Search

Background: Percutaneous kyphoplasty (PKP) is a widely accepted surgical treatment modality for painful osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures. The risk factors cause of subsequent vertebral fractures after PKP are debated., Objectives: To evaluate risk factors for the occurrence of new vertebral compression fractures after PKP., Study Design: A retrospective study., Setting: A single-center inpatient population., Methods: A total of 921 patients (1,152 vertebrae) with PKP were investigated. Among those patients, 111 patients (155 levels) incurred refractures after PKP., Results: The average bone mineral density was -3.27 in the "refracture"group and -3.00 in the "no fracture" group (P = 0.031). Morbidities of women were significantly higher in the "refracture" group (90.99%) compared with the "no fracture" group (81.73%) (P = 0.015). Among the basic diseases, several diseases (history of previously fracture, previously osteoporosis, gallstone disease, stomach disease, and ovariectomy) are associated with refractures after PKP (P < 0.05). And antiosteoporotic treatment (calcium + vitamin D or zoledronate) after PKP can also significantly reduce the occurrence of refracture (P < 0.000). In addition, logistic regression analysis also showed that most of the above contents had significant correlation with the refracture after PKP (P < 0.05), except for gallstone disease (P = 0.362)., Limitations: Retrospective study, single center., Conclusion: Osteoporosis is the main cause of refracture after PKP. Elderly women were found to be more susceptible than elderly men to refracture. Patients with a history of previously fracture, previously osteoporosis, stomach ulcer, and ovariectomy are more likely to be refracture. Antiosteoporosis treatment (calcium + vitamin D or zoledronate) after PKP can reduce the risk of refracture.

Background: The causes of subsequent vertebral fractures after kyphoplasty are debated. It is reported that most new vertebral fractures after kyphoplasty develop in adjacent vertebrae., Objectives: We explored whether kyphoplasty increases the incidence of adjacent vertebral fractures and identified risk factors for new vertebral compression fractures (VCFs) after kyphoplasty., Study Design: Retrospective study., Setting: Inpatient population of a single center., Methods: We studied 356 patients treated with kyphoplasty from January 2008 to March 2012. Among those patients, there were 35 new VCFs after kyphoplasty. Subsequently, these patients were divided into 2 groups: an "adjacent fracture" group and a "nonadjacent fracture" group. In addition, all patients treated with kyphoplasty were further assigned to either a "new fracture" group or a "no fracture" group., Results: The occurrence of new VCFs in the "nonadjacent fracture" group was significantly higher than that in the "adjacent fracture" group. The average bone mineral density (BMD) of the spine was -3.95 in the "new fracture" group and -2.86 in the "no fracture" group. The risk of new vertebral fracture increased as the bone mineral density decreased (P < 0.05). The morbidity of women was significantly higher in the "new fracture" group (94.29%) than in the "no fracture" group (77.88%) (P = 0.025)., Limitations: Retrospective study at a single center., Conclusion: New VCFs after kyphoplasty occurred most often in nonadjacent vertebrae. VCFs after kyphoplasty were common in patients with low bone mineral density and in women, suggesting that osteoporosis is an underlying mechanism. INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW: This study was approved by the institutional review board.

Background: An osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture is a common condition in elderly people, especially women. The percutaneous kyphoplasty is an effective treatment for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures. Controversy remains regarding whether a unilateral or a bilateral approach is superior, and to our knowledge, there have been no large studies comparing these two approaches, therefore a meta-analysis synthesizing the data on this question is warranted., Questions/purposes: We asked the following questions: (1) Is there evidence to suggest a benefit in clinical outcome as assessed by the VAS and Oswestry Disability Index of a unilateral kyphoplasty or bilateral kyphoplasties? (2) Are the complications associated with the two approaches different? (3) Do the procedures result in different kyphosis angle reduction or anterior vertebral height restoration? (4) Is the surgical time for the procedures different?, Methods: We searched the Cochrane Library, PubMed MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Knowledge MEDLINE (January 1980 to June 2013), and reference lists of eligible prospective studies. The levels of the evidence and recommendations were assessed using the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) system. Five studies encompassing 253 patients met the inclusion criteria., Results: The short- and long-term clinical outcomes as assessed by the VAS and Oswestry Disability Index showed no differences between unilateral and bilateral kyphoplasties (p = 0.41, p = 0.60 for VAS; p = 0.10, p = 0.36 for Oswestry Disability Index). There were no differences in complications such as cement leakage and adjacent vertebral fractures associated with the two approaches (p = 0.43 and p = 0.95). The kyphosis angle reduction and anterior vertebral height restoration showed no difference between the two approaches (p = 0.34 and p = 0.46). The unilateral approach was shorter in terms of surgical time (mean difference, -24.98; p < 0.0001). The overall GRADE system evidence quality was very low, with only high evidence for operation time, which lessens our confidence in recommendations., Conclusions: Unilateral and bilateral percutaneous kyphoplasties appear to be safe and effective for treating osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures. No clinically important differences were found between them. Considering less operation time and less cost, we suggest that a unilateral percutaneous kyphoplasty is advantageous, but because of the poor quality of the evidence, high-quality randomized controlled trials are required to resolve this issue.

Purpose: There is still debate over whether vertebroplasty (VP) or kyphoplasty (KP) is superior for the treatment of osteoporosis vertebral compression fractures (VCFs). We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised and non-randomised controlled trials comparing VP with KP to reach a relatively conclusive answer., Methods: We searched computerised databases comparing efficacy and safety of VP and KP in osteoporotic fractures. These trials reported pain relief (Visual Analogue Scale), disability (Oswestry disability score) and complications (i.e., cement leakage, incident fractures) as the primary outcome., Results: Eight studies involving 848 patients were identified. The outcome showed that VP is more effective in the short-term (no more than seven days) pain relief. Kyphoplasty had a superior capability for intermediate-term (around three months) functional improvement. As for long-term pain relief and functional improvement, there is no significant difference between these two interventions. Consistently, both interventions have similar risk for subsequent fracture and cement leakage., Conclusion: Thus considering the higher cost of the KP procedure, we recommend VP over KP for the treatment of osteoporotic VCFs.