Search

Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is becoming the standard for staging the axilla in breast cancer patients in many institutions. The best method of injection is still questionable. The purpose of this study was to compare the results of SLNB using the peritumoral or the subareolar injection site. Between December 1997 and March 2000, we performed 100 SLNBs. Technecium-labeled colloidal human serum albumin was injected peritumorally (Group A, 31 patients; Group B, 31 patients) or subareolarly (Group C, 38 patients). Patent blue dye was given periareolarly (Group A) or peritumorally (Groups B and C). Preoperative lymphoscintigraphy was performed in all patients. SLNB was successful in 94 patients (94%). The identification rate improved from 80 per cent (first 25 patients) to 99 per cent (last 75). The subareolar injection of the colloid did not adversely influence the results of SLNB compared with the peritumoral injection (identification rate, 100% vs 97%; false negative rate, 6% vs 14%). The subareolar injection of colloid is a simple and at least as accurate technique as the peritumoral one. This technique can also improve the identification rate of SLNB for breast cancer patients.

The clinical significance of sentinel lymph node biopsy for staging patients with ductal carcinoma in situ has not yet been solved. Determining the role of this method for the treatment of in situ ductal carcinoma has been the aim of this study.Dual agent guided sentinel lymph node biopsy with preoperative lymphoscintigraphy was performed on 36 patients with breast ductal carcinoma in situ from January 2001 to March 2004 at the Department of General and Thoracic Surgery, National Institute of Oncology, Budapest. Completion axillary lymph node dissection was not performed routinely. The sentinel lymph nodes were histologically examined at 0.5-1 mm levels with routine hematoxylin and eosin staining.One patient has been excluded from the final analysis because of contralateral invasive breast cancer and simultaneous local recurrence in her medical history. Micro- or submicrometastases were found in 2 patients. If our patient number is completed with the 5 patients operated on for ductal carcinoma in situ during the period of our feasibility study (from December 1997 to March 2000) then the rate of patients with positive sentinel lymph node(s) will be 5% (2/40). All metastases were less than 2 mm in size. Metastases were found only in patients with high risk, extended ductal carcinoma in situ who finally underwent mastectomy. Completion axillary lymphadenectomy has not been performed even for patients with positive sentinel lymph node and no regional recurrence has yet been observed.Our results corresponds well to the international ones. Performing sentinel lymph node biopsy for ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast is not recommended on the basis of the international and our own experiences. Sentinel lymph node biopsy is essential for patients undergoing mastectomy. In other cases when preoperative diagnostic studies do not verify invasion unequivocally we advise to perform sentinel lymph node biopsy (if necessary) after the final histological result of the excised breast specimen.

The feasibility, accuracy and clinical significance of sentinel lymph node biopsy for patients with breast cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy has not yet been determined. The aim of this study was to investigate these questions.Dual agent-guided sentinel lymph node biopsy with preoperative lymphoscintigraphy was performed on 17 breast cancer patients after neoadjuvant chemotherapy at the Department of General and Thoracic Surgery, National Institute of Oncology, Budapest, from April 2004 to August 2005. Patients with clinically lymph node-negative breast cancer less than 3 cm in size after neoadjuvant chemotherapy were enrolled in the study.Lymphoscintigraphy showed no axillary lymphatic drainage in 7 patients (41%), and no sentinel lymph node could be identified during surgery in these patients. Axillary lymph nodes were histologically positive in 6 (86%) out of these 7 patients. Sentinel lymph node biopsy was successful in 10 patients (59%), and in 8 (80%) of them the sentinel lymph node proved to be positive pathologically. False negative sentinel lymph node biopsy did not occur. Axillary lymph node status was histologically positive in 14 (82%) out of the 17 patients. The predictable value of the clinical examination of the axilla after neoadjuvant chemotherapy, for the histological nodal status, was very low.Our sentinel lymph node identification rate is lower than the published average in the literature. This difference can be explained by the differences in the indication for neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Our false negative rate (0%) is, however, significantly better than that of others. On the basis of international experiences sentinel lymph node biopsy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy is technically feasible, but its accuracy is not satisfactory and its clinical significance has not yet been determined. Our success rate is specifically low, which cannot be explained by the lack of practice. Taking the histologically very high axillary positive rate into consideration, sentinel lymph node biopsy has no clinical role in our practice after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

As a result of mammographic screening nonpalpable breast lesions are found with increasing frequency. The surgical management of these lesions presents two main problems: (1) How to localize the lesion pre- and intraoperatively; (2) What should be the extension of the axillary dissection for malignant lesions. This study is aimed to evaluate the technical feasibility of radioguided excision of nonpalpable breast lesions and the possibility of performing simultaneous sentinel lymph node biopsy for malignant lesions. Radioguided breast excisions have been performed in our Department since November 2000. The basis of this method is that radioisotope labelled colloid is injected into the lesion under stereo tactic or sonographic guidance. A gamma-probe is used intraoperatively to locate the lesion and guide its excision. Dual agent guided technique is used for sentinel lymph node biopsy. Radioguided breast excision was performed on 85 patients (93 lesion) till February 2002. The localization and excision were successful in 84 patients (92 lesions) (99%). Multifocal lesions were successfully localized and excised in 7 patients. There were 61 parenchyma lesions (66%) and 31 microcalcifications (34%). Localization was performed under sonographic guidance in 44 patients (52%) and under stereotactic guidance in 40 patients (48%). There were 25 benign (27%) and 67 malignant (73%) lesions. Second surgical procedure (mastectomy) was needed in 4 patients (6.5%) because of histologically incomplete excision. Sentinel lymph node biopsy was performed in 50 patients. The biopsy was successful in 45 patients (90%). The sentinel lymph node was histologically positive in 2 patients (4.4%). Radioguided localization with the intraoperative use of a gamma-probe is an easy, rapid and highly accurate technique for removing nonpalpable breast lesions and allows simultaneous sentinel lymph node biopsy for malignant lesions.

Surgical interventions have important role in the treatment of all stages of malignant melanoma. Surgery is the primary treatment of localized cutaneous melanoma. Excision of the primary tumor makes it possible to set up the histological diagnosis and to determine pathological prognostic factors. Appropriate surgical margin is important for local disease control. Sentinel lymph node biopsy with detailed histological examination has gained prominent importance for correct histological staging and for determining adjuvant oncological treatment. Surgery is the primary treatment of isolated regional metastases. Surgical methods also have a role in the palliative management of distant metastatic melanoma. In the present review the most important issues of the surgical treatment of malignant melanoma have been discussed in detail.