Search

The purpose of this qualitative secondary analysis research was to describe the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on self-management behaviors and practices for people living with the dual diagnoses of HIV/AIDS and type 2 diabetes mellitus and to identify early pandemic-specific disruptions or changes to their self-management practices. In-depth interviews conducted in May-June 2020 with 9 participants, and analyzed using content analysis, revealed 5 themes: adjusting to living with HIV/AIDS and diabetes impacts beliefs about COVID-19 risks; COVID-19 information seeking and accuracy; trade-offs in self-managing multiple chronic conditions; balance between safety, relationships, and the society at large; and discordant perceptions and actions. Some participants were resilient from previous experiences. Many received mixed messages about their risk for COVID-19, resulting in inaccurately or inconsistently applying guidelines for social isolation., Competing Interests: The authors have no conflict of interest to report., (Copyright © 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Designing and conducting effective intervention research is an important domain of nursing science. Nurse scientists have long recognized people with chronic conditions need effective self-management strategies across the lifespan, so they have led the way in establishing theoretical and practical grounds for the science of self-management. Guidance from pilot and feasibility research for self-management interventions is scarce. Documented exemplars of successes and failures in pilot and feasibility study designs are scant in the literature. The purpose of this paper is to illustrate methodological approaches using pilot and feasibility examples. To maximize collective lessons learned in self-management science study design, features of our pilot and feasibility research strategies that yielded both desirable and undesirable outcomes are described, analyzed, and paired with alternative solutions. A National Institute of Nursing Research P30 grant center, awarded grants to 8 pilot investigators to pilot self-management interventions. A wide variety of chronic conditions were addressed, including heart failure, chronic kidney disease, multiple sclerosis, diabetes, and HIV. The investigators provided their experiences of study implementation. Common themes across the studies were identified. There were four lessons learned from these studies: 1) maximize resources and develop enough evidence for subsequent studies; 2) embed patient-centered feasibility within implementation testing with new patient populations; 3) develop a flexible participant recruitment plan to allow for adjustments when unexpected barriers arise; and 4) define study-specific data collection procedures to demonstrate feasibility. Researchers conducting preliminary small-scale self-management intervention research must balance resources to develop and implement interventions to meet pilot and feasibility objectives., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Although researchers have studied how individuals manage type 2 diabetes, none have examined how Cuban Americans do so. This article explores how Cuban Americans make self-management choices and examines whether an empowerment framework is viable for informing interventions., Design: A qualitative descriptive study was conducted ( n = 20) with Cuban Americans with type 2 diabetes. Individual interviews were analyzed with content analysis., Results: Motivation and temporal factors, such as knowledge of symptoms and the ability to plan ahead, positively affect self-management. Cultural factors, such as access to cultural foods, negatively affect self-management. Empowerment formed a comprehensive lens through which self-management decisions were acted on., Conclusion: Given the cultural context, empowerment and unique barriers and facilitators can affect diabetes self-management in this population. Strategies to promote healthy decisions must take into account the strengths of this community as well as its challenges.

Purpose The purpose of this study is 2-fold: (1) to explore how people with diabetes view diabetes-related cognitive problems and (2) to examine participants' ideas on a cognitive rehabilitation intervention to adapt it for persons diagnosed with type 2 diabetes (T2DM). Methods A qualitative descriptive study based on narrative interviews was conducted with adults (n = 10) with T2DM. The interview data were analyzed using content analysis. Results The interviews reflected 4 major themes: search for advice regarding cognitive complaints, cognitive symptoms, impact of perceived cognitive dysfunction on diabetes self-management, and maintenance of cognitive health. Specific areas of interest for an intervention included the following: understanding how cognitive function relates to diabetes, dealing with cognitive barriers to self-management, and learning how to incorporate a "brain healthy" lifestyle into daily activities. Conclusions Findings showed that perceived cognitive impairment impacted self-management and suggested that cognitive rehabilitation interventions have potential utility for people with T2DM. Existing successful interventions can be tailored to meet the needs of those whose diabetes self-management is impacted by cognitive problems.