Search

Ambiguity is implicit in neural representations of the physical world. Previous work has examined how the visual system resolves ambiguous neural signals that represent various features, such as the percept resulting from rivalrous chromaticities or forms. Relatively little is known, however, about the contribution of unambiguous neural representations to perceptual resolution of ambiguous ones. This is addressed here by measuring perceptual resolution of ambiguity by grouping, which is operationalized as the tendency for multiple similar ambiguous representations to be seen as identical to each other. Multiple chromatically ambiguous representations were created using interocular switch rivalry and presented together with a nearby but separate unambiguous (non-rivalrous) chromaticity. The magnitude of grouping the chromatic regions was compared when ambiguous regions were seen alone versus with unambiguous regions seen simultaneously. Contrary to prevailing theory that the resolution of the ambiguous percepts would follow the unambiguous ones, the ambiguous chromatic regions consistently appeared identical to each other, but their appearance was not found to be attracted to the unambiguous color percept. This supports the proposition that the ambiguity itself in a neural representation is a linking feature contributing to perceptual disambiguation.

Competing rivalrous neural representations can be resolved at several levels of the visual system. Sustained percepts during interocular-switch rivalry (ISR), in which rivalrous left- and right-eye stimuli swap between eyes several times a second, often are attributed to competing binocularly driven neural representations of each rivalrous stimulus. An alternative view posits monocular neural competition together with a switch in eye dominance at the moment of each stimulus swap between eyes. Here, a range of experimental conditions was tested that would change the colors seen if mediated by eye dominance but not if by competition between binocularly driven responses. Observers viewed multiple chromatically rivalrous discs in various temporal and spatial patterns, and reported when all discs in view appeared the same color. Unlike typical ISR paradigms that swap the complete stimulus in each eye, some of the rivalrous discs were swapped at a different time, or faster frequency, than other discs. Monocular dominance of one eye at a time implies that all discs will rarely be seen as identical in color when some discs swap at a different frequency than others. On the other hand, competing binocularly driven neural responses are not affected by asynchronous swap timing among the individual discs. Results for every observer are in accord with competing responses at the level of binocularly driven, chromatically tuned neurons. Although an account based on eye dominance can be constructed using many small retinotopic zones that have independent timing for the moment of switching the dominant eye, competing binocularly driven responses are a more parsimonious explanation.

A coherent percept of our visual world is important for functioning. Ambiguities, however, are implicit in visual neural representations and must be resolved for stable perception of objects and scenes. Grouping processes can link multiple neurally ambiguous fragments across the visual field. Experiments here determined how multiple visual features of each fragment contribute to perceptual resolution of ambiguity by grouping. Chromatic interocular-switch rivalry, a technique for presenting competing dichoptic images, was used to induce ambiguous neural representations for equiluminant chromatic discs and gratings. Two dichoptic stimuli were presented simultaneously to measure the amount of time they both appeared the same in at least one feature domain. The two stimuli were grouped when they appeared to share ambiguous features such as color, orientation, and spatial frequency more often than chance. Experiments here tested whether unshared and unambiguous features impeded grouping of the ambiguous components. Overall, the results show that grouping can be driven by neural ambiguity that is common for fragments across the visual field, even when the fragments also have other unshared, unambiguous features.

The visual system must transform a point-by-point biological representation from the photoreceptors into neural representations of separate objects. Even a uniform circular patch of light that slowly modulates in luminance can be segmented into separate central and surrounding areas merely by introducing black lines to outline a central square. The black lines cause brightness induction in the center even though the light inside and outside the square is always identical, as predicted by spatial antagonism between the square central area and its surround. Importantly, illusory Kanizsa lines forming the square are as effective for this brightness induction as real black lines, suggesting a 'form-cue invariant' cortical neural representation that does not distinguish between a central region set off by real or illusory edges. An open question is whether separate subsystems generate objects defined by real versus illusory edges, each providing the same form-cue invariant neural representation of an object, or whether form-cue invariance extends to integrating component pieces that together define an object. Experiments here show object segmentation when subparts of a square are defined by a mixture of real and illusory edges. Subjects adjusted the Michelson contrast of a separate patch to match the perceived modulation depth within the central region of a circular field that slowly oscillated in luminance. A closed, four-sided figure, no matter how constructed, reduced the perceived modulation depth within the central region. This shows that both real and illusory subparts can be integrated to segment center from surround. It supports a strong version of form-cue invariance in which neural mechanisms responsible for object segmentation are impartial to the piecemeal cues that are integrated to define an object.

The percept of a time-varying light depends on the temporal properties of light within the surrounding area. The locus of the neural mechanism mediating this lateral interaction is controversial; neural mechanisms have been posited at the LGN (Kremers et al., 2004) or cortical level (D’Antona & Shevell, 2007). To determine the neural locus, changes in perceived temporal variation were compared with ipsilateral versus contralateral surrounding context. In both cases, a temporally varying central field was viewed within a temporally varying surround; relative phase between center and surround was varied. Perceived modulation depth in the central field depended strongly on the relative phase between center and surround, in both the ipsilateral and contralateral conditions. The results revealed lateral interactions arising from both a weak monocular (plausibly LGN) and a stronger central (cortical) mechanism. The monocular contribution was similar over the range of temporal frequencies tested (approx. 3–12Hz), while the central component showed low-pass temporal-frequency selectivity.

Very-long-term (VLT) chromatic adaptation results from exposure to an altered chromatic environment for days or weeks. Color shifts from VLT adaptation are observed hours or days after leaving the altered environment. Short-term chromatic adaptation, on the other hand, results from exposure for a few minutes or less, with color shifts measured within seconds or a few minutes after the adapting light is extinguished; recovery to the pre-adapted state is complete in less than an hour. Here, both types of adaptation were combined. All adaptation was to reddish-appearing long-wavelength light. Shifts in unique yellow were measured following adaptation. Previous studies demonstrate shifts in unique yellow due to VLT chromatic adaptation, but shifts from short-term chromatic adaptation to comparable adapting light can be far greater than from VLT adaptation. The question considered here is whether the color shifts from VLT adaptation are cumulative with large shifts from short-term adaptation or, alternatively, does simultaneous short-term adaptation eliminate color shifts caused by VLT adaptation. The results show the color shifts from VLT and short-term adaptation together are cumulative, which indicates that both short-term and very-long-term chromatic adaptation affect color perception during natural viewing.

This research had two goals. First, a new method of very-long-term chromatic adaptation was compared to an older method of long-wavelength ambient illumination. In the new method, the observer viewed for 1 h per day for 12 or 14 days a CRT screen composed of oriented lines that appeared red. One observer also replicated a previous procedure (Neitz et al., 2002) in which she was exposed to long-wavelength room illumination for 4 h per day for 14 days. For both methods, equilibrium yellow was measured each day about 20 h after the end of the adaptation period. Both methods of very-long-term chromatic adaptation gave similar results. Second, shifts in equilibrium yellow were measured over a 30:1 range of light levels to determine if changes in color percepts were explained solely by a gain change in cone sensitivities (von Kries coefficient law). The magnitude of shift of equilibrium yellow depended on the level of the test light, which was not consistent with a gain theory of very-long-term chromatic adaptation.

Under dichoptic viewing conditions, rivalrous gratings that differ in both color and form can give the percept of the color from one eye in part of the form in the other eye. This study examined the afterimage following such misbinding of color to form. The first experiment established that afterimages of the misbound percept were seen. Two possible mechanisms for the misbound afterimage are (1) persisting retinal representations that are rivalrous and subsequently resolved to give misbinding, as during rivalrous viewing, and (2) a persisting response from a central neural representation of the misbound percept with the form from one eye and color from the other eye. The results support afterimage formation from a central representation of the misbound percept, not from resolution of rivalrous monocular representations.

Flicker adaptation reduces subsequent temporal contrast sensitivity. Recent studies show that this adaptation likely results from neural changes in the magnocellular visual pathway, but whether this adaptation occurs at a monocular or a binocular level, or both, is unclear. Here, two experiments address this question. The first experiment exploits the observation that flicker adaptation is stronger at higher than lower temporal frequencies. Observers' two eyes adapted to 3Hz flicker with an incremental pulse at 1/4 duty cycle, either in-phase or out-of-phase in the two eyes. At the binocular level, the flicker rate was 6Hz in the out-of-phase condition if the two eyes' pulse trains sum. Similar sensitivity reduction was found in both phase conditions, as expected for independent monocular adapting mechanisms. The second experiment tested for interocular transfer of adaptation between eyes. Results showed that (1) flicker adaptation was strongest with adapting and test fields in only the same eye, (2) adaptation can be partially transferred interocularly with adaptation in only the opposite eye, and (3) adaptation was weakened when both eyes were adapted simultaneously at different contrasts, compared to test-eye adaptation alone. Taken together, the findings are consistent with mechanisms of flicker adaptation at both the monocular and binocular level.

The color appearance of a physically steady central region can appear to vary over time if a surrounding chromatic light varies in time. The induced temporal variation, however, is strongly attenuated at surround temporal frequencies above ∼3 Hz. At these higher temporal frequencies, the central region appears steady (De Valois et al., 1986). The posited explanation is a cortical low-pass temporal filter. Here, we investigate whether higher temporal-frequency surrounds induce color shifts in the steady appearance of the central test. Surrounds modulated in time along the l or s chromatic direction of MacLeod-Boynton color space were symmetric around equal-energy white (EEW). The temporal frequency of the surround was varied. If observers perceived the central test to be temporally modulating between two points in time, they set two separate matches to the extreme points of this modulation. If the central test appeared steady in time, then color matches were made to this steady appearance. Corroborating previous reports, measurements showed that surround temporal frequencies below ∼3 Hz induced temporal modulation. At higher temporal frequencies, however, the surround induced steady color shifts, compared to a steady surround at its time average (EEW). The measurements imply that a nonlinear neural process affects chromatic induction from time-varying context.

Temporally varying chromatic-inducing light was used to infer receptive-field organization. Time-varying shifts in color appearance within a test field were induced by a surrounding chromatic pattern; the shifts were then nulled by adding a time-varying stimulus to the test area so the observer perceived a steady test. This method measured chromatic induction without requiring an observer to judge the color appearance of the test. The induced color shifts were consistent with a +s/−s spatially antagonistic neural receptive field, which also accounts for color shifts induced by static chromatic patterns (Monnier & Shevell, 2003, Monnier & Shevell, 2004). The response of this type of receptive-field, which is found only in the visual cortex, increases with S-cone stimulation at its center and decreases with S-cone stimulation within its surround. The measurements also showed a negligible influence of temporal inducing frequency in the range 0.5–4 Hz.

Chromatic assimilation is the shift in color appearance toward nearby light. Assimilation was measured using nearby light with time-varying chromaticity. This light induced time-varying assimilation within the test area. Assimilation was quantified by the amplitude of temporally varying test-area light – in counter-phase to the induced assimilation – required to null the assimilation. Unlike previous studies of assimilation, observers here judged only the steadiness of the test area, not its color. The inducing light was varied in luminance, temporal frequency and chromaticity. The measured assimilation could not be explained by only optical factors affecting receptoral quantal absorption. This implies a neural process contributes to assimilation. The nulling measurements showed also that assimilation was not induced independently within the L/M- and S-cone pathways. � 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Chromatic assimilation is the shift in color appearance of a test field toward the appearance of nearby light. Possible explanations of chromatic assimilation include wavelength independent spread light, wavelength-dependent chromatic aberration and neural summation. This study evaluated these explanations by measuring chromatic assimilation from a concentric-ring pattern into an equal-energy-white background, as a function of the inducing rings width, separation, chromaticity and luminance. The measurements showed, in the s direction, that assimilation was observed with different inducing-ring widths and separations when the inducing luminance was lower or higher than the test luminance. In general, the thinner the inducing rings and the smaller their separation, the stronger the assimilation in s. In the l direction, either assimilation or contrast was observed, depending on the ring width, separation and luminance. Overall, the measured assimilation could not be accounted for by the joint contributions from wavelength-independent spread light and wavelength-dependent chromatic aberration. Spatial averaging of neural signals explained the assimilation in s reasonably well, but there were clear deviations from neural spatial averaging for the l direction. � 2004 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Patterned backgrounds that selectively stimulate the S-cones cause conspicuous color shifts. These shifts are accounted for by an S-cone antagonistic (+S/-S) center-surround receptive field [Monnier, P., & Shevell, S. K. (2004). Chromatic induction from S-cone patterns. Vision Research, 44, 849-856]. The present study tested two additional implications of the S-cone receptive field for color shifts: (1) proportionality of the shifts with respect to S-cone contrast within the inducing pattern and (2) bandpass selectivity of the shifts with respect to the spatial frequency of the inducing pattern. Measurements showed that the magnitude of the color shift was linear with S-cone contrast and that the largest color shift was observed with inducing patterns at an intermediate spatial frequency. These results further support an S-cone spatially antagonistic receptive field as the neural substrate mediating the large color shifts from S-cone patterns.

Chromatic assimilation is a shift toward the color of nearby light. Several studies conclude that a neural process contributes to assimilation but the neural locus remains in question. Some studies posit a peripheral process, such as retinal receptive-field organization, while others claim the neural mechanism follows depth perception, figure/ground segregation, or perceptual grouping. The experiments here tested whether assimilation depends on a neural process that follows stereoscopic depth perception. By introducing binocular disparity, the test field judged in color was made to appear in a different depth plane than the light that induced assimilation. The chromaticity and spatial frequency of the inducing light, and the chromaticity of the test light, were varied. Chromatic assimilation was found with all inducing-light sizes and chromaticities, but the magnitude of assimilation did not depend on the perceived relative depth planes of the test and inducing fields. We found no evidence to support the view that chromatic assimilation depends on a neural process that follows binocular combination of the two eyes' signals.

Intense scrutiny has been focused on whether chromatic stimuli contribute to motion perception. The present study considers a related but different question: how does motion affect chromatic detection? Detection thresholds were measured for a disk that underwent a brief (13.3 ms) chromatic change in the L/(L+M) chromatic direction. The disk's presentation sequence and speed (0–16 deg/s) were manipulated. In the coherent presentation sequence, the disk moved smoothly along a circular path centered on the fixation point. In the random presentation sequence, the disk appeared randomly at positions along the circular path. In both types of sequences, the disk underwent a brief chromatic change midway through the temporal presentation sequence. Threshold was elevated in the coherent condition compared to the random condition, and threshold decreased with an increase in speed. The threshold elevation observed in the coherent presentation sequence can be accounted for by temporal integration. The decrease in threshold with an increase in speed can be accounted for by spatial integration. The results, therefore, can be explained by spatiotemporal integration, without invoking a neural mechanism specialized for motion.

Theories of induction propose that the brightness of a test patch within a complex surround is explained by local contrast or by integrating contrasts from various regions within the surround, weighted inversely with the distance from the test. Results here corroborate that brightness induction from a patterned background depends on both contiguous and non-contiguous surrounding light, but the measurements were inconsistent with any linear integration of contrast at edges within the scene. In some conditions, assimilation rather than contrast to contiguous surrounding light was observed, depending on the luminance of the light in non-contiguous regions. This finding implies that brightness induction from patterned backgrounds depends on neural processes that can cause contrast and/or assimilation, depending on the luminance relation between contiguous and non-contiguous regions. A model in the literature postulating that the influence of a non-contiguous edge is regulated by the amount of contrast at the contiguous edge can accommodate brightness induced by these patterned backgrounds.

Binocular disparity is an aspect of natural viewing. This research investigates whether disparity affects surface color perception. Achromatic settings were obtained and compared for two stereograms of a scene with specular reflections, one stereogram with binocular disparity and one without it (cyclopean view). Binocular disparity was found to improve color constancy. Next, the geometry of specular highlights, which is distorted without binocular disparity, was specifically examined. Measurements compared color constancy with specular reflections that were either normal (with stereo disparity) or distorted (cyclopean view of the specularities). No significant change in constancy was found due to the geometrical distortion of specular highlights that occurs without stereo disparity, suggesting that constancy depends on other features of the percept affected by disparity. The results are discussed in terms of illuminant estimation in surface color perception.

Chromatic induction is the change in appearance of one light caused by a second, nearby light. We measured chromatic induction in a central test viewed within an inducing field that was varied in only short-wavelength-sensitive (S) cone stimulation. The observer matched the appearance of the central test by adjusting the chromaticity of a haploscopically presented comparison field, seen by the other eye on a dark background. When the central test weakly stimulated S cones, the S-cone level in the surround caused little change in the color appearance of the test. When the central test substantially stimulated S cones, on the other hand, the appearance of the center showed S-cone contrast: raising the level of S in the surround reduced the level of S set to match the central test. Further, a surround that weakly stimulated S cones raised the matching S-cone level above that required without a surround (dark-adapted condition). These results cannot be explained by S-cone sensitivity loss or by a two-process model of adaptation. A cortical mechanism is proposed to mediate S-cone antagonism.

Interocular-switch rivalry (also known as stimulus rivalry) is a kind of binocular rivalry in which two rivalrous images are swapped between the eyes several times a second. The result is stable periods of one image and then the other, with stable intervals that span many eye swaps (Logothetis, Leopold, & Sheinberg, 1996). Previous work used this close kin of binocular rivalry with rivalrous forms. Experiments here test whether chromatic interocular-switch rivalry, in which the swapped stimuli differ in only chromaticity, results in slow alternation between two colors. Swapping equiluminant rivalrous chromaticities at 3.75 Hz resulted in slow perceptual color alternation, with one or the other color often continuously visible for two seconds or longer (during which there were 15+ eye swaps). A well-known theory for sustained percepts from interocular-switch rivalry with form is inhibitory competition between binocular neurons driven by monocular neurons with matched orientation tuning in each eye; such binocular neurons would produce a stable response when a given orientation is swapped between the eyes. A similar model can account for the percepts here from chromatic interocular-switch rivalry and is underpinned by the neurophysiological finding that color-preferring binocular neurons are driven by monocular neurons from each eye with well-matched chromatic selectivity (Peirce, Solomon, Forte, & Lennie, 2008). In contrast to chromatic interocular-switch rivalry, luminance interocular-switch rivalry with swapped stimuli that differ in only luminance did not result in slowly alternating percepts of different brightnesses.

When seen in isolation, a light that varies in chromaticity over time is perceived to oscillate in color. Perception of that same time-varying light may be altered by a surrounding light that is also temporally varying in chromaticity. The neural mechanisms that mediate these contextual interactions are the focus of this article. Observers viewed a central test stimulus that varied in chromaticity over time within a larger surround that also varied in chromaticity at the same temporal frequency. Center and surround were presented either to the same eye (monocular condition) or to opposite eyes (dichoptic condition) at the same frequency (3.125, 6.25, or 9.375 Hz). Relative phase between center and surround modulation was varied. In both the monocular and dichoptic conditions, the perceived modulation depth of the central light depended on the relative phase of the surround. A simple model implementing a linear combination of center and surround modulation fit the measurements well. At the lowest temporal frequency (3.125 Hz), the surround's influence was virtually identical for monocular and dichoptic conditions, suggesting that at this frequency, the surround's influence is mediated primarily by a binocular neural mechanism. At higher frequencies, the surround's influence was greater for the monocular condition than for the dichoptic condition, and this difference increased with temporal frequency. Our findings show that two separate neural mechanisms mediate chromatic contextual interactions: one binocular and dominant at lower temporal frequencies and the other monocular and dominant at higher frequencies (6–10 Hz).

Observers performed red–green and yellow–blue hue cancellation tasks for a 0.8-deg circular test field on a dark surround, by manipulating the excitation level of one cone class while the other two classes were held constant. The results of the red–green judgments conformed to classical opponent color theory in that both L- and S-cone excitation levels were antagonistic to M-cone signals. The yellow–blue judgments revealed a nonmonotonic nonlinearity in which the S-cone signal could act either antagonistically or synergistically with M- and L-cone signals. These results demonstrate that fixed hue sensations should not be associated with a given class of cone, even at the level of opponent neural coding.

Deutan observers are a heterogeneous group, varying nearly continuously from deuteranomalous trichromats with fine chromatic discrimination in the red/green range to deuteranopes who have none. We sought to relate chromatic discriminative ability among deutans measured psychophysically (phenotypes) to observers' separation between long-wave visual pigments inferred from visual pigment genes (genotypes). If middle-wave pigment genes are assumed not to be expressed in these deutan observers there is a clear relation between phenotype and genotype.

The visual system is able to recognize a scene based on a sketch made of very simple features. This ability is likely crucial for survival, when fast image recognition is necessary, and it is believed that a primal sketch is extracted very early in the visual processing. Such highly simplified representations can be sufficient for accurate object discrimination, but an open question is the role played by color in this process. Rich color information is available in natural scenes, yet artist's sketches are usually monochromatic; and, black-and-white movies provide compelling representations of real world scenes. Also, the contrast sensitivity of color is low at fine spatial scales. We approach the question from the perspective of optimal information processing by a system endowed with limited computational resources. We show that when such limitations are taken into account, the intrinsic statistical properties of natural scenes imply that the most effective strategy is to ignore fine-scale color features and devote most of the bandwidth to gray-scale information. We find confirmation of these information-based predictions from psychophysics measurements of fast-viewing discrimination of natural scenes. We conclude that the lack of colored features in our visual representation, and our overall low sensitivity to high-frequency color components, are a consequence of an adaptation process, optimizing the size and power consumption of our brain for the visual world we live in.

We compared changes in the appearance of a test region caused by introducing an inhomogeneous chromatic background to changes caused by a space-averaged equivalent uniform background. Subjects adjusted a test field presented on a CRT so that it appeared neither reddish nor greenish. Sparse “white” or “green” dots, randomly scattered throughout a “red” background field, caused a large decrease (up to 15 nm) in the dominant wavelength of the red/green equilibrium setting, compared to measurements with a uniform “red” background. A uniform background with the same space-averaged chromaticity and luminance as the complex background had an effect similar to the uniform “red” background. These results contradict theories of color constancy that rely on the “gray world” assumption, and indicate the significance for color perception of individual chromaticities within discrete, noncontiguous regions.

International audience; The first physiological process influencing visual perception is the optics of the eye. The retinal image is affected by diffraction at the pupil and several kinds of optical imperfections. A model of the eye (Thibos & Bradley, 1999), which takes account of pupil aperture, chromatic aberration and wavefront aberrations, was used to determine wavelength-dependent point-spread functions, which can be convolved with any stimulus specified by its spectral distribution of light at each point. The resulting retinal spectral distribution of light was used to determine the spatial distribution of stimulation for each cone type (S, M and L). In addition, individual differences in retinal-image quality were assessed using a statistical model (Thibos, Bradley, & Hong, 2002) for population values of Zernike coefficients, which characterize imperfections of the eye's optics. The median and relatively extreme (5th and 95th percentile) modulation transfer functions (MTFs) for the S, M and L cones were determined for equal-energy-spectrum (EES) 'white' light. The typical MTF for S cones was more similar to the MTF for L and M cones after taking wavefront aberrations into account but even with aberrations the S-cone MTF typically was below the M- or L-cone MTF by a factor of at least 10 (one log unit). More generally, the model presented here provides a technique for estimating retinal image quality for the S, M and L cones for any stimulus presented to the eye. The model is applied to some informative examples.

When two different stimuli are presented continuously to each eye, the percept alternates over time between the left-eye stimulus and right-eye stimulus. The perceptual alternation can be slowed or even stopped, however, if the same stimuli are presented intermittently (D. A. Leopold, M. Wilke, A. Maier, & N. K. Logothetis, 2002; J. Orbach, D. Ehrlich, & H. A. Heath, 1963). A basic question is the nature of the persisting neural representation, which mediates the stabilized percept. Is it a representation for the dominant eye, for the stimulus in one eye or for a feature-integrated percept incorporating features presented separately to each eye? We define a feature-integrated percept as one constructed by the visual system but which never is presented as a stimulus. This was tested using a feature-integrated percept resulting from rivalrous, equiluminant chromatic patterns (S. W. Hong & S. K. Shevell, 2009). Measurements showed that the feature-integrated percept was stabilized by intermittent viewing: when the percept at the end of the initial viewing period was feature-integrated, this same integrated percept was seen on subsequent intermittent presentations. The results showed that the stabilized percept from these intermittent rivalrous patterns was due to a persisting neural representation at or after binocular feature integration, not to a persisting dominant eye or neural representation of a retinal stimulus.

A particular rate of quantal absorption by photoreceptors may result in a dim or an intense percept, depending on light stimulating other parts of the retina. The brightness of an object in a natural scene, therefore, depends on the amount of light reflected from the object in comparison to light from other parts of the scene. We show this phenomenon is mediated by two separate neural mechanisms at distinct levels of the visual system. The first mechanism depends on retinal image contrast between adjacent regions. The second mechanism depends on the binocularly fused “cyclopian” representation and is influenced by more remote, noncontiguous areas of the visual field.

According to opponent-colors theory, a reddish surround induces greenness in a central test field. Color-appearance measurements verify this with a long-wavelength reddish surround (660 nm) but not with a short-wavelength reddish surround (440 nm). Surprisingly, a short-wavelength reddish surround shifts the appearance of a test toward redness. Four possible explanations are: (1) stray light from the short-wavelength reddish surround falls in the test area; (2) receptoral sensitivity changes over whelm induced greenness from the surround; (3) a neural process of assimilation, rather than contrast, to the surrounding light; (4) short-wavelength-sensitive (S) cones do not contribute to induced redness/greenness. Chromatic cancelation experiments confirm the fourth explanation. There was no change in induced redness/greenness when quantal absorption by only S cones in the surround was varied by 30-fold (using tritanopic metamers), even though varying stimulation of S cones strongly affected the color appearance of the surround. The redness induced by a short-wavelength surround is accounted for by opponent chromatic induction mediated by only middle- and long-wavelength sensitive cones.

In natural viewing, an object's background often changes over time. Temporally varying backgrounds were investigated here with a steady test field within a time-varying surrounding chromaticity. With slow surround variation (below approximately 3 Hz), the color appearance of a steady test is also perceived to fluctuate. At somewhat higher temporal frequencies, however, temporal variation of the surround is visible but the test appears steady (R. L. De Valois, M. A. Webster, K. K. De Valois, & B. Lingelbach, 1986); also above approximately 3 Hz, temporal chromatic variation along the l- or s-axis of the MacLeod-Boynton space (symmetric about equal-energy-spectrum "white") shifts the steady appearance of the test field toward redness or yellowness, respectively (A. D. D'Antona & S. K. Shevell, 2006). In the study here, color shifts were measured with temporal surround modulation at 6 Hz or greater along axes intermediate to the l and s directions. Varying the relative phase of simultaneous surround variation in l and s should not change responses within independent l and s pathways but should differentially excite neural representations that combine l and s signals (so-called higher order chromatic mechanisms). Varying the phase of l and s showed that the induced color shifts were accounted for by neural responses both from nearly independent l and s pathways and from higher order chromatic mechanisms.