Search

Background/context: Degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis (DLS) is a prevalent spinal condition that can result in significant disability. DLS is thought to result from a combination of disc and facet joint degeneration, as well as various biological, biomechanical, and behavioral factors. One hypothesis is the progressive degeneration of segmental stabilizers, notably the paraspinal muscles, contributes to a vicious cycle of increasing slippage., Purpose: To examine the correlation between paraspinal muscle status on MRI and severity of slippage in patients with symptomatic DLS., Study Design/setting: Retrospective cross-sectional study at an academic tertiary care center., Patient Sample: Patients who underwent surgery for DLS at the L4/5 level between 2016-2018 were included. Those with multilevel DLS or insufficient imaging were excluded., Outcome Measures: The percentage of relative slippage (RS) at the L4/5 level evaluated on standing lateral radiographs. Muscle morphology measurements including functional cross-sectional area (fCSA), body height normalized functional cross-sectional area (HI) of Psoas, erector spinae (ES) and multifidus muscle (MF) and fatty infiltration (FI) of ES and MF were measured on axial MR. Disc degeneration and facet joint arthritis were classified according to Pfirrmann and Weishaupt, respectively., Methods: Descriptive and comparative statistics, univariable and multivariable linear regression models were utilized to examine the associations between RS and muscle parameters, adjusting for confounders sex, age, BMI, segmental degeneration, and back pain severity and symptom duration., Results: The study analyzed 138 out of 183 patients screened for eligibility. The median age of all patients was 69.5 years (IQR 62 to 73), average BMI was 29.1 (SD±5.1) and average preoperative ODI was 46.4 (SD±16.3). Patients with Meyerding-Grade 2 (M2, N=25) exhibited higher Pfirrmann scores, lower MF fCSA and MF HI , and lower BMI, but significantly more fatty infiltration in the MF and ES muscles compared to those with Meyerding Grade 1 (M1). Univariable linear regression showed that each cm 2 decrease in MF fCSA was associated with a 0.9%-point increase in RS (95% CI -1.4 to - 0.4, p<.001), and each cm 2 /m 2 decrease in MF HI was associated with an increase in slippage by 2.2%-points (95% CI -3.7 to -0.7, p=.004). Each 1%-point rise in ES FI and MF FI corresponded to 0.17%- (95% CI 0.05-0.3, p=.01) and 0.20%-point (95% CI 0.1-0.3 p<.001) increases in relative slippage, respectively. Notably, after adjusting for confounders, each cm 2 increase in Psoas fCSA and cm 2 /m 2 in Psoas HI was associated with an increase in relative slippage by 0.3% (95% CI 0.1-0.6, p=.004) and 1.1%-points (95% CI 0.4-1.7, p=.001). While MF fCSA tended to be negatively associated with slippage, this did not reach statistical significance (p=.105). However, each 1%-point increase in MF FI and ES FI corresponded to increases of 0.15% points (95% CI 0.05-0.24, p=.002) and 0.14% points (95% CI 0.01-0.27, p=.03) in relative slippage, respectively., Conclusion: This study found a significant association between paraspinal muscle status and severity of slippage in DLS. Whereas higher degeneration of the ES and MF correlate with a higher degree of slippage, the opposite was found for the psoas. These findings suggest that progressive muscular imbalance between posterior and anterior paraspinal muscles could contribute to the progression of slippage in DLS., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest One or more of the authors declare financial or professional relationships on ICMJE-TSJ disclosure forms., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

An observational study to discover the common conditions affecting the lumbosacral region that may affect lumbosacral position and tension. All the patients, underwent MRI exaamination (magnetic resonance imaging) in the supine position, were examined by the same consultant radiologist. The article was revised by the institutional ethical approval committee. The position of the nerve roots was observed, and the number of nerve roots was calculated anterior to a line passing between the mid-transvers process of L3(third lumbar vertebra). The number of nerve roots ahead of this line was calculated by the radiologist at the level of the right intervertebral foramen and at the left one. This procedure was applied to the normal group, and 5 common pathological diseases were repeated including single-level lumbar disc prolapse, multiple-disc prolapse, multiple bulge, spinal stenosis and spondylolisthesis (at the level of L45 (fourth to fifth lumbar vertebrae) or L5S1 (fifth lumbar to first sacral vertebrae) being outside the study area, i.e., L3). We noticed significant difference in the number of the nerve roots between the cases with herniated discs, spinal stenosis, and spondylolisthesis with the normal group and the significance was in ascending increment in significance being the highest in cases with spondylolisthesis, and even in the groups of other pathologies which are statistically not significant, we noticed that the significance is proportional to the severity of the disease being the least in single level cases (p 0.427), to be more significant on cases with multiple prolapses(p 0.319) to be more in cases with multiple bulges to start to be statistically significant in herniated, higher significance in cases with spinal stenosis to be the highest in cases with spondylolisthesis., Competing Interests: The authors have no funding and conflicts of interest to disclose., (Copyright © 2024 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.)

Purpose: To compare the morphometry of paraspinal muscles in patients with degenerative spondylolisthesis (DS), isthmic spondylolisthesis (IS), and healthy individuals., Methods: Thirty-seven pairs of DS patients were selected using propensity score matching with IS patients, while 37 healthy individuals matched for age, sex, and BMI were selected as controls. The relative cross-sectional area (rCSA), and relative functional cross-sectional area (rfCSA) of paraspinal muscles were measured, and the degree of fatty infiltration (FI) was calculated. Based on occupational differences, the patients were also divided into worker and farmer groups, and the same measurements were taken on them., Results: At the L3/L4 level, the multifidus (MF) FI was greater in the DS and IS groups than in the control group, the erector spinae (ES) rfCSA was higher in the IS group than in the DS and control groups. At the L4/L5 level, MF rfCSA was smaller in the DS and IS groups than in the control group; ES rfCSA was higher in the IS group than in the DS and control groups. At the L5/S1 level, MF rfCSA was smaller in the DS and IS groups than in the control group; ES rfCSA was higher in the IS group than in the DS group. At the L3/L4, L4/L5 level, MF rfCSA were higher in the worker group than in the farmer group (p < 0.05)., Conclusion: The morphological changes in paraspinal muscles in patients with DS were dominated by selective atrophy of the MF, while in patients with IS, the morphological changes in paraspinal muscle showed selective atrophy of the MF accompanied by compensatory hypertrophy of the ES. The surgeon should consider the morphological differences in paraspinal muscle between different types of lumbar spondylolisthesis when establishing the appropriate surgical program., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Study Design: A retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data., Objective: To assess the association between intervertebral disk degeneration and hip and knee osteoarthritis (OA) in patients with degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis., Background: The co-occurrence of hip OA and degenerative spinal pathologies was first described as the "hip-spine syndrome" and has also been observed in knee OA. It remains unclear whether both pathologies share an underlying connection beyond demographic factors., Materials and Methods: Intervertebral disk degeneration was classified by the Pfirrmann Classification and intervertebral vacuum phenomenon. Intervertebral vacuum phenomenon was classified into mild (1 point), moderate (2 points), and severe (3 points) at each level and combined into a lumbar vacuum score (0-15 points). Similarly, a lumbar Pfirrmann grade was calculated (5-25 points). Patients with previous hip or knee replacement surgery were classified as having an OA burden. We used multivariable regression to assess the association between OA and disk degeneration, adjusted for age, body mass index, and sex., Results: A total of 246 patients (58.9% female) were included in the final analysis. Of these, 22.3% had OA burden. The multivariable linear regression showed an independent association between OA burden and lumbar vacuum (β = 2.1, P <0.001) and Pfirrmann grade (β = 2.6, P <0.001). Representing a 2.1 points higher lumbar vacuum and 2.6 points higher lumbar Pfirrmann grade after accounting for demographic differences., Conclusions: Our study showed that OA burden was independently associated with the severity of the intervertebral disk degeneration of the lumbar spine. These findings give further weight to a shared pathology of OA of large joints and degenerative processes of the lumbar spine., Level of Evidence: 3., Competing Interests: A.A.S. reports royalties from Ortho Development, Corp.; private investments for Vestia Ventures MiRUS Investment, LLC, IVY II, LLC, ISPH II, LLC, ISPH 3, LLC, HS2, LLC, HSS ASC Development Network, LLC, and Centinel Spine (Vbros Venture Partners V); consulting fee from Depuy Synthes Products Inc., Clariance Inc., Kuros Biosciences AG, Ortho Development Corp., Medical Device Business Service Inc.; speaking and teaching arrangements of DePuy Synthes Products Inc.; membership of scientific advisory board of Depuy Synthes Products Inc., Clariance Inc., and Kuros Biosciences AG; Medical Device Business Service Inc. and trips/travel of Medical Device Business; research support from Spinal Kinetics Inc., outside the submitted work. Dr. F.P.C. reports royalties from NuVasive Inc. Accelus; ownership interest for 4WEB Medical/4WEB Inc.; Healthpoint Capital Partners, LP; ISPH II, LLC; ISPH 3 Holdings, LLC; Ivy Healthcare Capital Partners, LLC; Medical Device Partners II, LLC; Medical Device Partners III, LLC; Orthobond Corporation; Spine Biopharma, LLC; Tissue Differentiation Intelligence, LLC; VBVP VI, LLC; VBVP X, LLC; Woven Orthopedics Technologies; consulting fees from 4WEB Medical/4WEB Inc., DePuy Synthes, NuVasive Inc., Spine Biopharma, LLC, and Synexis, LLC, Accelus; membership of scientific advisory board/other office of Healthpoint Capital Partners, Medical Device Partners II, LLC, Orthobond Corporation, Spine Biopharma, LLC, and Woven Orthopedic Technologies; and research support from 4WEB Medical/4WEB, Inc., Mallinckrodt Pharmaceuticals, Camber Spine, and Centinel Spine, outside the submitted work. F.P.G. reports royalties from Lanx Inc., and Ortho Development Corp.; private investments for BCIMD; and stock ownership of Healthpoint Capital Partners, LP, outside the submitted work. Hughes reports research support from Kuros Biosciences AG and fellowship support from NuVasive Inc. and Kuros Biosciences BV, outside the submitted work. The remaining authors report no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2023 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: To provide normative data and to determine accuracy and reliability of preoperative measurements of spondylolisthesis and kyphosis on supine static magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of patients with degenerative cervical myelopathy., Methods: T2-weighted midsagittal images of the cervical spine were in 100 cases reviewed twice by one junior observer, with an interval of 3 months, and once by a senior observer. The spondylolisthesis slip (SSlip, mm) and the modified K-line interval (mK-line INT, mm) were assessed for accuracy with the standard error of measurement (SEm) and the minimum detectable change (MDC). Intraobserver and interobserver reliability levels were determined using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC)., Results: The SEm was 0.5 mm (95% CI 0.4-0.6) for spondylolisthesis and 0.6 mm (95% CI 0.5-0.7) for kyphosis. The MDC, i.e., the smallest difference between two examinations that can be detected with statistical certainty, was 1.5 mm (95% CI 1.2-1.8) for spondylolisthesis and 1.6 mm (95% CI 1.3-1.8) for kyphosis. The highest reliability levels were seen between the second observation of the junior examiner and the senior observer (ICC = 0.80 [95% CI 0.70-0.87] and ICC = 0.96 [95% CI 0.94-0.98] for SSlip and mK-line INT, respectively)., Conclusions: This study provides normative values of alignment measurements of spondylolisthesis and kyphosis in DCM patients. It further shows the importance of taking measurement errors into account when defining cut-off values for cervical deformity parameters and their potential clinical application in surgical decision-making., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Purpose: To elucidate whether pro-inflammatory cytokines might influence the commitment of intervertebral disc (IVD)- and ligamentum flavum (LF)-derived progenitor cells toward either osteogenesis or adipogenesis, specifically Interleukin-1β (IL-1β), IL-19, and IL-20., Methods: Sixty patients with degenerative spondylolisthesis and lumbar or lumbosacral spinal stenosis were included in the study. Injuries to the spine, infections, and benign or malignant tumors were excluded. From nine patient samples, IVD- and LF-derived cells were isolated after primary culture, and two clinical samples were excluded due to mycoplasma infection. The effects of IL-1β, IL-19, as well as IL-20 in regulating osteogenic and adipogenic differentiation in vitro were investigated., Results: Primary IVD- and LF-derived cells were found to have a similar cell morphology and profile of surface markers (CD44, CD90, and CD105) as placenta-derived mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs). Primary IVD/LF cells have a high capacity to differentiate into osteocytes and adipocytes. IL-19 had a tendency to promote adipogenesis. IL-20 inhibited osteogenesis and promoted adipogenesis; IL-1β promoted osteogenesis but inhibited adipogenesis., Conclusion: IL-1β, IL-19, and IL-20 impact the adipogenic and osteogenic differentiation of IVD-derived and LF-derived cells. Modulating the expression of IL-1β, IL-19, and IL-20 provides a potential avenue for controlling cell differentiation of IVD- and LF-derived cells, which might have beneficial effect for degenerative spondylolisthesis and spinal stenosis., (© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)

Competing Interests: The authors report no conflicts of interest.

Competing Interests: The authors report no conflicts of interest.

Intervertebral disc degeneration, local lumbar segmental morphology changes, and atrophy of multifidus muscle have been considered to be associated with degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis. However, there remains a great deal of controversy. To further investigate their relationship with degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis, we conducted a retrospective study that included 67 patients with degenerative spondylolisthesis and 182 control subjects. Propensity score matching was employed to match the case group and the control group. Disc height was evaluated by the anterior disc height index (DHIA) and posterior disc height index (DHIP). Local lumbar segmental morphology was assessed by segmental lordosis (SL). The fatty infiltration and atrophy of multifidus muscle was evaluated by multifidus muscle net content (MFNC). Our results indicate that DHIA, DHIP, SL, and MFNC in the case group were significantly lower than in the control group. Furthermore, the DHIA, DHIP, and MFNC of the slipped segment (L4/5) were lower than those of the non-slipped segment (L3/4). Correlation analysis showed a high relationship between DHIA and MFNC and the degree of degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis. Logistic regression analysis revealed that DHIA and MFNC might act as protective factors against the development of degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis. Additionally, a prognostic nomogram was developed and validated to assess the likelihood of patients with severe symptoms requiring surgical intervention., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Objective: To propose a new standardized technique for evaluating lumbar stability in degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis using lumbar lateral flexion-extension radiographs with brackets and magnetic resonance facet fluid., Methods: A retrospective analysis of 57 patients diagnosed with lumbar (L4-5) spondylolisthesis was performed. We analyzed lateral flexion-extension radiographs obtained with a bracket (LFEB) and without a bracket (LFE). Sagittal translation, segmental angulation, posterior opening, lumbar instability, and changes in lumbar lordosis were compared using functional radiographs. The mean width and maximum width of the facet fluid, mean facet joint length, and facet fluid index (FFI) of the 2 groups were compared using sagittal translation., Results: The average value of sagittal translation was 1.68 ± 0.96 mm in LFE and 3.07 ± 1.29 mm in LFEB, and the difference was significant (P < 0.05). Segmental angulation, posterior opening, and changes in lumbar lordosis were significantly greater in LFEB than in LFE. The instability detection rate was 14.0% in LFE and 35.1% in LFEB. The FFI, maximum width, and mean width were significantly increased in the unstable lumbar spondylolisthesis group compared with the stable group in LFEB. The FFI and maximum width of the facet fluid were significantly increased in the unstable lumbar spondylolisthesis group compared with the stable group in LFE., Conclusions: Lumbar lateral flexion-extension radiographs with brackets can standardize the operation process and provide sufficient hyperflexion and hyperextension images. The width of the facet fluid and FFI are significant factors in the evaluation of lumbar stability in patients with lumbar spondylolisthesis., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Degenerative spondylolisthesis (DS) is one of the most common pathologies spine surgeons treat. While a number of potential factors have been identified, there is no current consensus on which variables most impact the decision to fuse vs. decompress alone in this population., Purpose: The purpose of this study was to describe current DS treatment practices and identify both the radiographic and clinical factors leading to the decision to fuse segments for one level DS., Study Design/setting: Descriptive cross-sectional survey., Patient Sample: Surveys were administered to members of Lumbar Spine Research Society and Society of Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery., Outcome Measures: Surgeon demographics and treatment practices were reported. Radiographic and clinical parameters were ranked by each surgeon with regards to their importance., Methods: The primary analysis was limited to completed surveys. Baseline characteristics were summarized. Clinical and radiographic parameters were ranked and compared. Ranking of each clinical and radiographic parameters was reported using best and worst rank, mean rank position, and percentiles. The most important, top 3 most important, and top 5 most important parameters were ordered given each parameter's ranking frequency., Results: 381 surveys were returned completed. With regards to fusion vs. decompression, 19.9% fuse all cases, 39.1% fuse > 75%, 17.8% fuse 50%-75%, and 23.2% fuse <25%. The most common decompressive technique was a partial laminotomy (51.4%), followed by full laminectomy (28.9%). 82.2% of respondents instrument all fusion cases. Instability (93.2%), spondylolisthesis grade (59.8%), and laterolisthesis (37.3%) were the most common radiographic factors impacting the decision to fuse. With regards to the clinical factors leading to fusion, mechanical low back pain (83.2%), activity level (58.3%), and neurogenic claudication (42.8%) were the top 3 clinical parameters., Conclusions: There is little consensus on the treatment of DS, with society members showing substantial variation in treatment patterns with the majority utilizing fusion for treatment. The most common radiographic parameters impacting treatment are instability, spondylolisthesis grade, and laterolisthesis while mechanical low back pain, activity level, and neurogenic claudication are the most common clinical parameters., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Study Design: Retrospective radiologic analysis., Objective: The aim was to investigate if lateral flexion-extension radiographs identify additional cases of degenerative cervical spondylolisthesis (DCS) that would be missed by obtaining solely neutral upright radiographs, and determine the reliability of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in diagnosis., Summary of Background Data: DCS and instability can be a cause of neck pain, radiculopathy, and even myelopathy. Standard anteroposterior and lateral radiographs and MRI of the cervical spine will identify most cervical spine pathology, but spondylolisthesis and instability are dynamic issues. Standard imaging may also miss DCS in some cases., Methods: We compared the number of patients who demonstrated cervical spondylolisthesis on lateral neutral and flexion-extension radiographs in addition to MRI. We used established criteria to define instability as ≥2 mm of listhesis on neutral imaging, and ≥1 mm of motion between flexion-extension radiographs., Results: A total of 111 patients (555 cervical levels) were analyzed. In all, 41 patients (36.9%) demonstrated cervical spondylolisthesis on neutral and/or flexion-extension radiographs. Of the 77 levels of spondylolisthesis, 17 (22.1%) were missed on neutral radiographs ( P ,0.05). Twenty levels (26.0%) were missed when flexion-extension radiographs were used alone ( P =0.02). Twenty-nine levels (37.7%) of DCS identified on radiograph were missed by MRI ( P =0.004)., Conclusions: Lateral flexion-extension views can be useful in the diagnosis of DCS. These views provide value by identifying a significant cohort of patients that would be undiagnosed based on neutral radiographs alone. Moreover, MRI missed 38% of DCS cases identified by radiographs. Therefore, lateral radiographs can be a useful adjunct to neutral radiographs and MRI when instability is suspected or if these imaging modalities are unable to identify the source of a patient's neck or arm pain., Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.)

Background: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is used to detect degenerative changes of the lumbar spine. SpineNet (SN), a computer vision-based system, performs an automated analysis of degenerative features in MRI scans aiming to provide high accuracy, consistency and objectivity. This study evaluated SN's ratings compared with those of an expert radiologist., Method: MRIs of 882 patients (mean age, 72 ± 8.8 years) with degenerative spinal disorders from two previous trials carried out in our spine center between 2011 and 2019, were analyzed by an expert radiologist. Lumbar segments (L1/2-L5/S1) were graded for Pfirrmann Grades (PG), Spondylolisthesis (SL) and Central Canal Stenosis (CCS). SN's analysis for the equivalent parameters was generated. Agreement between methods was analyzed using kappa (κ), Spearman correlation (ρ) and Lin's concordance correlation (ρ c ) coefficients and class average accuracy (CAA)., Results: 4410 lumbar segments were analyzed. κ statistics showed moderate to substantial agreement in PG between the radiologist and SN depending on spinal level (range κ 0.63-0.77, all levels together 0.72; range CAA 45-68%, all levels 55%), slight to substantial agreement for SL (range κ 0.07-0.60, all levels 0.63; range CAA 47-57%, all levels 56%) and CCS (range κ 0.17-0.57, all levels 0.60; range CAA 35-41%, all levels 43%). SN tended to record more pathological features in PG than did the radiologist whereas the contrary was the case for CCS. SL showed an even distribution between methods., Conclusion: SN is a robust and reliable tool with the ability to grade degenerative features such as PG, SL or CCS in lumbar MRIs with moderate to substantial agreement compared to the current gold-standard, the radiologist. It is a valuable alternative for analyzing MRIs from large cohorts for diagnostic and research purposes., (© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)

Although osteoporosis has negative impacts on lumbar fusion, its effects on screw loosening in dynamic stabilization remain elusive. We aimed to correlate bone mineral density (BMD) with screw loosening in Dynesys dynamic stabilization (DDS). Consecutive patients who underwent 2- or 3-level DDS for spondylosis, recurrent disc herniations, or low-grade spondylolisthesis at L3-5 were retrospectively reviewed. BMD was assessed by the Hounsfield Unit (HU) in vertebral bodies (VB) and pedicles with and without cortical bone (CB) on pre-operative computed tomography (CT). Screw loosening was assessed by radiographs and confirmed by CT. HU values were compared between the loosened and intact screws. 176 patients and 918 screws were analyzed with 78 loosened screws found in 36 patients (mean follow-up: 43.4 months). The HU values of VB were similar in loosened and intact screws (p = 0.14). The HU values of pedicles were insignificantly less in loosened than intact screws (including CB: 286.70 ± 118.97 vs. 297.31 ± 110.99, p = 0.45; excluding CB: 238.48 ± 114.90 vs. 240.51 ± 108.91, p = 0.88). All patients had clinical improvements. In conclusion, the HU values, as a surrogate for BMD, were unrelated to screw loosening in DDS. Therefore, patients with compromised BMD might be potential candidates for dynamic stabilization rather than fusion., (© 2021. The Author(s).)

Objective: The purpose of our study was to analyze and compare the spino cranial angle (SCA) in patients with degenerative cervical spondylolisthesis (DCS) and asymptomatic controls and to determine whether SCA could help diagnose DCS., Methods: We enrolled 50 patients diagnosed with DCS (4.3%) from among 1168 patients and the same number of asymptomatic participants as the control group by using cervical radiographs. Both groups underwent cervical radiographs and computed tomography at the same time. Various sagittal parameters were measured on computed tomography in a standardized supine position and compared with the asymptomatic control group. The Spearman correlation coefficient was applied to test the correlation among the sagittal parameters in the DCS group. Multivariate logistic regression analysis and receiver operating characteristic curve analysis were performed to determine whether SCA could help predict DCS., Results: Fifty patients were enrolled in the DCS group, and 50 asymptomatic participants were included in the control group. The SCA was significantly lower for the DCS group than for the control group (76.84 ± 7.48 degrees vs. 82.47 ± 8.06 degrees, P < 0.001), and the T1 slope (T1s) was significantly greater for the DCS group than for the control group (27.29 ± 7.84 degrees vs. 22.28 ± 6.43 degrees, P = 0.001). Except for SCA and T1s, no other parameters showed significant differences. The SCA on the computed tomography scan was significantly correlated with the values of the T1s (r = -0.890, P < 0.001), cervical lordosis (r = -0.437, P = 0.002), C2-C7 sagittal vertical axis (r = 0.397, P = 0.004), and thoracic inlet angle (r = -0.565, P < 0.001). Multivariate logistic regression analysis and receiver operating characteristic curve analysis showed that both a lower SCA and a higher T1s could be risk factors for DCS, and an SCA of <79.1 degrees demonstrated significant diagnostic value for the detection of DCS., Conclusions: Patients in the DCS group had a lower SCA and a higher T1s. Both a lower SCA and a higher T1s could be risk factors for DCS, and an SCA of <79.1 degrees demonstrated significant diagnostic value for the detection of DCS., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Degenerative lumber spondylolisthesis (DLS) is a common orthopedic condition, described as a condition that compared with the lower vertebra, the superior vertebra slides forward or backward in the sagittal plane without accompanying isthmic spondylolisthesis. Information pertaining to different types of double-level DLS is scarce. This study aims to analyze parameters of patients with different types of double-level DLS to provide a reference for guiding surgical treatment and restoring sagittal balance of patients with DLS., Methods: From January 2014 to January 2020, records of patients with double-level DLS were retrospectively reviewed. Patients with double-level DLS were divided into 3 types: anterior, posterior, and combined; the anterior and combined types were studied. The sagittal spinopelvic parameters included C7 tilt, maximal thoracic kyphosis, maximal lumbar lordosis (LLmax), pelvic incidence (PI), pelvic tilt (PT), and sacral slope (SS). After descriptive analysis, demographic and radiographic data were compared., Results: Forty and 18 patients were included in the anterior and combined type groups, respectively. Both groups had different levels of chronic low back pain, but the incidence of radiating leg pain and neurogenic claudication was significantly higher in the anterior type. Oswestry Disability Index and visual analog scale low back scores were also higher in the anterior type. In the anterior type, C7 tilt (7.14 ± 2.15 vs. 5.41 ± 2.28, P = 0.007), LLmax (50.02 ± 14.76 vs. 36.96 ± 14.56, P = 0.003), PI (68.28 ± 9.16 vs. 55.53 ± 14.19, P < 0.001), PT (28.68 ± 7.31 vs. 19.38 ± 4.70, P < 0.001), and PT/PI (42.45 ± 11.22 vs. 36.04 ± 9.87, P = 0.041) were significantly higher. In the anterior type, PI correlated positively with LLmax (r = 0.59) and SS (r = 0.71). LLmax and SS (r = 0.65) had a positive correlation. PT/PI and SS (r = -0.77) had a negative correlation. In the combined type, PI correlated positively with LLmax (r = 0.61) and SS (r = 0.88), and PT/PI correlated negatively with SS (r = -0.81)., Conclusions: In patients with double-level DLS, the sagittal spinopelvic parameters differed between the anterior and combined types. Overall, spinal surgeons should focus on correcting sagittal deformities, relieving postoperative clinical symptoms, and improving quality of life during fusion surgery., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Rationale: The thoracic spine is stabilized in the anteroposterior direction by the rib cage and the facet joints, thus thoracic degenerative spondylolisthesis is very uncommon. Here, we report a rare case of thoracic degenerative spondylolisthesis in which the lower thoracic region was the only region involved., Patient Concerns: We present the case of a 56-year-old Chinese female who suffered from thoracic degenerative spondylolisthesis. She had a 2-year history of gait disturbance and bilateral lower-extremity numbness. The initial imaging examinations revealed Grade I anterior spondylolisthesis and severe cord compression, as well as bilateral facet joint osteoarthritis at T11/12., Diagnosis: The patient was diagnosed with thoracic degenerative spondylolisthesis-associated myelopathy., Interventions: She underwent a posterior decompression with transforaminal thoracic interbody fusion (TTIF) at T11/12., Outcomes: The patient recovered well after the operation, and MRI at 12-month follow-up revealed that spinal cord compression was relieved and high signal intensity in T2-weighted image was improved., Lessons: To the best of our knowledge, this is the first reported case of thoracic degenerative spondylolisthesis in which the lower thoracic region was the only region involved. Disruption of joint capsule, instability with micromotion, and degenerative disc may contribute to this rare disease. Posterior decompression with posterolateral fusion or TTIF were the main treatment modalities, however, TTIF has its unique advantages because of sufficient decompression, immediate stability and high fusion rate., Competing Interests: The authors have no conflicts of interests to disclose., (Copyright © 2021 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.)

Background: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is important in the assessment of degenerative spine disease. However, its role is limited in the identification of spinal instability; therefore, weight-bearing and dynamic studies like X-rays are required. The supine position eliminates the gravitational pull, corrects the vertebral slippage, and opens the facet joints leading to the collection of the synovial fluid into the joint space, which is detected on the MRI and can serve as a marker for instability. We aim to compare the facet fluid, facet hypertrophy, facet angle, and disc degenerative changes among the patients presenting with degenerative spondylolisthesis (DS) and those without., Methods: We performed a retrospective review for all the patients treated at our institution from January 2015 to December 2016. Facet Fluid Index (FFI) (ratio of facet fluid width and facet joint width) was calculated to assess the joint fluid. The percentage of spondylolisthesis was measured on X-rays. Each radiological parameter was compared between the two groups, i.e., patients with DS and patients without DS. A p value < 0.05 was considered significant., Results: In total, 61 patients, 28 with DS and 33 without DS, were enrolled. Baseline characteristics were similar in the two groups (p > 0.05). The average values of FFI, facet fluid width, and the difference between the superior and inferior facet were significantly higher in the group with instability (p < 0.05). Multivariate analysis demonstrated a 4.44 (95% confidence interval [CI] 2.03-5.365) times increase in the odds of instability with a unit increase in FFI, p < 0.0001., Conclusions: We report a positive linear correlation between the facet joint effusion and facet hypertrophy on MRI and the percentage of vertebral translation on X-ray. Prospective studies will determine if these markers can play a role in predicting spinal instability.

Study Design: A study using rat spondylolisthesis models., Objective: The aim of this study was to elucidate the mechanism for correction of vertebral rounding deformity., Summary of Background Data: Vertebral rounding deformity is the strongest risk factor for high-grade slippage associated with spondylolisthesis in adolescents. We previously reported that inadequate endochondral ossification of the anterior upper corner of the vertebral growth plate in response to mechanical stress could be the pathological mechanism of vertebral rounding deformity., Methods: We created a model of spondylolisthesis using 4-week-old rats. They were divided into a tail suspension group that underwent tail suspension to decrease mechanical stress starting at 2 weeks postoperatively and a ground control group with no intervention. Radiographs and microcomputed tomography scans were obtained once weekly for 6 weeks postoperatively. The lumbar spines were then harvested for histological analysis. Immunohistochemical studies detected types I, II, and X collagen in the growth plate cartilage. Bone histomorphometrical analysis was also performed., Results: Radiological and histological evidence in the ground control group showed progress the rounding deformity with time as previously reported. Formation of normal cancellous bone was observed radiologically over time in the tail suspension group, indicating correction of rounding deformity. Histologically, the site showing radiological evidence of correction was derived from cartilage tissue. After starting tail suspension, the growth plate stained positive for type X collagen and the corrected site stained for types II and X collagen in a mosaic pattern. Chondrocytes expressing types I and II collagen and tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase-positive cells were also present at the corrected site. Histomorphometrically, more endochondral bone was detected at the corrected site than in the posterior aspect of the normal growth plate., Conclusion: Correction of vertebral rounding deformity was associated with improvement of chondrocyte differentiation; furthermore, there is possible involvement of a third mechanism, namely transchondroid bone ossification.Level of Evidence: N/A., (Copyright © 2020 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared.

Study Design: A prospective cohort., Objective: The objective of this study was to develop a scoring system for lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis (LDS) that would guide decision-making., Background: The management protocol for LDS has been under debate, with no guidelines. Most studies oversimplify LDS as a homogenous entity., Materials and Methods: A retrospective analysis of 131 patients who underwent surgery for LDS between July 2007 and October 2011 with a minimum follow-up of 3 years was carried out on the basis of clinical, radiologic, and technical factors. A scoring system was conceptualized. Clinical: back pain score-2, age younger than 70 years-1, high-demand activity-1. Radiologic: segmental kyphosis-1.5, segmental dynamic translation-1, disk height >50% of adjacent level-1, facet effusion-1, sagittal facet-orientation-1. Technical: feasibility to decompress without causing instability-1.5. Its reliability was ascertained by a univariate analysis. The benchmark was set at 5.5 according to the Youden Index. This was followed by a prospective study for reliability analysis between November 2011 and January 2017 of 52 patients who underwent stand-alone decompression in LDS with a minimum follow-up of 24 months. Outcomes were evaluated using the Oswestry Disability Index and the Visual Analog Scale. Interobserver variability was determined. None of the patients in the retrospective or prospective group had undergone any lumbar surgery previously., Results: The mean Oswestry Disability Index and Visual Analog Scale of both the groups in the retrospective and the stand-alone decompression groups in prospective studies showed significant improvement. The interobserver reliability was high, with a κ value of 0.847., Conclusions: The proposed scoring system helps view LDS as a heterogenous condition and assists in tailoring treatment for individual patients. For a select subgroup of patients with LDS, minimally invasive decompression (unilateral laminotomy and bilateral decompression using a minimally invasive surgery tubular retractor system) without fusion is adequate., Level of Evidence: Level III.

Background: Endplate defects are commonly seen in patients with lumbar degenerative disease. However, little is known about the presence of endplate defects in patients with degenerative spondylolisthesis (DS). In the present study, we have introduced a classification system for endplate defects in patients with DS using routine magnetic resonance imaging findings and explored the correlative factors., Methods: Endplate defects were classified into 3 major categories (rim defects, focal defects, and erosive defects) and 5 subtypes (anterior type, posterior type, arc type at the anterior rim, notch type, and Schmorl's nodes). The incidence rates of the endplate defects were compared between the slippage and nonslippage levels. The correlations between the endplate defects and age, sex, disc degeneration, Modic changes (MCs), body mass index, slippage segment, and slippage degree were analyzed., Results: Endplate defects were present in 47.43% of the endplates in DS. The most common endplate defects were rim defects. The occurrence of endplate defects, especially anterior defects, was more common at the slippage levels. Endplate defects were associated with age and closely related to MCs and the severity of disc degeneration. The slippage degree, slippage segment, body mass index, and sex differences were not associated with endplate defects in our study. The results obtained using this novel classification system were stable and consistent., Conclusions: The results from the present study have shown that the novel radiological classification system of endplate defects is reliable. Endplate defects were associated with slippage but not with the slippage degree or slippage segment differences in DS. The correlation between endplate defects and age and between MCs and disc degeneration were important features on the magnetic resonance imaging scans of patients with DS., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Lumbar spondylolysis generally occurs in adolescent athletes. Bony union can be expected with conservative treatment, however, the fracture does not heal in some cases. When the fracture becomes a pseudoarthrosis, spondylolysis patients have the potential to develop isthmic spondylolisthesis. A cross-sectional study was performed to determine the incidence of spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis, and to elucidate when and how often spondylolisthesis occurs in patients with or without spondylolysis. Patients undergoing computed tomography (CT) scans of abdominal or lumbar regions for reasons other than low back pain were included (n = 580). Reconstruction CT images were obtained, and the prevalence of spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis were evaluated. Of the 580 patients, 37 patients (6.4%) had spondylolysis. Of these 37 patients, 19 patients (51.4%) showed spondylolisthesis, whereas only 7.4% of non-spondylolysis patients showed spondylolisthesis (p < 0.05). When excluding unilateral spondylolysis, 90% (18/20) of spondylolysis patients aged ≥60 years-old showed spondylolisthesis. None of the patients with isthmic spondylolisthesis had received fusion surgery, suggesting that most of these patients didn't have a severe disability requiring surgical treatment. Our results showed that the majority of bilateral spondylolysis patients aged ≥60 years-old show spondylolisthesis, and suggest that spondylolisthesis occurs very frequently and may develop at a younger age when spondylolysis exists.

Background Context: Patients with back pain predominance (BPP) have traditionally been thought to derive less predictable symptomatic relief from lumbar fusion surgery., Purpose: To compare postoperative clinical outcomes as well as degree of improvement in clinical outcome measures between patients with BPP and patients with leg pain predominance (LPP) undergoing open posterior lumbar fusion., Study Design: Retrospective cohort study., Patient Sample: Analysis of patients who underwent an open posterior lumbar fusion for low-grade (Meyerding Grade I or II) degenerative or isthmic spondylolisthesis from 2011 to 2018 was conducted. Surgery was indicated after failure of conservative treatment to address radiculopathy and/or neurogenic claudication. Patients were excluded if they were under 18 years of age at the time of surgery, had less than 6 months of follow-up, presented with a lumbar vertebral body fracture, tumor, or infection, or underwent a fusion surgery that extended to the thoracic spine, high-grade spondylolisthesis, or concomitant deformity., Outcome Measures: Radiographs obtained at preoperative, immediate postoperative, and final visits were evaluated for presence or absence of fusion. Patient-reported outcomes were recorded at preoperative and final clinic visits that included: visual analog scale (VAS) back/leg pain, and Oswestry disability index (ODI). Achievement of minimal clinically important difference (MCID) was analyzed, along with rates of postoperative complication and reoperation., Methods: Preoperative and final patient-reported outcomes were obtained. Achievement of MCID was evaluated using following thresholds: ODI 14.9, VAS-back pain 2.1, VAS-leg pain 2.8. For analysis, patients were divided into two groups based on predominant location of pain: predominantly VAS-back pain (BPP) and predominantly VAS-leg pain (LPP)., Results: One hundred forty-one patients met inclusion criteria. Of these, 71 had LPP, and 70 had BPP. Patients with preoperative LPP experienced greater improvements in VAS-leg (p<.001) compared to those with BPP, whereas patients with preoperative BPP experienced greater improvements in VAS-back (p=.011) postoperatively compared to those with LPP. There were no differences in the final clinical outcomes. Additionally, LPP achieved MCID for VAS-leg (p=.027) at significantly higher proportion than BPP and BPP achieved MCID for VAS-back (p=.050) at significantly higher proportion than LPP., Conclusions: Patients with low-grade spondylolisthesis who underwent an open posterior lumbar fusion had improvement in symptoms regardless of presentation with BPP or LPP. In properly indicated patients, posterior spinal fusion is effective for those with BPP in the setting of experiencing both leg and back pain, and clinicians can use this information for perioperative discussions and surgical decision-making., (Copyright © 2019. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Study Design: Surgeon survey., Objective: To examine factors influencing surgeons' definition of instability in grade 1 degenerative spondylolisthesis (DS) and assess treatment preferences for both stable and unstable DS., Summary of Background Data: DS treatment options are broadly classified as decompression with or without fusion. In surgical decision-making, "instability" is frequently considered as a key factor. However, no consensus on the definition of instability exists., Methods: A survey was conducted to ascertain the minimum amounts of static translation, dynamic translation, and angulation change that surgeons considered significant for determining instability. The importance of other clinical and radiographic features were also assessed, and respondents' standard treatment for stable and unstable DS., Results: Out of 226 respondents, 99% deemed dynamic translation moderately to extremely influential for determining instability, whereas only 55% found static translation as important. The most prevalent cut-off values for dynamic (57%) and static translation (32%) were at least 2-4 mm and for angulation change at least 10-15 degrees (43%). Facet angulation was considered moderately to extremely important to determine instability by 69% of the surgeons, disk height by 67%, patient age by 64%, severity of stenosis by 55%, severity of back pain by 50%, patient-reported function by 49%, pelvic incidence by 47%, and severity of neurogenic claudication by 42%.Decompression with fusion was the preferred treatment method for unstable DS in 99% of the respondents. For stable DS, 40% would still perform fusion, whereas 60% preferred treatment with decompression-alone. Those who preferred fusion for stable DS reported significantly lower thresholds for static (P<0.001) and dynamic translation (P=0.004) for their determination of instability., Conclusions: Clear consensus regarding the definition of instability does not exist. Dynamic translation is the most agreed-upon parameter of influence. Treatment preferences vary for stable DS, but for unstable cases there is broad consensus to perform fusion., Level of Evidence: Level II.

The objective of this study is to investigate the role of paraspinal muscles in the progression of different types of spondylolisthesis by examining the correlation between cross-sectional area (CSA) of lumbar paraspinal muscle and slip percentage (SP) in degenerative spondylolisthesis and isthmic spondylolisthesis.A multicenter retrospective analysis was carried out including 219 subjects diagnosed with lumbar spondylolisthesis. Using T2-weighted axial magnetic resonance imgaging, CSAs of the psoas major (PM), multifidus (MU), and erector spinae were measured and divided by L5 vertebral body (VB) CSA. SP was measured using sagittal T2-weighted images. Correlations between muscle CSA ratio and SP were calculated in each group. Regression analysis was performed to predict the influence of each muscle CSA/VB CSA ratio on SP.No significant correlation was found in the degenerative spondylolisthesis group between any of the muscle CSA ratios and SP. Both PM/VB ratio (r = -0.24, P = .021) and MU/VB ratio (r = -0.26, P = .012) were negatively correlated with SP in the isthmic spondylolisthesis group. MU had more influence on SP than PM in the isthmic spondylolisthesis group (regression coefficient MU/VB: -8.08, PM/VB: -4.34).Both PM and MU muscle CSA ratios were negatively correlated with SP in the isthmic group. MU had more influence on SP than PM. No muscles had any correlations with SP in the degenerative group. This discrepancy between the two groups suggests that exercise programs or interventions regarding the segmental stability of isthmic spondylolisthesis and degenerative spondylolisthesis should be distinguished in clinical practice.Clinical Research Information Service of Korea Centers for Disease control and Prevention, KCT0002588. Registered on 12 December 2017, https://cris.nih.go.kr/cris/search/search&#95;result&#95;st01.jsp?seq=10702.

Lumbar spondylolisthesis is usually asymptomatic. However, symptomatic spondylolisthesis results in back and/or leg pain such as radicular syndrome or neurogenic claudication. Variation in symptoms is caused by different types of spondylolisthesis. Lytic spondylolisthesis, most common at L5S1, is caused by spondylolysis of the pars interarticularis. This results in foraminal nerve compression and radicular symptoms. Degenerative spondylolisthesis, most common at L4L5 in patients >50 years old, is caused by slippage of the vertebral body and lamina, resulting in lumbar spinal stenosis and neurogenic claudication. Iatrogenic spondylolisthesis develops in 1.6-32.0% of patients after decompression surgery, causing recurrent neurogenic symptoms. It is important to understand the main symptoms patients experience: back or leg pain. In both cases, the preferred treatment is conservative. Surgery is only an option if patients have persistent/progressive leg pain. Shared decision-making is necessary to select the most accurate surgery for each individual patient while also taking into account age, comorbidities and symptoms. Further research is necessary to determine the advantages of each surgery in order to improve advice to patients.

Purpose: Although surgical reduction in high-grade lumbosacral spondylolisthesis is often performed in young patients, criteria for defining adequate reduction leading to optimal outcomes have yet to be defined. The purpose of this study is to determine if surgical reduction in pelvic balance, slip grade, lumbosacral angle and L5 incidence are associated with quality of life after surgery, based on specific criteria proposed previously in the literature., Methods: A prospective cohort of 61 patients (14.4 ± 2.7 years) with high-grade lumbosacral spondylolisthesis was followed for a minimum of 2 years after surgery. SRS-22 scores, slip grade, lumbosacral angle, pelvic balance and L5 incidence were assessed before surgery and at the latest follow-up. Multivariable regression analyses were performed using postoperative SRS domain and total scores as the dependent variables. Independent variables consisted of the preoperative SRS scores, and specific criteria of pelvic balance, slip grade, lumbosacral angle and L5 incidence. The influence of slip grade, lumbosacral angle and L5 incidence on pelvic balance was also assessed., Results: Obtaining a balanced pelvis postoperatively was mainly predictive of improved satisfaction with surgery and self-image and also tended to be associated with higher scores for other domains. Improved mental health was associated with reduction to a low-grade slip. Reduction in lumbosacral angle was not predictive of quality of life. Postoperative pelvic balance was mainly associated with preoperative pelvic balance, but there was a tendency for achieving normal pelvic balance when the postoperative L5 incidence was 60° or smaller., Conclusions: When performing surgery in young patients with high-grade lumbosacral spondylolisthesis, achieving normal pelvic balance is the key because it is associated with improved quality of life. Reduction to a low-grade slip is predictive of improved mental health, but reduction in lumbosacral angle is not associated with postoperative quality of life. There was a tendency for obtaining normal postoperative balance in patients with postoperative L5 incidence 60° or smaller. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.

Background: Degenerative spondylolisthesis (DS) occurs mostly at L4. However, there are a small number of patients in whom it occurs only at L3. Accordingly, past reports elucidating the factors of DS have been primarily concerned with L4 DS, and few reports are available on DS at L3. The objective of this study was to compare the differences between lumbar spinal stenosis patients with or without L3 DS and to identify the possible pathological mechanisms of their L3 DS., Methods: Among the 369 patients with lumbar spinal stenosis who underwent lumbar surgery, we assessed 25 patients who had DS only at L3 and compared them against 50 other age- and gender-matched lumbar spinal stenosis patients without any DS. The following radiographic parameters: pelvic incidence, sacral slope, pelvic tilt, L3 slope, L4 slope, L5 slope, and lumbar lordosis were measured on radiographs. The orientation of facet joints and disc heights were measured via computed tomography., Results: Imaging findings showed that the L3, L4, and L5 slopes in the L3 DS group were significantly greater than in the non-DS group, and only L3/4 facet joints in the L3 DS group were significantly more sagittally oriented than in the control group. The number of patients with low disc heights at L4/5 in the L3 DS group was significantly greater than in the control group., Conclusions: The results suggested that the greater lumbar slope, including L3 together with more sagittally oriented facet joints only at L3/4 and not at L4/5, may lead to DS only at L3., (Copyright © 2018 The Japanese Orthopaedic Association. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

This review of the historical medical literature aimed at understanding the evolution of surgical management of degenerative spondylolisthesis over time. The Medic@, IndexCat and Gallica historical databases and PubMed and Embase medical databases were used, with several search-terms, exploring the years 1700-2018. Data from anatomical, biomechanical, pathophysiological and surgical studies were compiled. In total, 150 documents were obtained, dating from 1782 to 2018: 139 from PubMed, 1 from Medic@, 7 from IndexCat, and 3 from Gallica. The review thus ranges in time from (1) description of the first clinical cases by several authors in Europe (1782), (2) the identification of a distinct entity by MacNab (1963), and (3) surgical management by the emerging discipline of minimally invasive spine surgery, to its subsequent evolution up to the present day. Spondylolisthesis is a frequent condition potentially responsible for a variety of functional impairments. Understanding and surgical management have progressed since the 20th century. Historically, the first descriptions of treatments concerned only spondylolisthesis associated with spondylolysis, especially in young adults. More recently, there has been progress in the understanding of the disease in elderly people, with the recognition of degenerative spondylolisthesis. New technologies and surgical techniques, aided by advances in supportive care, now provide spine surgeons with powerful treatment tools. Better knowledge of the evolution of surgery throughout history should enable better understanding of current approaches and concepts for treating degenerative spondylolisthesis., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Study Design: A retrospective study., Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate the incidence of adjacent segment disease (ASD) at 2, 5, and 10 years after primary posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF), and clinical features of ASD., Summary of Background Data: Few reports have examined ASD after PLIF with more than 10 years of follow-up. Furthermore, no reports have examined limited conditions of preoperative pathology, fusion segment, and fusion method with long follow-up., Methods: Data were reviewed for 128 patients who underwent single-segment PLIF for L4 degenerative spondylolisthesis and could be followed for at least 10 years. Mean age at the time of surgery was 63 years, and mean follow-up was 12.4 years. Follow-up rate was 62.4%. ASD was defined as radiological ASD (R-ASD), radiological degeneration adjacent to the fusion segment by plain X-rays and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI); symptomatic ASD (S-ASD), a symptomatic condition due to neurological deterioration at the adjacent segment degeneration; and operative ASD (O-ASD), S-ASD requiring revision surgery., Results: Incidences of each ASD at 2, 5, and 10 years after primary PLIF were 19%, 49%, and 75% for R-ASD, 6%, 14%, and 31% for S-ASD, and 5%, 9%, and 15% for O-ASD, respectively. O-ASD incidence was 24% at final follow-up. O-ASD peak was bimodal, at 2 and 10 years after primary PLIF. O-ASD was mainly observed at the cranial segment (77%), followed by the caudal segment (13%) and both cranial and caudal segments (10%). With respect to O-ASD pathology, degenerative spondylolisthesis was observed in 52%, spinal stenosis in 39%, and disc herniation in 10%., Conclusion: Incidences of R-ASD, S-ASD, and O-ASD at 10 years after primary PLIF were 75%, 31%, and 15%, respectively. With respect to O-ASD pathology, degenerative spondylolisthesis at the cranial segment was the most frequent., Level of Evidence: 4.

Objective: To evaluate the relationships among spino-pelvic parameters, trunk balance and functional disability in patients with degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis., Design:  Cross-sectional study., Subjects: Forty-five patients with degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis and 32 patients without degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis., Methods: Spino-pelvic parameters (pelvic incidence, pelvic tilt, sacral slope, lumbar lordosis) and pain severity were evaluated. Biodex balance tests (postural stability, limits of stability, modified clinical test of sensory interaction and balance, fall risk) and Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale (QBDS) scores were measured., Results: Intergroup differences were found in age, low back pain, limits of stability, pelvic incidence, pelvic tilt and some subscales of QBDS. Correlations were found: (i) in the degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis group: between pelvic incidence and sacral slope/pelvic tilt/lumbar lordosis/height/limits of stability; sacral slope and lumbar lordosis/height/limits of stability/modified clinical test of sensory interaction and balance (eyes closed on foam); lumbar lordosis and body mass index/QBDS/postural stability/modified clinical test of sensory interaction and balance (eyes open and eyes closed on foam); (ii) in the non-degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis group: between pelvic incidence and pelvic tilt; pelvic tilt and sacral slope/lumbar lordosis; sacral slope and lumbar lordosis/fall risk. All spino-pelvic parameters in the degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis group and pelvic tilt in the non-degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis group correlated with QBDS., Conclusion: Pelvic tilt was the major compensating factor in both groups (patients with and without degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis). Sacral slope and lumbar lordosis contributed to partial compensation in the degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis group. Lumbar lordosis correlated with body mass index. Sacral slope could be an indicator of fall risk in the non-degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis group.

Objective: To compare the radiologic and clinical outcomes between oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF) without laminectomy and minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MI-TLIF)., Methods: This was a retrospective study. Between April 2012 and January 2017, 25 patients in each of the MI-TLIF and OLIF groups were recruited as matched pairs. Clinical outcomes included visual analogue scale, Oswestry Disability Index, and satisfaction rates. Radiographic outcomes comprised disc height (DH) and fusion status. Intraoperative data and complications were collected. All patients completed the clinical and radiologic outcomes. Outcomes were compared preoperatively and postoperatively., Results: Matched pairs were compared between 2 groups in terms of demographic data and preoperative measurements; less blood loss and shorter operative time were found in OLIF versus MI-TLIF (P < 0.001). The total complication rate was 36% in OLIF and 32% in MI-TLIF (P = 0.77). The outcomes of visual analogue scale and Oswestry Disability Index were significantly improved in both groups, and there was no significant difference between 2 groups. Satisfaction rates of the both groups were more than 90%. OLIF was superior to MI-TLIF with respect its capability to restore DH (P < 0.001). Earlier time of fusion was observed in OLIF (80%) compared with MI-TLIF (52%) at 6 months (P = 0.04)., Conclusions: OLIF may achieve equivalent clinical and radiologic outcomes compared with MI-TLIF when the stenosis is minimal because the decompression performed is indirect. Furthermore, the OLIF shows less blood loss and shorter operative time, better restoration of DH, and earlier time to fusion than the MI-TLIF., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Degenerative spondylolisthesis (DS) and lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) are the most common degenerative spinal diseases. The evaluating of spinopelvic sagittal alignment of the two diseases using pelvic radius (PR) technique have not been reported. The purpose of this study was to use PR measurement technique to compare the differences in spinopelvic sagittal alignment between DS and LSS., Methods: A total of 145 patients with DS or LSS were retrospectively reviewed. Seventy patients with DS (DS group) and 75 age-matched patients with LSS (LSS group) were enrolled. Spinopelvic parameters including pelvic angle (PA), regional lumbopelvic lordosis (PR-L1, PR-L2, PR-L3, PR-L4 and PR-L5), total lumbopelvic lordosis (PR-T12), pelvic morphology (PR-S1), sagittal vertical axis from the C7 plumb line (SVA), lumbar lordosis (LL), thoracic kyphosis (TK), L4 slope and L5 slope were assessed in the two groups. Several parameters of DS and LSS group were compared with the normal population (NP)., Results: The PR-L4, PR-L5 and PR-S1 in the DS group were significantly smaller than those in the LSS group. There was no difference in PR-T12 between the DS group and NP (p > 0.05), while PR-T12 of the LSS group were significantly lower (p < 0.01). Degree of correlations among spinopelvic parameters differed between the two groups. PR-T12 of the DS group was more strongly correlated with PA (r = -0.829, p < 0.001) than with LL (r = 0.664, p < 0.001), TK (r = 0.582, p < 0.001). PR-T12 of the LSS group was more strongly correlated with LL (r = 0.854, p < 0.001), TK (r = 0.616, p < 0.001) than with PA (r = -0.582, p < 0.001)., Conclusions: PR-L4 and PR-L5 may be the predisposing factors for DS development. Spinopelvic morphology differed in patients with DS and LSS compared to NP. The compensatory mechanisms to maintain spinopelvic sagittal alignment in DS and LSS patients may be different., (Copyright © 2018 The Japanese Orthopaedic Association. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Objective: Using ultrasonography, this study investigated the abdominal and lumbar multifidus muscle size in patients with lumbar spondylolisthesis compared with healthy patients at rest and during contraction., Methods: This research was a nonexperimental, analytic case-control study. Ultrasound imaging was used to assess the thickness of the abdominal and lumbar multifidus muscles in 25 healthy patients and 25 patients with spondylolisthesis. For the purpose of this study, both men and women, aged 30 to 70 years, were recruited from physiotherapy clinics affiliated with the University of Social Welfare and Rehabilitation Sciences, Tehran, Iran. Measurements were taken at rest and during contraction., Results: There was a significant difference in abdominal and lumbar multifidus muscle size between the healthy and spondylolisthesic groups, both at rest and contraction (P < .05 in all instances). No significant difference was found between the right and left for all measurements (P > .05)., Conclusion: Patients with spondylolisthesis had smaller stabilizer muscle thickness at rest and during contraction compared with the healthy group., (Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Objective: Segmental instability traditionally is investigated with flexion and extension (F/E) radiographs. We sought to determine whether motion between upright and supine (U/S) views can serve as an alternative sensitive diagnostic tool that predicts similar outcomes., Methods: Ambispective collection of data was performed for 222 consecutive patients who underwent transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. Patients were divided into either group 1 (≥3 mm spondylolisthesis difference between F/E radiographs) or group 2 (≥3 mm spondylolisthesis difference between U/S imaging and otherwise not meeting group 1 criteria)., Results: In total, 77 patients met all inclusion/exclusion criteria. Patients in group 1 (n = 26) and group 2 (n = 51) did not differ with respect to key demographic criteria. Average clinical follow-up for groups 1 and 2 were 31.8 and 35.6 months (P = 0.43). Average spondylolisthesis was 8.1 mm and 8.0 mm for groups 1 and 2 (P = 0.93). The incidence of facet joint hyperintensity on T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging and average maximal facet joint widening (P > 0.2) did not differ between groups. Average F/E slip change was 5.0 mm for group 1 and average U/S slip change was 5.2 mm for group 2. For both groups, Numeric Rating Scale Back Pain and Numeric Rating Scale Leg Pain, Oswestry Disability Index v2.1a, and Short-Form 36 RAND (P < 0.02) improved significantly after surgery. Furthermore, ΔNumeric Rating Scale Back Pain, ΔNumeric Rating Scale Leg Pain, ΔOswestry Disability Index v2.1a, and ΔShort-Form 36 RAND (P > 0.2) were not significantly different between groups., Conclusions: No differences in outcomes were noted between patients based on either imaging criteria. These data suggest that static U/S imaging may identify a distinct group of patients who may benefit from transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion surgery., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Rationale: False localizing sign means that the lesion, which is the cause of the symptom, is remote or distant from the anatomical site predicted by neurological examination. This concept contradicts the classical clinicoanatomical correlation paradigm underlying neurological examinations., Patient Concerns: A 54-year-old man consulted for the right sciatica-like leg pain that had aggravated 1 year ago. Radiological examinations revealed degenerative spondylolisthesis with instability and right-sided recess stenosis at the L4-5 level. After initial improvement following 3 transforaminal epidural steroid injections with gabapentin and antidepressant medication, there was a recurrence of the symptoms a year later, along with wasting of the right leg for several months. Physical examination revealed difficulty in heel-walking and a weakness of extension of the right big toe; tendon reflexes were normal. Lumbar spine radiographs revealed no new findings. The initial course of treatment was repeated, but was ineffective., Diagnoses: Further cervicothoracic spine evaluations revealed a right-sided intradural-extramedullary mass and myelopathy at the C1-2 level., Interventions: The cervical mass was surgically resected and identified histopathologically as a schwannoma., Outcomes: Immediately after surgery, sciatica-like pain and weakness of right leg were completely resolved., Lessons: It is difficult to make an accurate diagnosis if there are symptoms caused by false localizing sign. Additionally, it is even more difficult to diagnose false localizing sign accurately when there is a co-existing lumbar lesion that can cause the similar symptoms.

Purpose: Previous studies did not specifically assess the influence of proximal femoral angle (PFA) on sagittal balance in high-grade spondylolisthesis (HGS). In addition, the relationship between PFA and quality of life (QOL) remains unknown. This study determines if increased PFA is associated with decreased QOL and sagittal balance in lumbosacral HGS., Methods: This retrospective case-control study was performed on a cohort of 56 normal subjects and 42 patients with HGS. Initially, PFA was measured twice by 3 raters in a random subset of 30 subjects (15 normal and 15 HGS) to determine the intrarater and interrater reliability of the measurement technique. PFA was then measured for all subjects. For the 42 patients with HGS, QOL was assessed from the SRS-22 questionnaire, in addition to the evaluation of the spino-pelvic balance., Results: The intrarater and interrater intraclass correlation coefficients for the measurement of PFA were, respectively, 0.951 and 0.958, suggesting excellent reliability. PFA was significantly higher in HGS patients (8.3° ± 6.7°; range - 5° to 24°) when compared to normal subjects (3.0° ± 3.1°; range - 6° to 10°). The PFA in HGS was 5.6° ± 5.6° (range - 5° to 18°), 8.9° ± 6.7° (range - 2° to 24°), and 14.0° ± 6.0° (range 7°-23°) in type 4 (balanced pelvis), type 5 (unbalanced pelvis/balanced spine), and type 6 (unbalanced pelvis and spine) subjects, respectively. There were, respectively, 23.5% (4/17), 26.3% (5/19), and 83.3% (5/6) of HGS patients with abnormal PFA ≥ 10° in type 4, type 5, and type 6 subgroups. Increased PFA in HGS patients was related with deteriorating self-image, pain, function and total SRS-22 score, as well as with increasing pelvic tilt and decreasing sacral slope., Conclusion: A PFA ≥ 10° is proposed as a criterion to define abnormal PFA. PFA was increased in HGS and increased along with deteriorating sagittal balance and QOL. PFA is a clinically relevant parameter of sagittal balance, and can be useful in the evaluation and management of patients with HGS.

This case-control study aimed to investigate differences in the sagittal spinal parameters between the symptomatic spondylolisthesis patients and the general population. Twenty-nine adolescent patients with symptomatic lumbar isthmic spondylolisthesis were included. For each patient, two age-matched, gender-matched and BMI-matched controls were enrolled. Comparison analyses detected higher values in the case group for the following parameters: CL (-22.06 ± 7.552° versus -20.36 ± 7.016°, P < 0.001), T1 Slope (19.84 ± 8.708° versus 13.99 ± 6.537°, P = 0.001), PT (21.54 ± 9.082° versus 8.87 ± 7.863°, P < 0.001), PI (64.45 ± 13.957° versus 43.60 ± 9.669°, P < 0.001), SS (42.90 ± 9.183° versus 34.73 ± 8.265°, P < 0.001), LL (-50.82 ± 21.596° versus -43.78 ± 10.356°, P = 0.042), SVA (16.99 ± 14.625 mm versus 0.32 ± 31.824 mm, P = 0.009), L5 Slope (33.95 ± 13.567° versus 19.03 ± 6.809°, P < 0.001), and L5I (8.90 ± 6.556° versus 1.29 ± 6.726°, P < 0.001). Conversely, TS-CL (6.56 ± 6.716° versus 11.04 ± 7.085°, P = 0.006), cSVA (11.31 ± 6.867 mm versus 17.92 ± 11.832 mm, P = 0.007), and TLK (-2.66 ± 10.101° versus 2.71 ± 7.708°, P = 0.007) were smaller in the case group. Slippage percentage was most correlated with PI (r = 0.530, P = 0.003), followed by PT (r = 0.465, P = 0.011) and L5I (r = 0.433, P = 0.019). Results of binary logistic regression showed that the main risk factor of isthmic spondylolisthesis was PI (OR = 1.145, 95%CI = 1.083-1.210, P < 0.001). Further subgroup analysis also showed that PI was the main risk factor of isthmic spondylolisthesis in the female adolescents (OR = 1.237, 95%CI = 1.086-1.493, P = 0.003) and in the male adolescents (OR = 1.523, 95%CI = 1.093-2.123, P = 0.013). PI was the main risk factor for adolescent symptomatic isthmic spondylolisthesis in the Chinese Han adolescents. The greater PI indicated the higher the progressive risk of spondylolisthesis. In these isthmic spondylolisthesis adolescents, the body always inclined forward and lumbar and cervical lordosis increased.

Study Design: Retrospective cohort study., Objective: The objective was to prove the association between anatomic pelvis parameters and specific types of lumbar spinal degeneration., Summary of Background Data: Different spinopelvic sagittal profile types are suggested to be associated with specific degenerative lumbar spine pathologies. Because pelvic morphology plays a key role defining the spinal shape as well as its load and function it thereby potentially predisposes the development of spinal degeneration., Materials and Methods: Patients with symptomatic lumbar spinal degeneration who were surgically treated in 2 spine departments from March 2011 until August 2016 were included in this retrospective analysis. Single-level degenerative pathologies were classified as lumbar disc herniation (LDH), degenerative disc disease (DDD), lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS), and degenerative spondylolisthesis (DSPL). The constant anatomic pelvic parameters pelvic incidence (PI), pelvic radius (PR), and sacral table angle (STA) were assessed in lateral radiographs of the lumbar spine and compared between the pathologies., Results: In total, 249 patients were assigned to the LDH (n=73), DDD (n=67), LSS (n=42), and DSPL (n=67) groups. Group comparisons revealed significant differences in the anatomic pelvic parameters PR (LDH, 139.5±10.8 mm; DDD, 135.9±14.0 mm; LSS, 127.8±14.3 mm; DSPL, 135.8±12.7 mm; P<0.001), PI (LDH, 53.1±10.0 degrees; DDD, 50.0±9.9 degrees; LSS, 54.5±9.6 degrees; DSPL, 57.1±10.8 degrees; P=0.001), and STA (LDH, 95.3±12.7 degrees; DDD, 105.4±9.0 degrees; LSS, 105.9±11.5 degrees; DSPL, 98.6±9.5 degrees; P<0.001). Post hoc tests indicated significant differences between the PR of the LSS group and that of all other subgroups (P<0.012), the PI of the DDD group and that of DSPL (P<0.001), and the STA of the LDH/DSPL groups and that of the LSS/DDD group (P<0.005)., Conclusions: We found all the constant anatomic parameters to be specific for distinct types of degeneration, suggesting pelvis shape is a predisposing factor for their development., Level of Evidence: Level III.

Study Design: Retrospective clinical study., Objective: We aimed to introduce new parameters that can better describe the pelvic morphology and lumbosacral segmental deformity in children with high-grade spondylolisthesis of the L5 vertebra: modified pelvic incidence (mPI) and modified lumbosacral angle (mLSA). Also, we aimed to establish the mLSA as a convenient, reliable measurement method and criteria to evaluate the reduction of L5 vertebral slippage., Summary of Background Data: Numerous parameters and methods exist to evaluate segmental deformity and reduction of L5 vertebral slippage, but no definitive standard for accurately and conveniently describing lumbosacral kyphosis and degree of reduction exists., Methods: A total of 24 children with high-grade spondylolisthesis (S group) and 152 children without spondylolisthesis (non-S group) underwent standard lateral radiography of the spine in our hospital between June 2009 and June 2014. We compared mPI and mLSA between the S and non-S groups. The agreement and repeatability of mPI and mLSA were also assessed. Preoperative and postoperative Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) and Scoliosis Research Society (SRS)-22 scores were compared to assess clinical outcomes in the S group. The correlations between modified parameter applications and clinical outcomes were also assessed., Results: While mPI did not differ between groups, mLSA differed significantly. In the non-S group, mLSA was lordotic (25.51±6.41 degrees). In the S group, mLSA was kyphotic (25.85±5.17 degrees) before surgery and lordotic (20.74±7.04 degrees) postoperatively. The agreement and repeatability of mPI and mLSA were good, and clinical outcomes of the S group were satisfactory. Positive correlations were found between modified parameter applications and the improvement rates of JOA scores., Conclusions: mPI and mLSA can better describe the pelvic morphology and local deformity of pediatric high-grade L5 spondylolisthesis, and mLSA can serve as a useful index for correcting lumbosacral kyphosis, rebalancing the sagittal spinal profile and predicting clinical outcomes.

Study Design: A retrospective study., Objective: This study aimed to analyze the relationships between degenerative spondylolisthesis in the fifth lumbar vertebra (L5-DS) and radiographic parameters and to further determine the radiographic predictors of the development of L5-DS., Summary of Background Data: Degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis (DLS) is a common degenerative disease of the spine; however, the correlations between L5-DS and radiographic parameters remain controversial., Patients and Methods: This retrospective case-control study was conducted in our hospital. Between 2011 and 2014, a total of 84 subjects with L5-DS were enrolled in the DLS group, and 56 healthy volunteers were recruited to the control group. A series of radiographic parameters, including the bone mineral density, disk degenerative index, disk height, L5 vertebral size (L5-VS), lumbar lordosis angle (LL), sacral slope angle (SS), pelvic incidence (PI), facet joint angulations (FJA) of the cephalad and caudad portions, and asymmetry of the FJA, were measured in both groups by 3 examiners., Results: The bone mineral density, disk degenerative index, disk height, L5-VS, LL, SS, PI, and FJA exhibited significant differences (P=0.014-0.045) between the DLS and control groups. Significant changes in the FJA of the cephalad and caudad portions in the L4-L5 and L5-S1 segments were observed between the 2 groups (P=0.00, 0.00), whereas no significant differences in the asymmetries of FJA were observed in the L4-L5 or L5-S1 segments (P=0.605-0.972). Among all of the parameters, the L5-VS (P=0.025), SS (P=0.020), LL (P=0.031), PI (P=0.014), and FJA (P=0.022) were identified as being associated with the DLS group by multiple logistic regression analysis., Conclusions: In this study, SS, LL, PI, and a more sagittal FJA were proven to be risk factors for L5-DS, whereas L5-VS was found to be a likely protective factor against L5-DS. These parameters should be considered predictors of L5-DS.

The objective was to evaluate motion, disc degeneration and Space Available for Cord (SAC) at the adjacent segments of degenerative cervical spondylolisthesis (DCS) using kinematic Magnetic Resonance Imaging (kMRI). The cervical spine kMRI of sixty-one DCS spinal levels (38 anterolisthesis and 23 retrolisthesis) were analyzed at the listhesis level and its adjacent segments in three position using kMRI. MRAnalyzer3 was used to analyze translation, angular motion and SAC. The caudad level had significantly less translation motion than the listhesis level in overall DCS or grade 2 anterolisthesis group (P<0.05). The cephalad level had significant more translational motion than the caudad level in overall DCS or grade 1 retrolisthesis group (P<0.05). For disc degeneration, the cephalad level had the least disc degeneration and showed significant difference with the listhesis level in overall DCS or overall anterolisthesis or overall retrolisthesis or grade 2 anterolisthesis or grade 1 or 2 retrolisthesis (P<0.05). For SAC, the listhesis level had the narrowest space in overall DCS groups. In neutral position, grade 1 anterolisthesis had significantly larger SAC at the listhesis and the cephalad level than grade 1 retrolisthesis (P<0.05). In conclusion, DCS affected cervical spine motion and kinematics. Grade 1 retrolisthesis showed tendency of narrower SAC at the cephalad level more than the same grade anterolisthesis. The likelihood of the adjacent segment disease and spinal cord compression are higher in both grade 2 anterolisthesis and retrolisthesis., (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Although degenerative spondylolisthesis (DS) and lumber disc herniation (LDH) are common causes of back pain, the associations between the lumbar facet joint angle orientation and tropism in these conditions are still contentious. The objective of the meta-analysis was to identify the role of facet joint orientation and tropism on the development of lumbar degenerative disease, including DS and LDH. Electronic searches of PubMed and Embase were conducted up to April 2017. P value<0.05 was regarded as significant. Seventeen studies were included in this meta-analysis. Depending on the analysis, patients with DS have more sagittal orientated facet joints compared with control subjects (weighted mean difference [WMD] -10.5, 95% confidence interval [CI] -11.71 to -8.60; P<0.00001). We also found that DS patients have more remarkable facet joint tropism (WMD 1.84, 95% CI 0.77-2.91; P=0.0007). No significant correlation was observed between facet joint angle with LDH. There is a possibility that morphological deformity of facet joints could be associated with accelerated degeneration of stabilizing structures and affect the progress of DS. Our conclusion did not support the correlation between LDH and abnormalities of the facet joint. We tend to assume that the mechanics related to biomechanical changes in LDH disease progress might be more sophisticated., (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Objective: The incidence of double-level isthmic spondylolisthesis is rare. The aim of this study is to evaluate the short-term functional and radiological outcomes of surgical treatment for double-level isthmic spondylolisthesis., Patients and Methods: Between 2004 and 2014, thirty-two patients with double-level isthmic spondylolisthesis who underwent posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) with autogenous bone chips were reviewed retrospectively. The clinical outcomes were measured by VAS (Visual analog scale) and JOA(Japanese Orthopedic Association) score., Results: At an average follow-up of 2.8 years, the mean score on the VAS of back pain and sciatica decreased from 6.48 and 4.26 points preoperatively to 1.82 and 1.10 points at final follow-up, respectively. The average JOA score improved from 13.8±3.1 preoperative to 25.6±1.3 (range, 17-28) points postoperative. The average recovery rate was 77.6%. The good and excellent rate was 84.3% (27/32). The fusion rate was 87.5% (28/32). Changes in disc height, degree of listhesis, whole lumbar lordosis, and sacral inclination between the pre- and postoperative periods were significant., Conclusions: Our findings suggest that PLIF with autogenous bone chips for double-level isthmic spondylolisthesis could yield good functional short-term results. It seems to be a viable approach in the treatment of double-level isthmic spondylolisthesis., (Copyright © 2017. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

Background Context: T1 slope is a novel thoracic parameter used to assess cervical spine sagittal balance. Thoracic index (TI) parameters including T1 slope and cervical sagittal alignment parameters may play an important role in degenerative cervical spondylolisthesis (DCS). Current literature regarding the relationship between TI and cervical sagittal alignment parameters in patients with DCS is limited., Purpose: (1) To evaluate the T1 slope, cervical sagittal alignment, and thoracic inlet parameter in patients with DCS using kinematic magnetic resonance imaging (kMRI), and (2) to find a correlation between the T1 slope, TI, and other cervical sagittal parameters in patients with DCS., Design/setting: Retrospective kMRI study, Level III., Patient Sample: Fifty-two patients with DCS from 1,128 patients from a cervical kMRI database., Outcome Measures: T1 slope, C2-C7 angle, sagittal vertical axis C2-C7 (SVA C2-C7), cranial tilt, cervical tilt, neck tilt, and thoracic inlet angle (TIA)., Methods: Cervical spine kMRIs of 52 patients with DCS (mean age 51.7±standard deviation) were analyzed in neutral, flexion, and extension positions. Patients with DCS were divided into two groups: anterolisthesis (N=33) and retrolisthesis (N=19). Each listhesis group was subclassified into grade 1 (slip 2-3 mm) and grade 2 (slip>3 mm)., Results: Grade 2 retrolisthesis had the largest T1 slope followed by grade 1 retrolisthesis, grade 2 anterolisthesis, and grade 1 anterolisthesis. Significant differences were found between the anterolisthesis and the retrolisthesis groups in the neutral position (p=.025). The flexion position had the largest T1 slope and showed a significant difference with anterolisthesis in the neutral position (p=.041). Sagittal vertical axis C2-C7 showed strong correlation with cranial tilt in all DCS groups and all positions., Conclusions: In our study, T1 slope was larger in grade 2 DCS, and the retrolisthesis group had larger T1 slope than the anterolisthesis group. Presence of larger T1 slope was significantly correlated with larger cervical lordosis curvature. Furthermore, cranial tilt was strongly correlated with SVA C2-C7., (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: To investigate the relationship between the facet fluid sign (FFS) and kinematics of affected lumbar segment in patients with low-grade, single-level lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis using kinematic magnetic resonance imaging (kMRI).Materials and methods Ninety-two patients diagnosed with low-grade (Grade 1 or 2), single level lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis L3 to S1. Angular and translational motion, whole lumbar motion, slip percentage, and facet angle were measured. Disc degeneration and degrees of osteoarthritis were graded, facet effusion was evaluated and classified as Positive or Negative FFS (PosFFS or NegFFS).Results There were significant differences in the facet degeneration, translational motion, percentage of total angular motion, and flexion-extension slip difference between the PosFFS and NegFFS group. 28.3% of the patients in PosFFS group had anterolisthesis in flexion, but not extension.There was a significant difference in the incidence of FFS between the dynamic and static spondylolisthesis (75% vs 35%, p < 0.001). If FFS was present on kMRI, a positive predictive value for dynamic spondylolisthesis was 75.6%. with the sensitivity and specificity of 0.75 and 0.65 for posFFS to diagnose dynamic DS. The likelihood ratio for dynamic slips in the presence of FFS was 2.1, and the likelihood ratio for static slips in the presence of FFS was 1.1.Conclusion Facet fluid sign was present in weight-bearing neutral position, and the presence of FFS in kMRI increased the probability of having dynamic spondylolisthesis., (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

A radiographic study was carried out to investigate the relationship between proximal sacral sagittal anatomy (either kyphosis or lordosis) and either isthmic or degenerative spondylolisthesis. In addition, we studied whether there is a relationship between proximal sacral kyphosis and the degree of such listhesis in the case of L5 isthmic spondylolisthesis. Lateral standing x-rays were used from 173 patients, ninety of whom had degenerative spondylolisthesis L4-L5, and eighty-three an isthmic spondylolisthesis of L5 (67 low-grade and 16 high-grade) and compared with a control group of 100 patients adjusted by age and gender, without any type of spondylolisthesis. Listhesis was graded using Meyerding's classification and the proximal sacral kyphosis angle (CSP) was measured between S1 and S2 posterior walls, according to Harrison's method. In our series, there was a proximal sacral kyphosis in both types of spondylolisthesis, greater in the lytic type. By contrast, the control group had a proximal sacral lordosis. The differences were statistically significant. Therefore, we concluded that there was a proximal sacral kyphosis in patients with both degenerative and isthmic lytic spondylolisthesis, but with our results, we were not able to ascertain whether it is a cause or a consequence of this listhesis., (Copyright © 2017 SECOT. Publicado por Elsevier España, S.L.U. All rights reserved.)