Search

Purpose: To characterize the progression of optical gaps and expand the known etiologies of this phenotype., Design: Retrospective cohort study., Methods: Thirty-six patients were selected based on the identification of an optical gap on spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (OCT) from a large cohort of patients (N = 746) with confirmed diagnoses of inherited retinal dystrophy. The width and height of the gaps in 70 eyes of 36 patients were measured by 2 independent graders using the caliper tool on Heidelberg Explorer. Measurements of outer and central retinal thickness were also evaluated and correlated with gap dimensions., Results: Longitudinal analysis confirmed the progressive nature of optical gaps in patients with Stargardt disease, achromatopsia, occult macular dystrophy, and cone dystrophies (P < .003). Larger changes in gap width were noted in patients with Stargardt disease (78.1 μm/year) and cone dystrophies (31.9 μm/year) compared with patients with achromatopsia (16.2 μm/year) and occult macular dystrophy (15.4 μm/year). Gap height decreased in patients with Stargardt disease (6.5 μm/year; P = .02) but increased in patients with achromatopsia (3.3 μm/year) and occult macular dystrophy (1.2 μm/year). Gap height correlated with measurements of central retinal thickness at the fovea (r = 0.782, P = .00012). Interocular discordance of the gap was observed in 7 patients. Finally, a review of all currently described etiologies of optical gap was summarized., Conclusion: The optical gap is a progressive phenotype seen in an increasing number of etiologies. This progressive nature suggests a use as a biomarker in the understanding of disease progression. Interocular discordance of the phenotype may be a feature of Stargardt disease and cone dystrophies., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Whole exome sequencing (WES) allows for an unbiased search of the genetic cause of a disease. Employing it as a first-tier genetic testing can be favored due to the associated lower incremental cost per diagnosis compared to when using it later in the diagnostic pathway. However, there are technical limitations of WES that can lead to inaccurate negative variant callings. Our study presents these limitations through a re-evaluation of negative WES results using subsequent tests primarily driven by fundoscopic findings. These tests included targeted gene testing, inherited retinal gene panels, whole genome sequencing (WGS), and array comparative genomic hybridization.Results: Subsequent genetic testing guided by fundoscopy findings identified the following variant types causing retinitis pigmentosa that were not detected by WES: frameshift deletion and nonsense variants in the RPGR gene, 353-bp Alu repeat insertions in the MAK gene, and large exonic deletion variants in the EYS and PRPF31 genes. Deep intronic variants in the ABCA4 gene causing Stargardt disease and the GUCY2D gene causing Leber congenital amaurosis were also identified.Conclusions: Negative WES analyses inconsistent with the phenotype should raise clinical suspicion. Subsequent genetic testing may detect genetic variants missed by WES and can make patients eligible for gene replacement therapy and upcoming clinical trials. When phenotypic findings support a genetic etiology, negative WES results should be followed by targeted gene sequencing, array based approach or whole genome sequencing. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]