Search

Background Context: Cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) is a safe and effective alternative to anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) in the treatment of various degenerative pathologies with advantages of motion preservation and lower rates of adjacent segment degeneration (ASD). Absolute contraindications for CDA have been well outlined in order to prevent adverse outcomes in patients. However, in cases of patients with relative contraindications (kyphotic deformity, prior cervical surgery, etc.), there remains controversy. There is minimal literature evaluating long-term outcomes in this patient population., Purpose: To compare long-term clinical and functional outcomes of CDA in typical patients versus those with relative contraindications., Design: Retrospective cohort review., Patient Sample: Eighty-nine patients were included in the study: 55 (no contraindications) in Group 1 and 34 (relatively contraindicated) in Group 2 and 26 (preoperative segmental kyphosis) in Group 3., Outcome Measures: (1) Patient demographics; (2) perioperative data; (3) rates of complications and revisions; (5) visual analogue scale (VAS), and neck disability index (NDI) scores., Methods: Patients were placed in the relatively contraindicated cohort if they possessed at least one of the following: (1) segmental kyphosis of 5° to 10°, (2) significant loss of disc height (between 50% and 75% of initial measurements or 1.5-3mm), (3) bridging osteophytes, and (4) prior cervical spine surgery based on preoperative cervical radiographs. The other cohort included patients without any relative contraindication who underwent CDA over the same time frame. Additionally, a subgroup analysis was used to compare those without any contraindications to those with only preoperative segmental kyphosis. Patients were included in this study if they met the following criteria: over 18 years of age, minimum follow-up of 24 months, and availability of complete medical records. Patient demographics, levels operated on, and perioperative outcomes were assessed between the two groups. Revision and complication rates were recorded. Functional outcomes scores were compared using VAS and NDI scores at 6-months, 12-months and final follow-up., Results: Mean follow-up was 40.8 months in Group 1 and 38.3 months in Group 2 (p=.569). Complication rates were 21.8% in Group 1 and 26.4% in Group 2 (p=.615). Complication rates in a comparison between Groups 1 and 3 were statistically insignificant (p=.383). The most common complication was transient approach-related postoperative dysphagia (Group 1: 20% vs Group 2: 23.5%, p=.693). No significant differences were observed in the rates of transient dysphonia (Group 1: 0.0% vs Group 2: 2.9%, p=.201), adjacent segment degeneration (ASD) (Group 1: 1.8% vs Group 2: 0.0%, p=.429), infection (Group 1: 1.8% vs Group 2: 2.9%, p=.712), heterotopic ossification (Group 1: 49.1% vs Group 2: 50.0%, p=.934) or spontaneous fusion (Group 1: 1.8% vs Group 2: 2.9%, p=.728). No revision surgeries were observed in either cohort. All three groups demonstrated significant improvements in their VAS and NDI scores compared with preoperative measurements (p<.001), but no significant differences were found in the degree of improvement between groups at any point in time., Conclusions: Our study found no significant differences in clinical and functional outcomes between patients undergoing 1- and 2-level CDA with relative contraindications versus typical patients. These findings suggest that patient eligibility criteria for CDA may warrant expansion. However, future prospective studies over a longer period of follow-up are necessary to corroborate our results., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest Dr Emami receives grants/research support from NuVasive. Dr Hwang is a consultant for Stryker Spine. None of these are applicable to the current study. For the remaining authors, none were declared., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MI-TLIF) is an established technique for the treatment of degenerative spine disease. The larger body habitus of obese patients increases the intraoperative complexity of MI-TLIF. Therefore, it is unclear whether this procedure is appropriate for this population. The goal of this study was to compare postoperative outcomes for obese patients vs nonobese patients undergoing MI-TLIF through a matched cohort analysis. A retrospective review was performed to identify patients who underwent MI-TLIF at a single institution with a minimum follow-up of 5 years. Patients were divided into 2 cohorts: nonobese (body mass index <30 kg/m 2 ) and obese (body mass index ≥30 kg/m 2 ). Each cohort was matched for age, sex, and levels operated. Perioperative data and patient-reported outcomes were compared. Radiographic outcomes were measured at final follow-up. Standard binomial and categorical comparative analyses were performed. A total of 148 patients were included. Of obese patients, 17.6% required revision surgery compared with 16.2% of nonobese patients ( P =.826). Both cohorts had a similar proportion of pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis mismatch correction ( P =.780). Mean change in functional outcome scores for each cohort did not differ significantly. Obese patients had clinically minor but statistically significantly greater blood loss and longer operative times than nonobese patients ( P <.001). Obese and non-obese patients undergoing MI-TLIF showed no long-term differences in revision rate, radiologic outcome, or functional outcome after long-term follow-up. Obese patients had slightly greater blood loss and longer operative times. Our findings suggest that MI-TLIF is an appropriate alternative to traditional open lumbar fusion for obese patients. [ Orthopedics . 2022;45(4):203-208.].

The literature has shown the importance of long-term follow-up for adults with scoliosis treated surgically because complication and revision rates are high. The goal of this study was to determine long-term outcomes and complications of lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) with posterior instrumentation for adult patients with scoliosis. A retrospective review of our institution's database was performed to identify adult patients with scoliosis treated with LLIF between 2008 and 2013 with a minimum follow-up of 4 years. Medical records were reviewed for complications and revisions. Pre- and postoperative deformity Cobb angle measurements were taken as well as pelvic incidence (PI) and lumbar lordosis (LL). Functional outcome scores, including Oswestry Disability Index and visual analog scale score for back and leg pain, were assessed preoperatively and at follow-up. Standard binomial and categorical comparative analysis was performed. The 26 patients included had a mean age of 62 years, mean follow-up of 89 months, and mean of 1.8 levels per operation. Four patients (15.4%) required revisions. Mean deformity Cobb angle was 26° preoperatively and 14° postoperatively. Mean PI-LL mismatch was 11.7° preoperatively and 5.9° postoperatively. Nineteen (73%) patients had a PI-LL mismatch greater than 10° preoperatively, whereas only 2 (7.7%) had a mismatch postoperatively. Improvement was seen in all functional outcome scores. Long-term clinical results of LLIF for adults with deformity showed a low proportion of revision in the treatment of a condition with an established high rate of revision. The ability to reduce pelvic mismatch may further reduce the rate of revision. In this study, LLIF resulted in improved functional outcomes and patient satisfaction. [ Orthopedics . 2022;45(3):e134-e139.].

Study Design: Retrospective cohort study., Objective: To compare minimally invasive posterior cervical foraminotomy (MI-PCF) and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) in the treatment of unilateral cervical radiculopathy., Summary of Background Data: MI-PCF has been shown to be equally effective as ACDF in treating cervical radiculopathy due to foraminal stenosis and similar pathologies. Additionally, it has been hypothesized that preserving motion and avoiding fusion reduces risk for adjacent segment disease, but potentially increases risk for subsequent revision to an ACDF. With similar short-term outcomes and substantial advantages, MI-PCF may be an effective alternative to ACDF for addressing appropriate cervical pathology., Methods: A retrospective review was performed to identify patients between 2009 and 2013 who underwent ACDF or MI-PCF with a minimum follow-up of 7 years. Demographic data was recorded. Revision rates and average time to revision between cohorts were compared. Clinical outcomes were assessed at each follow-up visit with Neck Disability Index and Visual Analog Scale for neck and Visual Analog Scale for arm pain scores. All complications were reviewed. Standard binomial and categorical comparative analysis were performed., Results: A total of 251 consecutive patients were included (205 ACDF, 46 MI-PCF). Mean follow-ups for the ACDF and MI-PCF groups were 98.3 and 95.9 months, respectively. Complication rates were 2.9% and 2.2% for the ACDF and MI-PCF cohorts, respectively (P = 0.779). Revision rates were 7.8% for the ACDF cohort and 8.7% for the MI-PCF cohort (P = 0.840). Both cohorts experienced significant improvements in their clinical scores compared with their preoperative values. Final Visual Analog Scale for neck pain (ACDF: 2.6; MI-PCF: 1.6) and Visual Analog Scale for arm pain (ACDF: 1.1; MI-PCF: 0.4) scores differed significantly at final follow-up (P =  < 0.001; P =  < 0.001)., Conclusion: MI-PCF is a safe and effective alternative to ACDF in the treatment of cervical radiculopathy, demonstrating substantial benefit. After final follow-up, MI-PCF demonstrated superior improvements in Visual Analog Scale scores, without increased complication or revision rates.Level of Evidence: 3., (Copyright © 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Given the shift toward value-based healthcare, strategies that decrease risk in commonly performed procedures such as anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) are of interest. The objective of this study was to analyze the effect of a two-attending surgeon team on the outcomes of patients undergoing single-level ACDF. A retrospective matched-cohort study of patients undergoing single-level ACDF for degenerative cervical spondylosis, with minimum 2-year follow-up was performed. Patients were subdivided into two cohorts: cases with procedures performed by one attending surgeon assisted by a resident physician and cases with procedures performed by an attending surgeon with another attending surgeon as first-assist. Patients were matched by age, sex, body mass index, smoking status, American Society of Anesthesia grade and Charlson Comorbidity Index. Perioperative data and complications were compared. Standard binomial and categorical comparative analysis were performed. Forty-two patients were included (21 in each group). There were 22 males and 20 females, with a mean age of 47.7 years and mean follow-up of 43.4 months. There were no differences in any demographic variable between groups, indicating successful matching. Cohort B had decreased anesthesia time (114.9 vs. 157.1 minutes, P < 0.001), operative time (58.1 vs. 98.9 minutes, P < 0.001) and blood loss (14.8 vs. 24.3 mL, P = 0.012). There were no significant differences in terms of post-operative complications including dysphagia, wound infection, neurologic or cardiovascular related complications. A two-attending surgeon team significantly reduces anesthesia time, surgical time, and blood loss in single-level ACDF procedures without an increase in complications or a decrease in fusion rates.

Background Context: Although highlighted in joint arthroplasty studies, long-term outcomes between differing biomaterial composites, such as metal-on-metal (MoM) and metal-on-plastic (MoP) in anterior cervical disc replacement (ACDR) have not been thoroughly investigated., Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the patient-reported clinical outcomes, overall reoperation rates, complications, and rates of ASD of MoM versus MoP artificial discs in two-level ACDR for the treatment of cervical DDD., Study Design/setting: Meta-analysis and systematic review., Patient Sample: Nine hundred eighty patients (442 MoM, 538 MoP) across seven studies., Outcome Measures: Patient reported clinical outcomes (NDI, VAS-n, VAS-a), overall reoperation rates, complications, and rates of ASD., Methods: A systematic search strategy of three electronic databases (PubMed, CINAHL Plus, and SCOPUS) was conducted utilizing terms related to two-level ACDR. All studies included had a sample size of >10 patients, had a minimum 5-year follow-up, and reported data on adjacent segment disease. Cadaver studies, non-English manuscripts, articles with less than 5-year follow-up and studies in which only single-level ACDR was investigated were excluded. A total of seven studies were included in this analysis. Studies were analyzed for demographic data, clinical outcome scores (NDI, VAS-neck, and VAS-arm), overall reoperation rates, complications, and rates of ASD. A random-effects model of meta-analysis was used for groups that were determined to be heterogenous and a fixed-effects model was utilized for groups that were not. An overlap of 95% confidence intervals suggests no statistically significant difference at the p<.05 level., Results: Seven studies were included with data on 980 patients (442 MoM, 538 MoP). The study population was 52.84% female, with a mean age of 48.01 years, and a mean follow-up of 85.66 months. The mean improvement in NDI was 34.42 (95% CI, 32.49-36.36) and 29.72 (95% CI, 27.15-32.29) for the MoM and MoP groups, respectively. The mean improvement in VAS-neck was 11.20 (95% CI, 10.69-11.70) and 8.78 (95% CI, 7.81-9.74) for the MoM and MoP groups, respectively. The mean improvement in VAS-arm was 10.73 (95% CI, 9.83-11.63) and 8.49 (95% CI, 7.59-9.39) for the MoM and MoP groups, respectively. 3.85% (95% CI, 2.40-6.10) of patients who underwent ACDR with a MoM implant required reoperation compared to 5.33% (95% CI, 3.68-7.65) of patients with a MoP implant. Heterotopic ossification and dysphagia were the most common complications in both groups. The MoM cohort showed a higher incidence of HO (72.62% vs. 21.07%), but a lower incidence of dysphagia (0.96% vs. 16.31%) compared to the MoP cohort. The MoM cohort had a larger proportion of patients with ASD who underwent subsequent surgery at an adjacent level (7.89% MoM versus 1.91% MoP)., Conclusions: Our present meta-analysis suggests that the use of MoM artificial discs in two-level ACDR results in superior clinical outcome score improvement, but higher rates of ASD requiring secondary surgery compared to MoP discs after a follow-up period of 5 years or more., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background Context: Obese patients can pose significant challenges to spine surgeons in lumbar fusion procedures. The increased risk of complications has led surgeons to be wary in pursing operative interventions in these patients. Since the advent of minimally-invasive techniques in lumbar fusion, surgeons are turning to these procedures in an attempt to minimize operative time, blood loss and overall cost. With an increased proportion of obese patients in the population, it is imperative to understand the long-term outcomes in these minimally-invasive approaches., Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the long-term safety and efficacy of extreme lateral interbody fusion (XLIF) in the obese., Study Design/setting: Retrospective cohort study., Patient Sample: A total of 115 patients (53 nonobese and 62 obese) who underwent XLIF with a minimum of 5-year follow-up., Outcome Measures: (1) Patient reported outcome scores: Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for back pain, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), (2) Reoperation rate, (3) Pelvic incidence (PI)- Lumbar lordosis (LL) mismatch correction, (4) Graft subsidence and fusion rate METHODS: A retrospective review was performed to identify patients who underwent XLIF with percutaneous posterior stabilization since 2007 with a minimum follow-up of 5 years. Demographics including BMI were recorded and patients were subdivided into 2 cohorts: nonobese (BMI <30 kg/m 2 ) and obese (BMI ≥30 kg/m 2 ). Functional outcomes were assessed by comparing pre- and postoperative VAS and ODI scores. Reoperation rates were compared between cohorts. PI-LL mismatch was calculated from both pre- and postoperative radiographs. Rates of graft subsidence and fusion were measured at final follow-up., Results: A total of 115 consecutive patients were included (53 nonobese and 62 obese) with a mean follow up of 95.3 months. Mean BMI was 25.3 in the nonobese group and 35.3 in the obese group (p<.001). There were more females in nonobese cohort. VAS scores decreased by a mean of 5.7 in the nonobese cohort, and 5.4 in the obese cohort (p=.213). ODI improvement was also similar between the groups. 5.6% of nonobese patients required reoperation compared to 9.6% of obese patients (p=.503). Graft subsidence rates at final follow-up were 5.66% and 8.06% for the nonobese and obese groups, respectively (p=.613). Rates of successful fusion were 96.23% and 98.39% for the nonobese and obese groups, respectively (p=.469). Both cohorts achieved a similar proportion of PI-LL mismatch correction, 85% in obese versus 78% in nonobese patients (p=.526)., Conclusion: Obese patients have similar surgical outcomes to nonobese patients with respect to functional outcome scores, reoperation rates, graft subsidence and correction of PI-LL mismatch after long-term follow-up. With similar outcome and reoperation profiles, minimally-invasive approaches to the spine, such as XLIF, may be an acceptable alternative to traditional open procedures in obese patients., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF) has been shown to have long-term clinical outcomes similar to those with open TLIF and decreased perioperative morbidity. This study assessed whether this procedure can be safely performed in outpatient settings. Ninety-six consecutive patients undergoing 1- or 2-level MIS-TLIFs were retrospectively reviewed. They were divided into inpatient and outpatient cohorts (36%). All had a minimum of 2 years of follow-up. Patient demographics, comorbidities, complications, and readmissions were examined. Early postoperative complications were stratified into wound related, infection, neurologic, implant related, and vascular injuries. Patients in the outpatient cohort were significantly younger, had lower American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status scores, and had lower Charlson Comorbidity Index scores than patients in the inpatient cohort. There were no statistically significant differences in overall postoperative complication rates, readmission rates, or final Oswestry Disability Index or visual analog scale scores between the 2 cohorts. The clinical outcomes of the outpatient TLIF procedure were similar to those of the inpatient procedure and it had an acceptable complication rate. [Orthopedics. 2016; 39(6):e1218-e1222.]., (Copyright 2016, SLACK Incorporated.)

Paraspinal muscles are commonly affected during spine surgery. The purpose of this study was to assess the potential factors that contribute to paraspinal muscle atrophy (PMA) after lumbar spine surgery. A comprehensive review of the available English literature, including relevant abstracts and references of articles selected for review, was conducted to identify studies that reported PMA after spinal surgery. The amount of postoperative PMA was evaluated in (1) lumbar fusion vs nonfusion procedures; (2) posterior lumbar fusion vs anterior lumbar fusion; and (3) minimally invasive (MIS) posterior lumbar decompression and/or fusion vs non-MIS equivalent procedures. In total, 12 studies that included 529 patients (262 men and 267 women) were reviewed. Of these, 365 patients had lumbar fusions and 164 had lumbar decompressions. There was a significantly higher mean postoperative volumetric PMA with fusion vs nonfusion procedures (P=.0001), with posterior fusion vs anterior fusion (P=.0001), and with conventional fusions vs MIS fusions (P=.001). There was no significant difference in mean volumetric lumbar PMA with MIS decompression vs non-MIS decompression (P=.56). There was significantly higher postoperative PMA with lumbar spine fusions, posterior procedures, and non-MIS fusions., (Copyright 2016, SLACK Incorporated.)

This study evaluated the safety of 3-level anterior cervical diskectomy and fusion (ACDF) with ultra-low-dose recombinant bone morphogenetic protein-2 (rhBMP-2). Thirty-seven consecutive patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy who were treated with 3-level ACDF and rhBMP-2 were evaluated. Complications such as airway or cervical swelling or hematoma were not observed. The rate of dysphagia was no different at 1, 2, and 6 months postoperatively compared with reports in the literature without rhBMP-2. There were significant improvements in VAS neck/arm pain, Oswestry Neck Disability Index, and cervical lordosis. The use of ultra-low-dose rhBMP-2 for 3-level ACDF may be efficacious for surgically addressing 3-level spondylotic myelopathy., (Copyright 2015, SLACK Incorporated.)