Search

This article, titled "Artificial Intelligence in Skull Base Surgery: A Scoping Review," examines the use of artificial intelligence (AI) in the field of skull base surgery. The authors conducted a systematic review of relevant articles published between January 2018 and September 2023. They found that AI is being increasingly utilized in skull base surgery, particularly for diagnostic and prognostic purposes. The majority of the studies focused on radiomics, with MRI being the most common imaging modality used. However, there are still many areas within skull base surgery that have not been explored with AI and warrant further investigation. [Extracted from the article]

The article discusses the versatility of the SPIWAY, an endonasal access guide (EAG) used in surgery. The SPIWAY is a stent that can be placed in the nasal cavity to provide access during endoscopic endonasal surgery. The study includes a retrospective review of cases, a cadaveric model, and a literature review to demonstrate the various uses of the SPIWAY. The article highlights the advantages of the SPIWAY, such as reducing aerosol spread, improving efficiency, and preventing tumor spillage. Overall, the SPIWAY is a useful tool in facilitating access in different surgical approaches within the head and neck. [Extracted from the article]

Background  There is little data regarding postoperative outcomes of patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) undergoing skull base surgery. The purpose of this study is to determine an association between risk factors and proximity of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak to surgery in patients with OSA undergoing endoscopic skull base surgery. Methods  A retrospective review of neurosurgical inpatients, with and without OSA, at a tertiary care institution from 2002 to 2015 that experienced a postoperative CSF leak after undergoing endoscopic skull base surgery. Results  Forty patients met inclusion criteria, 12 (30%) with OSA. OSA patients had significantly higher body mass index (BMI; median 39.4 vs. 31.7, p  < 0.01) and were more likely to have diabetes (41.7 vs. 10.7%, p  = 0.04) than non-OSA patients; otherwise there were no significant differences in clinical comorbidities. No patients restarted positive pressure ventilation (PPV) in the inpatient setting. The type of repair was not a significant predictor of the time from surgery to leak. Patients with OSA experienced postoperative CSF leak 49% sooner than non-OSA patients (Hazard Ratio 1.49, median 2 vs. 6 days, log-rank p  = 0.20). Conclusion  Patients with OSA trended toward leaking earlier than those without OSA, and no OSA patients repaired with a nasoseptal flap (NSF) had a leak after postoperative day 5. Due to a small sample size this trend did not reach significance. Future studies will help to determine the appropriate timing for restarting PPV in this high risk population. This is important given PPV's significant benefit to the patient's overall health and its ability to lower intracranial pressure. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Olfactory nerve fibers are at risk of injury during transnasal endoscopic skull‐base approaches. Olfactory outcomes for various techniques have not been thoroughly investigated. This study aims to report long‐term olfactory outcomes when a cold knife upper septal limb incision technique is used compared to monopolar cautery. Methods: A prospective cohort study was performed at a tertiary referral center. Adult patients undergoing endoscopic approaches with septal incisions were randomized to cold knife or monopolar cautery groups. Patient demographics, clinical history, surgical data, and outcomes were collected. Preoperative, 3‐month, and 12‐month postoperative scores on the University of Pennsylvania Smell Inventory Test (UPSIT) and 22‐item Sino‐Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT‐22) were measured. Fisher's exact tests were performed for categorical variables and t tests were performed for continuous variables. Results: Twenty‐two (22) patients (10 cold knife, 12 cautery) were enrolled between March 2016 and August 2017. The average age ± standard deviation was 50.2 ± 14.0 years (p = 0.59), 54% (p = 0.69) were female, and the primary pathology was pituitary adenoma (73%, p = 1.00). Preoperative, 3‐month, and 12‐month postoperative UPSIT scores were similar between the cold knife and cautery groups (32.8 vs 32.4, p = 0.80; 33.1 vs 33.0, p = 0.96; 33.6 vs 33.3, p = 0.84). On the "sense of smell/taste" question of the SNOT‐22, there was also no difference at all time points (p > 0.22). Conclusion: There was no significant change in patient UPSIT scores 1 year after transnasal skull‐base approaches, and no short‐term or long‐term differences between cold knife and cautery upper septal limb incision techniques. Our study supports an individualized approach based on surgeon preference. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]