Search

Study Design: Retrospective comparative study., Objectives: We hypothesize that preoperative bracing for idiopathic scoliosis results in increased stiffness, as measured by reduced correction on bending films, ultimately leading to decreased surgical correction. Bracing is the primary nonoperative treatment for immature AIS patients with mild to moderate curves. For patients who fail bracing and proceed to operative intervention, it is unknown whether their nonoperative treatment impacts their surgical results., Methods: We conducted a single-center, retrospective, comparative study on 181 consecutive adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients, aged 11-17 years, who underwent posterior spine fusion between 2011 and 2013. Patient flexibility was measured as percent change in the curve angle of the spine from standing to supine bend. Overall curve correction was calculated as the preoperative to postoperative change in standing coronal measure divided by the preoperative measurement and reported as a percentage., Results: One hundred and twelve subjects (62%) underwent bracing prior to fusion. Braced patients had similar preoperative major Cobb angles than unbraced patients (56.5 vs 59.0, p = 0.07). Preoperatively, braced patients achieved less primary curve correction in bending films (33.6%) than unbraced patients (40.6%, p = 0.003). Postoperatively, Cobb angle correction was not different between the braced (75.7%) and unbraced group (77.2%) overall (p = 0.41). There was no difference in blood loss (p = 0.14) or surgical time (p = 0.96) between braced and unbraced groups when adjusted for surgeon and number of levels fused., Conclusions: While braced patients may demonstrate less preoperative flexibility, there is no evidence that braced patients experience decreased curve correction compared to unbraced patients. Bracing treatment did not impact operative results, as indicated by similar Cobb angle correction, estimated blood loss, and surgical time in both groups., Level of Evidence: III.

Background: Treatment of early onset scoliosis (EOS) with growing rods (GR) can be challenging in patients with significant deformity, hyperkyphosis, or poor bone quality, due to risks of neurological deficit and hardware pull-out. The objective of this study is to report a series of EOS patients managed with a 2-stage GR technique used to minimize these complications., Methods: Two-stage GR technique was performed in 8 patients at mean age of 5.4 (range, 3.4 to 7.9) years. At stage 1, proximal and distal anchors were implanted with local fusion. At stage 2, the distraction rods were inserted. There were at least 3 months between stages 1 and 2, and halo-gravity traction was used before stage 2 unless contraindicated. Demographic, clinical, and surgical data were retrospectively reviewed with mean 4.9 (range, 2.0 to 9.4) years of follow-up. Radiographic measurements including Cobb and kyphosis angles were evaluated before stage 1, after halo-gravity traction, after stage 2, and at last follow-up. Indications for staging, anchor healing time, and complications were collected and analyzed., Results: Indications for 2-stage surgery were poor bone quality in 5 patients and neurological changes during initial attempt at GR placement in 3 patients. The mean time between stage 1 and 2 was 23 (15 to 45) weeks. Patients have undergone mean 7 (3 to 16) lengthenings. Three patients have been converted to magnetically controlled GR. The major coronal Cobb angle improved from mean 81 degrees (range, 61 to 97) preoperatively to 40 degrees (24 to 50) after stage 2 and remained at 40 degrees (27 to 53) at last follow-up. Kyphosis remained controlled from 45 degrees (10 to 76) preoperatively to 38 degrees (9 to 61) after stage 2 to 41 degrees (17 to 65) at last follow-up. Complications included superficial wound problems (4 patients), broken rods (2 patients), proximal migration (2 patients), and implant prominence (1 patient). At minimum 2-year follow-up, no patients had lingering neurological complications or instrumentation-bone failure of the GR construct., Conclusions: Two-stage GR technique can effectively be utilized in EOS patients with poor bone quality or in the event of intraoperative neurological changes. Satisfactory deformity correction can be obtained and routine serial lengthenings can take place with minimal complications., Level of Evidence: Level IV- case series.

Deep wound infection is a common complication in early-onset scoliosis (EOS) surgery. Soft tissue technique has received less attention as a means to reduce infection. A retrospective review of 1170 EOS surgeries (single surgeon, institution) investigated the impact of offset layered closure (OLC) and soft tissue awareness. The introduction of OLC reduced deep infection from 3.0% in 99 surgeries to 0.37% in 1071. Logistic regression confirmed that OLC led to significantly lower odds of infection (P=0.007). This deep infection rate (0.37%) is more typical of elective surgery, providing a more optimistic view of infection in EOS surgery than generally reported.

Study Design: A multicenter retrospective study of preoperative characteristics and surgical outcomes in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS).Objective: To determine the effect of obesity on (i) curve magnitude at first presentation to an orthopedic surgeon, and (ii) surgical outcomes.Summary Of Background Data: Clinical findings for scoliosis may be less apparent in overweight adolescents. The effect of obesity on curve magnitude at presentation to an orthopedic surgeon has not been studied. It is unclear whether obesity is associated with worse surgical outcomes in AIS.Methods: Demographic, radiographic, perioperative, and complications data were collected on AIS patients who had undergone posterior spinal fusion (PSF). Descriptive and inferential analyses were conducted to compare healthy-weight (HW) [body mass index percentile for age (BMI%) ≤ 84], overweight (OW; BMI% ≥ 85), and obese (OB; BMI% ≥ 95) adolescents.Results: We analyzed 588 patients (454 HW, 134 OW, and 71 OB). In comparison with the HW adolescents, major curve magnitude at presentation to orthopedics was larger in the OW adolescents (49.3° vs. 43.9°) (P < 0.0001) and OB adolescents (50.4° vs. 43.9°) (P = 0.001). The OW and OB groups had increased preoperative major curve magnitude [(59.1° vs. 55.4°) (P = 0.001); (59.9° vs. 55.4°) (P = 0.001)], preoperative minor curve magnitude [(42.2° vs. 37.2°) (P < 0.0001); (43.0° vs. 37.2°) (P = 0.001)], preoperative thoracic kyphosis [(30.8° vs. 25.7°) (P < 0.0001); (33.7° vs. 25.7°) (P < 0.0001)], and surgical time [(307 vs. 276 mins) (P = 0.009); (320 vs. 276 mins) (P = 0.005)] than the HW group.Subgroup analysis of the patients with a minimum 2-year follow-up (n = 245) showed a trend towards a higher complication rate in the OB group (47.8% vs. 28.3%) (P = 0.054). The OB group had significantly more superficial infections than the HW group (13.0% vs. 1.6%) (P = 0.001).Conclusion: OW patients with AIS have a larger curve magnitude at presentation to an orthopedic surgeon. OW patients who undergo PSF for AIS have increased surgical times. OB patients may be at higher risk of postoperative complications.Level Of Evidence: 3. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]