Search

Aim: For reliable assessment of ataxia severity in children, the Childhood Ataxia and Cerebellar Group of the European Pediatric Neurology Society aimed to validate the Scale for Assessment and Rating of Ataxia (SARA) according to age., Method: Twenty-two pediatric ataxia experts from 15 international institutions scored videotaped SARA performances in 156 typically developing children (4-16y: m/f=1; 12 children per year of age; including nine different nationalities). We determined age-dependency and reliability of pediatric SARA scores by a mixed model., Results: In typically developing children, age was the only variable that revealed a relationship with SARA scores (p<0.001). The youngest children revealed the highest scores and the highest variation in scores (<8y; p<0.001). After 11 years of age, pediatric scores approached adult outcomes. The interobserver agreement of total SARA scores was substantial with an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.63 (95% confidence interval 0.56-0.69; p<0.001)., Interpretation: In typically developing European children, both SARA scores and interobserver agreement are age-dependent. For reliable interpretation of pediatric SARA scores, consideration of the underlying test construct appears prudent. These data will hopefully contribute to a correct and uniform interpretation of longitudinal SARA scores from childhood to adulthood., (© 2017 Mac Keith Press.)

Aim: To determine whether ataxia rating scales are reliable disease biomarkers for early onset ataxia (EOA)., Method: In 40 patients clinically identified with EOA (28 males, 12 females; mean age 15y 3mo [range 5-34y]), we determined interobserver and intraobserver agreement (interclass correlation coefficient [ICC]) and discriminant validity of ataxia rating scales (International Cooperative Ataxia Rating Scale [ICARS], Scale for Assessment and Rating of Ataxia [SARA], and Brief Ataxia Rating Scale [BARS]). Three paediatric neurologists independently scored ICARS, SARA and BARS performances recorded on video, and also phenotyped the primary and secondary movement disorder features. When ataxia was the primary movement disorder feature, we assigned patients to the subgroup 'EOA with core ataxia' (n=26). When ataxia concurred with other prevailing movement disorders (such as dystonia, myoclonus, and chorea), we assigned patients to the subgroup 'EOA with comorbid ataxia' (n=12)., Results: ICC values were similar in both EOA subgroups of 'core' and 'comorbid' ataxia (0.92-0.99; ICARS, SARA, and BARS). Independent of the phenotype, the severity of the prevailing movement disorder predicted the ataxia rating scale scores (β=0.83-0.88; p<0.05)., Interpretation: In patients with EOA, the reliability of ataxia rating scales is high. However, the discriminative validity for 'ataxia' is low. For adequate interpretation of ataxia rating scale scores, application in uniform movement disorder phenotypes is essential., (© 2016 Mac Keith Press.)

Aim: To investigate the interobserver agreement on phenotypic early-onset ataxia (EOA) assessment and to explore whether the Scale for Assessment and Rating of Ataxia (SARA) could provide a supportive marker., Method: Seven movement disorder specialists provided independent phenotypic assessments of potentially ataxic motor behaviour in 40 patients (mean age 15y [range 5-34]; data derived from University Medical Center Groningen medical records 1998-2012). We determined interobserver agreement by Fleiss' kappa. Furthermore, we compared percentage SARA subscores ([subscore/total score]×100%) between 'indisputable' (primary ataxia recognition by at least six observers) and 'mixed' (ataxia recognition, unfulfilling 'indisputable' criteria) EOA phenotypes., Results: Agreement on phenotypic EOA assessment was statistically significant (p<0.001), but of moderate strength (Fleiss' kappa=0.45; 95% CI 0.38-0.51). During mild disease progression, percentage SARA gait subscores discriminated between 'indisputable' and 'mixed' EOA phenotypes. In patients with percentage SARA gait subscores >30%, primary ataxia was more frequently present than in those with subscores <30% (p=0.001)., Interpretation: Among movement-disorder professionals from different disciplines, interobserver agreement on phenotypic EOA recognition is of limited strength. SARA gait subscores can provide a supportive discriminative marker between EOA phenotypes. Hopefully, future phenotypic insight will contribute to the inclusion of uniform, high-quality data in international EOA databases., (© 2015 Mac Keith Press.)