Search

Youth soccer participation, particularly among females, continues to grow worldwide. With the high incidence of sport-related concussion (SRC) in soccer, it is important to investigate if SRC occurs disproportionally by positions. Our hypothesis was to see no positional differences in SRCs, SRC-related characteristics, and outcomes among in female youth soccer athletes. Data were prospectively collected from participants at a single sports medicine institution between August 2015-April 2021. Female participants aged 8–18 diagnosed with SRC sustained during an organized soccer practice, scrimmage, or game were separated into 4 groups based on position: Forward, Midfielder, Defender, and Goalkeeper. Demographics, medical history, injury-related details, and outcomes were reviewed. A chi-square test or Fisher's exact test was used for categorical variables. Continuous variables were compared with Mann-Whitney or Kruskal-Wallis test. Two hundred fourteen participants were included: 52 Forwards, 65 Midfielders, 63 Defenders, and 34 Goalkeepers. There were no significant differences between the groups in age, race, ethnicity, or previous concussion history. Differences in mechanism existed with Goalkeepers most commonly reporting Head to Body Part. Goalkeepers, which make up 1/11 of the total positions on the field, had a significantly higher proportion of SRCs compared to Field Positions. (9.1% vs 15.9%) At 3-month post-enrollment, there were no significant differences in reported symptoms or return-to-play between the different positions. In youth female soccer players, goalkeepers sustained a higher proportion of sport-related concussions compared to field players based upon the composition of a soccer team. The mechanism of injury also differed among the different soccer positions. However, no differences in concussion characteristics, outcomes, or RTP were seen across the different soccer positions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Accurate assessment of balance recovery throughout treatment of a sport-related concussion is imperative. This study examined differences in balance from diagnosis to return-to-play initiation in adolescent patients post-concussion. Second, this study investigated the extent to which the Balance Error Scoring System (BESS) correlated with center-of-pressure (COP) measures. Forty participants performed the BESS while standing on a force platform such that COP data were obtained simultaneously. Spatial and velocity COP-based measures were computed for the double-stance conditions. BESS scores and COP-based measures indicated improved balance performance between visits. Specifically, 62.5/65.0% of participants exhibited improved firm/foam BESS final scores, respectively, and 56.4–71.8% exhibited improved COP-based measures. However, once normative ranges were referenced to identify maintained performance, the percentage of participants who substantially improved differed from initial findings (BESS: 2.5/7.5%, COP: 48.7–69.2%). Additionally, positive correlations between balance measures were primarily found at diagnosis (r=0.33–0.53), while only three correlations were maintained at return-to-play initiation (r=0.34–0.39). BESS scores successfully identified poor balance performance at diagnosis when symptoms were most pronounced, but failed to accurately depict performance once balance impairment, indicated by COP-based measures, became less apparent. Further work is needed to implement more advanced balance assessments into clinical environments. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]