Search

Background: Microscopic residual disease (MRD) after surgery can be a challenging situation in cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (CSCC) and there is a lack of evidence concerning its management., Objective: To evaluate the prognosis of CSCC with MRD and the usefulness of postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) in CSCC with MRD., Methods: Retrospective cohort study of CSCC with MRD through a 10-year period (2010-2019) (n = 244). Disease-free survival and event-free survival were assessed using R (v.3.4.1), considering competing risks. Evaluated outcomes were local recurrence (LR), nodal metastases (NMs), and disease-specific death (DSD)., Results: Median age was 88y (IQR: 10.5). A total of 145 (59.43%) were men and 69 (28.28%) were immunosuppressed. Median tumour diameter and thickness were 19 and 6.4 mm (IQR 11 and 5.5 mm). Patients treated by re-excision had a relapse rate of 4.3% compared with 11.30% and 29.71% in those who received PORT and observation (P = 0.045). The use of PORT was associated with a lower risk of LR compared with observation (HR = 0.206 [0.049-0.859], P = 0.030), but not with a lower risk of NMs or DSDs. In the multivariable models, PORT was again associated with a lower risk of LR than observation (HR = 0.167 [0.039-0.708], P = 0.014), but not with lower risk of metastasis and death., Conclusions: We always should try to obtain clear margins after surgery. PORT improves local control in CSCC with MRD, but when administered to the tumour bed, it does not reduce the risk of NM and DSD., (© 2022 European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology.)

Background: Although the eighth edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system (AJCC8) provides improved prognosis stratification of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (CSCC) over AJCC7, T3 has a variable prognosis., Objective: To define prognostic subgroups in T3-AJCC8 CSCC., Methods: Retrospective cohort study of 196 primary T3-AJCC8 CSCCs. We conducted multidimensional scaling analysis using the 6 risk factors that define T3 CSCCs. The prognoses of the groups obtained were analyzed by means of competing risk analysis., Results: Group 1 was characterized by a tumor thickness greater than 6 mm (without invasion beyond the subcutaneous fat), alone or in combination with a tumor width of at least 4 cm. Group 2 was characterized by the presence of either invasion beyond the subcutaneous fat or by the involvement of nerves (≥0.1 mm, or deeper than the dermis). Group 3 was characterized by the combination of both T3b risk factors, or of 3 or more risk factors. Group 3 (tentatively named T3c) patients had the worst prognosis for disease-specific poor outcome events and major events, Group 2 (T3b) had intermediate risk, and Group 1 (T3a) had the best prognosis (disease-specific poor outcome events: hazard ratio [HR], 1.94; P = .00009; major events: HR, 2.55; P = .00001; disease-specific death: HR, 10.25; P = .0009)., Limitations: Retrospective study., Conclusions: There is statistically significant evidence that T3-AJCC8 may be classified into distinct prognostic subgroups., (Copyright © 2020 American Academy of Dermatology, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Perineural invasion (PNI) is a feature of poor prognosis in cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (CSCC). The benefit of postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) in the management of CSCC with PNI is still not well established., Objectives: We aimed to evaluate the usefulness of PORT in the treatment of CSCC with PNI so as to determine which patients would best benefit from this type of treatment., Methods: A retrospective multicenter cohort of 110 CSCCs with PNI was evaluated. Eighteen recurrent cases were excluded for subsequent analysis. We searched for the types of PNI associated with poor outcome and analysed the effectiveness of PORT on different groups of CSCC with PNI. We also assessed for the usefulness of PORT depending on the surgical margin status (either clear or positive)., Results: Postoperative radiotherapy showed clear benefit over observation in CSCC with PNI and positive margins after surgery, where the management by observation increased the risk of poor outcome events 2.43 times (P = 0.025), and especially in those with positive margins and PNI ≥0.1 mm, where the risk of poor prognosis is eight times greater following a management by observation (P = 0.0065). Multivariate competing risk analysis preserved statistical significance., Conclusions: The use of PORT on patients with CSCC with PNI and positive margins after surgery, especially in PNI ≥0.1 mm, significantly improves long-term outcome. The benefit of PORT in cases with clear margins is not as evident, especially in those with PNI of small-calibre nerves. Clinical trials are imperative., (© 2019 European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology.)