Search

This paper presents the findings of a UK-based evaluation of service user-led role-play interviews for social work students. Skill development relating to 'procedural competencies' (relationship forming, communication skills) and 'meta-competencies' (linking theory to practice, reflection) is explored using a mixed-method repeated-measures design. Assessment feedback from student self-ratings (N = 32), as well as service user (N = 7) and practice educator (N = 4) ratings were compared at two time points. An overall improvement of the students' professional skills was identified, with a notable divergence regarding what had improved: students focused on procedural skills, practice educators on cognitive skills, whereas service users focused on relational/embodied aspects. Moreover, what counted as 'improvement' varied between the groups: when considering 'problem-solving' students and practice educators were emphasizing the importance of not rushing to resolutions, whereas service users were praising students who were proactive and solution-focused. The findings assert the value of service user-led educational activities not only as contributing to the improvement of social work students' skill development but also as providing a perspective that may challenge the dominance of professional narratives in social work education. The findings have specific implications for curriculum development and evaluation of service user-led activities. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This paper discusses the involvement of service users in academic assessment as part of a second year module for social work undergraduate students at Canterbury Christ Church University in the UK. The three main tasks undertaken in partnership are detailed: designing an assessment form, assessment of student group presentations and assessment of a written reflective essay. The paper starts by identifying key questions raised by the assessor team before providing a critical commentary on the process, and identifying challenges and learning points. The experience emphasises the need for a more critical and searching approach towards service user involvement in social work education in academic assessment. Moreover, the team's experience suggests that such work is best achieved in the context of collaborative working relationships based on trust, with opportunities for team reflection and supported by training in academic assessment. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]