Search

The objective of this study is to determine the bone mineral density (BMD) changes in adjacent vertebra following anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). Consecutive patients undergoing ACDF with available preoperative and postoperative computed tomography (CT) imaging were included. Quantitative CT measurements of screw-free cervical and first thoracic vertebra were performed. Comparisons between pre- and postoperative BMD in the vertebrae one or two levels above the upper instrumented vertebra (UIV + 1, UIV + 2) and one level below the lowest instrumented vertebra (LIV + 1) were assessed. Seventy-two patients (men, 66.7%) met the inclusion criteria. The patient population was 91.7% Caucasian with a mean age of 55.0 years. The mean interval (±SD) between surgery and secondary CT was 157 ± 23 days. Preoperative BMD (±SD) in UIV + 1 was 300.6 ± 66.2 mg/cm 3 . There was a significant BMD loss of 1.5% at UIV + 1 after surgery, resulting in a postoperative BMD of 296.2 ± 64.8 mg/cm 3 (p = .029). At UIV + 2 and LIV + 1, no significant differences between pre- and postoperative BMD (304.7 ± 75.7 mg/cm 3 vs. 299.8 ± 74.3 mg/cm 3 , 197.3 ± 50.4 mg/cm 3 vs. 200.8 ± 48.7 mg/cm 3 , p = .113 and p = .078, respectively) were observed. Clinical significance Our results demonstrate a small BMD decrease of 1.5% at UIV + 1. This suggests that the effect of ACDF surgery on the adjacent levels might be smaller compared to the previously described lumbar BMD loss of 10%-20% following posterior lumbar fusion procedures., (© 2021 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Background: Lateral lumbar interbody fusion can be performed without supplemental posterior instrumentation. Previous reports have shown favorable results with stand-alone lateral lumbar interbody fusion (SA-LLIF); however, a reoperation rate of up to 26% has been reported. It remains unclear what perioperative factors are associated with early failure after SA-LLIF. The objective of this study is to determine perioperative factors that increase the risk of early revisions after SA-LLIF., Methods: Data of consecutive patients with SA-LLIF were reviewed. All revisions or recommendations for revision surgery within 12 months after the LLIF procedure were documented. As potential contributors, operative levels, preoperative clinical diagnosis, number of fusion levels, and the average L1/L2 quantitative computed tomography-volumetric bone mineral density value were obtained along with other demographic factors. Cage subsidence (grade 0-III as per Marchi et al.), was also evaluated in patients who had radiographs/computed tomography between 6 and 12 months postoperatively (n = 122). Logistic regression analyses were conducted., Results: Of 133 eligible patients, 21 (15.8%) underwent revision surgery and 4 (3.0%) were recommended for revision surgery within 1 year primarily because of neurologic symptoms or pain (68%). Baseline demographics showed no significant difference between the revision and the nonrevision group. The average number of levels fused was 2.12 (revision group) and 2.14 (nonrevision group) (P = 0.55). Significantly more patients in the revision group had the diagnosis of foraminal stenosis (64.0% vs. 39.8%; P = 0.04)., Conclusions: Patients with foraminal stenosis were more likely to have early revision surgery after SA-LLIF primarily because of neurologic symptoms/pain. This information can assist in preoperative discussions and management of patient expectations., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Bone mineral density (BMD) is not the sole predictor of fracture development. Qualitative markers including bone collagen maturity contribute to bone fragility. Bone and related type I collagen containing connective tissues degenerate in parallel fashion. With aging, changes in skin collagen content and quality have been observed that can be detected on ultrasound (US) as a decrease in dermal thickness and an increase in reticular layer echogenicity. We hypothesized that US dermal thickness and echogenicity correlate with bone collagen maturity. Data of 43 prospectively enrolled patients (mean age 61 years, 24 females), who underwent instrumented, posterior lumbar fusion was analyzed. Besides preoperative quantitative computed tomography (QCT) and skin US measurements, intraoperative bone biopsies were obtained and analyzed with Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy. Among men, there was no correlation between US measurements and collagen maturity. Among women, dermal layer thickness correlated negatively with collagen maturity in trabecular bone of the iliac crest (r = -0.51, p = 0.01) and vertebra (r = -0.59, p = 0.01) as well as in cortical bone of the iliac crest (r = -0.50, p = 0.02) and vertebra (r = -0.50, p = 0.04). In addition, echogenicity correlated positively with collagen maturity in trabecular vertebral bone (r = 0.59, p = 0.01). In both genders, US measurements showed no correlation with QCT BMD. In summary, ultrasound skin parameters are associated with bone quality factors such as collagen maturity, rather than bone quantity (BMD). Ultrasound of the skin may thereby be an easy and accessible take off point for diagnosis of bone collagen maturity and connective tissue degeneration in the future. © 2019 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 37:2508-2515, 2019., (© 2019 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)

Objective: Lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) at the L4-L5 level is a controversial topic in the spine data. The aim of the present study was to compare the rate of nerve-related motor deficits in patients undergoing LLIF with and without L4-L5 involvement., Methods: The clinical data from consecutive patients who had undergone LLIF from 2006 to 2016 at a single academic institution were retrospectively reviewed for new postoperative motor weakness of the quadriceps or tibialis anterior muscle. The patients were divided into 2 groups according to L4-L5 involvement. Regression analysis was performed to examine the association of LLIF at L4-L5 and the risk of new motor deficits., Results: A total of 872 patients met inclusion criteria. The rate of new motor deficits at the 6-week postoperative visit in the L4-L5 group was 13.1%, which was significantly greater than that in the non-L4-L5 group at 5.5% (P < 0.001). After adjustment for potential confounders in multivariate logistic regression models, L4-L5 was still significantly associated with an increased risk of new motor deficit (odds ratio, 2.290; P = 0.008). Of the 686 patients with a minimum follow-up of 6 months, persistent nerve-related motor deficits at the last follow-up examination were recorded in 2.5% of the L4-L5 group and 0.4% of the non-L4-L5 group (P = 0.065)., Conclusions: The results from the present large study are in line with previous investigations reporting an initial increased risk of new motor deficits for LLIF performed at L4-L5. However, most new motor deficits were transient in nature and had resolved over time., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background Context: Clinically, the association between bone mineral density (BMD) and surgical instrumentation efficacy is well recognized. Although several studies have quantified the BMD of the human lumbar spine, comprehensive BMD data for the cervical spine is limited. The few available studies included young and healthy patient samples, which may not represent the typical cervical fusion patient. Currently no large scale study provides detailed BMD information of the cervical and first thoracic vertebrae in patients undergoing anterior cervical spine surgery.Purpose: The objective of this study was to determine possible trabecular BMD variations throughout the cervical spine and first thoracic vertebra in patients undergoing anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) and to assess the correlation between BMDs of the spinal levels C1-T1.Study Design/setting: This is a retrospective case series.Patient Sample: Patients undergoing ACDF from 2015 to 2018 at a single, academic institution with available preoperative CT imaging were included in this study.Outcome Measures: The outcome measure was BMD measured by QCT.Methods: Patients that underwent ACDF from 2015 to 2018 at a single, academic institution were included in this study. Subjects with previous cervical instrumentation or missing/incomplete preoperative cervical spine CT imaging were excluded. Asynchronous quantitative computed tomography (QCT) measurements of the lateral masses of C1 and the C2-T1 vertebral bodies were performed. For this purpose, an elliptical region of interest that consisted exclusively of trabecular bone was selected. Any apparent sclerotic levels that might affect trabecular QCT measurements were excluded from the final analysis. Interobserver reliability of measurements was assessed by calculating the interclass correlation coefficients (ICC). Pairwise comparison of BMD was performed and correlations between the various cervical levels were evaluated. The statistical significance level was set at p<.05.Results: In all, 194 patients (men, 62.9%) met inclusion criteria. The patient population was 91.2% Caucasian with a mean age of 55.9 years and mean BMI of 28.2 kg/m2. The ICC of cervical QCT measurements was excellent (ICC 0.92). The trabecular BMD was highest in the mid-cervical spine (C4) and decreased in the caudal direction (C1 average=253.3 mg/cm3, C2=276.6 mg/cm3, C3=272.2 mg/cm3, C4=283.5 mg/cm3, C5=265.1 mg/cm3, C6=235.3 mg/cm3, C7=216.8 mg/cm3, T1=184.4 mg/cm3). The BMD of C7 and T1 was significantly lower than those of all other levels. Nonetheless, significant correlations in BMD among all measured levels were observed, with a Pearson's correlation coefficient ranging from 0.507 to 0.885.Conclusions: To the authors' knowledge this is the largest study assessing trabecular BMD of the entire cervical spine and first thoracic vertebra by QCT. The patient sample consisted of patients undergoing ACDF, which adds to the clinical relevance of the findings. Knowledge of BMD variation in the cervical spine might be useful to surgeons utilizing anterior cervical spine plate and screw systems. Due to the significant variation in cervical BMD, procedures involving instrumentation at lower density caudal levels might potentially benefit from a modification in instrumentation or surgical technique to achieve results similar to more cephalad levels. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

There have been some reports on the association between spinal balance parameters and regional bone mineral density (BMD), but the results are controversial. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the relationship between spinopelvic parameters and regional volumetric BMDs (vBMDs) measured by quantitative computed tomography (QCT) in the lumbosacral region of patients undergoing lumbar fusion surgery. The data of consecutive patients undergoing posterior lumbar spinal fusion with preoperative computed tomography was reviewed. QCT measurements were conducted in L1–S1 vertebral trabecular bone. The associations between spinopelvic sagittal parameters and vBMDs were evaluated. Multivariate analyses adjusted with age, gender, race, and body mass index were conducted with vBMD as the response variable. A total of 144 patients were included in the final analyses. Mean age (± standard deviation) was 65.4 ± 11.8 years. Mean vBMD in L1 (± standard deviation) was 118.3 ± 37.4 mg/cm3. After adjusting by cofactors, lumbar lordosis was negatively associated with vBMDs in all levels from L1 to L5 (% regression coefficients and adjusted R 2 values: L1, –0.438, 0.268; L2, –0.556, 0.296; L3, –0.608, 0.362; L4, –0.554, 0.228; L5, –0.424, 0.194), but not in S1. Sacral slope was negatively associated with vBMD only at L4 (% coefficient, –0.588; R 2, 0.208). Other parameters were not significantly associated with vBMDs at any levels. Higher lumbar lordosis was associated with lower vBMDs in all lumbar spine levels. Our results suggest that BMD is affected not only by metabolic factors but also by the mechanical environment. Further longitudinal studies are needed to elucidate this effect of vBMD on clinical outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]