Search

There is a paucity of data examining the prognostic significance of untreated obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) in hemodynamically stable patients with acute pulmonary embolism (PE). This prospective cohort study enrolled consecutive non-hypotensive patients with acute PE who underwent an overnight sleep study within 48 h after diagnosis. The patients were divided into 2 groups based on apnea-hypopnea index (AHI): OSA (AHI ≥15) and non-OSA (AHI <15) groups. The study used a composite of fatal or nonfatal cardiovascular events, including PE-related death, other cardiovascular deaths, clinical deterioration requiring an escalation of treatment, recurrent venous thromboembolism, acute myocardial infarction, or stroke within 30-days after the diagnosis of PE as the primary outcome. Between January 1, 2018, and December 31, 2020, 283 eligible patients were prospectively enrolled in 2 academic hospitals, of whom 268 patients completed a sleep study within 7 days of PE diagnosis. OSA was found in 47% (95% confidence interval [CI], 41 to 54%) of patients. The primary outcome occurred in 13 (4.9%) patients within 30-days after the diagnosis of PE. The crude incidence of the composite was not significantly different in the OSA than the non-OSA group (30-day estimate, 6.3% versus 3.5%; P = 0.30). OSA did not significantly predict the incidence of the primary outcome after adjustment for age, sex, body mass index, systolic blood pressure, heart rate, and oxygen saturation (adjusted hazard ratio, 2.15; 95% confidence interval, 0.67-6.87). In this study, untreated OSA was not a significant multivariable predictor of adverse cardiovascular events in patients with acute PE., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background:  In patients with pulmonary embolism (PE), there is a lack of comprehensive data on the prevalence and prognostic significance of pre-existing obstructive sleep apnea (OSA)., Methods:  In this study of patients with PE from the Registro Informatizado de la Enfermedad TromboEmbólica (RIETE) registry, we assessed the prevalence of OSA, and the association between pre-existing OSA and the outcomes of all-cause mortality, PE-related mortality, recurrences, and major bleeding over 30 days after initiation of PE treatment. Additionally, we also examined rates of outcomes within 90 days and 1 year following the diagnosis of PE., Results:  Of 4,153 patients diagnosed with PE, 241 (5.8%; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 5.1-6.6%) had pre-existing OSA. Overall, 166 (4.0%; 95% CI: 3.4-4.6%) died during the first 30 days of follow-up. In multivariable analysis, the OSA syndrome was not a significant predictor of death from any cause (odds ratio [OR]: 1.5; 95% CI: 0.8-2.9; p  = 0.19). However, patients with pre-existing OSA had an increased PE-specific mortality (adjusted OR: 3.0; 95% CI: 1.3-6.8; p  = 0.01) compared with those without OSA. OSA was not significantly associated with 30-day recurrent venous thromboembolism (adjusted OR: 0.6; 95% CI: 0.1-4.7; p  = 0.65) or major bleeds (adjusted OR: 1.0; 95% CI: 0.4-2.2; p  = 1.0). Findings were similar at 90-day and 1-year follow-ups., Conclusion:  In patients presenting with PE, pre-existing OSA is relatively infrequent. Patients with OSA were at increased risk of PE-related mortality when compared with those without OSA., Competing Interests: B.B. reports that he is a consulting expert, on behalf of plaintiff, in litigation related to a specific type of IVC filters. The current study is the idea of the investigators and not performed at the request of a third party., (Thieme. All rights reserved.)

Background: There is some controversy about the effect of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) on the incidence of cardiovascular events (CVE). However, the incidence of CVE among patients with both obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) ans resistant hypertension (HR) has not been evaluated. Our objective was to analyze the long-term effect of CPAP treatment in patients with RH and OSA on the incidence of CVE., Methods: Multi-center, observational and prospective study of patients with moderate-severe OSA and RH. All the patients were followed up every 3-6 months and the CVE incidence was measured. Patients adherent to CPAP (at least 4h/day) were compared with those with not adherent or those who had not been prescribed CPAP., Results: Valid data were obtained from 163 patients with 64 CVE incidents. Treatment with CPAP was offered to 82%. After 58 months of follow-up, 58.3% of patients were adherent to CPAP. Patients not adherent to CPAP presented a non-significant increase in the total CVE incidence (HR:1.6; 95%CI: 0.96-2.7; p=0.07). A sensitivity analysis showed that patients not adherent to CPAP had a significant increase in the incidence of cerebrovascular events (HR: 3.1; CI95%: 1.07-15.1; p=0.041) and hypertensive crises (HR: 5.1; CI95%: 2.2-11.6; p=0.006), but the trend went in the opposite direction with respect to coronary events (HR: 0.22; CI95%: 0.05-1.02; p=0.053)., Conclusions: In patients with RH and moderate-severe OSA, an uneffective treatment with CPAP showed a trend toward an increase in the incidence of CVE (particularly neurovascular events and hypertensive crises) without any changes with respect to coronary events., (Copyright © 2021. Publicado por Elsevier España, S.L.U.)

Introduction: Short-term treatment with continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) produces a clinically significant reduction in blood pressure (BP) in patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and resistant hypertension. However, it is unknown whether this effect continues over the long-term. Our objective was to assess the effect of long-term CPAP on BP in patients with OSA and resistant hypertension., Methods: The study included 161 patients diagnosed with both OSA [apnea--hypopnea index (AHI) ≥15] and resistant hypertension diagnosed via 24-hour ambulatory BP measurement (24-h ABPM), in whom a second analysis via 24-h ABPM was performed at the end of the follow-up., Results: Patients were followed up within 59 months [interquartile range (IQR): 44-70]. CPAP treatment was prescribed to 82% of the patients (70% with good adherence to CPAP defined as use of CPAP at least 4 h/night). A comparison between the adherent group and nonadherent group (including those with CPAP not prescribed) showed that CPAP adherents had a significant drop in the 24-h BP, both systolic [-3.9 mmHg; 95% confidence interval (CI): -8.1 to 0.3] and diastolic pressure (-3.5 mmHg [95% [CI]: -6.4-0.5]), with a higher magnitude during the night (-5.5 and -4.9 mmHg, respectively). The CPAP adherent group needed a mean of 1.1 less antihypertensive drugs (particularly spironolactone). Finally, there was a positive correlation between the drop in 24-h SBP and the hours of CPAP use (r = 0.24; P = 0.01)., Conclusion: Good adherence to long-term CPAP treatment largely succeeded in significantly reducing BP in those patients with OSA and resistant hypertension, despite the use of a lower number of antihypertensive drugs., (Copyright © 2020 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Rationale: Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) can significantly reduce blood pressure (BP) levels in patients with resistant hypertension and sleep apnea (OSA); however, the effect on patients with refractory hypertension (RfH) is not known. This study seeks to evaluate the effect of CPAP treatment on BP levels in patients with OSA and RfH, compared with those with OSA and resistant hypertension., Methods: Post-hoc analysis of the HIPARCO randomized clinical trial on the effect of CPAP treatment on BP levels in patients with resistant hypertension. Those patients with uncontrolled 24-h ambulatory BP monitoring readings (>130 and/or >80 mmHg) in SBP or DBP were considered to have resistant hypertension (if they were taking three or four antihypertensive drugs) or RfH (if they were taking at least five drugs). OSA patients were randomized to receive CPAP or usual care for 3 months. They underwent a second 24-h ambulatory BP monitoring study to establish the effect of CPAP treatment on BP levels in both groups., Results: A total of 98 patients were randomized to CPAP (19 RfH/79 resistant hypertension) and 96 to usual care (21 RfH/75 resistant hypertension). BP readings dropped more marked in patients with RfH than resistant hypertension, in both 24-h SBP (-9 vs. -1.6 mmHg, P = 0.021) and 24-h DBP (-7.3 vs. -2.3 mmHg, P = 0.074), especially at night (-11.3 vs. -3.8, P = 0.121 and -8.8 vs. -2.2, P = 0.054) respectively. Adjusted difference between groups was statistically significant in 24-h SBP levels (-7.4 mmHg, P = 0.021)., Conclusion: CPAP lowers BP levels in both resistant hypertension and RfH patients although the degree of this reduction is higher in those with RfH especially during the night.

Obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) and pulmonary embolism (PE) remain major health issues worldwide. Data from pathophysiological studies suggest that both intermittent hypoxia and sleep fragmentation are associated with increased blood coagulability, endothelial dysfunction and venous stasis. There is growing evidence that OSA is potentially prevalent in and a risk factor for PE. Conversely, patients with acute PE have two to four times greater risk of moderate-to-severe OSA. The role of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) treatment in improving clinically meaningful outcomes in PE patients remains unclear, although some authors have suggested that CPAP could improve the hypercoagulability state and normalise circadian alterations in some of the coagulation molecules, as observed in patients with OSA. Emerging research highlights the complex interdependent relationships between OSA and PE, emphasising the need for rigorous, well-powered trials that address the impact of OSA and its treatment on the prevention and management of PE. Undoubtedly, these will require closer collaboration between the sleep medicine and clinical/venous thromboembolism communities., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest: A. García-Ortega has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: E. Mañas has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: R. López-Reyes has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: M.J. Selma has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: A. García has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: G. Oscullo has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: D. Jiménez has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: M.Á. Martínez-García has nothing to disclose., (Copyright ©ERS 2019.)

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is an independent cause of resistant hypertension (RH) but its association with refractory hypertension (RfH), a recently described form of severe hypertension, has not yet been investigated. This study seeks to analyze the association between the presence and severity of OSA/OSA syndrome with RfH and to compare it with a group of patients with OSA/OSA syndrome and RH. We conducted a multicenter, cross-sectional study of consecutive patients diagnosed with RH by means of 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring. Those patients with blood pressure levels ≥130/80 mm Hg, despite taking at least 5 antihypertensive drugs, were considered to have true RfH. All patients underwent a sleep study and completed a detailed clinical history related to OSA, current medication, and cardiovascular diseases. Overall, 229 patients were included (mean age, 58.3 years; 63% male), of whom 42 (18.3%) satisfied the criteria for RfH. Compared with those with RH, patients with RfH had a higher cardiovascular risk profile, higher blood pressure measurements, and a 2-fold greater risk of having both severe OSA (odds ratio, 2.1, with a prevalence of apnea-hypopnea index ≥15, 95.2% and apnea-hypopnea index ≥30, 64.3%) and OSA syndrome (apnea-hypopnea index ≥5+Epworth Sleepiness Scale >10; odds ratio, 1.9; 52.4% versus 37.3%; P=0.023), as well as higher OSA severity (apnea-hypopnea index, 41.8 versus 33.8 events/h; P=0.026). Patients with RfH had an even greater prevalence and severity of OSA and OSA syndrome than RH patients, highlighting the need to identify these patients to refer them to sleep units on a preferential basis.