Search

Background and Objectives: Research shows that living in segregated neighborhoods may have deleterious health outcomes via social, physical, and socioeconomic contexts that deepen existing inequities. However, there has been limited scholarship examining the effects of segregation on older adults, despite an increasing focus on aging in place. Guided by the Ecological Model of Aging, we examined the effects of segregation on older adults' self-rated health and mental health, accounting for both individual characteristics and neighborhood opportunities and risks (e.g., social cohesion) and the potential moderating role of race and economic vulnerability., Research Design and Methods: We used data from the first 4 rounds of the National Health and Aging Trends Study (2011-2014) merged with tract-level census data for a final sample size of 3,084 community-dwelling older adults in urban areas. We conducted multivariate regression analyses after conditioning on residential location selection variables., Results: There was no significant association between neighborhood segregation and self-rated health or between segregation and anxiety and depression symptoms. Consistent with the literature, perceived social cohesion was protective of health in each model., Discussion and Implications: Our findings highlight the need for more rigorous research on segregation and older residents that utilize longitudinal and spatial data. Our findings also have implications for policies and programs that aim to support the ability to age in place for older adults who have different racial identities and live in different neighborhood contexts. Because social cohesion can be a protective factor for older adults' health and mental health, policymakers and practitioners should support initiatives to increase social cohesion., (© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Gerontological Society of America. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

The objective of this study was to ascertain whether participation in the Your Family, Your Neighborhood (YFYN) intervention, an intervention for families living in low-income neighborhoods, leads to improved perceptions of neighborhood social cohesion and informal neighborhood social control. Fifty-two families in three low-income, urban neighborhoods participated in the manualized YFYN intervention. In this quasi-experimental study treatment families (n = 37) in two low-income neighborhoods received YFYN and control families (n = 15) from one separate low-income neighborhood did not. Families receiving YFYN attended 10 two-hour skills-based curriculum sessions during which they gathered for a community dinner and participated in parent- and child-specific skills-based groups. Treatment families reported increases in both neighborhood social cohesion and informal neighborhood social control after receiving YFYN. However, families receiving YFYN did not experience statistically significant improvements in perceptions of neighborhood social cohesion or informal neighborhood social control compared with nontreatment families. In conclusion, the delivery of YFYN in low-income neighborhoods may improve perceptions of neighborhood social cohesion. Further testing, with randomization and a larger sample, should be conducted to provide a more robust understanding of the impact of YFYN. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]