Search

The anti-sequence, a portable element extending from +1 to +15 of the transcript, is sufficient to prevent promoter escape from a variety of strong final sigma70 promoters. We show here that this sequence does not function with even the strongest final sigma32 promoter. Moreover, a particular class of substitutions in final sigma70 that disrupt interaction between Region 2.2 of final sigma70 and a coiled-coiled motif in the beta'-subunit of RNA polymerase antagonizes the function of the anti-element. This same group of mutants prevents lambdaQ-mediated anti-termination at the lambdaP(R') promoter. At this promoter, interaction of final sigma70 with the non-template strand of the initial transcribed sequence (ITS) is required to promote the pause prerequisite for anti-termination. These mutants prevent pausing because they are defective in this recognition event. By analogy, we suggest that interaction of final sigma70 with the non-template strand of the anti-ITS is required for function of this portable element, thus explaining why neither final sigma32 nor the Region 2.2 final sigma70 mutants mediate anti-function. Support for the analogy with the lambdaP(R') promoter comes from preliminary experiments suggesting that the anti-ITS, like the lambdaP(R') ITS, is bipartite.

The interaction of RNA polymerase and its initiation factors is central to the process of transcription initiation. To dissect the role of this interface, we undertook the identification of the contact sites between RNA polymerase and sigma(70), the Escherichia coli initiation factor. We identified nine mutationally verified interaction sites between sigma(70) and specific domains of RNA polymerase and provide evidence that sigma(70) and RNA polymerase interact in at least a two-step process. We propose that a cycle of changes in the interface of sigma(70) with core RNA polymerase is associated with progression through the process of transcription initiation.

For transcription to initiate, RNA polymerase must recognize and melt promoters. Selective binding to the nontemplate strand of the -10 region of the promoter is central to this process. We show that a 48 amino acid (aa) coiled-coil from the beta' subunit (aa 262--309) induces sigma(70) to perform this function almost as efficiently as core RNA polymerase itself. We provide evidence that interaction between the beta' coiled-coil and region 2.2 of sigma(70) promotes an allosteric transition that allows sigma(70) to selectively recognize the nontemplate strand. As the beta' 262--309 peptide can function with the previously crystallized portion of sigma(70), nontemplate recognition can be reconstituted with only 47 kDa, or 1/10 of holoenzyme.

DegS (HhoB), a putative serine protease related to DegP/HtrA, regulates the basal and induced activity of the essential Escherichia coli sigma factor sigma (E), which is involved in the cellular response to extracytoplasmic stress. DegS promotes the destabilization of the sigma (E)-specific anti-sigma factor RseA, thereby releasing sigma (E) to direct gene expression. We demonstrate that degS is an essential E. coli gene and show that the essential function of DegS is to provide the cell with sigma (E) activity. We also show that the putative active site of DegS is periplasmic and that DegS requires its N-terminal transmembrane domain for its sigma (E)-related function.

Bacteriophage T4 middle-mode transcription requires two phage-encoded proteins, the MotA transcription factor and AsiA coactivator, along with Escherichia coli RNA polymerase holoenzyme containing the sigma(70) subunit. A motA positive control (pc) mutant, motA-pc1, was used to select for suppressor mutations that alter other proteins in the transcription complex. Separate genetic selections isolated two AsiA mutants (S22F and Q51E) and five sigma(70) mutants (Y571C, Y571H, D570N, L595P, and S604P). All seven suppressor mutants gave partial suppressor phenotypes in vivo as judged by plaque morphology and burst size measurements. The S22F mutant AsiA protein and glutathione S-transferase fusions of the five mutant sigma(70) proteins were purified. All of these mutant proteins allowed normal levels of in vitro transcription when tested with wild-type MotA protein, but they failed to suppress the mutant MotA-pc1 protein in the same assay. The sigma(70) substitutions affected the 4.2 region, which binds the -35 sequence of E. coli promoters. In the presence of E. coli RNA polymerase without T4 proteins, the L595P and S604P substitutions greatly decreased transcription from standard E. coli promoters. This defect could not be explained solely by a disruption in -35 recognition since similar results were obtained with extended -10 promoters. The generalized transcriptional defect of these two mutants correlated with a defect in binding to core RNA polymerase, as judged by immunoprecipitation analysis. The L595P mutant, which was the most defective for in vitro transcription, failed to support E. coli growth.

The sigma subunit of eubacterial RNA polymerase is required throughout initiation, but how it communicates with core polymerase (alpha(2)betabeta') is poorly understood. The present work addresses the location and function of the interface of sigma with core. Our studies suggest that this interface is extensive as mutations in six conserved regions of sigma(70) hinder the ability of sigma to bind core. Direct binding of one of these regions to core can be demonstrated using a peptide-based approach. The same regions, and even equivalent residues, in sigma(32) and sigma(70) alter core interaction, suggesting that sigma(70) family members use homologous residues, at least in part, to interact with core. Finally, the regions of sigma that we identify perform specialized functions, suggesting that different portions of the interface perform discrete roles during transcription initiation.

The activity of the stress-responsive sigma factor, sigma(E), is induced by the extracytoplasmic accumulation of misfolded or unfolded protein. The inner membrane protein RseA is the central regulatory molecule in this signal transduction cascade and acts as a sigma(E)-specific anti-sigma factor. Here we show that sigma(E) activity is primarily determined by the ratio of RseA to sigma(E). RseA is rapidly degraded in response to extracytoplasmic stress, leading to an increase in the free pool of sigma(E) and initiation of the stress response. We present evidence that the putative inner membrane serine protease, DegS, is responsible for this regulated degradation of RseA.

The sigma subunit of RNA polymerase orchestrates basal transcription by first binding to core RNA polymerase and then recognizing promoters. Using a series of 16 alanine-substitution mutations, we show that residues in a narrow region of Escherichia coli sigma70 (590 to 603) are involved in transcription activation by a mutationally altered CRP derivative, FNR and AraC. Homology modeling of region 4 of sigma70 to the closely related NarL or 434 Cro proteins, suggests that the five basic residues implicated in activation are either in the C terminus of a long recognition helix that includes residues recognizing the -35 hexamer region of the promoter, or in the subsequent loop, and are ideally positioned to permit interaction with activators. The only substitution that has a significant effect on activator-independent transcription is at R603, indicating that this residue of sigma70 may play a distinct role in transcription initiation., (Copyright 1998 Academic Press)

SigmaE is an alternative sigma factor that controls the extracytoplasmic stress response in Escherichia coli. SigmaE is essential at high temperatures but was previously thought to be nonessential at temperatures below 37 degrees C. We present evidence that sigmaE is an essential sigma factor at all temperatures. Cells lacking sigmaE are able to grow at low temperatures because of the presence of a frequently arising, unlinked suppressor mutation.

The activity of the alternate sigma-factor sigmaE of Escherichia coli is induced by several stressors that lead to the extracytoplasmic accumulation of misfolded or unfolded protein. The sigmaE regulon contains several genes, including that encoding the periplasmic protease DegP, whose products are thought to be required for maintaining the integrity of the cell envelope because cells lacking sigmaE are sensitive to elevated temperature and hydrophobic agents. Selection of multicopy suppressors of the temperature-sensitive phenotype of cells lacking sigmaE revealed that overexpression of the lipoprotein NlpE restored high temperature growth to these cells. Overexpression of NlpE has been shown previously to induce DegP synthesis by activating the Cpx two-component signal transduction pathway, and suppression of the temperature-sensitive phenotype by NlpE was found to be dependent on the Cpx proteins. In addition, a constitutively active form of the CpxA sensor/kinase also fully suppressed the temperature-sensitive defect of cells lacking sigmaE. DegP was found to be necessary, but not sufficient, for suppression. Activation of the Cpx pathway has also been shown to alleviate the toxicity of several LamB mutant proteins. Together, these results reveal the existence of two partially overlapping regulatory systems involved in the response to extracytoplasmic stress in E. coli.

The extracytoplasmic stress response in Escherichia coli is controlled by the alternative sigma factor, sigma(E). sigma(E) activity is uniquely induced by the accumulation of outer membrane protein precursors in the periplasmic space, and leads to the increased production of several proteins, including the periplasmic protease DegP, that are thought to be required for maintaining cellular integrity under stress conditions. Genetic and biochemical experiments show that sigma(E) activity is under the control of three genes, rseABC (for regulator of sigma E), encoded immediately downstream of the sigma factor. Deletion of rseA leads to a 25-fold induction of sigma(E) activity. RseA is predicted to be an inner membrane protein, and the purified cytoplasmic domain binds to and inhibits sigma(E)-directed transcription in vitro, indicating that RseA acts as an anti-sigma factor. Deletion of rseB leads to a slight induction of sigma(E), indicating that RseB is also a negative regulator of sigma(E). RseB is a periplasmic protein and was found to co-purify with the periplasmic domain of RseA, indicating that RseB probably exerts negative activity on sigma(E) through RseA. Deletion of rseC, in contrast, has no effect on sigma(E) activity under steady-state conditions. Under induction conditions, strains lacking RseB and/or C show wild-type induction of sigma(E) activity, indicating either the presence of multiple pathways regulating sigma(E) activity, or the ability of RseA alone to both sense and transmit information to sigma(E).

The recent publication of the 2.6 A crystal structure of a portion of sigma70 provides insight into the role of sigma during transcription initiation. This high resolution picture unveils novel questions.

The promoters recognized by sigma 70, the primary sigma of Escherichia coli, consist of two highly conserved hexamers located at -10 and -35 bp from the start point of transcription, separated by a preferred spacing of 17 bp. sigma factors have two distinct DNA binding domains that recognize the two hexamer sequences. However, the component of RNA polymerase recognizing the length of the spacing between hexamers has not been determined. Using an equilibrium DNA binding competition assay, we demonstrate that a polypeptide of sigma 70 carrying both DNA binding domains is very sensitive to promoter spacing, whereas a sigma 70 polypeptide with only one DNA binding domain is not. Furthermore, a mutant sigma, selected for increasing transcription of the minimal lac promoter (18-bp spacer), has an altered response to promoter spacing in vivo and in vitro. Our data support the idea that sigma makes simultaneous, productive contacts at both the -10 and the -35 regions of the promoter and discerns the spacing between these conserved regions.

In Escherichia coli, the heat shock response is under the control of two alternative sigma factors: sigma 32 and sigma E. The sigma 32-regulated response is well understood, whereas little is known about that of sigma E, except that it responds to extracytoplasmic immature outer membrane proteins. To further understand this response, we located the rpoE gene at 55.5' and analyzed the role of sigma E. sigma E is required at high temperature, and controls the transcription of at least 10 genes. Some of these might contribute to the integrity of the cell since delta rpoE cells are more sensitive to SDS plus EDTA and crystal violet. sigma E controls its own transcription from a sigma E-dependent promoter, indicating that rpoE transcription plays a role in the regulation of E sigma E activity. Indeed, under steady-state conditions, the transcription from this promoter mirrors the levels of E sigma E activity in the cell. However, it is unlikely that the rapid increase in E sigma E activity following induction can be accounted for solely by increased transcription of rpoE. Based upon homology arguments, we suggest that a gene encoding a negative regulator of sigma E activity is located immediately downstream of rpoE and may function as the target of the E sigma E inducing signal.

Prokaryotic transcription initiation factor sigma is required for sequence-specific promoter recognition by RNA polymerase. Genetic studies have indicated that sigma itself interacts with DNA at the -10 and -35 promoter consensus sequences. Binding of Escherichia coli sigma 70 to DNA in vitro, however, can only be observed for truncated polypeptides lacking the amino-terminal amino acids. We have investigated the role of the amino terminus of E. coli sigma 70 in controlling DNA-binding ability. Deletion analysis indicates that amino acids within amino-terminal region 1.1 of sigma 70 inhibit DNA binding by the carboxy-terminal DNA-binding domains. Furthermore, inhibition of binding by the amino-terminal inhibitory domain of sigma 70 can be observed in trans. Likewise, the amino-terminal extensions of two alternative sigma-factors, E. coli sigma 32 and Bacillus subtilis sigma K, negatively affect the DNA binding activity of their carboxy-terminal domains. We propose that initiation of transcription is subject to modulation as a result of the composition and/or structure of the amino terminus of the sigma-subunit and that the sigma family of proteins belong to a larger class of intramolecularly regulated transcriptional effectors.

sigma E and sigma 32 are two heat- and ethanol-inducible sigma-factors in Escherichia coli. The sigma 32 regulon is also induced by unfolded and misfolded proteins in the cytoplasm, and the function of many of the proteins in the sigma 32 regulon is to bind to cytoplasmic proteins and assist them in folding or unfolding. To further understand the function of the sigma E regulon, we searched for mutants that affected sigma E activity. Our results indicate that a signal generated by expression of outer membrane proteins modulates sigma E activity. Specifically, sigma E activity is induced by increased expression of OMPs and is reduced by decreased expression of OMPs. In addition, mutations that cause misfolded OMPs induce sigma E activity. This signal is generated after the fate of OMPs and periplasmic proteins diverge in the secretory pathway and is not the result of an accumulation of OMP precursors in the cytoplasm. Our results indicate that this effect of OMPs is specific to the sigma E regulon, because none of the above mutations affect sigma 32 activity. We propose that the sigma E regulon is involved in processes that occur in extracytoplasmic compartments and that these two heat-inducible regulons may have distinct but complementary roles of monitoring the state of proteins in the cytoplasm (sigma 32) and outer membrane (sigma E).

The accumulation of secretory protein precursors, caused either by mutations in secB or secA or by the overproduction of export-defective proteins, results in a two- to fivefold increase in the synthesis of heat shock proteins. In such strains, sigma 32, the alternative sigma factor responsible for transcription of the heat shock genes, is stabilized. The resultant increase in the level of sigma 32 leads to increased transcription of heat shock genes and increased synthesis of heat shock proteins. We have also found that although a secB null mutant does not grow on rich medium at a temperature range of 30 to 42 degrees C, it does grow at 44 degrees C. In addition, we found that a secB null mutant exhibits greater thermotolerance than the wild-type parental strain. Elevated levels of heat shock proteins, as well as some other non-heat shock proteins, may account for the partial heat resistance of a SecB-lacking strain.

Prokaryotic transcription initiation factor sigma is required for sequence-specific promoter recognition by RNA polymerase holoenzyme. Genetic and physiological studies have indicated that sigma interacts with promoter DNA sequences but biochemical analysis did not demonstrate DNA binding by the sigma subunit itself. We have investigated both the DNA binding properties and the regulation of DNA binding for several sigma factors using partial polypeptides. In this report we demonstrate that partial sigmas can bind to promoter DNA in the absence of the core subunits of RNA polymerase and the binding is regulated by an N-terminal inhibitory domain.

In Escherichia coli, transcription of the heat shock genes is regulated by sigma 32, the alternative sigma factor directing RNA polymerase to heat shock promoters. sigma 32, encoded by rpoH (htpR), is normally present in limiting amounts in cells. Upon temperature upshift, the amount of sigma 32 transiently increases, resulting in the transient increase in transcription of the heat shock genes known as the heat shock response. Strains carrying the rpoH165 nonsense mutation and supC(Ts), a temperature-sensitive suppressor tRNA, do not exhibit a heat shock response. This defect is suppressed by rpoD800, a mutation in the gene encoding sigma 70. We have determined the mechanism of suppression. In contrast to wild-type strains, the level of sigma 32 and the level of transcription of heat shock genes remain relatively constant in an rpoH165 rpoD800 strain after a temperature upshift. Instead, the heat shock response in this strain results from an approximately fivefold decrease in the cellular transcription carried out by the RNA polymerase holoenzyme containing mutant RpoD800 sigma 70 coupled with an overall increase in the translational efficiency of all mRNA species.

The sigma 70 subunit of E. coli RNA polymerase is required for sequence-specific recognition of promoter DNA. Genetic studies and sequence analysis have indicated that sigma 70 contains two specific DNA-binding domains that recognize the two conserved portions of the prokaryotic promoter. However, intact sigma 70 does not bind to DNA. Using C-terminal and internal polypeptides of sigma 70, carrying one or both putative DNA-binding domains, we demonstrate that sigma 70 does contain two DNA-binding domains, but that N-terminal sequences inhibit the ability of intact sigma 70 to bind to DNA. Thus, we propose that sigma 70 is a sequence-specific DNA-binding protein that normally functions through an allosteric interaction with the core subunits of RNA polymerase.

sigma 70, encoded by rpoD, is the major sigma factor in Escherichia coli. rpoD285 (rpoD800) is a small deletion mutation in rpoD that confers a temperature-sensitive growth phenotype because the mutant sigma 70 is rapidly degraded at high temperature. Extragenic mutations which reduce the rate of degradation of RpoD285 sigma 70 permit growth at high temperature. One class of such suppressors is located in rpoH, the gene encoding sigma 32, an alternative sigma factor required for transcription of the heat shock genes. One of these, rpoH113, is incompatible with rpoD+. We determined the mechanism of incompatibility. Although RpoH113 sigma 32 continues to be made when wild-type sigma 70 is present, cells show reduced ability to express heat shock genes and to transcribe from heat shock promoters. Glycerol gradient fractionation of sigma 32 into the holoenzyme and free sigma suggests that RpoH113 sigma 32 has a lower binding affinity for core RNA polymerase than does wild-type sigma 32. The presence of wild-type sigma 70 exacerbates this defect. We suggest that the reduced ability of RpoH113 sigma 32 to compete with wild-type sigma 70 for core RNA polymerase explains the incompatibility between rpoH113 and rpoD+. The rpoH113 cells would have reduced amounts of sigma 32 holoenzyme and thus be unable to express sufficient amounts of the essential heat shock proteins to maintain viability.

We have investigated the sequence requirements for the translational regulation of sigma 32 by examining the behavior of a new rpoH-lacZ protein fusion containing a short N-terminal fragment of sigma 32 fused to beta-galactosidase. Although the fusion retains rpoH translational initiation signals, it lacks translational regulation, implicating coding sequences within rpoH in this regulatory process.

The Escherichia coli DnaK heat shock protein has been identified previously as a negative regulator of E. coli heat shock gene expression. We report that two other heat shock proteins, DnaJ and GrpE, are also involved in the negative regulation of heat shock gene expression. Strains carrying defective dnaK, dnaJ, or grpE alleles have enhanced synthesis of heat shock proteins at low temperature and fail to shut off the heat shock response after shift to high temperature. These regulatory defects are due to the loss of normal control over the synthesis and stability of sigma 32, the alternate RNA polymerase sigma-factor required for heat shock gene expression. We conclude that DnaK, DnaJ, and GrpE regulate the concentration of sigma 32. We suggest that the synthesis of heat shock proteins is controlled by a homeostatic mechanism linking the function of heat shock proteins to the concentration of sigma 32.

We have systematically assayed the in vivo promoter recognition properties of 13 mutations in rpoD, the gene that encodes the sigma 70 subunit of Escherichia coli RNA polymerase holoenzyme, using transcriptional fusions to 37 mutant and wild-type promoters. We found three classes of rpoD mutations: (1) mutations that suggest contacts between amino acid side-chains of sigma 70 and specific bases in the promoter; (2) mutations that appear to affect either sequence independent contacts to promoter DNA or isomerization of the polymerase; and (3) mutations that have little or no effect on promoter recognition. Our results lead us to suggest that a sequence near the C terminus of sigma 70, which is similar to the helix-turn-helix DNA binding motif of phage and bacterial DNA binding proteins, is responsible for recognition of the -35 region, and that a sequence internal to sigma 70, in a region which is highly conserved among sigma factors, recognizes the -10 region of the promoter. rpoD mutations that lie in the recognition helix of the proposed helix-turn-helix motif affect interactions with specific bases in the -35 region, while mutations in the upstream helix, which is thought to contact the phosphate backbone, have sequence-independent effect on promoter recognition.

Recombinant DNA techniques allow rapid construction and characterization of tools for genetic dissection of essential genes. In this report, we describe construction of a set of deletions in rpoD, the gene which encodes the sigma subunit of E. coli RNA polymerase. We used this deletion set to identify a region of the sigma polypeptide which is dispensable for its function.

The rpoD gene encoding the sigma subunit of E. coli RNA polymerase is cotranscribed with rpsU and dnaG, encoding ribosomal protein S21 and DNA primase, respectively. After temperature upshift, a heat shock promoter (Phs) located within dnaG is transiently induced, causing increased transcription of rpoD. The extent of induction is sufficient to account for the heat shock response of sigma synthesis. The initiation site of this promoter was located about 360 bp upstream of rpoD by promoter cloning and S1 nuclease mapping. Plasmid deletions generated with Bal 31 nuclease show that the DNA sequence CTGCCACCC in the -44 to -36 region of this promoter is necessary for its heat shock activity. Heat induction of transcription from Phs is under the control of HtpR, a positive regulator of the heat shock response.

The htpR gene of E. coli encodes a positive regulator of the heat-shock response. We have fused the htpR gene to the inducible PL promoter of phage lambda. Overproduction of HtpR following a temperature upshift resulted in the overexpression of heat-shock proteins. We describe the purification and initial in vitro characterization of the factor controlling expression of heat-shock genes. The factor was the 32 kd htpR gene product. In vitro, a mixture of HtpR and core RNA polymerase initiated transcription at heat-shock promoters. The sigma factor encoded by rpoD was not required for this reaction. Therefore, HtpR is a sigma factor that promotes transcription initiation at heat-shock promoters. We propose that htpR be renamed rpoH and that the gene product be called sigma-32.

The sigma subunit of E. coli RNA polymerase is encoded by the rpoD gene. Within the sequence upstream from rpoD, we have identified the structural genes rpsU and dnaG, which encode the 30S ribosomal protein S21 and DNA primase, respectively. The three genes are in the order rpsU, dnaG rpoD, and are all encoded by the same DNA strand. Analysis of in vivo transcripts from this region shows that these genes are all within the same operon. By correlating the 5' and 3' ends of in vivo transcripts with our DNA sequence, we have identified several regulatory features of the operon. These features include tandem promoters upstream from rpsU, a terminator between rpsU and dnaG, an RNA processing site separating dnaG and rpoD, and the operon terminator just downstream from rpoD. Immediately upstream of the operon promoters is an active promoter for an unidentified gene. We discuss the regulatory significance of the operon features and the biological significance of an operon encoding proteins essential for translation, replication and transcription.

The Escherichia coli strain, ts-rnp5, originally described in 1975 by G. D. Burdick and H. Berger, is shown to possess an RNA polymerase (RNA nucleotidyltransferase) sigma subunit with an activity 4--6 times less thermostable at 45 degrees than sigma from wild-type strains. This defect remains associated with the sigma polypeptide through a variety of purification stages, including renaturation of sigma after its elution from sodium dodecyl sulfate/polyacrylamide gels. The mutation responsible for decreased thermostability of sigma, called rpoD1, cotransduces with dnaG and therefore is located at about 66 min of the E. coli genetic map.

The Escherichia coli rpoH (htpR) gene product, sigma 32, is required for the normal expression of heat shock genes and for the heat shock response. We present experiments indicating a direct role for sigma 32 in controlling the heat shock response. Both the induction and decline in the synthesis of heat shock proteins can be controlled by changes in the rate of synthesis of sigma 32. Specifically, we show that: (1) sigma 32 is an unstable protein, degraded with a half-life of approximately 4 min; (2) increasing the rate of synthesis of sigma 32, by inducing expression from a Plac or Ptac-rpoH fusion, is sufficient to increase the rate of synthesis of heat shock proteins; (3) during the shut-off phase of the heat shock response synthesis of sigma 32 is repressed post-transcriptionally, and the dnaK756 mutation, which causes a defect in the shut-off phase, prevents the post-transcriptional repression of synthesis of sigma 32. These results serve as a basis for understanding the role of DnaK in the heat shock response, the regulation of sigma 32 synthesis, and the role of sigma 32 in controlling transcription of heat shock genes.

The rpoH gene of Escherichia coli encodes sigma 32, the 32-kD sigma-factor responsible for the heat-inducible transcription of the heat shock genes. rpoH is transcribed from at least three promoters. Two of these promoters are recognized by RNA polymerase containing sigma 70, the predominant sigma-factor. We purified the factor responsible for recognizing the third rpoH promoter (rpoH P3) and identified it as RNA polymerase containing a novel sigma-factor with an apparent Mr of 24,000. This new sigma, which we call sigma E, is distinct from the known sigma factors in molecular weight and promoter specificity. sigma E holoenzyme will not recognize the sigma 70- or sigma 32-controlled promoters we tested, but it does transcribe the htrA gene, which is required for viability at temperatures greater than 42 degrees C. The in vivo role of sigma E is not known. The transcripts from the sigma E-controlled rpoH P3 and htrA promoters are most abundant at very high temperature, suggesting the sigma E holoenzyme may transcribe a second set of heat-inducible genes that are involved in growth at high temperature or in thermotolerance.

Escherichia coli K-12 strain 285c contains a mutation in rpoD, the gene encoding the sigma subunit of RNA polymerase. The 70-kilodalton sigma polypeptide encoded by this allele is unstable, and this instability leads to temperature-sensitive growth. We describe the isolation and characterization of four temperature-resistant pseudorevertants of 285c that can grow at high temperature. Each of these revertants increased the stability of the sigma 70 mutant protein. The map position of the suppressor mutations was close to that of the rpoH (htpR) gene. A multicopy plasmid containing the intact rpoH gene restored the temperature-sensitive phenotype. Marker rescue experiments established the positions of three of the alleles within the rpoH gene. One mutation has been sequenced and causes a leucine-to-tryptophan change 7 amino acids from the carboxyl terminus of the rpoH gene product.

A transducing phage has been isolated with codes for the sigma subunit of Escherichia coli RNA polymerase. Transducing phage were selected from E. coli shotgun collections of HindIII or Sac I fragments cloned into Charon 25, a new bacteriophage lambda vector that is capble of forming lyosogens at high temperature. Transduction of an E. coli strain carrying a temperature-sensitive mutation in the sigma gene was used for the selection. The positions of restriction sites for Sac I, HindIII, Xho I, Bgl II, and Kpn I in the cloned bacterial DNA segments were determined. Phage containing the HindIII fragment complement both primase (dnaG) and sigma (rpoD) whereas those containing the Sac I fragment complement only sigma. Results of analyses of the proteins made both in vivo after infection of UV-irradiated cells and in vitro in a coupled transcription/translation system suggest that a Sac I site separates the promoter for sigma from the sigma structural gene. The direction of transcription of sigma was determined to be clockwise with respect to the E. coli genetic map.

An immediate 12-fold inhibition in the rate of beta-galactosidase synthesis occurs in Escherichia coli cells containing the mutant sigma allele rpoD800 after a shift to 42 degrees C. In the present study we characterize the nature of the inhibition. The severe inhibition of beta-galactosidase synthesis was partly relieved by cyclic AMP (cAMP). We inferred that the inhibition might be mediated by a decreased intracellular concentration of cAMP. Consistent with this inference, the rate of cAMP accumulation in mutant cells after a temperature upshift was depressed relative to that in wild-type cells. Glucose and chloramphenicol, two agents known to inhibit differentially beta-galactosidase mRNA synthesis, caused a similar inhibition in the rate of cAMP accumulation. Thus, three diverse stimuli, glucose, chloramphenicol, and a temperature-sensitive sigma mutation, appear to affect beta-galactosidase synthesis by regulating the synthesis of cAMP.

Escherichia coli K12 strains containing the mutant sigma allele rpoD800 are temperature-sensitive for growth. We have compared gene expression in isogenic rpoD+ and rpoD800 cells during steady-state growth and after temperature shift, in order to define the role of the sigma subunit in vivo. We have shown that sigma synthesis is regulated. After temperature shift-up, sigma behaves like other heat-shock proteins. The stimulation of sigma synthesis by heat shock is greater in mutant than in wild-type cells, possibly because the cell is responding to sigma limitation at high temperature by over-producing sigma. Mutant cells continue protein synthesis for a short time after shift-up and then shut off the synthesis of all proteins in response to the decreasing intracellular concentration of sigma. During the initial period of high protein synthesis, the relative expression of many proteins is changed in mutant cells. We argue that these changes are predominantly an indirect, rather than a direct effect of mutant sigma and are due to a change in the physiological state of mutant cells. Finally, we have shown that degradation of mutant sigma results in a decrease in synthesis of all major messenger RNA and stable RNA species. If other sigma factors are present in exponentially growing cells, they do not appear to be involved in a significant fraction of RNA synthesis.

The interaction of E sigma 32 with the groE promoter at temperatures between 0 degrees C and 37 degrees C was studied using DNase I footprinting and dimethyl sulfate methylation. Three distinct complexes were observed. At 0 degrees C E sigma 32 fully protected sequences between -60 and -5 from DNase I digestion on the top (non-template) strand of the promoter. At 16 degrees C the majority of the E sigma 32 promoter complexes had a DNase I footprint almost identical with that seen at 37 degrees C, protecting the DNA from about -60 to +20; however, little DNA strand separation had occurred, and the changes in sensitivity of guanine residues to dimethyl sulfate methylation caused by E sigma 32 differed from those seen at 37 degrees C. DNA strand separation, and changes in the pattern of protections from and enhancements of methylation by dimethyl sulfate to those characteristic of the open complex, occurred at temperatures between 16 degrees C and 27 degrees C. It is plausible to assume that these temperature-dependent isomerizations are analogous to the time-dependent sequence of intermediates on the pathway to open complex formation at 37 degrees C. Therefore we propose that the formation of an open complex by E sigma 32 at the groE promoter involves three classes of steps: E sigma 32 initially binds to the promoter in a closed complex (RPC1) in which the enzyme interacts with a smaller region of the DNA than in the open complex. E sigma 32 then isomerizes to form a second closed complex (RPC2) in which the enzyme interacts with the same region of the DNA as in the open complex. Finally, a process of local DNA denaturation (strand opening) leads to formation of the open complex (RPO).

We have isolated spontaneous temperature-resistant revertants of a temperature-sensitive mutation (rpoD800) in the sigma subunit of E. coli K12 RNA polymerase. These revertants still contained the rpoD800 allele. They were mucoid, and sensitive to ultraviolet light and the radiomimetic agent nitrofurantoin, which are characteristics of lon mutants. One revertant, Tr29, was mapped to the lon region of the chromosome. Lon- rpoD800 double mutants were constructed, and were phenotypically indistinguishable from the spontaneous temperature-resistant revertant. It is the degradation-deficient property of lon mutants that is responsible for the suppression of the temperature-sensitive phenotype. We show that the rpoD800 sigma polypeptide is a substrate for the ion proteolytic system, and that mutations in lon decrease the rate of mutant sigma degradation. The rate of synthesis of mutant sigma was also affected in lon- strains. The net effect of lon-mutations was to increase the concentration of mutant sigma. We conclude that the temperature-sensitive phenotype results from insufficient concentration, rather than altered function, of the mutant protein.

The DNase I protection pattern of E sigma 32 was assayed on three heat shock promoters, the E sigma 32 promoter for the groESL operon, P2 of the dnaKJ operon, and rpoD PHS, the E sigma 32 promoter upstream from rpoD. E sigma 32 protected each of these promoters from DNase I digestion from around -60 to around +20. Protection from dimethyl sulfate methylation was assayed at the groE promoter. E sigma 32 binding altered the sensitivity to methylation of bases in the vicinity of both the -10 and -35 regions. The DNase I footprints for the E sigma 32 promoters were very similar to the DNase I footprint of E sigma 70 on the lacUV5 promoter. After analyzing the DNase I footprints by taking into account the contacts predicted to be made by DNase I, it appeared that E sigma 32, like E sigma 70, contacts the DNA primarily on one face of the helix in the -35 region and on both faces in the -10 region.

The sigma subunits of bacterial RNA polymerases are required for the selective initiation of transcription. We have isolated and characterized mutations in rpoD, the gene which encodes the major form of sigma in E. coli, which affect the selectivity of transcription. These mutations increase the expression of araBAD up to 12-fold in the absence of CAP-cAMP. Expression of lac is unaffected, while expression of malT-activated operons is decreased. We determined the DNA sequence of 17 independently isolated mutations, and found that they consist of three different changes in a single CGC arginine codon at position 596 in the sigma polypeptide.

The expression of heat shock genes in Escherichia coli is controlled by the action of an alternate sigma-factor of RNA polymerase, sigma 32, which directs core RNA polymerase to recognize the promoters for heat shock genes. After a shift from 30 degrees C to 42 degrees C, both the level of sigma 32 and transcription initiation at heat shock promoters transiently increase, indicating that heat shock gene expression is regulated by changes in the concentration of sigma 32. Here, we report that heat shock gene expression is regulated by changes in the activity of sigma 32 under some conditions. Our results show that the transient repression of heat shock protein synthesis, which follows a shift down from 42 degrees C to 30 degrees, occurs as a result of decreased transcription initiation at heat shock promoters, but this repression is accompanied by only a small decrease in the level of sigma 32. In addition, the induction of heat shock proteins following overproduction of sigma 32 from a multicopy plasmid is only transient, despite the fact that the level of sigma 32 remains elevated. Constitutive overproduction of sigma 32 also fails to cause a proportionate increase in heat shock gene transcription. These three examples suggest that the activity of sigma 32 is reduced under conditions of excess heat shock gene expression.

Cells subjected to a heat shock, or a variety of other stresses increase the synthesis of a set of proteins, known as heat shock proteins. This response is apparently universal, occurring in the entire range from bacterial to mammalian cells. In Escherichia coli heat shock protein synthesis transiently increases following a shift from 30 degrees C to 42 degrees C as a result of changes in transcription initiation at heat shock promoters. Heat shock promoters are recognized by RNA polymerase containing a sigma factor of relative molecular mass (Mr) 32,000 (32K) E sigma 32 and not E sigma 70, the major form of RNA polymerase holoenzyme. To determine whether changes in the concentration of sigma 32 regulate this response, we measured the amount of sigma 32 before and after shift to high temperature and found that it increased transiently during heat shock as a result of changes in sigma 32 synthesis and stability. Our results indicate that sigma 32 is directly responsible for regulation of the heat shock response.

The product of the Escherichia coli rpoH (htpR) gene, sigma 32, is required for heat-inducible transcription of the heat shock genes. Previous studies on the role of sigma 32 in growth at low temperature and in gene expression involved the use of nonsense and missense rpoH mutations and have led to ambiguous or conflicting results. To clarify the role of sigma 32 in cell physiology, we have constructed loss-of-function insertion and deletion mutations in rpoH. Strains lacking sigma 32 are extremely temperature sensitive and grow only at temperatures less than or equal to 20 degrees C. There is no transcription from the heat shock promoters preceding the htpG gene or the groESL and dnaKJ operons; however, several heat shock proteins are produced in the mutants. GroEL protein is present in the rpoH null mutants, but its synthesis is not inducible by a shift to high temperature. The low-level synthesis of GroEL results from transcription initiation at a minor sigma 70-controlled promoter for the groE operon. DnaK protein synthesis cannot be detected at low temperature, but can be detected after a shift to 42 degrees C. The mechanism of this heat-inducible synthesis is not known. We conclude that sigma 32 is required for cell growth at temperatures above 20 degrees C and is required for transcription from the heat shock promoters. Several heat shock proteins are synthesized in the absence of sigma 32, indicating that there are additional mechanisms controlling the synthesis of some heat shock proteins.