Search

Objective: We aimed to evaluate the usability and acceptability of a co-designed mobile health (mHealth) application (PrEP-EmERGE) within a digital health pathway to support HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP)., Methods: This was a cross-sectional study to evaluate the usability and acceptability of the PrEP-EmERGE app. Data were collected via an online survey sent to all PrEP EmERGE users in September 2021. Usability was assessed with a validated usability tool, the System Usability Scale (SUS). Acceptability was assessed using modified patient-reported experience measures (PREMs). Quantitative data were analysed using descriptive and/or inferential statistics and qualitative data (free text responses) using thematic analysis., Results: In total, 81/133 (61%) active PrEP EmERGE users completed the online survey, which was available directly from their PrEP EmERGE app: 78/81 (96%) identified as cis-male, 74/81 (91%) reported their ethnicity as 'white', 69/81 (85%) reported daily PrEP use, 7/81 (9%) reported using an event-based dosing schedule, and 5/81 (6%) were switching between dosing schedules. Overall, the median SUS score was 78/100 (interquartile range: 70-92). There were no differences in median SUS scores by PrEP dosing schedules (p = 0.78) or months of experience of using the app (p = 0.31). Overall, 73/81 (90%) would recommend the PrEP EmERGE app to a friend and 78/81 (96%) rated their satisfaction of the app as excellent, good or satisfactory. The free text responses generated three key themes: accessibility (for results and information); autonomy [taking responsibility for their (sexual) health] and functionality (including technical recommendations for app development and the digital health pathway)., Conclusions: Innovative, co-designed digital health pathways, such as PrEP EmERGE can help sexual health services to manage increasing numbers of people accessing PrEP - ensuring that they retain access for those who need to be seen face-to-face. We report high levels of acceptability and usability during the first 4 months of this novel pathway., (© 2022 The Authors. HIV Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British HIV Association.)

Objective: Hepatitis B is sexually transmitted among men who have sex with men (MSM) and has previously been endemic in some populations of MSM. Presence of anti-hepatitis B core (anti-HBc) determines previous or ongoing infection. We aimed to establish the prevalence and associations of anti-HBc in our clinic population of MSM., Method: A cross-sectional study of newly attending MSM to determine the prevalence and associations of testing positive for anti-HBc using our clinic database from 2012 to 2019. We used crude odds ratios to identify any associations., Results: There were 3342/5842 (58%) newly attending MSM who were tested for anti-HBc between 2012 and 2019. Of the 3342 MSM tested for anti-HBc, the median age was 30years (interquartile range 23-43), 442 (13%) were living with HIV, 10 (0.3%) were HBsAg positive, 62 (1.9%) had past/current hepatitis C, 401 (12%) had a positive syphilis enzyme immunoassay (EIA), 455 (14%) were diagnosed with either gonorrhoea or chlamydia and 1080 (32%) were non-UK born. A total of 331 (10%, 95% confidence interval (CI)=8.9-11.0) tested positive for anti-HBc and the proportion testing positive reduced significantly throughout the study period (P <0.004). Testing positive for anti-HBc was associated with age >30years (OR=8.2, 95% CI=5.9-11.4, P <0.0001), having past/current hepatitis C (odds ratio (OR)=5.0, 95% CI=3.0-8.6, P <0.0001), having a positive syphilis EIA (OR=5.9, 95% CI=4.4-7.3, P <0.0001) and being non-UK born (OR=1.4, 95% CI=1.1-1.8, P <0.006). There were no associations with HIV status or having a diagnosis of gonorrhoea or chlamydia., Conclusion: Although reducing, the prevalence of anti-HBc remains endemic in MSM locally and further efforts are needed to enhance hepatitis B prevention strategies.

Within the healthcare domain, commercial-sector terminology such as 'client', 'customer' and 'user' are replacing the previously acceptable collective noun, 'patient'. Is the term we use important to the individuals accessing our services? A paper survey collected the responses of 581 individuals attending the service between August and October 2019. Overall, 372/496 (75%) (95% CI = 71.2-78.8%) unique responses reported a preference to the term 'patient', while only 92/496 (19%) (95% CI = 15.1-22.0%) preferred 'client', 23/496(5%) (95% CI = 2.8-6.5%) 'customer' and 9/496 (2%) (95% CI = 0.6-3.0%) 'user'. In line with other published data, we acknowledge that people attending our service prefer to be referred to as 'patient' above all else.

Within the UK, the majority of hepatitis A occurs in high risk groups such as men who have sex with men (MSM). It has been estimated that 70% of MSM need immunity to provide adequate herd immunity. We aimed to estimate the proportion of hepatitis A susceptibility in MSM throughout a 10-year period (2010–2019), and explore associated demographic factors. Using our Electronic Patient Record system, we extracted anonymous clinical data between for MSM at their first attendance; including hepatitis A IgG result, age, country of birth and diagnosis of an STI. Overall, 1401/6884(20%) were tested for hepatitis A IgG at their first attendance, with 626/1401 (45%, 95% CI = 42%–47%) showing susceptibility. Testing rates increased between 2010–2019 (OR = 67.79, 95%CI = 39.09–117.60, p = <0.0001); however, susceptibility remained similar (OR = 0.98, 95%CI = 0.33–2.89, p = 0.98). MSM aged 35 and under had significantly higher susceptibility vs MSM aged over 35 (OR 3.4176, 95%CI = 2.71–4.31, p = <0.0001). UK-born had significantly higher susceptibility vs non-UK born (OR 1.5, 95%CI = 1.2147–1.8618, p = 0.0002). Susceptibility of hepatitis A in MSM may be higher than necessary to control future outbreaks. It is important that effective targeting of MSM, particularly young MSM, occur at all levels of healthcare and not solely rely on opportunistic presentation at a sexual health clinic. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Anal examination and proctoscopy are important skills needed to facilitate the diagnoses of STIs and cancer. Clinician (25 doctors/15 nurses) confidence was higher for anal examination versus proctoscopy (median Likert scores 4/5 vs 5/5, P≤0.05) and higher in doctors compared with nurses (median Likert scores 5/5 vs 4/5, P<0.008, 4/5 vs 2/5, P<0.005), and related to years of experience (5/5 vs 4/5, P<0.001, 3/5 vs 5/5, P=0.007). Barriers included lack of opportunities for training, concerns about patient reluctance, and lack of available equipment. We need to be innovative when up-skilling the specialist sexual health workforce using online training and optimising opportunities for clinical assessment of MSM. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]