Search

Purpose: To determine the relationships between impact of secondary health conditions (SHCs), treatment of SHCs, and life satisfaction (LS) following spinal cord injury (SCI) across 21 countries. Hypotheses were as follows: (1) Persons with SCI and fewer SHCs report higher LS and (2) Persons who receive treatment for SHCs report higher LS than those who do not receive treatment., Methods: Cross-sectional survey, including 10,499 persons with traumatic or non-traumatic SCI aged 18 years or older and living in the community. To assess SHCs, 14 items adapted from the SCI-Secondary Conditions Scale were used (range 1-5). SHCs index was calculated as the mean of all 14 items. LS was assessed using a selection of 5 items from the World Health Organization Quality of Life Assessment. LS index was calculated as the mean of these 5 items., Results: South Korea, Germany, and Poland exhibited the highest (2.40-2.93) and Brazil, China, and Thailand the lowest (1.79-1.90) impact of SHCs. Indexes for LS and SHCs were inversely correlated (- 0.418; p < 0.001). Mixed Model Analysis showed that the fixed effect (key predictors of the study) of SHCs index (p < 0.001) and the positive interaction between SHCs index and treatment (p = 0.002) were significant determinants of LS., Conclusion: Persons with SCI across the world are more likely to perceive better LS if they experience fewer SHCs and receive treatment for SHCs, in comparison to those who do not. Prevention and treatment of SHCs following SCI should be a high priority in order to improve the lived experience and enhance LS., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Objective: To analyze and compare life satisfaction (LS) in persons with spinal cord injury (SCI) living in 22 countries participating in the International Spinal Cord Injury (InSCI) community survey. The study tested the hypothesis that there are differences in LS across InSCI countries according to the countries' economic status specified as gross domestic product per capita purchased power parity (GDP-PPP)., Design: Cross-sectional survey., Setting: Community setting (22 countries representing all 6 World Health Organization regions)., Participants: Persons (N=12,108) with traumatic or nontraumatic SCI aged at least 18 years, living in the community and able to respond to one of the available language versions of the questionnaire., Interventions: Not applicable., Main Outcome Measures: LS measured by 5 items selected from the World Health Organization Quality of Life Assessment-BREF: satisfaction with overall quality of life, health, daily activities, relationships, and living conditions. LS index was calculated as the mean of these 5 items., Results: The highest level of LS was reported by persons with SCI living in the United States, Malaysia, and Switzerland (mean range, 3.76-3.80), and the lowest was reported by persons with SCI living in South Korea, Japan, and Morocco (mean range, 2.81-3.16). There was a significant cubic association between LS index and GDP-PPP. Regression tree analysis revealed the main variables differentiating LS index were GDP-PPP and monthly income, followed by time since injury and education., Conclusions: Life satisfaction reported by persons with SCI related mainly to their country economic situation expressed by GDP-PPP and monthly income. The results of this study underscore the need for policy dialogues to avoid inequalities and improve the life experience in persons with SCI., (Copyright © 2021 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To examine relationships between age and spinal cord injury (SCI) and cause of SCI and how this depends on economic development., Design: Cross-sectional survey., Setting: Community, 22 countries representing all stages of economic development., Participants: A total of 12,591 adults with SCI (N=12,591)., Interventions: Not applicable., Main Outcome Measures: Interactions between age at injury and gross domestic product per capita based on purchasing power parity (GDP PPP) quartiles calculated with the application of logistic regression with the Maximum Likelihood estimator. Independence between SCI cause and age was assessed with the Wald test., Results: In persons with traumatic SCI, younger age was associated with a higher likelihood of injury in motor vehicle collisions, whereas older individuals had a greater chance of SCI due to falls. Associations between increased likelihood of high-energy traumatic SCI and younger age, low-energy traumatic SCI with older age, nontraumatic SCI with older age in persons injured in adulthood, and a higher prevalence of incomplete SCI lesions in individuals injured at an older age were revealed. Higher GDP PPP influenced positively the likelihood of low-energy SCI in older individuals and was negatively associated with the chance of sustaining SCI in motor vehicle collisions and the likelihood of having nontraumatic SCI at an older age., Conclusions: SCI in older age is predominantly because of falls and nontraumatic injuries. Higher country income is associated with an increased proportion of SCI sustained later in life because of low-energy trauma involving cervical injury and a lower chance of being because of motor vehicle collisions. An increased prevalence of nontraumatic SCI in older individuals associated with lower country income may reflect a higher exposure to socially preventable conditions and lower access to or efficacy of health care. Future studies on etiology of SCI should make the distinction between low and high falls and overcome underrepresentation of older persons., (Copyright © 2021 The American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: To investigate the experience of environmental barriers by people with spinal cord injury (SCI) across 22 countries. Specific aims were to describe and compare the prevalence of environmental barriers experienced across countries, and to analyze determinants of environmental barriers at individual and country level., Design: Cross-sectional community survey., Participants: Individuals (N=12,591) living with SCI in the community., Interventions: Not applicable., Main Outcome Measure: Nottwil Environmental Factors Inventory-Short Form., Results: Most barriers were experienced in relation to accessibility, climate, transportation, finances, and state services. More severe barriers were experienced in settings with lower gross domestic product (GDP), which especially refers to medical supplies (gamma=-0.38; P<.001) and finances (gamma=-0.37; P<.001) in this study. However, in a multivariable negative binomial regression using within-between estimation of the number of barriers experienced on the selected predictors, the effect of GDP was reversed when it was adjusted for covariates. On the individual level, the number of experienced barriers decreased with better mental health and greater self-care ability. People with low income, with paraplegia, complete lesions, and more health problems reported more barriers. On the country level, fewer barriers were reported in countries with higher average age, better mental health, and greater self-care ability, as well as in those with a higher percentage of traumatic SCI, paraplegia, and complete lesions. More barriers were reported in countries with a higher percentage of married individuals, lower average household income, higher average time since injury, higher mean vitality scores, and greater income inequality., Conclusions: Study participants reported a significant number of environmental barriers, many of which are modifiable. Complementary interventions are recommended. Within and between country effects of covariates sometimes pointed in different directions, suggesting that countries with a different composition of SCI population also differed in environmental contexts., (Copyright © 2020 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)