Search

The aim of this study was to develop and validate a UHPLC-MS/MS assay to quantify cyclosporin (CYC), tacrolimus (TAC), sirolimus (SIR) and everolimus (EVE) in human whole blood for therapeutic drug monitoring. Analytes were extracted from 50 μL human whole blood by protein precipitation. The separation of the drugs was performed on an Acquity UPLC BEH C18 column. Analytes were eluted with a mobile phase consisting of 2 mM ammonium acetate with 0.1% formic acid (v/v) in deionised water and 2 mM ammonium acetate with 0.1% formic acid (v/v) in methanol at a flow rate of 300 μL/min in gradient elution. The method performance was evaluated by analysing patient blood samples and/or external quality control samples [proficiency testing (PT) scheme]. The method was linear from 23.75 to 1094.0, 1.3 to 42.4, 1.3 to 47.0 and 1.2-41.6 μg/mL for CYC, TAC, SIR and EVE, respectively. The within- and between-assay reproducibility results were ˂ 11%. Results from PT and patient sample quantification were comparable to those obtained previously by an in-house validated method using protein precipitation and liquid-liquid extraction. This method showed good analytical performance for quantifying CYC, TAC, SIR and EVE in whole blood over their respective calibration ranges., (© 2021 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.)

Background: Therapeutic drug monitoring of the immunosuppressants tacrolimus, sirolimus, everolimus, and cyclosporine A is effectively performed by analyzing whole-blood samples using liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry. Samples are usually prepared using simple protein precipitation (PPT) with methanol and zinc sulfate (ZnSO4). Significant sample dilution is necessary to obtain clean extracts but may increase the limit of quantification of the method. Salting out-assisted liquid-liquid extraction (SALLE) was explored as a novel sample preparation method for measuring these drugs in blood., Method: SALLE, which simply consists of LLE with a water-miscible solvent where phase separation is achieved by adding salt, was used to analyze treated blood samples., Results: SALLE allowed direct injection of a 5-µL extract from the upper solvent phase into a reversed phase LC column, which would not be feasible using standard LLE. Compared with PPT, SALLE provided better extraction efficiencies and more ion enhancement, resulting in limit of quantification of 0.4, 1.4, 0.06, and 0.4 ng/mL for tacrolimus, sirolimus, everolimus, and cyclosporine A, respectively. Full-method validation was performed, including a comparison of results with those of another laboratory. A ≤10% bias was observed for tacrolimus and cyclosporine A, whereas further investigation of that for sirolimus (-12%) and everolimus (-18%) revealed that it was caused by the different calibrators used., Conclusions: This is the first report of the use of SALLE for the measurement of tacrolimus, sirolimus, everolimus, and cyclosporine A in whole blood. The advantages of SALLE over PPT and conventional LLE would make it an attractive sample preparation method for clinical laboratories.

An isotope dilution LC-MS/MS based candidate reference measurement procedure for the quantification of cyclosporine A, tacrolimus, sirolimus and everolimus in human whole blood is presented to be used for evaluation and standardization of routine assays applied for therapeutic drug monitoring. The assay allows baseline separation of the four immunosuppressive drugs within a total runtime of 9 minutes using a C4 reversed phase column. Sample preparation is based on protein precipitation with zinc sulphate followed by purification with solid phase extraction. Reference materials used in this reference measurement procedure were characterized by qNMR and an absolute content of analytes calculated to guarantee traceability to SI units. As internal standards the corresponding deuterated and 13 C-labelled analytes were used. The method allows the measurement of cyclosporine A in the range of 5 ng/mL to 2100 ng/mL; tacrolimus, sirolimus and everolimus were analysed in the range of 0.25 ng/mL to 50 ng/mL. Imprecision for inter-day measurements were found to be ≤3.5% for cyclosporine A and ≤4.4% for tacrolimus, sirolimus and everolimus. Accuracy was found to be within 101% and 108% for cyclosporine A and between 95% and 104% for the macrolide compounds. The uncertainty was evaluated according to the GUM. Expanded measurement uncertainties were found to be ≤7.2% for cyclosporine A, ≤6.8% for tacrolimus, ≤9.0% for sirolimus and ≤8.9% for everolimus (k = 2)., (Copyright © 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

According to the standard ISO 15189 clinical routine laboratories shall estimate measurement uncertainty (MU) of patient results of their provided measurands. Up to now there was no accepted description on how to perform. Recently, the ISO technical standard ISO/TS 20914 was published giving a practical guide for uncertainty estimation. The immunosuppressive drugs Everolimus, Ciclosporin, Sirolimus and Tacrolimus have narrow therapeutic windows. Hence, their MU should be considered for deducing clinical decisions. Here, a pathway is presented in detail on how to estimate MU measuring immunosuppressants using a widespread CE certified assay via LC-MS/MS technology. Namely, the expanded measurement uncertainties are from 13% to 27% depending on analyte and concentration. The calculation based on n  > 2000 measurements each of four control levels within one year. Lower uncertainties were observed if the material was native pooled blood (13% to 17%, n  > 300 measurements, one year).

Background: The mechanistic target of rapamycin inhibitors everolimus and sirolimus have activity against multiple manifestations of tuberous sclerosis complex and are approved to treat astrocytomas, angiomyolipomas, lymphangioleiomyomatosis, and epilepsy. Cannabidiol is a novel antiepileptic medication. There is lack of information regarding drug-drug interactions between mechanistic target of rapamycin inhibitors and cannabidiol in clinical practice., Methods: We reviewed patients with tuberous sclerosis complex who were treated with a mechanistic target of rapamycin inhibitor (everolimus, sirolimus) and cannabidiol. Clinical information, mechanistic target of rapamycin inhibitor and cannabidiol dosing, concomitant antiepileptic drugs, as well as laboratory and adverse events were reviewed before and after initiation of cannabidiol., Results: A total of 25 patients were treated with cannabidiol and a mechanistic target of rapamycin inhibitor (18 everolimus, seven sirolimus). All mechanistic target of rapamycin inhibitor levels were drawn as troughs. Levels were significantly higher in 76% patients after cannabidiol treatment (P = 0.0003). Median change from baseline was +9.8 ng/mL for everolimus and +5.1 ng/mL for sirolimus. Adverse events occurred in 40%, with diarrhea being the most frequent adverse event occurring in three patients. No severe adverse events occurred during the treatment period., Conclusions: Cannabidiol resulted in increased serum levels of everolimus and/or sirolimus. Some patients experienced doubling or tripling of their mechanistic target of rapamycin inhibitor trough following the addition of cannabidiol. In some cases, this resulted in clinical toxicity, as well as laboratory abnormalities. Awareness of this interaction can lead clinicians to evaluate serum levels and other safety laboratory studies more closely, and thereby avoid potentially significant adverse effects. In patients known to be prone to mechanistic target of rapamycin inhibitor toxicity, preemptive reduction in dose may be warranted upon initiation of cannabidiol., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background Monitoring of immunosuppressive drugs such as everolimus and sirolimus is important in allograft rejection prevention in transplant patients. Dried blood spots (DBS) sampling gives patients the opportunity to sample a drop of blood from a fingerprick at home, which can be sent to the laboratory by mail. Methods A total of 39 sirolimus and 44 everolimus paired fingerprick DBS and whole blood (WB) samples were obtained from 60 adult transplant patients for method comparison using Passing-Bablok regression. Bias was assessed using Bland-Altman. Two validation limits were pre-defined: limits of analytical acceptance were set at >67% of all paired samples within 20% of the mean of both samples and limits of clinical relevance were set in a multidisciplinary team at >80% of all paired samples within 15% of the mean of both samples. Results For both sirolimus and everolimus, Passing-Bablok regression showed no differences between WB and DBS with slopes of 0.86 (95% CI slope, 0.72-1.02) and 0.96 (95% CI 0.84-1.06), respectively. Only everolimus showed a significant constant bias of 4%. For both sirolimus and everolimus, limits of analytical acceptance were met (76.9% and 81.8%, respectively), but limits or clinical relevance were not met (77.3% and 61.5%, respectively). Conclusions Because pre-defined limits of clinical relevance were not met, this DBS sampling method for sirolimus and everolimus cannot replace WB sampling in our center at this time. However, if the clinical setting is compatible with less strict limits for clinical relevance, this DBS method is suitable for clinical application.

Background: Many studies demonstrate the relationship between the high intrapatient variability of calcineurin inhibitor (CNI) levels and poor long-term renal graft outcome. Our objective is to analyze the intrapatient variability observed in the mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors (mTOR-i) blood levels, to compare the variability of sirolimus (SRL) with that of everolimus (EVL) in kidney transplant patients converted to an mTOR-i, and to analyze whether the coefficient of variation (CV) was correlated with long-term graft survival., Methods: We analyzed 279 adult renal transplant patients converted to an mTOR-i. CV was calculated using at least 3 blood trough levels between 3 and 18 months postconversion., Results: The mean and median CV of the entire group was 25.54% and 23.7%, respectively. SRL and EVL mean CV was 23.8% and 27.1% (P = .03), respectively. The group of patients into the last tertile with CV> 28.52% presented a lower death-censored graft survival (75.26% vs. 93.01%, P < .0001) with a mean follow-up of 66.5 months., Conclusion: The CV of mTOR-i is correlated with long-term renal graft survival, so it should be considered a prognostic factor. SRL has a lower CV than EVL in renal transplant patients converted to mTOR-i in the stable posttransplant phase., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Few years ago, it was proposed that everolimus blood levels could be determined with the commercially available sirolimus chemiluminescence magnetic microparticle immunoassay (CMIA). More recently, a highly specific microsphere system (QMS) has been approved by FDA for therapeutic drug monitoring in humans. Aim of the present study was to compare the results of everolimus assay performed with everolimus QMS and with sirolimus CMIA. The two methods were compared with Passing-Bablok regression and Bland-Altman plot analysis. The Passing-Bablok regression analysis showed that although the results obtained with the two techniques were significantly correlated, CMIA-measured differed from QMS-measured everolimus concentrations by both a systematic and a proportional error. Specifically, at blood levels lower than 5 ng/mL CMIA were lower than QMS-measured everolimus concentrations. On the opposite, at everolimus blood concentrations higher than 10 ng/mL CMIA-estimated values became progressively higher than QMS-measured everolimus concentrations. The analysis of the Bland Altman plot showed a less than optimal agreement of the two tests (5.59% of the data point outside the ±1.96 SD interval). Moreover, the relationship between the difference between Evero QMS and Evero CMIA and their average was clearly concentration dependent with positive and negative values at concentration values lower and higher than 5 ng/mL respectively. In conclusion, our finding showed that the values of everolimus concentrations measured with sirolimus CMIA differ from those detected with the FDA-approved everolimus QMS further suggesting that sirolimus CMIA should not be used anymore for everolimus therapeutic drug monitoring.

Coated Blade Spray (CBS) is a technology that efficiently integrates sample preparation and direct coupling to mass spectrometry (MS) on a single device. In this article, we present CBS-tandem mass spectrometry (CBS-MS/MS) as a novel tool for the rapid and simultaneous determination of four commonly used immunosuppressive drugs (ISDs) in whole blood: tacrolimus (TAC) and cyclosporine-A (CycA), which are calcineurin inhibitors; and sirolimus (SIR) and everolimus (EVR), which are both mTOR (mechanistic target of rapamycin) inhibitors. Given that CBS extracts via free concentration, analytes that are largely bound to plasma proteins or red blood cells provide considerably lower extraction recovery rates. Therefore, we defy the solventless philosophy of SPME-based techniques, like CBS, by performing the analyte-enrichment step via direct immersion in a solvent-modified matrix. The assay was linear within the evaluated range of concentrations (between 1 and 100 ng/mL for EVR/SIR/TAC and 10-1000 ng/mL for CycA), and the limits of quantification were determined to be 10 ng/mL for CycA and 1 ng/mL for EVR/SIR/TAC. Good accuracy (87-119%) and linearity (r 2  ≥ 0.99) were attained over the evaluated range for all ISDs. Interassay imprecision (CV) determined from incurred sample reanalysis was ≤10% for all ISDs. Our method was validated using Liquichek™ whole blood immunosuppressant quality control (QC) standards purchased from Bio-Rad. Concentrations determined by CBS-MS/MS were inside the range specified by Bio-Rad and within 15% of the expected mean value for all ISDs at all QC levels. Furthermore, the effect of different hematocrit levels (20, 45, and 70%) in the entire calibration range was carefully studied. No statistical differences (RSD ≤ 7%) in the calibration curve slopes of ISDs in blood were observed. CBS offers a simpler workflow than that of traditional methods; it eliminates the need for chromatographic separation and provides a clean extract that allows for long-term MS instrumental operation with minimal maintenance. Additionally, because CBS integrates all analytical steps into one device, it eliminates the risk of instrumental carry-over and can be used as a low-cost disposable device for sample preparation and analysis. Fully-automated sample preparation simplifies the method and allows for total analysis times as short as 3 min with turn-around times of less than 90 min., (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: Liquid chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) utilizing triple-quadrupole instruments has been widely used for quantification of endogenous compounds, drugs or metabolites in clinical laboratories. In contrast, high-resolution mass spectrometry (HRMS) is typically used for compound identification due to its limited dynamic range. Recently HRMS instruments with enhanced linear dynamic range have become available. The aim of this study was to evaluate HRMS for fast quantitative applications in a clinical laboratory., Methods: A high throughput UPLC-TOF-MS assay for simultaneous quantification of cyclosporin A, tacrolimus, sirolimus and everolimus was developed. All immunosuppressants were analyzed as sodium adducts in TOF-only mode using an Agilent 6540 Q-TOF system. Extracted ion chromatograms of analytes and internal standards were created from full-scan data. The assay was evaluated and compared to an established LC-MS/MS assay according to CLSI recommendations., Results: The novel HRMS assay has a total run time of 3 min. The assay is linear in a clinical relevant concentration range for all four immunosupressants. Method correlations vs. established LC-MS/MS assay were between R2=0.99 and R2=0.97. Total coefficients of variation (CVT) ranges were 4.5%-6.4% (tacrolimus), 7.4%-8.0% (sirolimus), 8.0%-8.8% (everolimus) and 6.1%-7.4% (cyclosporine A) for three relevant concentration levels each., Conclusions: High resolution TOF-MS and LC-MS/MS show equivalent quantitative performance for monitoring of cyclosporin A, tacrolimus, sirolimus and everolimus. HRMS has the potential to replace conventional LC-MS/MS in clinical laboratories because it simplifies assay development (no optimization of fragmentations and product ions necessary) and its full-scan data can provide additional information.

Measurement of whole blood sirolimus and everolimus is required in order to optimize patient treatment following solid organ transplant. Assay by LC-MS/MS is increasingly preferred; however efficient use of the instrument and short turnaround times are crucial. Use of a 1.6 µm solid-core packing HPLC column (Cortecs) gave significant increases in efficiency, sensitivity and throughput compared with an existing method, following simple protein precipitation of small-volume (20 μL) whole blood samples. Sirolimus, everolimus and the stable isotopic internal standard ((13) C2 D4 - everolimus) eluted at around 0.8 min, and total analytical run time was 2.2 min, saving almost 4 min per sample compared with an existing method. Within-assay imprecision (CV) was 3.3-8.5%, and between-assay imprecision was 2.2-10.8%. Retrospective assay of external quality assurance samples and comparison of patient samples assayed in parallel showed only small differences (between +6.8 and -1.9%) in results using the Cortecs column when compared with the existing method. No significant interferences or ion suppression were observed. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., (Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.)