Search

Studies in healthy individuals indicate a significant influence of rotating visual motion on judgments of the subjective visual vertical (SVV). Moreover, sensory stimulation manoeuvres like horizontal coherent dot movement significantly modulate horizontal spatial deficits in patients with rightsided stroke. Here, we investigated whether rotational coherent dot movement (RCDM) modulates spatial orientation deficits of the SVV in the roll plane in right hemispheric stroke. We tested the perceptual judgment of the SVV in 20 patients with right-hemispheric, first ever stroke (10 of them with a disorder of the SVV and 10 without a disorder), and 10 healthy, age-matched subjects under three experimental conditions: (1) with a static background of small white dots, (2) with slow clockwise or (3) counterclockwise circular RCDM of these background stimuli. In the baseline condition with static background, the impaired patient group showed a counterclockwise tilt of the SVV. Clockwise RCDM normalized this deficit completely, while with counterclockwise RCDM a slight aggravation was observed. Similar but quantitatively much smaller effects were obtained in the SVV-unimpaired patients and the healthy individuals. These results demonstrate a strong modulatory effect of RCDM on the SVV in patients with a tilt of the SVV due to right-sided stroke. RCDM thus appears to influence higher spatial representations devoted to visuospatial perception of the SVV. Possible mechanisms as well as clinical implications for therapy of visuospatial disorientation (self-orientation in space) after stroke are discussed., (Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Spatial deficits are frequent after brain damage, particularly right hemisphere stroke. Visual judgments of line orientation (LINE) are often impaired after right parietal lesions. Perception of line orientation is an important visuoperceptual component of visuoconstructive capacities. Yet, little is known about modulating factors in LINE and effective treatments are rare for this disorder. Studies in patients with spatial neglect show that horizontal random dot motion (RDM) significantly modulates horizontal spatial disorders, both transiently and permanently after treatment. In the current study, we investigated whether rotational RDM modulates judgements in an oblique LINE task in 20 patients with right-hemispheric first ever stroke (10 of them with a disorder in LINE and 10 without such a disorder), and 10 healthy, age-matched subjects. Subjects were tested under three experimental conditions: (1) with a static background of small white dots, (2) with slow clockwise or (3) counterclockwise circular RDM of these background stimuli, while they performed the LINE task. In the baseline condition with static background, the impaired patient group showed a significant counterclockwise tilt. Clockwise rotating RDM normalized this deficit transiently but completely, while counterclockwise rotating RDM slightly aggravated it, though not significantly. Tilts in the LINE task were significantly correlated with left visuospatial neglect. Similar but much smaller effects were obtained in the spatially unimpaired patients and the normal controls. These results show that rotational RDM modulates deficits of line orientation in patients with right-sided stroke, possibly by influencing higher spatial representations devoted to the perception of oblique lines., (Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: Patients with right or more rarely left parietotemporal lesions after stroke may have profound visuospatial disorders that impair activities of daily living (ADL) and long-term outcome. Clinical studies indicate improvements with systematic training of perception. Studies of perceptual learning in healthy persons suggest rapid improvements in perceptual learning of spatial line orientation with partial transfer to nontrained line orientations., Objective: The authors investigated a novel feedback-based perceptual training procedure for the rehabilitation of patients after stroke., Methods: In an uncontrolled trial, 13 participants showing profound deficits in line orientation and related visuospatial tasks within 12 to 28 weeks of onset performed repetitive feedback-based, computerized training of visual line orientation over 4 weeks of treatment. Visual line-orientation discrimination and visuospatial and visuoconstructive tasks were assessed before and after training., Results: The authors found (a) rapid improvements in trained but also in nontrained spatial orientation tests in all 13 participants, partially up to a normal level; (b) stability of the obtained improvements at 2-month follow-up; (c) interocular transfer of training effects to the nontrained eye in 2 participants suggesting a central, postchiasmatic locus for this perceptual improvement; and (d) graded transfer of improvements to related spatial tasks, such as horizontal writing, analog clock reading, and visuoconstructive capacities but no transfer to unrelated measures of visual performance., Conclusions: These results suggest the potential for treatment-induced improvements in visuospatial deficits by feedback-based, perceptual orientation training as a component of rehabilitation after stroke.

Patients with homonymous hemianopia often show a contralesional shift towards their blind field when bisecting horizontal lines ("hemianopic line bisection error", HLBE). The reasons for this spatial bias are not well understood and debated. Cueing of spatial attention modulates line bisection significantly in patients with visuospatial neglect. Moreover, recent evidence showed that attention training significantly improves deficits of visual search in hemianopia. Here, we tested in 20 patients with chronic homonymous hemianopia (10 left-sided, 10 right-sided) without visual neglect, 10 healthy control subjects, 10 neurological control patients, and 3 patients with left visuospatial neglect and leftsided hemianopia whether spatial cueing influences the HLBE. Subjects indicated verbally the midpoint of horizontal lines in a computerized line bisection task under four experimental cue positions (cue far left, mid-left, mid-right or far-right within the horizontal line). All 20 hemianopic patients showed the typical HLBE towards their blind field, while the two control samples showed only a small but significant leftward shift (pseudoneglect). None of the 4 cueing manipulations had a significant effect on the HLBE in the hemianopic patients. Moreover, no differential effects of cueing on line bisection results were obtained when analyzed in lesion subgroups of hemianopic patients with circumscribed occipital lesions (N=8) as contrasted with patients having more extended (occipito-temporal or temporal) lesions (N=12). This null-effect contrasts with marked cueing effects observed in 3 neglect patients with left hemianopia in the same tasks, showing the principal efficacy of our cueing manipulation. These results argue against attentional explanations of the HLBE., (Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Patients with right hemisphere lesions often omit or misread words on the left side of a text or the beginning letters of single words which is termed neglect dyslexia (ND). Two types of reading errors are typically observed in ND: omissions and word-based reading errors. The prior are considered as space-based omission errors on the contralesional side of the page, while the latter can be viewed as a kind of stimulus- or word-based reading errors where leftsided parts of a single perceptual entity (the word) are neglected. The head, trunk and eyes are part of a hypothetical egocentric reference frame that is aligned around our body and divides space into a left and right hemispace. Previous neglect studies have shown that head- and trunk-orientation significantly influence contralesional neglect. An open question is whether such egocentric manipulations also influence omissions and word-based errors in paragraph reading in ND. The current study investigated in a sample of right-hemisphere lesioned patients with ND vs. without ND and matched healthy control subjects the influence of head-rotation (HR) on both types of reading errors using controlled indented paragraph reading tests. Passive leftward HR significantly reduced omission errors on the left side of the text in ND, but had no effect on word-based reading errors. In conclusion egocentric manipulations like HR only appear to influence space-based attentional processes in neglect evident as omissions in paragraph reading but have no impact on those attentional processes involved in word identification evident as word-based errors in paragraph reading., (Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)