16 results on '"Peters, Matthew J."'
Search Results
2. Two-year efficacy of varenicline tartrate and counselling for inpatient smoking cessation (STOP study): A randomized controlled clinical trial.
- Author
-
Carson-Chahhoud KV, Smith BJ, Peters MJ, Brinn MP, Ameer F, Singh K, Fitridge R, Koblar SA, Jannes J, Veale AJ, Goldsworthy S, Hnin K, and Esterman AJ
- Subjects
- Adult, Aged, Female, Humans, Inpatients, Male, Middle Aged, Nicotinic Agonists administration & dosage, Outpatients, Smoking epidemiology, Smoking psychology, Nicotiana adverse effects, Tobacco Smoking epidemiology, Tobacco Smoking psychology, Treatment Outcome, Smoking drug therapy, Smoking Cessation methods, Tobacco Smoking drug therapy, Varenicline administration & dosage
- Abstract
Introduction: Varenicline tartrate is superior for smoking cessation to other tobacco cessation therapies by 52 weeks, in the outpatient setting. We aimed to evaluate the long-term (104 week) efficacy following a standard course of inpatient-initiated varenicline tartrate plus Quitline-counselling compared to Quitline-counselling alone., Methods: Adult patients (n = 392, 20-75 years) admitted with a smoking-related illnesses to one of three hospitals, were randomised to receive either 12-weeks of varenicline tartrate (titrated from 0.5mg daily to 1mg twice-daily) plus Quitline-counselling, (n = 196) or Quitline-counselling alone, (n = 196), with continuous abstinence from smoking assessed at 104 weeks., Results: A total of 1959 potential participants were screened for eligibility between August 2008 and December 2011. The proportion of participants who remained continuously abstinent (intention-to-treat) at 104 weeks were significantly greater in the varenicline tartrate plus counselling arm (29.2% n = 56) compared to counselling alone (18.8% n = 36; p = 0.02; odds ratio 1.78; 95%CI 1.10 to 2.86, p = 0.02). Twenty-two deaths occurred during the 104 week study (n = 10 for varenicline tartrate plus counselling and n = 12 for Quitline-counselling alone). All of these participants had known or developed underlying co-morbidities., Conclusions: This is the first study to examine the efficacy and safety of varenicline tartrate over 104 weeks within any setting. Varenicline tartrate plus Quitline-counselling was found to be an effective opportunistic treatment when initiated for inpatient smokers who had been admitted with tobacco-related disease., Competing Interests: The authors have read the journal’s policy and have the following potential competing interests: KVCC was paid an honorarium and provided with economy airfares and accommodation by Pfizer Australia to present at the 2019 Smoking Exchange Summit in New South Wales where she spoke about ‘cultural-specific issues in smoking cessation’ and as an invited panellist in a plenary session about ‘a national approach to smoking cessation’. In 2017 she received an honorarium and provided with economy airfares and accommodation to speak about 12-month results of the STOP trial at the annual Pfizer Australia conference in New South Wales, Hunter Valley. This does not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials. There are no patents, products in development or marketed products associated with this research to declare.
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
3. Safety of varenicline tartrate and counseling versus counseling alone for smoking cessation: a randomized controlled trial for inpatients (STOP study).
- Author
-
Carson KV, Smith BJ, Brinn MP, Peters MJ, Fitridge R, Koblar SA, Jannes J, Singh K, Veale AJ, Goldsworthy S, Litt J, Edwards D, Hnin KM, and Esterman AJ
- Subjects
- Adult, Aged, Benzazepines adverse effects, Female, Headache chemically induced, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Nausea chemically induced, Nicotinic Agonists adverse effects, Quinoxalines adverse effects, Smoking psychology, Smoking Cessation psychology, Treatment Outcome, Varenicline, Young Adult, Benzazepines administration & dosage, Counseling methods, Hospitalization, Nicotinic Agonists administration & dosage, Quinoxalines administration & dosage, Smoking therapy, Smoking Cessation methods
- Abstract
Introduction: Inpatient medical settings offer an opportunistic environment for initiating smoking cessation interventions to patients reflecting on their health. Current evidence has shown the superior efficacy of varenicline tartrate (VT) for smoking cessation compared with other tobacco cessation therapies; however, recent evidence also has highlighted concerns about the safety and tolerability of VT. Given these apprehensions, we aimed to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of VT plus quitline-counseling compared to quitline-counseling alone in the inpatient medical setting., Methods: Adult patients (n = 392, 20-75 years) admitted with a smoking-related illnesses to 3 hospitals were randomized to receive either 12 weeks of varenicline tartrate (titrated from 0.5mg daily to 1mg twice daily) plus quitline-counseling (VT+C), (n = 196) or quitline-counseling alone (n = 196)., Results: VT was well tolerated in the inpatient setting among subjects admitted with acute smoking-related illnesses (mean age 52.8±2.89 and 53.7±2.77 years in the VT+C and counseling alone groups, respectively). The most common self-reported adverse event during the 12-week treatment phase was nausea (16.3% in the VT+C group compared with 1.5% in the counseling alone group). Thirteen deaths occurred during the study period (n = 6 were in the VT+C arm compared with n = 7 in the counseling alone arm). All of these subjects had known comorbidities or developed underlying comorbidities., Conclusions: VT appears to be a safe and well-tolerated opportunistic treatment for inpatient smokers who have related chronic disease. Based on the proven efficacy of varenicline from outpatient studies and our recent inpatient evidence, we suggest it be considered as part of standard care in the hospital setting., (© The Author 2014. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)
- Published
- 2014
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
4. Smoking Termination Opportunity for inPatients (STOP): superiority of a course of varenicline tartrate plus counselling over counselling alone for smoking cessation: a 12-month randomised controlled trial for inpatients.
- Author
-
Smith BJ, Carson KV, Brinn MP, Labiszewski NA, Peters MJ, Fitridge R, Koblar SA, Jannes J, Veale AJ, Goldsworthy SJ, Litt J, Edwards D, and Esterman AJ
- Subjects
- Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Australia epidemiology, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Incidence, Male, Middle Aged, Nicotinic Agonists pharmacology, Smoking epidemiology, Time Factors, Treatment Outcome, Varenicline, Young Adult, Benzazepines pharmacology, Counseling methods, Inpatients, Quinoxalines pharmacology, Smoking adverse effects, Smoking Cessation methods
- Abstract
Rationale: Smoking cessation interventions in outpatient settings have been demonstrated to be cost effective. Given this evidence, we aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of varenicline tartrate plus Quitline-counselling compared with Quitline-counselling alone when initiated in the inpatient setting., Methods: Adult patients (18-75 years) admitted with a smoking-related illness to three hospitals, were randomised to receive either 12-weeks of varenicline tartrate plus Quitline-counselling, (n=196) or Quitline-counselling alone, (n=196), with 12-months follow-up., Results: For the primary analysis population (intention-to-treat), the proportion of subjects who remained continuously abstinent were significantly greater in the varenicline plus counselling arm (31.1%, n=61) compared with counselling alone (21.4%, n=42; RR 1.45, 95% CI 1.03 to 2.03, p=0.03)., Conclusions: The combined use of varenicline plus counselling when initiated in the inpatient setting has produced a sustained smoking cessation benefit at 12-months follow-up, indicating a successful opportunistic treatment for smokers admitted with smoking related illnesses., Trial Registration: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ ClinicalTrials.gov identification number: NCT01141855.
- Published
- 2013
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
5. Towards an endgame for tobacco.
- Author
-
Peters MJ
- Subjects
- Australia, Humans, Health Policy, Smoking legislation & jurisprudence, Smoking Cessation legislation & jurisprudence, Smoking Prevention
- Abstract
Background: The reduction in smoking in Australia in the past 30 years has established the conditions in which elimination of smoking should now be considered. This is sometimes referred to as the 'tobacco endgame'. A range of approaches can be considered and any that are implemented would build on current actions such as plain packaging., Objective: This article outlines possible public health and policy approaches with the goal of leading to the elimination of smoking, and discusses a potential target date for the elimination of smoking in Australia., Discussion: The most effective strategy for eliminating smoking in Australia is likely to be one that reverses the tolerable, addictive nature of modern tobacco by the elimination of all additives and by specifying a very low level of true nicotine delivery. Use of an unsatisfying, costly and toxic product would naturally, and rapidly, decline.
- Published
- 2012
6. Smoking cessation and elective surgery: the cleanest cut.
- Author
-
Peters MJ, Morgan LC, and Gluch L
- Subjects
- Contraindications, Cross-Sectional Studies, Humans, New South Wales, Risk, Surgical Wound Dehiscence epidemiology, Surgical Wound Dehiscence prevention & control, Surgical Wound Infection epidemiology, Surgical Wound Infection prevention & control, Elective Surgical Procedures, Ethics, Medical, Smoking adverse effects, Smoking Cessation, Waiting Lists
- Published
- 2004
7. The pharmacotherapy of smoking cessation.
- Author
-
Peters MJ and Morgan LC
- Subjects
- Antidepressive Agents, Second-Generation adverse effects, Bupropion adverse effects, Chewing Gum, Contraindications, Female, Humans, Mental Disorders complications, Pregnancy, Smoking Cessation psychology, Antidepressive Agents, Second-Generation therapeutic use, Bupropion therapeutic use, Nicotine therapeutic use, Smoking Cessation methods
- Abstract
1. The great majority of smokers are chronically dependent on tobacco. This dependence arises from the rituals and sensory associations of smoking that are reinforced, within seconds, by a rapid burst of nicotine from the cigarette. 2. All forms of nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) -- gum, patches and inhaler -- and bupropion are safe and effective for increasing smoking cessation rates in the short and long terms. 3. Other than those who are minimally dependent, all patients willing to quit should be offered one of these therapies unless contraindications exist. The effectiveness of drug treatments is multiplied when associated with effective counselling or behavioural treatments. 4. While NRT is not recommended during pregnancy or in patients with cardiac disease, if the alternative is smoking NRT is almost certainly safe. 5. Combination NRT (more than one therapy) may be indicated in patients who have failed monotherapy in association with withdrawal symptoms. 6. There are some specific contraindications to the use of bupropion. Its subsidised availability should not influence prescribers to ignore these.
- Published
- 2002
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
8. Should Smokers Be Refused Surgery?
- Author
-
Peters, Matthew J. and Glantz, Leonard
- Published
- 2007
9. Commitment to quit is essential for tobacco harm reduction.
- Author
-
Peters, Matthew J.
- Subjects
- *
TOBACCO , *HARM reduction , *COVID-19 - Abstract
As nicotine was known to be the agent of addiction, cigarettes with high amounts of nicotine relative to tar were a logical first step but were rated by smokers as unpleasant or harsh. Investigating smoking and nicotine dependence among people with severe mental illness during the COVID-19 pandemic: analysis of linked data from a UK Closing the Gap cohort. Keywords: smoking cessation; harm reduction; nicotine dependence EN smoking cessation harm reduction nicotine dependence 638 640 3 06/18/21 20210701 NES 210701 World No Tobacco Day (WNTD) is marked by the World Health Organization on 31 May each year. Smoking cessation, harm reduction, nicotine dependence. [Extracted from the article]
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
10. Correction: Two-year efficacy of varenicline tartrate and counselling for inpatient smoking cessation (STOP study): A randomized controlled clinical trial.
- Author
-
Carson-Chahhoud, Kristin V., Smith, Brian J., Peters, Matthew J., Brinn, Malcolm P., Ameer, Faisal, Singh, Kuljit, Fitridge, Robert, Litt, John, Edwards, David, Koblar, Simon A., Jannes, Jim, Veale, Antony J., Goldsworthy, Sharon, Hnin, Khin, and Esterman, Adrian J.
- Subjects
VARENICLINE ,CLINICAL trials ,NICOTINE ,SMOKING cessation ,RANDOMIZED controlled trials ,COUNSELING - Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
11. E-cigarettes and airways' disease: Behind the smokescreen.
- Author
-
Peters, Matthew J.
- Subjects
- *
ELECTRONIC cigarettes , *OBSTRUCTIVE lung diseases , *ASTHMATICS , *SMOKING cessation , *ASTHMA , *PHYSIOLOGY - Abstract
The author comments on studies on electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) and airways' disease. Topics include criticisms against a study which proposed that long-term e-cigarette use was beneficial for smokers living with asthma, a single study which argued a benefit for e-cigarette use in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients, and the need for research examining any smoking cessation benefit of e-cigarettes and the consequences of long-term use in patients with COPD and asthma.
- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
12. Smoking Termination Opportunity for in Patients (STOP): superiority of a course of varenicline tartrate plus counselling over counselling alone for smoking cessation: a 12-month randomised controlled trial for inpatients.
- Author
-
Smith, Brian James, Carson, Kristin Veronica, Brinn, Malcolm Philip, Labiszewsk, Nadina Ann, Peters, Matthew J., Fitridge, Robert, Koblar, Simon A., Jannes, Jim, Veale, Antony J., Goldsworthy, Sharon J., Litt, John, Edwards, David, and Esterman, Adrian Jeffrey
- Subjects
VARENICLINE ,TERMINATION of treatment ,SMOKING cessation ,RANDOMIZED controlled trials ,DRUG efficacy ,COST effectiveness - Abstract
Rationale Smoking cessation interventions in outpatient settings have been demonstrated to be cost effective. Given this evidence, we aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of varenicline tartrate plus Quitline-counselling compared with Quitline-counselling alone when initiated in the inpatient setting. Methods Adult patients (18-75 years) admitted with a smoking-related illness to three hospitals, were randomised to receive either 12-weeks of varenicline tartrate plus Quitline-counselling, (n=196) or Quitlinecounselling alone, (n=196), with 12-months follow-up. Results For the primary analysis population (intention-to-treat), the proportion of subjects who remained continuously abstinent were significantly greater in the varenicline plus counselling arm (31.1%, n=61) compared with counselling alone (21.4%, n=42; RR 1.45, 95% CI 1.03 to 2.03, p=0.03). Conclusions The combined use of varenicline plus counselling when initiated in the inpatient setting has produced a sustained smoking cessation benefit at 12-months follow-up, indicating a successful opportunistic treatment for smokers admitted with smoking related illnesses. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2013
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
13. Correction: Two-year efficacy of varenicline tartrate and counselling for inpatient smoking cessation (STOP study): A randomized controlled clinical trial
- Author
-
Kristin V. Carson-Chahhoud, Brian J. Smith, Matthew J. Peters, Malcolm P. Brinn, Faisal Ameer, Kuljit Singh, Robert Fitridge, John Litt, David Edwards, Simon A. Koblar, Jim Jannes, Antony J. Veale, Sharon Goldsworthy, Khin Hnin, Adrian J. Esterman, Carson-Chahhoud, Kristin V, Smith, Brian J, Peters, Matthew J, Brinn, Malcolm P, Ameer, Faisal, Singh, Kuljit, Fitridge, Robert, Koblar, Simon A, Jannes, Jim, Veale, Antony J, Goldsworthy, Sharon, Hnin, Khin, and Esterman, Adrian J
- Subjects
Male ,Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptors ,medicine.medical_treatment ,Anti-Addiction Drug Therapy ,Social Sciences ,Biochemistry ,Habits ,0302 clinical medicine ,Outpatients ,Smoking Habits ,Medicine and Health Sciences ,Psychology ,030212 general & internal medicine ,Nicotinic Agonists ,Tartrates ,Multidisciplinary ,Pharmaceutics ,Smoking ,Middle Aged ,Chemistry ,Treatment Outcome ,Research Design ,Physical Sciences ,Medicine ,Female ,Research Article ,Signal Transduction ,Neurological Drug Therapy ,Adult ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Patients ,Transmembrane Receptors ,Clinical Research Design ,Science ,Research and Analysis Methods ,Varenicline Tartrate ,03 medical and health sciences ,Pharmacotherapy ,Drug Therapy ,Nicotine Replacement Therapy ,Internal medicine ,Tobacco ,medicine ,Tobacco Smoking ,Humans ,Adverse effect ,Aged ,Behavior ,Inpatients ,Adult patients ,business.industry ,Chemical Compounds ,Biology and Life Sciences ,Proteins ,Correction ,Odds ratio ,Cell Biology ,Nicotine replacement therapy ,Clinical trial ,Health Care ,Acetylcholine Receptors ,Smoking cessation ,Smoking Cessation ,Adverse Events ,Varenicline ,business ,030217 neurology & neurosurgery - Abstract
IntroductionVarenicline tartrate is superior for smoking cessation to other tobacco cessation therapies by 52 weeks, in the outpatient setting. We aimed to evaluate the long-term (104 week) efficacy following a standard course of inpatient-initiated varenicline tartrate plus Quitline-counselling compared to Quitline-counselling alone.MethodsAdult patients (n = 392, 20-75 years) admitted with a smoking-related illnesses to one of three hospitals, were randomised to receive either 12-weeks of varenicline tartrate (titrated from 0.5mg daily to 1mg twice-daily) plus Quitline-counselling, (n = 196) or Quitline-counselling alone, (n = 196), with continuous abstinence from smoking assessed at 104 weeks.ResultsA total of 1959 potential participants were screened for eligibility between August 2008 and December 2011. The proportion of participants who remained continuously abstinent (intention-to-treat) at 104 weeks were significantly greater in the varenicline tartrate plus counselling arm (29.2% n = 56) compared to counselling alone (18.8% n = 36; p = 0.02; odds ratio 1.78; 95%CI 1.10 to 2.86, p = 0.02). Twenty-two deaths occurred during the 104 week study (n = 10 for varenicline tartrate plus counselling and n = 12 for Quitline-counselling alone). All of these participants had known or developed underlying co-morbidities.ConclusionsThis is the first study to examine the efficacy and safety of varenicline tartrate over 104 weeks within any setting. Varenicline tartrate plus Quitline-counselling was found to be an effective opportunistic treatment when initiated for inpatient smokers who had been admitted with tobacco-related disease.
- Published
- 2021
14. Electronic cigarettes: A position statement from the Thoracic Society of Australia and New Zealand
- Author
-
Juliet M. Foster, Sandra Hodge, Alexander N. Larcombe, Claudia C. Dobler, Christine F McDonald, Philip Pattemore, Emily Stone, Stuart Jones, Henry M. Marshall, Miranda P. Ween, Bruce Thompson, Robert Roseby, Billie Bonevski, Paul Hamor, Kristin Carson-Chahhoud, Lutz Beckert, Hayley V. See, Tanya Buchanan, Gabrielle B. McCallum, Alistair Miller, Jack Bozier, Matthew J. Peters, Peter Holmes, David G. Chapman, McDonald, Christine F, Jones, Stuart, Beckert, Lutz, Bonevski, Billie, Carson-Chahhoud, Kristin V, and Peters, Matthew J
- Subjects
Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine ,Position statement ,Adult ,Male ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Adolescent ,medicine.medical_treatment ,Respiratory System ,Recreational use ,Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems ,Risk Factors ,Tobacco Smoking ,Medicine ,Humans ,vaping ,Product (category theory) ,Position Statement ,e‐cigarettes ,11 Medical and Health Sciences ,Societies, Medical ,business.industry ,Public health ,Tobacco control ,Smoking ,public health ,Australia ,e-cigarettes ,Former Smoker ,United States ,smoking cessation ,Family medicine ,tobacco control ,Position (finance) ,Smoking cessation ,Female ,business ,New Zealand - Abstract
The TSANZ develops position statements where insufficient data exist to write formal clinical guidelines. In 2018, the TSANZ addressed the question of potential benefits and health impacts of electronic cigarettes (EC). The working party included groups focused on health impacts, smoking cessation, youth issues and priority populations. The 2018 report on the Public Health Consequences of E-Cigarettes from the United States NASEM was accepted as reflective of evidence to mid-2017. A search for papers subsequently published in peer-reviewed journals was conducted in August 2018. A small number of robust and important papers published until March 2019 were also identified and included. Groups identified studies that extended, modified or contradicted the NASEM report. A total of 3793 papers were identified and reviewed, with summaries and draft position statements developed and presented to TSANZ membership in April 2019. After feedback from members and external reviewers, a collection of position statements was finalized in December 2019. EC have adverse lung effects and harmful effects of long-term use are unknown. EC are unsuitable consumer products for recreational use, part-substitution for smoking or long-term exclusive use by former smokers. Smokers who require support to quit smoking should be directed towards approved medication in conjunction with behavioural support as having the strongest evidence for efficacy and safety. No specific EC product can be recommended as effective and safe for smoking cessation. Smoking cessation claims in relation to EC should be assessed by established regulators Refereed/Peer-reviewed
- Published
- 2020
15. Safety of varenicline tartrate and counseling versus counseling alone for smoking cessation: a randomized controlled trial for inpatients (STOP Study)
- Author
-
John Litt, Matthew J. Peters, Simon A. Koblar, Sharon Goldsworthy, Antony J. Veale, Adrian Esterman, Brian J. Smith, Jim Jannes, Malcolm P Brinn, Khin Hnin, Robert Fitridge, Kristin V Carson, David Edwards, Kuljit Singh, Carson, Kristin Veronica, Smith, Brian James, Brinn, Malcolm Philip, Peters, Matthew J, Fitridge, Robert, Koblar, Simon, Jannes, Jim, Singh, Kuljit, Veale, Antony J, Goldsworthy, Sharon, Litt, John, Edwards, David, Hnin, Khin Moe, and Esterman, Adrian Jeffrey
- Subjects
Adult ,Counseling ,Male ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Nausea ,medicine.medical_treatment ,smoking ,law.invention ,Varenicline Tartrate ,chemistry.chemical_compound ,Young Adult ,Randomized controlled trial ,law ,Internal medicine ,Quinoxalines ,medicine ,Humans ,Nicotinic Agonists ,Varenicline ,Adverse effect ,Aged ,business.industry ,Smoking ,Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health ,Headache ,Benzazepines ,Middle Aged ,medicine.disease ,Comorbidity ,Hospitalization ,Treatment Outcome ,counseling ,Tolerability ,chemistry ,Physical therapy ,Smoking cessation ,Female ,Smoking Cessation ,medicine.symptom ,business - Abstract
Introduction: Inpatient medical settings offer an opportunistic environment for initiating smoking cessation interventions to patients reflecting on their health. Current evidence has shown the superior efficacy of varenicline tartrate (VT) for smoking cessation compared with other tobacco cessation therapies; however, recent evidence also has highlighted concerns about the safety and tolerability of VT. Given these apprehensions, we aimed to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of VT plus quitlinecounseling compared to quitline-counseling alone in the inpatient medical setting. Methods: Adult patients (n = 392, 20–75 years) admitted with a smoking-related illnesses to 3 hospitals were randomized to receive either 12 weeks of varenicline tartrate (titrated from 0.5 mg daily to 1 mg twice daily) plus quitline-counseling (VT+C), (n = 196) or quitline-counseling alone (n = 196). Results: VT was well tolerated in the inpatient setting among subjects admitted with acute smoking-related illnesses (mean age 52.8 ± 2.89 and 53.7 ± 2.77 years in the VT+C and counseling alone groups, respectively). The most common self-reported adverse event during the 12-week treatment phase was nausea (16.3% in the VT+C group compared with 1.5% in the counseling alone group). Thirteen deaths occurred during the study period (n = 6 were in the VT+C arm compared with n = 7 in the counseling alone arm). All of these subjects had known comorbidities or developed underlying comorbidities. Conclusions: VT appears to be a safe and well-tolerated opportunistic treatment for inpatient smokers who have related chronic disease. Based on the proven efficacy of varenicline from outpatient studies and our recent inpatient evidence, we suggest it be considered as part of standard care in the hospital setting. Refereed/Peer-reviewed
- Published
- 2014
16. Smoking Termination Opportunity for inPatients (STOP): superiority of a course of varenicline tartrate plus counselling over counselling alone for smoking cessation: a 12-month randomised controlled trial for inpatients
- Author
-
Robert Fitridge, Simon A. Koblar, Brian J. Smith, Nadina A Labiszewski, Jim Jannes, Sharon Goldsworthy, Malcolm P Brinn, Antony J. Veale, Adrian Esterman, John Litt, Kristin V Carson, David Edwards, Matthew J. Peters, Smith, Brian James, Carson, Kristin Veronica, Brinn, Malcolm Philip, Labiszewski, Nadina Ann, Peters, Matthew J, Fitridge, Robert, Koblar, Simon A, Jannes, Jim, Veale, Antony J, Goldsworthy, Sharon J, Litt, John, Edwards, David, and Esterman, Adrian Jeffrey
- Subjects
Adult ,Male ,Counseling ,Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Time Factors ,Adolescent ,medicine.medical_treatment ,Population ,law.invention ,Varenicline Tartrate ,Young Adult ,chemistry.chemical_compound ,Randomized controlled trial ,law ,Quinoxalines ,Internal medicine ,medicine ,Humans ,In patient ,Nicotinic Agonists ,Young adult ,Varenicline ,education ,Aged ,Inpatients ,education.field_of_study ,business.industry ,Incidence ,Incidence (epidemiology) ,Smoking ,Australia ,Middle Aged ,Benzazepines ,Treatment Outcome ,chemistry ,Physical therapy ,Smoking cessation ,Female ,Smoking Cessation ,business ,Follow-Up Studies - Abstract
Rationale Smoking cessation interventions in outpatient settings have been demonstrated to be cost effective. Given this evidence, we aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of varenicline tartrate plus Quitline-counselling compared with Quitline-counselling alone when initiated in the inpatient setting. Methods Adult patients (18–75 years) admitted with a smoking-related illness to three hospitals, were randomised to receive either 12-weeks of varenicline tartrate plus Quitline-counselling, (n=196) or Quitline-counselling alone, (n=196), with 12-months follow-up. Results For the primary analysis population (intention-to-treat), the proportion of subjects who remained continuously abstinent were significantly greater in the varenicline plus counselling arm (31.1%, n=61) compared with counselling alone (21.4%, n=42; RR 1.45, 95% CI 1.03 to 2.03, p=0.03). Conclusions The combined use of varenicline plus counselling when initiated in the inpatient setting has produced a sustained smoking cessation benefit at 12-months follow-up, indicating a successful opportunistic treatment for smokers admitted with smoking related illnesses. Trial registration http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ ClinicalTrials.gov identification number: NCT01141855.
- Published
- 2012
Catalog
Discovery Service for Jio Institute Digital Library
For full access to our library's resources, please sign in.