Search

An animal model was used to see if maternal genetic factors contribute to ethanol-induced fetal malformations. Susceptible C57BL/6J (B6) and resistant Short-Sleep (SS) mice were used in a reciprocal cross-breeding design. This design produced four fetal genotypes: true-bred B6B6 and SSSS liters and hybrid B6SS and SSB6 litters. Dams were intubated with either 5.8 g/kg of ethanol or an isocaloric amount of maltose-dextrin on day 9 of pregnancy. Fetuses were removed on day 18 of pregnancy and assessed for soft tissue and gross malformations. Results show different prenatal treatment effects on malformations depending on the fetal genotype. Mean percentage of total malformations in ethanol-treated groups were 61% (B6B6), 28% (B6SS), 3% (SSB6), and 16% (SSSS), respectively. Litters exposed to maltose-dextrin showed low (< or = 4%) malformation rates regardless of fetal genotype. The difference in teratogenic response between genetically identical hybrid litters (B6SS and SSB6) suggests a maternal genetic contribution to susceptibility. Of the two major types of malformations, forelimb but not kidney malformations showed a pattern characteristic of a maternal genetic effect. It was concluded that maternal genetic effects can be distinguished from fetal genetic effects responsible for ethanol teratogenesis. Genetically based physiological responses to alcohol in the mother may confer varying degrees of risk for prenatal alcohol effects in the child.

The Albany subcolony of the selectively bred Long- and Short-Sleep mice was directly compared to the original Colorado colony. As expected from the additional selection applied to the Colorado colony, small differences in the selection phenotype, loss of the righting reflex duration following ethanol treatment, were observed in the Short-Sleep line. However, no colony differences existed in three other indices of ethanol effects. Clear line differences in the shape of the locomotor activity dose-response curve, thermoregulatory effects of ethanol, and ethanol elimination rate replicated earlier findings, but these differences were similar in the two colonies. These data argue for stability of the polygenic control system and provide a picture of remarkable similarity of the two sublines, which were separated by more than 30 generations.

Concentration-dependent effects of ethanol upon behavior and upon physiological regulatory mechanisms have been suggested. In a previous study, we found that the concentration of an acute ethanol injection confounded dose-response relationships for measures of blood pH, PCO2, and PO2. Two lines of mice that differ in CNS sensitivity to the hypnotic effects of ethanol (long sleep, LS; short sleep, SS) have also been found to differ in sensitivity to the physiological depressant effects of this drug. Therefore, we designed the present study to examine how intraperitoneal (IP) injections of varying ethanol concentrations differentially affect blood parameters (pH, PCO2, and PO2) and respiration rate in the LS and SS mouse lines. Different groups of LS female mice were injected IP with 165.0, 198.8, 248.1, or 330.0 mg/ml ethanol at a constant dose of 3.3 g/kg. Groups of SS female mice received 205.0, 247.0, 308.3, or 410.0 mg/ml ethanol at a dose of 4.1 g/kg. Blood parameters and respiration rate were measured at 60 min post-injection. In both the LS and SS mice, increasing concentrations of ethanol caused a progressive decline in respiration rate and blood pH. Blood PCO2 values were greater than control only at the highest ethanol concentration. Concentration-dependent effects of ethanol on blood PO2 values were not found in either line. However, LS PO2 was significantly elevated from the control value at all ethanol concentrations. These results suggest that a dose-response relationship may be obtained by varying ethanol concentration for some physiological measures, but not for others. Thus, attention should be paid to differences in concentration as well as amount of ethanol when dose-response curves are to be constructed.

Sensitivity to alcohol may influence the severity of ethanol teratogenesis. To examine this hypothesis, the teratogenic effects of ethanol were compared in Long-Sleep (LS) and Short-Sleep (SS) mice, selectively bred for differences in ethanol-induced narcosis. Inbred C57BL/6J (B6) mice were included to confirm previously reported teratogenic effects using our own treatment regimen and standard assessment technique. Intragastric administration of ethanol (5.8 g/kg) on Days 9 and 10 of pregnancy resulted in growth retardation and an increase in prenatal mortality in LS litters but not in SS litters. Therefore, alcohol sensitivity plays a role in the severity of prenatal alcohol effects. B6 mice showed more ethanol teratogenicity than either LS or SS mice, even though maternal blood ethanol levels were similar across genotypes. This result suggests genetic variations other than alcohol sensitivity also influence ethanol teratogenesis.

Behavioral studies using mice have suggested circadian influences on response to ethanol. Studies examining possible circadian influences on ethanol elimination are ambiguous as to whether changes in elimination contribute to circadian variations in response. Therefore, the linear declines in blood alcohol concentrations (BACs) were assessed in long-sleep (LS) and short-sleep (SS) male mice at 0300, 0900, 1500, or 2100 hr following an intraperitoneal injection of either 2.5 or 4.1 g/kg ethanol. Overall mean BAC for LS mice was significantly higher than for SS mice at both ethanol doses. With the 4.1 g/kg dose, LS mean BAC was higher at 2100 hr than at 0900 hr. Both lines of mice exhibited faster elimination rates at 0300 and 0900 hr than at 1500 and 2100 hr. SS mice generally showed a more rapid decline in BAC than did LS mice at this dose. With the 2.5 g/kg dose, the rate of decline was faster at 0900 hr than at 2100 hr for both lines of mice. SS mice showed a significantly greater overall rate of decline than did LS mice. The line differences in blood alcohol concentration and elimination rate may have resulted from a change in the doses used to select these mice and may contribute to circadian influences on ethanol response.