Search

Study Design: A retrospective study., Objective: The aim of this study was to compare clinical and radiological outcomes of the anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) with a novel zero-profile variable-angle (Zero-P VA) spacer and a traditional poly-ether-ether-ketone (PEEK) cage and plate system in cases pertaining to cervical radiculopathy/myelopathy. There are two conventional types of ACDF procedures aimed at treating symptomatic cervical spondylosis. The first one involves an uninstrumented "stand-alone" approach utilizing bone graft/cage, while the second incorporates bone graft/cage in conjunction with a front plate positioned before the vertebral bodies. Both procedures have their own inherent advantages and disadvantages. The Zero-P VA spacer, however, represents a unique synthesis by amalgamating the advantages of both traditionally typical procedures. Notably, this spacer can potentially circumvent the issue related to prevertebral soft-tissue disturbance and reduce the occurrence of dysphagia., Methods: Using our surgical database, the authors systematically conducted a retrospective analysis encompassing all patients who underwent single-level ACDF between January 2018 and January 2019, with a minimum two-year follow-up. Patients either received a Zero-P VA implant or PEEK cage coupled with plating. The Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) score and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for arm and neck pain were documented. Dysphagia was evaluated using the Eating Assessment Tool-10 (ETA-10). Additional parameters such as cervical alignment, fusion rate and the incidence of postoperative complications were assessed., Results: According to the outcomes of the statistical analysis, there was no substantial disparity that emerged in the advancements observed in the JOA and VAS metrics between the two study cohorts. Noteworthy, however, the ETA-10 scores were statistically significantly reduced in the Zero-P VA group compared to the cage and plating group (p < 0.05). At the final follow-up, there were no statistically significant differences in the height of the operated segment, Cobb angle of the fused segment, C2-C7 Cobb angle and fusion rate between the two groups (p > 0.05). However, postoperative complications were slightly lower in patients with the Zero-P VA group (7.69%) as compared to the cage and plating group (16.67%)., Conclusion: The clinical outcomes observed with the Zero-P VA spacer used for single-level ACDF were found to be satisfactory. The performance of this device is comparable or even superior to the traditional cage and plating method in preventing postoperative dysphagia and mitigating potential complications associated with the use of a plate., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Objective: The aim of our study was to evaluate features and complications of patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) who underwent posterior lumbar fusion surgery for lumbar degenerative diseases (LDD), as well as the risk factors for revision., Methods: Between January 2010 and December 2016, 132 patients were retrospectively identified for inclusion. Patients were divided into a 29 revision PD group and a 103 non-revision PD group. Patient factors included bone mineral density (BMD) and severity of PD using the Hoehn and Yahr staging system. Surgical factors included surgical levels and fusion methods. Radiographic measurements included pre-operative spinopelvic parameters, paraspinal muscle atrophy, and fatty infiltration. Logistic regression analysis was used to determine independent predictors for revision posterior lumbar fusion., Results: The average age of the PD patients was 67.96 years, and the follow-up time was 49.01 months. R-PD patients accounted for 21.97% of all PD patients who underwent lumbar fusion surgery. Multivariable analysis indicated that low BMD (p = 0.012), fatty infiltration (p = 0.038), a smaller relative cross-sectional area (rCSA) of the paraspinal muscle (p = 0.008), larger pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis (PI-LL) (p = 0.01), and sagittal vertical axis (SVA) (p = 0.004) were significant independent risk factors for revision posterior lumbar fusion in PD patients., Conclusion: PD patients with low pre-operative BMD, fatty infiltration, a smaller rCSA of the paraspinal muscle, and larger PI-LL and SVA had a higher rate of revision lumbar fusion. Maintaining sagittal balance, functional exercises, and anti-osteoporosis treatment were important in preventing complications in PD patients.

Background: Symptomatic adjacent segment disease (ASDis) is a major complication following spinal fusion. Sagittal spinopelvic imbalance may contribute to the development of ASDis. However, the exact ideal correction of lumbar lordosis (LL) is unknown for different ages of people to prevent ASDis. The purpose of this study was to estimate the ideal correction of LL required to prevent symptomatic ASDis requiring revision surgery in patients of various ages, and to determine the radiographic risk factors for ASDis., Methods: 468 patients who underwent lumbar fusion between January 2014 and December 2016, were enrolled in the present study. The patients were classified into the ASDis and N-ASD group. These two matched groups were compared regarding surgery-related factors and radiographic features. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate the risk factors for ASDis., Results: Sixty-two patients (13.25%) underwent reoperation for ASDis during a mean follow-up duration of 38.07 months. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis showed that the postoperative LL - preoperative LL (△LL) cutoff value was 11.7°for the development of ASDis. Logistic regression analysis revealed that the risk factors for symptomatic ASDis were a smaller LL angle, △LL > 12°, and PI-LL > 10° (p <  0.05). For patients > 60 years, the incidence of ASDis was higher in patients with a LL correction of ≥10° and a lumbar-pelvic mismatch (PI-LL) of > 20°., Conclusions: The significant predictors of the occurrence of ASDis were a smaller LL angle, △LL > 12°, and PI-LL > 10°. However, in patients older than 60 years, the incidence of ASDis after lumbar fusion was higher in those with a LL correction of ≥10° and PI-LL of > 20°. More attention should be paid to patient age and the angle of correction of LL before lumbar fusion.

Adjacent segment disease (ASD) is one of the potential risks after lumbar spine surgery with instrumentation. Revision surgery needs to be performed on patients suffered from ASD. The traditional open surgery takes severe injury to the body. We investigated the clinical outcome of using full-endoscopic transforaminal procedure to treat the single-level adjacent segment diseases after posterior lumbar fusion. 33 patients (average 71 years, ranged 65-84 years old) underwent full-endoscopic transforaminal procedure were involved. The Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Modified Japanese Orthopedic Association (mJOA) score and visual analogue scale (VAS) score were used to evaluate the clinical effect. The complication, hospital stay, hospitalization costs and blood loss were investigated according to the patient's records. The mean VAS score was 1.8 and mJOA score was 5.4 postoperatively. Improvement rate was 78%. The mean ODI was 14.6 postoperatively. The mean length of hospital stay, hospitalization costs and blood loss was 2.5 days, $3500 and 15 mL, respectively. No complication or recurrence was observed in any of the patients at the final follow-up. Full-endoscopic transforaminal procedure is a safe and effective technique. It is economical, acceptable and mini-invasive. Of course, it also can shorten the length of hospital stay and decrease bleeding. For revision surgery to treat ASD, this technique can achieve good clinical effects.

Purpose: To review the outcome of 32 consecutive patients who underwent 4-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) with cages and plates and were followed up for at least 5 years., Methods: Records of 19 men and 13 women aged 48 to 69 years who underwent 4-level ACDF with cages and plates for myelopathy (n=11) or myeloradiculopathy (n=21) at C3 to C7 by a single surgeon and were followed up for a minimum of 5 years were reviewed. Clinical outcome was assessed using the visual analogue scale (VAS), Neck Disability Index (NDI), and modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score for pain or myelopathic symptoms. Radiographic evaluation included fusion rate, range of motion, cervical lordosis (C2-to-C7 Cobb angle), and disc height., Results: The mean follow-up was 66 months. All patients had good recovery of muscle strength and resolution of limb sensory disturbance, except for 4 who still had some numbness. The mean VAS for neck and arm pain improved from 14.2 to 6.84 (p=0.012); the mean NDI improved from 31.62 to 12.17 (p<0.01); and the mean JOA score improved from 10.1 to 13.9 (p=0.027). The mean percentage of recovery was 62.9. The mean Cobb angle improved from 10.24º to 1.28º (p=0.019); the mean disc height improved from 4.12 to 6.58 mm (p<0.01). 30 (94%) patients achieved solid fusion., Conclusion: Multilevel ACDF using PEEK cages and plates is safe and effective for multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy and achieves satisfactory mid-term outcome.

Objective: To identify the risk factors for cage retropulsion after lumbar interbody fusion surgery., Methods: 667 patients underwent lumbar interbody fusion surgery between November 2011 to December 2014 were retrospectively reviewed by the medical recording system in our institute. 8 patients experiencing cage retropulsion were included and 2 underwent the initial surgery in other hospitals. The clinical outcomes were evaluated by visual analog scores (VAS) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). Plain radiographs and three-dimensional computed tomography scans were used to analyze the incidence of cage retropulsion. Data were analyzed by SPSS 19.0., Results: The incidence of cage retropulsion was 0.90%(6 out of 665) in our institution. There were 6 male and 2 female with an average age of 45.63 ± 15.48(range, 21-60). The average follow-up time was 23.88 ± 12.69 months(range, 6-43 months) and average retropulsion onset time was 2.75 months(range,1-6 months). 6 patients experienced cage retropulsion at L5/S1 and 2 at L4/5. 6 used bullet-shaped cages and two had kidney-shaped cages. Average bed rest time after the initial surgery was 5.75 ± 1.67 days. 6 patients had neurological deficits and underwent revision surgery. Average operation time and blood loss for revision surgery were much higher than those of the initial surgery (P < 0.05). All the patients got a good result in VAS and ODI both from initial surgery and revision surgery (P < 0.05)., Conclusions: There were multiple risk factors for cage retropulsion after lumbar interbody fusion surgery, including patient factors, radiological characteristics, surgical techniques and postoperative reasons. In case of retropulsion, revision surgery was essential for the patients who presented neurological deficits and conservative treatment was recommended for asymptomatic patients., (Copyright © 2016 IJS Publishing Group Ltd. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Various fusion techniques have been used to treat lumbar spine isthmic spondylolisthesis (IS) in adults, including anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF), posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF), transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF), posterolateral fusion (PLF), and circumferential fusion. The objective of this study was to evaluate which fusion technique provides the best clinical and radiological outcome for adult lumbar IS., Materials and Methods: A systematic review was performed. MEDLINE databases and reference lists of selected articles were searched. Inclusion criteria stated that the studies had to be controlled and that they compared clinical and radiological outcomes of various fusion techniques for treating adult IS. Exclusion criteria were use of only one treatment and non-English language articles. Two reviewers independently extracted relevant data from each included study. Statistical comparisons were made when appropriate., Results: Nine studies that compared two surgical approaches to IS were included in this systematic review. Three were prospective studies, and six were retrospective studies. Two studies compared ALIF with instrumented PLF and ALIF with percutaneous pedicle screw fixation, two studies compared ALIF and TLIF, and five studies compared PLIF and PLF. ALIF was superior to other techniques regarding restoration of disc height, segmental lordosis, and whole lumbar lordosis. TLIF had lower complication rates. ALIF combined with PLF showed lower nonfusion rates than other techniques. However, there were no significant differences in clinical outcomes between any two techniques., Conclusion: Compared to other fusion techniques, TLIF shows fewer complications, ALIF shows better sagittal alignment, and circumferential fusion showed better fusion rates. It was difficult to make recommendations about the optimal approach because of the methodological variance in the publications.