Search

The primary objective of this work is to obtain fundamental insights on phase transformations, with focus on the reaustenitization process (α′→γ transformation), of a cold-rolled (CR) semi-austenitic metastable stainless steel upon different isochronal conditions (0.1, 1, 10 and 100 °C/s). For this purpose, an exhaustive microstructural characterization has been performed by using complementary experimental such as scanning and transmission electron microscopy (SEM and TEM), electron backscattered diffraction (EBSD), electron probe microanalysis (EPMA), micro-hardness Vickers and magnetization measurements. It has been detected that all microstructural changes shift to higher temperatures as the heating rate increases. The reaustenitization occurs in two-steps for all heating rates, which is attributed to the chemical banding present in the CR state. The α′→γ transformation is controlled by the migration of substitutional alloying elements across the austenite/martensite (γ/α′) interface, which finally leads to ultrafine-grained reaustenitized microstructures (440–280 nm). The morphology of the martensite phase in the CR state has been found to be the responsible for such a grain refinement, along with the presence of χ-phase and nanometric Ni 3 (Ti,Al) precipitates that pin the austenite grain growth, especially upon slowly heating at 0.1 °C/s. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This study unravels the microstructural mechanisms controlling the mechanical behaviour and austenite mechanical stability in ultrafine grained austenite/martensite (α′/γ) microstructures, created varying the austenitisation heating rate (0.1–10 °C/s) and temperature within the start-finish austenite formation temperatures (A S − A F) in a cold-rolled semi-austenitic stainless steel. A wide spectrum of strength-ductility combinations; i.e. strengths of 900–2100 MPa and elongations up to 25%, were characterised by sub-size tensile testing. The nanoprecipitation of Ni 3 (Ti,Al) in martensite during heating to low austenitisation temperatures rises the strength, while the martensite recovery, enhanced at low heating rates, improves the work-hardening. The high strength of martensite partially suppresses the formation of mechanically-induced martensite during loading, which is enabled with the increase of austenite volume fraction and contributes positively to the work-hardening. The heating rate barely affects the mechanical properties of microstructures austenitised close to A F. The austenite ultrafine grain size controls the yield strength, while the decrease in austenite mechanical stability and the α′/γ composite effect increase remarkably the work-hardening with respect to dual (α′/γ) microstructures with larger martensite volume fractions and fully austenitised microstructures. These results will enable the design of microstructures with controlled mechanical behaviour for a wider spread use of similar steel grades. Unlabelled Image • Increasing the austenitisation temperature reduces similarly the austenite mechanical stability for all heating rates. • The austenite mechanical stability and work hardening of dual microstructures depend on the strength of martensite. • Low austenitisation temperatures cause strengthening due to the nanoprecipitation of Ni 3 (Ti,Al) in martensite. • The heating rate barely affects the mechanical properties of microstructures austenitised close to the A F temperature. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]