Search

Copyright of Canadian Geotechnical Journal is the property of Canadian Science Publishing and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Copyright of Canadian Geotechnical Journal is the property of Canadian Science Publishing and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Abstract In the current state of practice, static/seismic soil-pile interaction is included in design calculations by a set of one-dimensional (1D) uncoupled springs. The guidelines of American Petroleum Institute (API) are often adopted to develop backbone curves for the lateral springs. The purpose of the paper is to assess the reliability of this practice. Twenty-seven static field and laboratory tests, and two dynamic centrifuge tests are simulated to evaluate the performance of the springs. More detailed elaboration on the performance of the springs is provided by simulation of one of the static tests and both of the dynamic tests using also three-dimensional (3D) continuum approach. The evaluation results indicate that API springs do not capture the major mechanisms involved in soil-pile interaction, and this results in erroneous estimation of pile deflections and bending moments. It is shown that the observed errors stem not only from the insufficient characterization of the spring properties (API backbone curves), but also from the inadequate simulation method in which three-dimensional continuum configuration of the supporting soil is represented by a 1D uncoupled spring. Highlights • Measurements of 27 static and 2 dynamic tests on lateral loading of piles are used to assess the reliability of API p - y  springs. • 3D continuum method was used to provide better insight into soil-pile interaction mechanism. • Sources of error in the spring-based simulations are explored and discussed. • Detailed documentation of the limitations of p-y springs is insightful as they are used extensively in design practice. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]