Search

Testicular spermatozoa are utilized to achieve pregnancy in couples with severe male factor infertility. Several studies suggest that aneuploidy rates in spermatozoa are elevated at the testicular level in infertile patients compared to ejaculates of normal controls. However, essential data regarding aneuploidy rates between ejaculated and testicular spermatozoa in the same individuals is lacking. The purpose of our study was to compare aneuploidy rates at the testicular and post-testicular level from the same patients with persistently high sperm DNA damage. Ejaculates and testicular biopsies were obtained from eight patients with persistently high DNA damage (>30%). Both ejaculated and testicular samples were analyzed for sperm DNA damage and sperm aneuploidy for chromosomes 13, 18, 21, X, and Y. In addition, semen samples from ten normozoospermic men presenting for fertility evaluation served as a control group. A strong correlation between the alteration of spermatogenesis and chromatin deterioration was observed in our study. In the same individuals, testicular samples showed a significantly lower DNA damage compared to ejaculated spermatozoa (14.9% ± 5.0 vs. 40.6% ± 14.8, P < 0.05), but significantly higher aneuploidy rates for the five analyzed chromosomes (12.41% ± 3.7 vs. 5.77% ± 1.2, P < 0.05). While testicular spermatozoa appear favourable for ICSI in terms of lower DNA damage, this potential advantage could be offset by the higher aneuploidy rates in testicular spermatozoa. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Telomeres play a fundamental role in the organization of the sperm nucleus resulting in the looped chromosome configuration and non-random positioning of chromosomes. Telomeres localize in the nuclear periphery and interact dynamically by forming dimers and tetramers. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the relationship of telomere interactions to DNA damage, a factor known to adversely influence male fertility. Telomeres were localized by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) using human chromosome pan-telomeric probe in ten samples with low and ten samples with high sperm DNA damage. The samples with a low DNA fragmentation index (DFI) had a mean number of telomere signals of 21.7±1.9 compared to a mean of 26.5±3.4 signals in the samples with a high DFI ( p<.005). The percentage of cells with a typical telomere distribution of ≤23 telomere-telomere dimers was observed in 70.8%±15.6 samples with a low DFI compared to 44.2%±22.4 in samples with a high DFI ( p<.05). These results suggest that sperm DNA damage is associated with disruption of the normal telomere-telomere interactions leading to possible loss of the looped chromosome configuration. Improperly packed and organized sperm chromatin might have a high probability of disrupting the extremely structured sequence of sperm chromosome deposition, activation, and processing by the oocyte at the time of fertilization. These results might provide additional information on the nature of sperm DNA damage and the role of such damage on fertilization and development of the zygote. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Men with high sperm DNA damage have a reduced fertility potential. Correlation of specific clinical factors to the degree of sperm DNA damage remains unclear. This retrospective study evaluated the frequency and severity of sperm DNA damage in men with different aetiologies of male factor infertility. Patients with mate factor infertility (n = 288) underwent flow cytometry-based sperm DNA damage assessment and results were correlated with the major aetiologies of male infertility: varicocele, bacteriospermia and idiopathic infertility. Sperm DNA damage was significantly correlated to the patient's age, sperm motility, normal morphology and vitality (P < 0.001). High sperm DNA damage (≥30%) was most frequently found in the group with bacteriospermia (48%), compared with 30% of the men with varicoceles and 22% of the men with idiopathic infertility (P < 0.02). White some tendency was observed for a correlation of increasing sperm DNA damage in patients with grade III and bilateral varicoceles, this difference did not reach statistical significance. The data support the importance of proper physical and laboratory investigations of the fertility status in men to correctly diagnose and treat mate infertility. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Assessment of sperm DNA damage has been suggested as a negative predictor of fertility potential. Multiple pathological factors acting at both the intra-testicular and post-testicular levels may contribute to sperm DNA damage. The relative contribution of each of these factors in an individual with high DNA damage (>30%) is unclear. The management of patients with elevated DNA damage is also challenging. The purpose of our retrospective study was to evaluate the clinical course of patients with sperm DNA damage over 30% and to assess the effect of non-specific (oral antioxidant) and cause-specific treatments on the quality of their sperm DNA. Results of our retrospective study suggest that the evaluated group with high DNA damage was diagnostically heterogeneous and comprised patients with varicoceles, bacteriospermia and idiopathic infertility. A three month course of antioxidant therapy reduced sperm DNA damage in only 30/61 (49%) patients with significant improvement between the initial and post-treatment DNA Fragmentation Index (DFI) results (46.8%±14.1 vs. 36.7%±16.6, p < .001). The positive effect of antioxidants could be age-dependent, as patients older that 40 years of age showed no improvement after such treatment. The cause-specific treatments showed superior results compared to antioxidants alone. Improvement was observed in 7/9 (78%) of patients after surgical varicocele repair between the initial and post-treatment DFI results (44.7%±12.8 vs. 28.4%±9.5, p < .03). The majority of the patients 13/14 (93%) with bacteriospermia had improvement in sperm DFI results after antibiotic treatment (50.4%±19.1 vs. 38.6%±18.7, p < .001). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To compare DNA damage in ejaculated and testicular spermatozoa in patients with previously unsuccessful oral antioxidant treatment.Design: Prospective clinical study.Setting: University-affiliated teaching hospital.Patient(s): Twelve men with persistently high sperm DNA damage.Intervention(s): Evaluation of DNA damage of ejaculated and testicular spermatozoa by terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase-mediated deoxyuridine triphosphate nick end labeling (TUNEL) assay.Main Outcome Measure(s): The DNA damage of ejaculated spermatozoa compared with that of testicular spermatozoa, both samples collected on the day of intracytoplasmic sperm injection.Result(s): Ejaculated spermatozoa showed a threefold higher DNA damage when compared with testicular samples (39.7% +/- 14.8 vs. 13.3% +/- 7.3).Conclusion(s): Our results indicated that in patients with previously unsuccessful oral antioxidant treatment the retrieved testicular spermatozoa had a lower degree of DNA damage compared with ejaculated sperm collected on the same day. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]