Search

Background: The market for online sexually transmitted infection (STI) services is rapidly expanding. Online health services often have unequal uptake among different demographics of the population. There is a need to understand how different online delivery options for STI testing may appeal to different groups of young people, particularly young people who have higher rates of STI diagnoses., Methods: An online survey of young Australians aged 16 to 29 years was conducted to understand service preferences regarding consultation (telehealth, fully automated questionnaire), testing (electronic pathology form, at-home self-sampling), and treatment (e-prescriptions, mailed oral tablets). Multivariable multinomial logistic regression examined associations between user characteristics and service preferences, and adjusted relative risk ratios (aRRRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) are presented., Results: Among 905 respondents, rural youth were more likely to prefer fully automated questionnaires (aRRR, 1.9; 95% CI, 1.0-3.5) over telehealth consultations, whereas culturally and linguistically diverse (CALD) youth were less likely (aRRR, 0.4; 95% CI, 0.2-0.7). Rural youth preferred at-home self-sampling kits (aRRR, 1.9; 95% CI, 1.3-2.7) over electronic forms for on-site collection at pathology centers, with the opposite for CALD youth (aRRR, 0.7; 95% CI, 0.5-1.0). Receiving oral antibiotics by mail was preferred by rural youth (aRRR, 2.3; 95% CI, 1.1-4.6) over for in-clinic treatment, but not for CALD youth (aRRR, 0.5; 95% CI, 0.4-0.8)., Conclusions: Our findings suggest that rural youth tend to prefer self-navigated and automated options, whereas CALD prefer options with greater provider engagement. Online STI service providers should consider how different service options may affect equitable uptake across the population and implications for addressing disparities in testing and treatment., Competing Interests: Conflict of Interest and Sources of Funding: None declared., (Copyright © 2023 American Sexually Transmitted Diseases Association. All rights reserved.)

Accessing testing for sexually transmissible infections (STI) in regional and rural areas can be challenging for many people. Innovative solutions are necessary to ensure that barriers are minimised for populations who are often disadvantaged by the health system. STI-X, our STI test vending machine brings testing to local communities in areas where accessing a clinical service can be difficult due to extended wait times or where there is concern about privacy. Providing the option of a free, quick and easy STI test aims to reduce the prevalence of STIs and the burden on the primary care system.

Background: Sexually transmitted infection (STI) rates continue to rise in Australia, and timely access to testing and treatment is crucial to reduce transmission. Web-based services have been viewed as a way to improve timely access to STI/HIV testing and have proliferated in recent years. However, the regulation of these services in Australia is minimal, leading to concerns about their quality. The purpose of this review was to systematically identify web-based STI/HIV testing services available in Australia and assess them on aspects of quality, reliability, and accessibility., Objective: We aim to systematically identify and assess web-based STI/HIV testing services available in Australia., Methods: A Google search of Australian web-based services was conducted in March 2022 and repeated in September 2022 using Boolean operators and search terms related to test services (eg, on the internet or home), STIs (eg, chlamydia or gonorrhea), and test type (eg, self-test). The first 10 pages were assessed, and services were categorized as self-testing (ST; test at home), self-sampling (SS; sample at home and return to laboratory), or self-navigated pathology (SNP; specimens collected at pathology center). Website reliability was assessed against the Health on the Net Foundation code of conduct, and service quality was assessed using a scorecard that was developed based on similar reviews, Australian guidelines for in-person services, and UK standards. Additionally, we looked at measures of accessibility including cost, rural access, and time to test results., Results: Seventeen services were identified (8 ST, 2 SS, and 7 SNP). Only 4 services offered recommended testing for all 4 infections (chlamydia, gonorrhea, syphilis, and HIV) including genital, anorectal, and oropharyngeal sites, and 5 offered tests other than those recommended by Australian testing guidelines (eg, Ureaplasma). Nine services (1 SNP, 8 self-test) had no minimum age requirements for access. Reliability scores (scale 0-8) were similar between all services (range 4.75-8.0). Quality weighted scores (scale 0-58) were similar between SNP and SS services (average 44.89, SD 5.56 and 44.75, SD 1.77, respectively) but lower for ST services (22.66, SD 8.93; P=.002). Government-funded services were of higher quality than private services (43.54, SD 6.71 vs 29.43, SD 13.55; P=.03). The cost for services varied between SNP (Aus $0-$595; ie, US $0-$381.96), self-sample (Aus $0; ie, US $0), and ST (Aus $0-$135; ie, US $0-$86.66). The time to test results was much shorter for SNP services (~4 days) than for SS (~12 days) and ST (~14 days)., Conclusions: This review identified considerable variability in the quality and reliability of the web-based STI/HIV testing services in Australia. Given the proliferation and use of these services will likely increase, it is imperative that Australia develops national standards to ensure the standard-of-care offered by web-based STI/HIV testing services is appropriate to protect Australian users from the impact of poorly performing and inappropriate tests., (©Ethan Trey Cardwell, Teralynn Ludwick, Christopher Fairley, Christopher Bourne, Shanton Chang, Jane S Hocking, Fabian Y S Kong. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (https://www.jmir.org), 22.09.2023.)