Search

Background: Free silicone injection for breast augmentation, which became widespread in the 1960s and continues illicitly to this day, has well-known adverse effects. In this retrospective chart review of 14 patients treated for silicone mastitis from 1990 to 2002, we present our experience with the surgical management of patients with silicone mastitis., Methods: All the patients were women, ranging in age from 49 to 76 years old (mean age = 58.8). Patients presented to us a mean of 29.9 years after their free silicone breast injection. Treatment modalities were analyzed, and, specifically, methods of breast reconstruction involving autologous tissue transfers, implants, or a combination were evaluated., Results: The majority of patients (12 of 14) required mastectomies for extensive silicone-infiltrated tissues. The remaining two patients had focal areas of disease and were successfully treated with excision and local breast parenchyma flaps. Autologous reconstruction was performed with a total of 20 flaps, including 12 free transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous flaps, 4 free superior gluteal artery perforator (SGAP) flaps, and 4 pedicled latissimus dorsi (LD) flaps. Two patients had bilateral implant-based breast reconstruction., Conclusion: A variety of reconstructive options are available for patients presenting with silicone mastitis. Once an appropriate breast cancer workup has been performed, the surgical goal is to excise as much of the silicone-infiltrated tissues as possible before reconstruction. To our knowledge, this is the first reported series that incorporates the use of SGAP and LD flaps as a means of autologous tissue reconstruction for silicone-infiltrated breasts., Level of Evidence Iv: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Possible adverse effects of microbial organisms have been implicated in symptomatic silicone implant patients. In the literature, numerous authors have investigated the possible role of infection with respect to implant problems. To date, various bacterial species have been reported, including Staphylococcus aureus, Staphylococcus epidermidis, peptostreptococci, and Clostridium perfringens. Infections in polyurethane-coated prostheses also have been shown to prolong morbidity. Antibiotic use has been relatively empirical in this regard. The purpose of this study was, first, to determine the frequency, type, and clinical relevance of microbial colonization on implant surfaces removed from symptomatic patients and, second, to determine possible effects of microbial colonization on implant integrity (gel bleed, rupture). A total of 139 implants from 72 symptomatic patients were entered into the prospective clinical study between February of 1993 and July of 1994 at the UCLA Medical Center. The implant shell types included smooth (79 percent), polyurethane (8 percent), textured (7 percent), and smooth and Dacron (6 percent). The implant locations were subglandular (71 percent), submuscular (28 percent), and subcutaneous (1 percent). Of the 139 implants removed, 69 percent were intact and 31 percent were ruptured. Forty-seven percent of 139 implants were culture-positive. Propionibacterium acnes was isolated most frequently (57.5 percent), followed by Staphylococcus epidermidis (41 percent), and then Escherichia coli (1.5 percent). No fungal infections were identified. Culture positivity was not significantly associated with systemic symptoms. Sixty-seven percent of the positive culture implants were intact; 33 percent were ruptured. The frequency (47 percent) and types (P. acnes and S. epidermidis) of microbial colonization are determined in symptomatic silicone implant patients.

The current controversy surrounding the safety of silicone gel breast implants has resulted in an increasing number being removed. Although previous reports have suggested that remnants of the implant capsule are reabsorbed after explantation surgery, the persistence of the capsule in fact may be associated with implant fragments and silicone gel leakage. In this study we have used magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to identify residual silicone gel and silicone granulomas following the removal of silicone gel breast implants. Four representative clinical case reports are presented. These patients, who had residual silicone present in their bodies, presented to us with breast pain, palpable masses, or abnormal calcific mass densities apparent on a mammogram. High-resolution MRI images were found to be helpful in identifying local and remote collections of silicone gel, silicone granulomas, and residual capsules that were incompletely removed from previous explantation surgery. MRI breast images demonstrated high resolution and provided the accurate anatomical locations of residual silicone gel and silicone granulomas in all the regions of breast parenchyma, chest wall muscles, and axillae. Patients with persistent local symptoms following explantation surgery may benefit from an evaluation of the breast using MRI.

The current literature is reviewed, and four clinical cases of silicone-gel migration are reported. All 4 patients reported here had histories of closed capsulotomy, and all were symptomatic. Preoperative magnetic resonance imaging demonstrated the anatomical locations of silicone-gel migration into the chest wall muscles, axillae, and upper extremity. Intraoperative and pathological findings correlated with the presence of silicone-gel migration and granulomas in various anatomical regions. With the recent advances in diagnostic breast imaging of silicone-implant patients, intracapsular rupture can be identified. Implant removal may be indicated for intracapsular ruptures to prevent silicone-gel migration into parenchyma, chest wall muscles, axillae, and the upper extremity.

Objective: This study was designed to compare the three-point Dixon technique with our present MR protocol incorporating T2-weighted fast spin echo and fast spin echo with water suppression to detect ruptured silicone breast implants., Subjects and Methods: Eighty-two symptomatic women with silicone breast implants were examined with both the three-point Dixon technique and fast spin-echo MR sequences. Of these patients, 41 had surgery to remove their implants. Four radiologists reviewed the images from only those patients who had surgery and graded each for rupture by using a scale of 1-5. Receiver-operating-characteristic analysis was performed., Results: Of 81 implants removed, 18 were ruptured. Silicone implant ruptures were identified more frequently on the fast spin-echo sequence than on the three-point Dixon sequence, with areas under the ROC curves of .95 and .84, respectively. Although the difference was not statistically significant, the sensitivity for detecting silicone implant rupture was 89% for the fast spin-echo sequence and 61% for the three-point Dixon sequence. The specificity was 97% for both sequences., Conclusion: Silicone implant ruptures were detected more frequently with fast spin-echo MR sequences than with the three-point Dixon technique, although the difference was not significant. The greater spatial resolution used for the fast spin-echo sequence partially accounts for the difference in detection of implant ruptures in this study.

Purpose: To determine the most accurate imaging modality for detection of silicone implant ruptures., Materials and Methods: Forty single-lumen silicone implants were surgically placed in 20 rabbits. Each rabbit received one intact and one ruptured implant and was examined with mammography, magnetic resonance (MR) imaging, ultrasound (US), and computed tomography (CT). Five radiologists reviewed all images in a random fashion and graded each for rupture. The radiologist who performed US also graded her impression during examination with US. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed., Results: MR imaging and CT were the most accurate modalities in detection of implant ruptures, with areas under the ROC curves (Az) of .95 and .91. Mammography and US were statistically significantly inferior, with Az of .77 for each (P < .05)., Conclusion: MR imaging and CT are statistically more accurate than US and mammography for detection of intracapsular silicone implant ruptures when only the images are reviewed.

Purpose: To determine the value of breast ultrasonography (US) in the assessment of silicone breast implants for rupture., Materials and Methods: Seventy-four women with local or systemic symptoms related to silicone implants underwent breast US. Of these, 28 underwent surgical removal of the implants., Results: Of 57 implants removed, 37 were intact. The most reliable sign of an intact implant was an anechoic interior, although reverberation artifact and radical folds could be seen. Of 20 ruptured implants, 16 were intracapsular and four were extracapsular ruptures. The most reliable US sign of rupture was echogenic, horizontal ("stepladder") lines (14 of 20 ruptures). Two of the four extracapsular ruptures were accurately identified as echogenic nodules outside the implant; two were false-negative findings. Three intracapsular ruptures identified at US were false-positive; six were false-negative. Overall sensitivity for rupture was 70%, specificity was 92%, positive predictive value was 82%, and negative predictive value was 85%., Conclusion: Breast US is capable of depicting intracapsular and extracapsular rupture of breast implants.

This study was designed to evaluate pulse sequences and patient positioning for MR imaging of silicone breast implants in patients. One hundred forty-three patients (281 silicone implants) underwent imaging over a 21-month period. The combination of a T2-weighted fast spin echo technique (SE), T2-weighted fast SE with water suppression, and T1-weighted SE with fat suppression is recommended to reliably differentiate silicone from other breast tissues and to identify intracapsular and extracapsular ruptures or leaks. Seventy of the 143 patients underwent removal of their silicone implants. The sensitivity for detection of silicone implant rupture was 76%, with a specificity of 97%. Positioning the patient prone improved image quality.