Search

In this study, we have shown that nutrient input in aquatic ecosystems has different impacts on the various facets of phytoplankton and zooplankton diversity. We designed an experiment with eleven levels of nutrient addition replicated four times. Alpha, beta, and gamma taxonomic and functional diversity indices were calculated based on organisms' occurrences and abundances in each microcosm, among microcosms of the same treatment and for the set microcosms of a same treatment. There was an increase in species richness and a decrease in equitability along the gradient for both groups. Taxonomic beta diversity based on occurrences was positively related to nutrient gradient, but a hump-shaped relationship between nutrient enrichment and beta diversity was observed when abundance data were considered, showing greater variation in species composition at intermediate levels of nutrient. Alpha functional richness increased for both groups, whereas alpha and gamma RaoQ, and gamma functional divergence decreased, indicating that nutrient enrichment promotes functional trait richness, but also the dominance of species. At small spatial scale and at a short period of time, we showed that taxonomic and functional diversities respond in similar ways to nutrient enrichment. We conclude that nutrient input may modify community composition and affect ecological processes overtime. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Eutrophication is a key threat to aquatic biodiversity around the world, but especially in the Cerrado biome that has undergone intensive land use conversion and fertilizer use. In this study, we investigated how water conditions and different taxonomic and functional indicators of phytoplankton communities responded to eutrophication over time and also identified which of these variables can act as early indicators of eutrophication. We used a mesocosm experiment to simulate shallow lakes and added nutrients to produce eutrophic and oligo-mesotrophic environments. We found that conductivity and turbidity increased with the nutrient enrichment process. Eutrophication did not change species richness; however, it increased the total phytoplankton density and chlorophyll-a concentration and decreased the diversity indices (Shannon–Wiener diversity and Pielou's equitability) over time, for both taxonomic and functional facets. Our results indicate that eutrophication may not have marked effects on the composition of the initially dominant organisms in the short term but does increase the density of certain organisms and exclude rare species and functional groups in eutrophic environments along the time. Furthermore, the diversity indices are more sensitive indicators of eutrophication compared to abiotic indicators and composition of species and functional groups. Therefore, they may be considered reliable early warnings of ecosystem changes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

While environmental alterations have made Homo sapiens the hyperkeystone species of the globe, biotic homogenization initiated a new era, the "Homogenocene." Still, some terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems in South America are considered pristine and wild, which can lead to a general faith that economic progress is consistent with conservation strategies, even without scientific support. We compiled anthropogenic threats to fish biodiversity in a hierarchical meta‐analysis, along with an evidence synthesis of threats related to biological invasions, based on peer‐reviewed research with the aim to represent the actual conservation status of the South American ichthyofauna. We highlighted human‐related threats and synergistic effects of biological invasions, climate change, environmental alterations (e.g., pollution, aquaculture and damming) and fisheries. Considering measures that reinforce novel alien fish (e.g., artificial hybrids or genetically modified) introductions, it became clear why an eventual increase in local or regional species richness is not always beneficial to aquaculture, biodiversity, human well‐being or nature. In fact, citizens in all societal roles, including scientists, should revise their concepts about threats to fish biodiversity. Environmental policies require more than taxonomic diagnostics to achieve conservation goals under an incompatible scenario of a multiplying number of fish species and biotic homogenization. We advocate for countries in South America using science‐based strategies useful to maintain their social and economic growth along with their "remaining nature." We live a crucial moment when the government overlooks threats to biodiversity and uses agribusiness as the most acceptable manner of fuelling the economy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]