Search

Purpose: To evaluate whether a new PEEK vertebral body replacement can maintain the sagittal alignment as an anterior column reconstruction device in thoracic and lumbar spinal defects due to trauma or tumor., Methods: Retrospective review of 48 patients who underwent a corpectomy between T5 and L5 due to trauma or tumor and were stabilized with the new PEEK vertebral body replacement, between 2013 and 2017. We excluded patients who underwent a corpectomy for infection or degenerative disease and patients without complete follow-up in our institution. The primary outcome was the bi-segmental kyphotic angle (BKA). Secondary outcomes were the assessment of pedicle screw loosening, cage height, and subsidence or tilting of the cage. The clinical outcomes were assessed through the COMI-Score, EuroQol-5D, and Karnofsky indexes. Bony fusion and complications were registered., Results: After the surgery BKA decreased by 12.1° (p < 0.001). At the end of the follow-up, we observed a mean loss of reduction of 1.6° (p = 0.002). This was accompanied by an increase in subsidence of 2.1 mm (p < 0.001) and mean tilting of the cage of 1.4° (p = 0.003). The height of the cage and other parameters did not experience any changes. Clinically, the COMI-Score (p = 0.02) and the EuroQol-5D Index (p = 0.012) showed significant improvement, same as Karnofsky-Index (p = 0.015) at final follow-up. The fusion rate according to Bridwell was 92.1%. The 2% late complications were related to implant malpositioning., Conclusion: The new PEEK expandable vertebral body replacement is effective and safe in thoracic and lumbar anterior column reconstruction in tumor and trauma diseases.

Background: Thoracolumbar burst fractures (TLBFs) are the most common spinal trauma; however, their appropriate management has not yet been determined. In this study, we aimed to compare the clinical and radiological results of percutaneous pedicle screw fixation (PPSF) following posterior decompression technique versus anterior corpectomy and fusion technique for the treatment of TLBFs., Methods: A total of 46 patients (2002-2015) with TLBFs were included in this study. The inclusion criteria were a single-level Magerl type A3 burst fracture of the thoracolumbar junctional spine (T12-L2). The patients were divided into two groups; Group A (22 patients) underwent anterior corpectomy and fusion, and Group B (24 patients) underwent PPSF after posterior decompression. Anterior corpectomy and fusion surgery were performed in 22 cases before April 2009, and PPSF following posterior decompression technique was used in 24 cases since then. For radiological assessment, the kyphosis angle was measured preoperatively, early postoperatively, and at the last follow-up using the Cobb angle. Mean correction of the Cobb angle after surgery, and loss of correction between the immediate postoperative and final Cobb angle were calculated accordingly. All neurological deficits were identified in the initial evaluation and graded using the American Spinal Injury Association(ASIA) grading system. Perioperative parameters including operation time, amount of blood loss, and mean hospital stay were also evaluated., Results: The patients comprised 17 males and 5 females in Group A and 13 males and 11 females in Group B. In terms of the involved levels, there were three cases of T12, twelve L1, and seven L2 in Group A and one case of T12, thirteen L1, and ten L2 in Group B. The mean follow-up duration was 44.9 months in Group A and 14.7 months in Group B. The kyphotic angle was significantly corrected after surgery by 6.4° in Group A (p = 0.001) and 9.2° in Group B (p < 0.001). Among patients with neurological deficit, 11 of 15 in Group A and 20 of 23 in Group B demonstrated improvement by at least one ASIA grade at the final observation. However, there was no significant difference in neurological improvement between the two groups (p = 0.13). Mean operation time was significantly shorter (p < 0.001) and mean blood loss was significantly less (p < 0.001) in Group B than in Group A. Mean hospital stay was also significantly shorter in Group B (p < 0.001)., Conclusions: Spinal canal decompression through small laminectomy followed by PPSF in the treatment of TLBFs with neurological deficits offers excellent clinical and radiological improvement as well as biomechanical stability. Furthermore, this can be a safe and effective surgical option with the advantage of less invasiveness in the treatment of TLBFs., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: Destabilization of the vertebral column - as seen in trauma and metastatic spine disease - often requires corpectomy and anterior column reconstruction. Stresses applied to the implant can lead to subsidence, ultimately requiring in surgical revision. Here we report a cadaveric investigation of a novel expandable corpectomy cage with a self-adjusting, multiaxial end cap., Methods: Four cadaveric T11-sacrum spines (mean 67.3 yr; 75% female) were treated with L2 corpectomy and T12-L4 pedicle screw fusion. Pressure sensors were applied to the L1 and L3 endplates and anterior column reconstruction was performed with either a standard expandable corpectomy cage (T2A), an expandable corpectomy cage with a self-adjusting, multiaxial end cap (T2S), or the latter cage with oblong, extended end caps (T2S + EE). Total contact area was compared pre- and post-reduction using ANOVA general linear model., Results: Pre-reduction, the T2S constructs had a trend of higher surface contact than the conventional T2A constructs, though the results were not significant (p = 0.068); however, T2S + EE constructs did produce significantly larger contact with vertebral endplates (p = 0.04). The difference was also significant for both conditions following compression (p < 0.01 for both constructs)., Conclusions: The use of an expandable corpectomy cage with a self-adjusting, multiaxial end cap produces significant increases in vertebral endplate contact area. These in vitro data suggest that the self-adjusting, multiaxial end cap may serve to decrease the risk of subsidence in patients undergoing anterior column resection and reconstruction. Clinical data would be required to confirm the relationship between endplate contact area and risk of subsidence., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Study Design: Retrospective study. Aim: To retrospectively evaluate and compare the long-term outcome of anterior vertebral body reconstruction in tuberculosis (TB) of the dorsal spine by direct anterior-versus-posterior approach. Materials and Methods: A total of 127 patients operated by posterior approach, 118 by anterior for TB-thoracic spine with at least 1-year follow-up were included and retrospectively analyzed. Patients were assessed clinically, radiologically and data regarding age, sex, levels involved, surgical approach, operative time, blood loss, neurological recovery using Frankel grade, pre- and post-operative kyphosis, % correction of kyphosis, time for fusion, fusion grading using Bridwell criteria, % loss of correction, mobilization time and complications if any were collected, analyzed, compared in anterior-v/s-posterior approaches. Results: The mean age in anterior-approach was 36.03 and 39.83 years in posterior. Mean operative time in anterior-approach was 6.11 and 5 h in posterior. Mean blood loss of 1.6 L in anterior approach and 1.11 L in posterior. Mean preoperative kyphosis angle in posterior-approach was 34.803°and 11.286° (P < 0.001) at 3 months postopandtotal correction of 67.216%. Mean preoperative kyphosis angle in anterior-approach was 41.154° and 9.498° at 3 months postopandtotal correction of 77.467% (P < 0.001). Mean loss of correction at 1 year was 4.186°in posterior-approach and 6.184°in anterior. The mean time for fusion was 4.69 months in anterior-approach while 6.34 months in posterior as per Bridwell criteria. Meantime for mobilization in posterior-approach was 1.18 and 2.51 weeks in anterior. Significant improvement in neurology was seen in patients operated by either approach, slightly better in anterior. Complications were more in posterior-approach. Conclusions: Anterior-approach allows for thorough debridement, neural decompression, better anterior column reconstruction, and deformity correction under direct vision than posterior. Direct cord visualization while correcting kyphosis reduces the chances of neurological complications significantly. Both approaches have unique advantages and limitations. Though the posterior approach is easy to master, results shown by the anterior cannot be overseen. To conclude, better functional outcome and significantly better kyphosis correction are seen with anterior-approach, which are strong pointers favoring it. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Study Design: A retrospective case series.Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate patients with cervical spine osteomyelitis who underwent multilevel (≥2) subaxial corpectomies and anterior column reconstruction and plating.Summary Of Background Data: Neglected multilevel subaxial cervical osteomyelitis is a potentially dangerous disease. As it is rare, early radiographic and clinical outcomes after multilevel anterior corpectomy and reconstruction for subaxial cervical osteomyelitis are incompletely defined.Methods: Adults who underwent multilevel corpectomy and anterior plating/reconstruction for subaxial cervical osteomyelitis at two institutions were reviewed. Analysis of patient demographics, operative details, and radiographic cervical alignment parameters [segmental kyphosis, cervical lordosis, C2-7 sagittal vertical axis (SVA)] was performed.Results: Nineteen patients [15 males, four females; average age 48 years (20-81 yrs)] met inclusion criteria. The majority had pre-operative neurologic deficits or was immunosuppressed. All were treated with ≥6 weeks of intravenous antibiotics following operation. All had anterior plating/reconstruction with titanium cages (expandable-6; mesh-6) or structural bone graft (fibular allogaft-6; tricortical iliac crest-1). The average number of corpectomies was 2.4 (2-4). The average numbers of levels fused anteriorly was 4.4 (4-6) and posteriorly was 6.3 (4-9). The majority of patients (74%) was treated with an anterior/posterior approach. Average follow-up was 16 ± 9 months. There was significant improvement in all cervical alignment parameters (segmental kyphosis, C2-7 SVA, cervical lordosis). No intraoperative complications occurred and no patient deteriorated neurologically postoperatively. Postoperative complications included anterior cage/graft dislodgement (n = 2), recurrent neck hematomas requiring revision (n = 1), epidural hematoma (n = 1), and wound infection (n = 1). Sixty percent of patients had persistent neurologic dysfunction at final follow-up. None required reoperation for recurrent infection or pseudarthrosis.Conclusion: Although overall prognosis and neurologic recovery are guarded in medically fragile patients with multilevel subaxial cervical osteomyelitis, reconstruction with multilevel (≥2) corpectomy and anterior reconstruction/plating results in excellent restoration of cervical alignment and low rates of recurrent infection and pseudarthrosis.Level Of Evidence: 4. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]