subjects
Adult ,Male ,Paper ,Self Disclosure ,Adolescent ,Psychometrics ,Writing ,Medical Records ,Compliance (psychology) ,Bias ,Humans ,Self report ,Mathematical Computing ,Motivation ,Data collection ,Reproducibility of Results ,Data interpretation ,Medical services ,Computers, Handheld ,Data Interpretation, Statistical ,Data quality ,Self-disclosure ,Patient Compliance ,Female ,Psychology (miscellaneous) ,Psychology ,Social psychology - Abstract
This commentary discusses 4 issues relevant to interpretation of A. S. Green, E. Rafaeli, N. Bolger, P. E. Shrout, and H. T. Reis's (2006) article: (a) Self-reported compliance in medical settings has generally been substantially higher than verified compliance, suggesting that this is not a rare phenomenon; (b) none of the studies reported in Green et al. explicitly verified paper diary compliance; (c) the impact of participant motivation on diary compliance is unknown, and it may be difficult for researchers to accurately assess it in their own studies; and (d) without objective verification of diary compliance, analysis of the effects of noncompliance on data quality is difficult to interpret. The authors conclude that compliance in paper diaries and the effects of noncompliance on data quality are still unsettled issues.
- Published
- 2006
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
14. Equivalence of electronic and paper-based patient-reported outcome measures
- Author
-
Sam Salek, Faraz M. Ali, Andrew Yule Finlay, and Niloufar Campbell
- Subjects
Paper ,Information retrieval ,Web of science ,business.industry ,Software Validation ,Comparability ,Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health ,MEDLINE ,Paper based ,computer.software_genre ,Patient Outcome Assessment ,Computer Systems ,Preference data ,Interactive voice response ,Quality of Life ,Medicine ,Humans ,Patient-reported outcome ,Data mining ,Self Report ,business ,Equivalence (measure theory) ,computer ,Pain Measurement - Abstract
Aim Electronic formats (ePROs) of paper-based patient-reported outcomes (PROs) should be validated before they can be reliably used. This review aimed to examine studies investigating measurement equivalence between ePROs and their paper originals to identify methodologies used and to determine the extent of such validation. Methods Three databases (OvidSP, Web of Science and PubMed) were searched using a set of keywords. Results were examined for compliance with inclusion criteria. Articles or abstracts that directly compared screen-based electronic versions of PROs with their validated paper-based originals, with regard to their measurement equivalence, were included. Publications were excluded if the only instruments reported were stand-alone visual analogue scales or interactive voice response formats. Papers published before 2007 were excluded, as a previous meta-analysis examined papers published before this time. Results Fifty-five studies investigating 79 instruments met the inclusion criteria. 53 % of the 79 instruments studied were condition specific. Several instruments, such as the SF-36, were reported in more than one publication. The most frequently reported formats for ePROs were Web-based versions. In 78 % of the publications, there was evidence of equivalence or comparability between the two formats as judged by study authors. Of the 30 publications that provided preference data, 87 % found that overall participants preferred the electronic format. Conclusions When examining equivalence between paper and electronic versions of PROs, formats are usually judged by authors to be equivalent. Participants prefer electronic formats. This literature review gives encouragement to the further widespread development and use of ePROs.
- Published
- 2015
15. Internet-based guided self-help for parents of children on cancer treatment : A randomized controlled trial
- Author
-
Martin Cernvall, Gustaf Ljungman, Per Carlbring, Lisa Ljungman, and Louise von Essen
- Subjects
Paper ,Adult ,Male ,Parents ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Adolescent ,Experimental and Cognitive Psychology ,Pediatrics ,law.invention ,Self-help ,Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic ,Randomized controlled trial ,Internet based ,law ,Intervention (counseling) ,Neoplasms ,medicine ,cancer ,Humans ,Self report ,Child ,Internet ,business.industry ,Pediatrik ,Middle Aged ,posttraumatic stress ,Cancer treatment ,Psychiatry and Mental health ,Posttraumatic stress ,Child, Preschool ,Therapy, Computer-Assisted ,Papers ,oncology ,randomized controlled trial ,Physical therapy ,Feasibility Studies ,The Internet ,Female ,Self Report ,business ,internet‐based intervention ,Clinical psychology - Abstract
Objective The aim of the study was to investigate the feasibility and preliminary efficacy of an Internet‐based guided self‐help intervention for posttraumatic stress symptoms (PTSS) and related symptoms in parents of children on cancer treatment. Methods Parents of children on cancer treatment, who fulfilled the modified symptom criteria on the PTSD Checklist, were randomly allocated to the intervention or to a wait‐list control condition. The intervention group accessed a 10‐week guided self‐help program via the Internet based on principles from cognitve behavior therapy. The primary outcome PTSS and the secondary outcomes depression and anxiety were assessed by self‐report preintervention and postintervention. Results Seven hundred forty‐seven parents were approached and informed about the study, 92 were assessed for eligibility, and 58 were included and randomized to the intervention (n = 31) or wait list (n = 27). Eightteen participants completed the intervention. Intention‐to‐treat analyses indicated a significant effect of the intervention on PTSS with a large between‐group effect size at postassessment (Cohen's d = 0.88). The intervention group reported reductions in PTSS with a large within‐group effect size (d = 1.62) compared with a minimal reduction in the wait‐list group (d = 0.09). There was a significant intervention effect on depression and anxiety and reductions in the intervention group with large within‐group effect sizes (d = 0.85–1.09). Conclusions Findings indicate a low enrollment rate and considerable attrition but also that Internet‐based guided self‐help shows promise for parents of children on cancer treatment who report a high level of PTSS and would like to take part in an Internet‐based intervention. © 2015 The Authors. Psycho‐Oncology published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
- Published
- 2015
16. Interformat Reliability of Digital Psychiatric Self-Report Questionnaires: A Systematic Review
- Author
-
Pernilla Maathz, Timo Hursti, and Sven Alfonsson
- Subjects
Paper ,medicine.medical_specialty ,psychometric ,Psychological intervention ,MEDLINE ,Health Informatics ,Sample (statistics) ,PsycINFO ,Review ,lcsh:Computer applications to medicine. Medical informatics ,Surveys and Questionnaires ,medicine ,Humans ,Psychiatry ,Reliability (statistics) ,computer ,Internet ,Data collection ,reliability ,business.industry ,lcsh:Public aspects of medicine ,questionnaire ,Mental Disorders ,Comparability ,Reproducibility of Results ,lcsh:RA1-1270 ,Psychotherapy ,lcsh:R858-859.7 ,The Internet ,Self Report ,business ,Psychology ,Clinical psychology - Abstract
Background: Research on Internet-based interventions typically use digital versions of pen and paper self-report symptom scales. However, adaptation into the digital format could affect the psychometric properties of established self-report scales. Several studies have investigated differences between digital and pen and paper versions of instruments, but no systematic review of the results has yet been done. Objective: This review aims to assess the interformat reliability of self-report symptom scales used in digital or online psychotherapy research. Methods: Three databases (MEDLINE, Embase, and PsycINFO) were systematically reviewed for studies investigating the reliability between digital and pen and paper versions of psychiatric symptom scales. Results: From a total of 1504 publications, 33 were included in the review, and interformat reliability of 40 different symptom scales was assessed. Significant differences in mean total scores between formats were found in 10 of 62 analyses. These differences were found in just a few studies, which indicates that the results were due to study effects and sample effects rather than unreliable instruments. The interformat reliability ranged from r =.35 to r =.99; however, the majority of instruments showed a strong correlation between format scores. The quality of the included studies varied, and several studies had insufficient power to detect small differences between formats. Conclusions: When digital versions of self-report symptom scales are compared to pen and paper versions, most scales show high interformat reliability. This supports the reliability of results obtained in psychotherapy research on the Internet and the comparability of the results to traditional psychotherapy research. There are, however, some instruments that consistently show low interformat reliability, suggesting that these conclusions cannot be generalized to all questionnaires. Most studies had at least some methodological issues with insufficient statistical power being the most common issue. Future studies should preferably provide information about the transformation of the instrument into digital format and the procedure for data collection in more detail. [J Med Internet Res 2014;16(12):e268]
- Published
- 2014
17. Electronic versus paper-based assessment of health-related quality of life specific to HIV disease: reliability study of the PROQOL-HIV questionnaire
- Author
-
Christophe Lalanne, Cécile Goujard, Susan Herrmann, Jean-Paul Brosseau, Christian Cheung-Lung, Martin Duracinsky, Olivier Chassany, and Yannick Schwartz
- Subjects
Male ,020205 medical informatics ,Psychometrics ,Intraclass correlation ,HIV Infections ,02 engineering and technology ,User-Computer Interface ,0302 clinical medicine ,Quality of life ,Surveys and Questionnaires ,Outcome Assessment, Health Care ,0202 electrical engineering, electronic engineering, information engineering ,Electronic Health Records ,030212 general & internal medicine ,Reliability (statistics) ,Cross-Over Studies ,lcsh:Public aspects of medicine ,electronic records ,Middle Aged ,3. Good health ,patient-reported outcomes ,lcsh:R858-859.7 ,Female ,Social psychology ,Adult ,Paper ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Health Informatics ,lcsh:Computer applications to medicine. Medical informatics ,03 medical and health sciences ,medicine ,Humans ,Face validity ,Analysis of Variance ,Internet ,Original Paper ,reliability ,business.industry ,Computers ,Reproducibility of Results ,HIV ,Usability ,lcsh:RA1-1270 ,Confidence interval ,quality of life ,Physical therapy ,Self Report ,Outcomes research ,business - Abstract
Background: Electronic patient-reported outcomes (PRO) provide quick and usually reliable assessments of patients’ health-related quality of life (HRQL). Objective: An electronic version of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Quality of Life-human immunodeficiency virus (PROQOL-HIV) questionnaire was developed, and its face validity and reliability were assessed using standard psychometric methods. Methods: A sample of 80 French outpatients (66% male, 52/79; mean age 46.7 years, SD 10.9) were recruited. Paper-based and electronic questionnaires were completed in a randomized crossover design (2-7 day interval). Biomedical data were collected. Questionnaire version and order effects were tested on full-scale scores in a 2-way ANOVA with patients as random effects. Test-retest reliability was evaluated using Pearson and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC, with 95% confidence interval) for each dimension. Usability testing was carried out from patients’ survey reports, specifically, general satisfaction, ease of completion, quality and clarity of user interface, and motivation to participate in follow-up PROQOL-HIV electronic assessments. Results: Questionnaire version and administration order effects (N=59 complete cases) were not significant at the 5% level, and no interaction was found between these 2 factors ( P =.94). Reliability indexes were acceptable, with Pearson correlations greater than .7 and ICCs ranging from .708 to .939; scores were not statistically different between the two versions. A total of 63 (79%) complete patients’ survey reports were available, and 55% of patients (30/55) reported being satisfied and interested in electronic assessment of their HRQL in clinical follow-up. Individual ratings of PROQOL-HIV user interface (85%-100% of positive responses) confirmed user interface clarity and usability. Conclusions: The electronic PROQOL-HIV introduces minor modifications to the original paper-based version, following International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research (ISPOR) ePRO Task Force guidelines, and shows good reliability and face validity. Patients can complete the computerized PROQOL-HIV questionnaire and the scores from the paper or electronic versions share comparable accuracy and interpretation. [J Med Internet Res 2014;16(4):e115]
- Published
- 2014
18. Demonstrating measurement equivalence of the electronic and paper formats of the Urticaria Patient Daily Diary in patients with chronic idiopathic urticaria
- Author
-
Jennifer Devlen, Emuella Flood, and James L. Zazzali
- Subjects
Adult ,Male ,Paper ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Handwriting ,Evening ,Wilcoxon signed-rank test ,Adolescent ,Urticaria ,Intraclass correlation ,Medical Records ,law.invention ,Young Adult ,Randomized controlled trial ,law ,Medicine ,Electronic Health Records ,Humans ,Child ,Equivalence (measure theory) ,Morning ,Aged ,Cross-Over Studies ,business.industry ,Middle Aged ,Crossover study ,Treatment Outcome ,Chronic Disease ,Physical therapy ,Histamine H1 Antagonists ,Female ,Self Report ,business ,Kappa - Abstract
The Urticaria Patient Daily Diary (UPDD), originally developed on paper, is a measure of key symptoms of chronic idiopathic urticaria (CIU). The development of the electronic version (eUPDD) involved moderate modifications to the appearance of the paper version. This study assessed the measurement equivalence of the electronic and paper versions of the UPDD in a sample of patients with CIU. This was a cross-over study of patients with moderate–severe CIU refractory to H1 antihistamines. Patients were randomized to either the eUPDD followed by the paper UPDD or vice versa. The UPDD includes morning and evening questions; both sets were administered together in this study. An hour-long filler task was given between paper and electronic administrations. Patients with stable symptoms between the two assessments were included in the analyses. Cohen’s kappa coefficients and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) were computed as applicable to assess equivalence. A total of 91 patients participated (mean age 43 years, 79.1 % female). Symptoms were stable between assessments for 67–74 (74–81 %) patients (varied by symptom). Kappa coefficients ranged from 0.82 to 1.00 for the individual UPDD items. For the Urticaria Activity Score (the sum of the ‘itch severity’ and ‘number of hives’ item scores) the ICC was 0.90 for the morning (Wilcoxon p = 0.331) and 0.95 for the evening (Wilcoxon p = 0.836). All test–retest statistics in this study were well above the accepted threshold, indicating excellent agreement between the two administration methods. Findings support the measurement equivalence of the electronic and paper versions of the UPDD to measure CIU symptoms.
- Published
- 2013
Discovery Service for Jio Institute Digital Library
For full access to our library's resources, please sign in.