1. Parallax Systematics and Photocenter Motions of Benchmark Eclipsing Binaries in Gaia EDR3
- Author
-
Guillermo Torres and Keivan G. Stassun
- Subjects
Physics ,Brightness ,010504 meteorology & atmospheric sciences ,Cosmic distance ladder ,Stellar parallax ,FOS: Physical sciences ,Astronomy and Astrophysics ,Astrophysics ,01 natural sciences ,Highly sensitive ,Astrophysics - Solar and Stellar Astrophysics ,Space and Planetary Science ,0103 physical sciences ,Binary star ,Parallax ,010303 astronomy & astrophysics ,Data release ,Solar and Stellar Astrophysics (astro-ph.SR) ,0105 earth and related environmental sciences - Abstract
Previous analyses of various standard candles observed by the Gaia satellite have reported statistically significant systematics in the parallaxes that have improved from $\sim$250 $\mu$as in the first data release (DR1) to 50--80 $\mu$as in the second data release (DR2). Here we examine the parallaxes newly reported in the Gaia early third data release (EDR3) using the same sample of benchmark eclipsing binaries (EBs) we used to assess the DR1 and DR2 parallaxes. We find a mean offset of $-37\pm20$ $\mu$as (Gaia$-$EB), which decreases to $-15\pm18$ $\mu$as after applying the corrections recommended by the Gaia Mission team; global systematics in the Gaia parallaxes have clearly improved and are no longer statistically significant for the EB sample, which spans $5\lesssim{G}\lesssim12$ in brightness and 0.03--3 kpc in distance. We also find that the RUWE goodness-of-fit statistic reported in Gaia EDR3 is highly sensitive to unresolved companions (tertiaries in the case of our EB sample) as well as to photocenter motion of the binaries themselves. RUWE is nearly perfectly correlated ($r^2=0.82$) with photocenter motions down to $\lesssim$0.1 mas, and surprisingly this correlation exists entirely within the nominal "good" RUWE range of 1.0--1.4. This suggests that RUWE values even slightly greater than 1.0 may signify unresolved binaries in Gaia, and that the RUWE value can serve as a quantitative predictor of the photocenter motion., Comment: accepted for publication in ApJ Letters
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF