Search

Background: Presepsin is a promising biomarker for the diagnosis and prognosis of sepsis. However, results reported about its value to diagnose sepsis in an emergency department (ED) are controversial, probably due to differences in the design of the studies. We have evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of presepsin for infection and sepsis, compared with procalcitonin (PCT) and C-reactive protein (CRP), in patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) with suspected infection., Methods: 223 patients with suspected infection were enrolled for the study. Blood samples were collected on admission for measurement of biomarkers. Definitive diagnosis was obtained afterwards by analysis of digital medical records. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was conducted to determine the diagnostic accuracy., Results: Infection was confirmed in 200 patients, including 130 with non-complicated infection and 70 with sepsis. Median CRP, PCT and presepsin levels were significantly higher in patients with infection and sepsis. PCT was the biomarker with the highest performance for infection (ROC AUC: 0.910); for sepsis, PCT (ROC AUC: 0.815) and presepsin (ROC AUC: 0.775) shown a similar performance., Conclusion: Although presepsin is a valuable biomarker for diagnosis of infection and sepsis, its diagnostic accuracy in our study does not improve that of PCT. Its introduction in clinical practice is not justified., (Copyright © 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To assess the accuracy of lipopolysaccharide binding protein (LBP) for diagnosing late-onset neonatal sepsis (LONS) in very low birth weight (VLBW) infants., Study Design: Observational, prospective study. We assessed the diagnostic performance of LBP in 26 suspected LONS episodes among 54 patients. Proven and probable LONS episodes were recorded according to established criteria. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was performed to evaluate LBP's ability to predict LONS., Results: LONS was diagnosed in 17 of 26 episodes. LBP levels were significantly higher in confirmed LONS episodes (P<0.001). The area under the curve of LBP was 0.89. A cut-off of 17.5 μg/mL had a sensitivity of 94.1%, a specificity of 77.8%, a positive predictive value of 88.9% and a negative predictive value of 87.5%., Conclusions: Serum LBP measurement may be useful as an additional tool in the evaluation of suspected LONS in VLBW infants.