Search

Humans show distinct social behaviours when we evaluate an individual as being a member of the same group and recognize social similarity to the individual. One example is more accurate identification of emotion in that individual. Our previous studies proposed that rats recognize social similarity to certain strains of unfamiliar rats. It is therefore possible that the strain of unfamiliar conspecifics affects stress identification in rats. Wistar subject rats were allowed to explore a pair of unfamiliar Wistar, Sprague-Dawley (SD), Long-Evans (LE), or Fischer344 (F344) stimulus rats. To induce differences in stress, one of the stimulus rats had received foot shocks immediately before the test. It was found that the subjects showed biased interaction towards the shocked Wistar and SD stimulus rats, but not toward the shocked LE or F344 stimulus rats. Subsequent experiments confirmed that the biased interaction towards the shocked Wistar and SD stimulus rats was driven by stress in these stimulus rats. In addition, the lack of biased interaction towards the shocked LE and F344 stimulus rats did not appear to be due to procedural reasons. The experiment using LE subject rats further confirmed that the shocked LE stimulus rats emitted distress signals. These results suggested that Wistar rats could identify stress in unfamiliar Wistar and SD rats, but not in unfamiliar LE or F344 rats. Therefore, rats appear to recognize social similarity to certain unfamiliar strains of rats., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Social buffering is the phenomenon in which an affiliative conspecific (associate) ameliorates stress responses of a subject. We previously found that social buffering in Wistar subject rats is induced if the strain of the associate is Wistar or a strain derived from Wistar rats. In the present study, we assessed the possible role of medial amygdala (Me) in this strain-dependent induction of social buffering. The subjects were exposed to the conditioned stimulus (CS) that had been paired or unpaired with a foot shock either alone, with an unfamiliar Wistar associate, or with an unfamiliar Fischer 344 (F344) associate. We found that the Wistar associates, but not F344 associates, ameliorated increased freezing and Fos expression in the paraventricular nucleus of the hypothalamus and lateral amygdala caused by the CS. In addition, Fos expression in the posterior complex of the anterior olfactory nucleus and lateral intercalated cell mass of the amygdala was increased simultaneously. These results suggest that Wistar associates, but not F344 associates, induced social buffering. In the Me, we did not find any differences associated with stress responses or amelioration of stress responses. In contrast, a comparison among the unpaired subjects found that the Wistar associates, but not F344 associates, increased exploratory behavior and Fos expression in the posteroventral subdivision of the Me (MePV). Based on these results, we propose that the MePV is involved in the recognition of social similarity with the associates. Taken together, the present study provides information about the possible role of Me in social buffering., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Humans show distinct social behaviours when we recognise social similarity in opponents that are members of the same social group. However, little attention has been paid to the role of social similarity in non-human animals. In the Wistar subject rats, the presence of an unfamiliar Wistar rat mitigated stress responses, suggesting the importance of social similarity in this stress-buffering phenomenon. We subsequently found that the presence of unfamiliar Sprague-Dawley (SD) or Long-Evans (LE) rats, but not an unfamiliar Fischer 344 (F344) rat, similarly mitigated stress responses in the subject rats. It is therefore possible that the subject rats recognised social similarity to unfamiliar SD and LE rats. In this study, we demonstrated that the Wistar subject rats were capable of categorizing unfamiliar rats based on their strain, and that the Wistar subjects showed a preference for unfamiliar Wistar, SD, and LE rats over F344 rats. However, the subject rats did not show a preference among Wistar, SD, and LE rats. In addition, the results were not due to an aversion to F344 rats, and preference was not affected when anaesthetised rats were presented to the subject rats. The findings suggested that rats recognise social similarity to certain unfamiliar strains of rats., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

The presence of an affiliative conspecific reduces stress responses to a wide variety of stimuli, which is termed "social buffering." We previously reported that social buffering in male rats ameliorated behavioral responses, as well as hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis activation, elicited by an auditory conditioned stimulus (CS). In addition, subjects that experienced social buffering did not show stress responses when re-exposed to the CS the next day in the absence of an accompanying rat. However, the mechanisms underlying this enhancement of between-session extinction are poorly understood. In Experiment 1, we compared corticosterone levels at 0, 10, and 15 min after extinction training. Subjects that experienced social buffering had lower corticosterone levels than subjects that trained alone at the end of extinction training. However, corticosterone levels at 10 and 15 min after training were not affected by the experience of social buffering. These results suggest that a lower level of corticosterone during extinction training had an important role in the enhancement of extinction. To directly assess this, in Experiment 2, we manipulated the corticosterone level during extinction training. We found that a subcutaneous injection of corticosterone before extinction training blocked the enhancement of extinction by social buffering. These results demonstrate that the enhancement is caused by a low level of corticosterone during the training. Taken together, we suggest that social buffering enhances extinction of conditioned fear responses by reducing corticosterone levels in male rats., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

KIYOKAWA, Y. and HENNESSY, M.B. Comparative studies of social buffering: A consideration of approaches, terminology, and pitfalls…NEUROSCI BIOBEHAV REV XXX-XXX, .- Over the past decades, there has been an increasing number of investigations of the impact of social variables on neural, endocrine, and immune outcomes. Among these are studies of "social buffering"-or the phenomenon by which affiliative social partners mitigate the response to stressors. Yet, as social buffering studies have become more commonplace, the variety of approaches taken, definitions employed, and divergent results obtained in different species can lead to confusion and miscommunication. The aim of the present paper, therefore, is to address terminology and approaches and to highlight potential pitfalls to the study of social buffering across nonhuman species. We review and categorize variables currently being employed in social buffering studies and provide an overview of responses measured, mediating sensory modalities and underlying mechanisms. It is our hope that the paper will be useful to those contemplating examination of social buffering in the context of their own research., (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Social buffering is a phenomenon in which stress in an animal is ameliorated when the subject is accompanied by a conspecific animal(s) during exposure to distressing stimuli. Previous studies of social buffering of conditioned fear responses in rats have typically used a 3-s auditory conditioned stimulus (CS) as a stressor, observing stress responses during a specified experimental period. Because a 3-s CS is extremely short compared with a typical experimental period, freezing has thus been observed primarily in the absence of the CS. Therefore, it has been unclear whether social buffering ameliorates conditioned fear responses in the presence of the CS. To clarify this issue, the current study assessed the effects of social buffering on conditioned fear responses in the presence of a 20-s CS. We measured the percentage of time spent freezing during the 20-s period following the onset of the CS. When conditioned subjects were exposed to the 20-s CS alone, they exhibited a high percentage of freezing in the presence of the CS. The presence of another non-conditioned rat completely blocked this response. The same result was observed when freezing was observed primarily in the absence of the 3-s CS. In addition, we confirmed that the presence of an associate ameliorated conditioned fear responses induced by a 20-s CS or 3-s CS when the duration and frequency of fear responses was measured. These findings indicate that social buffering ameliorates conditioned fear responses in the presence of an auditory CS., (Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

In social species, the phenomenon in which the presence of conspecific animals mitigates stress responses is called social buffering. We previously reported that social buffering in male rats ameliorated behavioral fear responses, as well as hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis activation, elicited by an auditory conditioned stimulus (CS). However, after social buffering, it is not clear whether rats exhibit fear responses when they are re-exposed to the same CS in the absence of another rat. In the present study, we addressed this issue using an experimental model of extinction. High stress levels during extinction training impaired extinction, suggesting that extinction is enhanced when stress levels during extinction training are low. Therefore, we hypothesized that rats that had received social buffering during extinction training would not show fear responses to a CS, even in the absence of another rat, because social buffering had enhanced the extinction of conditioned fear responses. To test this, we subjected male fear-conditioned rats to extinction training either alone or with a non-conditioned male rat. The subjects were then individually re-exposed to the CS in a recall test. When the subjects individually underwent extinction training, no responses were suppressed in the recall test. Conversely, when the subjects received social buffering during extinction training, freezing and Fos expression in the paraventricular nucleus of the hypothalamus and lateral amygdala were suppressed. Additionally, the effects of social buffering were absent when the recall test was conducted in a different context from the extinction training. The present results suggest that social buffering enhances extinction of conditioned fear responses., (Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Social buffering is a phenomenon in which stress in an animal is ameliorated when the subject is accompanied by a conspecific animal(s) during exposure to distressing stimuli. We previously reported that in male Wistar rats, the presence of another Wistar rat mitigates conditioned fear responses to an auditory conditioned stimulus (CS). Subsequent analyses revealed several characteristics of this social buffering of conditioned fear responses. However, information regarding the specificity of accompanying conspecifics is still limited. In the present study, we assessed whether rats of other strains could induce social buffering in Wistar rats. When a fear-conditioned Wistar subject was re-exposed to the CS alone, we observed increased freezing and decreased investigation and walking, as well as elevated corticosterone levels. The presence of a Wistar, Sprague-Dawley, or Long-Evans rat blocked these responses, suggesting that social buffering was induced by these strains of rats. In contrast, a Fischer 344 rat did not induce social buffering in the Wistar subject. We further found that an inbred Lewis rat induced social buffering whereas a Brown Norway rat, a strain that has been established independently from Wistar rats, did not. These results suggest that the difference in origin, rather than the inbred or outbred status of the associate rat, seemed to account for the lack of social buffering induced by the F344 rats. Based on these findings, we conclude that strains of an accompanying conspecific can affect the efficacy of social buffering in rats., (Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

The stress experienced by an animal is ameliorated when the animal is exposed to distressing stimuli along with a conspecific animal(s). This is known as social buffering. Previously, we found that the presence of an unfamiliar male rat induced social buffering and ameliorated conditioned fear responses of a male rat subjected to an auditory conditioned stimulus (CS). However, because our knowledge of social buffering is highly biased towards findings in male subjects, analyses using female subjects are crucial for comprehensively understanding the social buffering phenomenon. In the present studies, we assessed social buffering of conditioned fear responses in female rats. We found that the estrus cycle did not affect the intensity of the rats' fear responses to the CS or their degree of vigilance due to the presence of a conspecific animal. Based on these findings, we then assessed whether social buffering ameliorated conditioned fear responses in female rats without taking into account their estrus cycles. When fear conditioned female rats were exposed to the CS without the presence of a conspecific, they exhibited behavioral responses, including freezing, and elevated corticosterone levels. By contrast, the presence of an unfamiliar female rat suppressed these responses. Based on these findings, we conclude that social buffering can ameliorate conditioned fear responses in female rats., (Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

In social animals, recovery from the adverse effects of distressing stimuli is promoted by subsequent cohousing with a conspecific animal(s). This phenomenon has been termed housing-type social buffering. We previously found that social housing induced housing-type social buffering in fear-conditioned male rats. This buffering took the form of attenuated conditioned hyperthermia in response to an auditory conditioned stimulus (CS). Here, we assessed whether this social buffering is sustained even if the subject is housed alone after a period of social housing. When fear-conditioned subjects were housed alone during a 48-h period between conditioning and re-exposure to the auditory CS, they exhibited conditioned hyperthermia in response to the CS. However, conditioned hyperthermia was not observed when the 12-h period of social housing began 24 and 36h after conditioning during the 48-h period. This was not the case when the 12-h period of social housing began 0 and 12h after the conditioning. These results suggest that housing-type social buffering is sustained for 12h after the 12-h period of social housing. We next considered whether increasing the duration of social housing would extend the period of social buffering. We observed social buffering of conditioned hyperthermia 24 and 48, but not 96h after a 24-h period of social housing. These results suggest that social buffering was extended when the duration of social housing was increased. Taken together, our findings indicate that housing-type social buffering is sustained after a period of social housing., (Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

In social animals, the presence of an affiliative conspecific alleviates acute stress responses, and this is called social buffering. We previously reported in male rats that the presence of a conspecific mitigates conditioned fear responses to auditory conditioned stimulus paired with foot shocks. Subsequent studies revealed that we could observe this social buffering when rats were tested in a box odorized by a conspecific. Because we previously used an unfamiliar conspecific, the effects of familiarity with a conspecific on the intensity of social buffering remain unclear. Here, we examine this question by preparing a familiar conspecific that had been housed with a subject for 3 weeks in the same cage. We exposed fear-conditioned subjects to a conditioned stimulus in either a clean control box or a box odorized beforehand by either an unfamiliar or a familiar conspecific. When the subjects were tested in the control box, they showed freezing and Fos expression in the paraventricular nucleus. These responses were suppressed when we placed rats in the box odorized by a conspecific. However, the suppression was greater when the box was odorized by a familiar conspecific rather than by an unfamiliar conspecific. Fos expression in the lateral amygdala was also suppressed in the same manner. These results suggest that a familiar conspecific is more effective for social buffering of conditioned fear responses., (Copyright © 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

In social species, the presence of an affiliative same-sex conspecific ameliorates acute stress responses in threatening conditions. We previously found that the presence of an unfamiliar male rat separated by a wire mesh barrier blocks the behavioral responses and Fos expression in the paraventricular nucleus of the hypothalamus (PVN) in a male subject rat that had previously been exposed to an auditory conditioned stimulus (CS) paired with foot shocks. Based on the Fos expression in the PVN, we hypothesized that the presence of a conspecific ameliorated the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis activation and induced social buffering of conditioned fear responses. The direct evidence for this hypothesis, however, is still lacking. To clarify this point, we exposed fear-conditioned and non-conditioned subjects to the CS either alone or with a conspecific separated by a wire mesh barrier. When the fear-conditioned subject alone was re-exposed to the CS, it exhibited increased freezing, decreased sniffing, and elevated corticosterone levels. In contrast, the presence of the conspecific suppressed these behavioral and HPA axis responses to a level similar to those observed in the non-conditioned subjects. These results suggest that the presence of a conspecific suppressed the behavioral responses and HPA axis activation to the CS. The present results provide direct evidence for the existence of social buffering of conditioned fear responses in male rats., (Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

In social animals, housing with conspecific animals after a stressful event attenuates the subsequent adverse outcomes due to the event, and this has been called housing-type social buffering. We have previously found that housing-type social buffering attenuates the enhancement of hyperthermia and Fos expression in the paraventricular nucleus of the hypothalamus that occurs in response to an aversive conditioned stimulus in male rats. Here, we analyzed the role of physical interactions during social housing in the induction of housing-type social buffering. When a fear-conditioned subject was alone after the conditioning and then exposed to the conditioned stimulus, it showed behavioral, autonomic, and neural stress responses. However, social housing, during which physical interactions were prevented by wire mesh, attenuated these autonomic and neural stress responses, as has been seen in previous studies. These results suggested that physical interaction was not necessary for the induction of housing-type social buffering. With this social cohabitation model, we then found that social cohabitation increased Fos expression in the posterior complex of the anterior olfactory nucleus of the fear-conditioned subject. Social cohabitation also increased Fos expression in 11 brain regions, including the prefrontal cortex, the nucleus accumbens, the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis, and the medial, lateral, basal, and cortical amygdala. These results provide information about the neural mechanisms that induce housing-type social buffering., (Copyright © 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

We previously reported that in male rats, 24 h of social housing with an associate male rat immediately following fear conditioning attenuated conditioned hyperthermia in response to an auditory conditioned stimulus. In this study, we investigated the time window and threshold of social housing where "social buffering" mitigates conditioned hyperthermia. When 6 h of social housing immediately followed the conditioning procedure, attenuation of conditioned hyperthermia did not occur. However, an 18-h social housing period that started 6h after the conditioning procedure successfully blocked the subsequent hyperthermia, as was observed in our previous study. We also shortened the duration of social housing and found that a 12-h, but not a 6-h, period of social housing mitigated the subsequent hyperthermia. In addition, a 24-h social housing period that started 24 h after the conditioning procedure mitigated the hyperthermia. These results suggest that 12 h is sufficient for social buffering of conditioned hyperthermia., (Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

We previously reported that the presence of a conspecific animal blocked freezing of a male rat in response to an auditory conditioned stimulus that had been paired with foot shocks, as well as associated Fos expression in the paraventricular nucleus. Here we investigated how this 'social buffering' is mediated by examining the contributions of both physical contact and the main olfactory system. Fear-conditioned rats exposed to the conditioned stimulus alone responded by freezing and increased Fos expression in the paraventricular nucleus. However, the presence of another rat, but not a guinea pig, dramatically mitigated these responses, even if the dyad was separated by a wire mesh or a pair of wire meshes 5 cm apart. In contrast, social buffering was absent when a transparent acrylic board was inserted between the double wire mesh. Lesioning of the main olfactory epithelium by injection of ZnSO(4) intranasally also abolished social buffering. Thus, we conclude that the main olfactory system is essential for the social buffering but does not require physical contact between the dyad.

In a phenomenon known as 'social buffering' in various species, signals from a conspecific animal can mitigate stress responses. This buffering can be achieved either by 'pair-housing' after a stressful event or by 'pair-exposure' to an acute stressor with a conspecific animal. In this study, we compared the impacts of these two types of social buffering on auditory conditioned fear responses in male rats. When subjects were exposed to an auditory conditioned stimulus (CS) that had been paired with foot shocks on the previous day, they clearly exhibited behavioral (freezing), autonomic (aggravated stress-induced hyperthermia) and neural (Fos expression) responses. Pair-housing for 24 h with an unfamiliar rat following fear conditioning resulted in a suppressed autonomic, but not behavioral, response, with Fos expression in the lateral nucleus of the amygdala and ventrolateral periaqueductal gray. On the other hand, pair-exposure to the CS with an unfamiliar rat eliminated the behavioral, but not the autonomic, response, with Fos expression in the basal nucleus of the amygdala and infralimbic region of the prefrontal cortex. Furthermore, subjects that had been pair-housed and then pair-exposed showed no behavioral, autonomic or neural responses, suggesting that the combination of the two procedures can completely block the fear conditioning sequence. These results demonstrate that two types of social buffering differentially relieve conditioned fear responses, by influencing different neural pathways in the amygdala.

The relationship between a social partner's stress status and the social buffering effect was examined in adult male Wistar rats. Fear-conditioned rats were exposed to the same context along with either a shocked or nonshocked conspecific partner. Changes in body temperature and behavioral responses were monitored in order to compare the effects of social buffering, and the Fos protein in the paraventricular nucleus was immunostained. The presence of the partner rat attenuated stress-induced hyperthermia, as well as behavioral responses and Fos expression in response to the fearful context, and nonshocked partners were more effective than shocked partners. These findings suggest that the social buffering effect depends on the stress status of the accompanying conspecific animal.