Search

Inferring treatment effects on a survival time outcome based on data from an observational study is challenging due to the presence of censoring and possible confounding. An additional challenge occurs when a unit's treatment affects the outcome of other units, i.e., there is interference. In some settings, units may be grouped into clusters such that it is reasonable to assume interference only occurs within clusters, i.e., there is clustered interference. In this paper, methods are developed which can accommodate confounding, censored outcomes, and clustered interference. The approach avoids parametric assumptions and permits inference about counterfactual scenarios corresponding to any stochastic policy which modifies the propensity score distribution, and thus may have application across diverse settings. The proposed nonparametric sample splitting estimators allow for flexible data-adaptive estimation of nuisance functions and are consistent and asymptotically normal with parametric convergence rates. Simulation studies demonstrate the finite sample performance of the proposed estimators, and the methods are applied to a cholera vaccine study in Bangladesh.

Confounding and exposure measurement error can introduce bias when drawing inference about the marginal effect of an exposure on an outcome of interest. While there are broad methodologies for addressing each source of bias individually, confounding and exposure measurement error frequently co-occur and there is a need for methods that address them simultaneously. In this paper, corrected score methods are derived under classical additive measurement error to draw inference about marginal exposure effects using only measured variables. Three estimators are proposed based on g-formula, inverse probability weighting, and doubly-robust estimation techniques. The estimators are shown to be consistent and asymptotically normal, and the doubly-robust estimator is shown to exhibit its namesake property. The methods, which are implemented in the R package mismex, perform well in finite samples under both confounding and measurement error as demonstrated by simulation studies. The proposed doubly-robust estimator is applied to study the effects of two biomarkers on HIV-1 infection using data from the HVTN 505 preventative vaccine trial.

Observational data are often used to estimate real-world effectiveness and durability of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines. A sequence of nested trials can be emulated to draw inference from such data while minimizing selection bias, immortal time bias, and confounding. Typically, when nested trial emulation (NTE) is employed, effect estimates are pooled across trials to increase statistical efficiency. However, such pooled estimates may lack a clear interpretation when the treatment effect is heterogeneous across trials. In the context of COVID-19, vaccine effectiveness quite plausibly will vary over calendar time due to newly emerging variants of the virus. This manuscript considers a NTE inverse probability weighted estimator of vaccine effectiveness that may vary over calendar time, time since vaccination, or both. Statistical testing of the trial effect homogeneity assumption is considered. Simulation studies are presented examining the finite-sample performance of these methods under a variety of scenarios. The methods are used to estimate vaccine effectiveness against COVID-19 outcomes using observational data on over 120,000 residents of Abruzzo, Italy during 2021., Comment: 27 pages, 2 figures

Patient care may be improved by recommending treatments based on patient characteristics when there is treatment effect heterogeneity. Recently, there has been a great deal of attention focused on the estimation of optimal treatment rules that maximize expected outcomes. However, there has been comparatively less attention given to settings where the outcome is right-censored, especially with regard to the practical use of estimators. In this study, simulations were undertaken to assess the finite-sample performance of estimators for optimal treatment rules and estimators for the expected outcome under treatment rules. The simulations were motivated by the common setting in biomedical and public health research where the data is observational, survival times may be right-censored, and there is interest in estimating baseline treatment decisions to maximize survival probability. A variety of outcome regression and direct search estimation methods were compared for optimal treatment rule estimation across a range of simulation scenarios. Methods that flexibly model the outcome performed comparatively well, including in settings where the treatment rule was non-linear. R code to reproduce this study's results are available on Github.

While randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are critical for establishing the efficacy of new therapies, there are limitations regarding what comparisons can be made directly from trial data. RCTs are limited to a small number of comparator arms and often compare a new therapeutic to a standard of care which has already proven efficacious. It is sometimes of interest to estimate the efficacy of the new therapy relative to a treatment that was not evaluated in the same trial, such as a placebo or an alternative therapy that was evaluated in a different trial. Such multi-study comparisons are challenging because of potential differences between trial populations that can affect the outcome. In this paper, two bridging estimators are considered that allow for comparisons of treatments evaluated in different trials using data fusion methods to account for measured differences in trial populations. A "multi-span'' estimator leverages a shared arm between two trials, while a "single-span'' estimator does not require a shared arm. A diagnostic statistic that compares the outcome in the standardized shared arms is provided. The two estimators are compared in simulations, where both estimators demonstrate minimal empirical bias and nominal confidence interval coverage when the identification assumptions are met. The estimators are applied to data from the AIDS Clinical Trials Group 320 and 388 to compare the efficacy of two-drug versus four-drug antiretroviral therapy on CD4 cell counts among persons with advanced HIV. The single-span approach requires fewer identification assumptions and was more efficient in simulations and the application.

People living with HIV on antiretroviral therapy often have undetectable virus levels by standard assays, but "latent" HIV still persists in viral reservoirs. Eliminating these reservoirs is the goal of HIV cure research. The quantitative viral outgrowth assay (QVOA) is commonly used to estimate the reservoir size, i.e., the infectious units per million (IUPM) of HIV-persistent resting CD4+ T cells. A new variation of the QVOA, the Ultra Deep Sequencing Assay of the outgrowth virus (UDSA), was recently developed that further quantifies the number of viral lineages within a subset of infected wells. Performing the UDSA on a subset of wells provides additional information that can improve IUPM estimation. This paper considers statistical inference about the IUPM from combined dilution assay (QVOA) and deep viral sequencing (UDSA) data, even when some deep sequencing data are missing. Methods are proposed to accommodate assays with wells sequenced at multiple dilution levels and with imperfect sensitivity and specificity, and a novel bias-corrected estimator is included for small samples. The proposed methods are evaluated in a simulation study, applied to data from the University of North Carolina HIV Cure Center, and implemented in the open-source R package SLDeepAssay., Comment: Main text is 13 pages, including 2 figures and 2 tables. Supporting information follows the main text

Interference occurs when a unit's treatment (or exposure) affects another unit's outcome. In some settings, units may be grouped into clusters such that it is reasonable to assume that interference, if present, only occurs between individuals in the same cluster, i.e., there is clustered interference. Various causal estimands have been proposed to quantify treatment effects under clustered interference from observational data, but these estimands either entail treatment policies lacking real-world relevance or are based on parametric propensity score models. Here, we propose new causal estimands based on modification of the propensity score distribution which may be more relevant in many contexts and are not based on parametric models. Nonparametric sample splitting estimators of the new estimands are constructed, which allow for flexible data-adaptive estimation of nuisance functions and are consistent, asymptotically normal, and efficient, converging at the usual parametric rate. Simulations show the finite sample performance of the proposed estimators. The proposed methods are applied to evaluate the effect of water, sanitation, and hygiene facilities on diarrhea among children in Senegal.

Comparisons of treatments, interventions, or exposures are of central interest in epidemiology, but direct comparisons are not always possible due to practical or ethical reasons. Here, we detail a fusion approach to compare treatments across studies. The motivating example entails comparing the risk of the composite outcome of death, AIDS, or greater than a 50% CD4 cell count decline in people with HIV when assigned triple versus mono antiretroviral therapy, using data from the AIDS Clinical Trial Group (ACTG) 175 (mono versus dual therapy) and ACTG 320 (dual versus triple therapy). We review a set of identification assumptions and estimate the risk difference using an inverse probability weighting estimator that leverages the shared trial arms (dual therapy). A fusion diagnostic based on comparing the shared arms is proposed that may indicate violation of the identification assumptions. Application of the data fusion estimator and diagnostic to the ACTG trials indicates triple therapy results in a reduction in risk compared to monotherapy in individuals with baseline CD4 counts between 50 and 300 cells/mm$^3$. Bridged treatment comparisons address questions that none of the constituent data sources could address alone, but valid fusion-based inference requires careful consideration of the underlying assumptions., Comment: 21 pages, 3 figures, 5 tables

Causal inference methods can be applied to estimate the effect of a point exposure or treatment on an outcome of interest using data from observational studies. For example, in the Women's Interagency HIV Study, it is of interest to understand the effects of incarceration on the number of sexual partners and the number of cigarettes smoked after incarceration. In settings like this where the outcome is a count, the estimand is often the causal mean ratio, i.e., the ratio of the counterfactual mean count under exposure to the counterfactual mean count under no exposure. This paper considers estimators of the causal mean ratio based on inverse probability of treatment weights, the parametric g-formula, and doubly robust estimation, each of which can account for overdispersion, zero-inflation, and heaping in the measured outcome. Methods are compared in simulations and are applied to data from the Women's Interagency HIV Study.

Assessing population-level effects of vaccines and other infectious disease prevention measures is important to the field of public health. In infectious disease studies, one person's treatment may affect another individual's outcome, i.e., there may be interference between units. For example, the use of bed nets to prevent malaria by one individual may have an indirect effect on other individuals living in close proximity. In some settings, individuals may form groups or clusters where interference only occurs within groups, i.e., there is partial interference. Inverse probability weighted estimators have previously been developed for observational studies with partial interference. Unfortunately, these estimators are not well suited for studies with large clusters. Therefore, in this paper, the parametric g-formula is extended to allow for partial interference. G-formula estimators are proposed for overall effects, effects when treated, and effects when untreated. The proposed estimators can accommodate large clusters and do not suffer from the g-null paradox that may occur in the absence of interference. The large sample properties of the proposed estimators are derived assuming no unmeasured confounders and that the partial interference takes a particular form (referred to as `weak stratified interference'). Simulation studies are presented demonstrating the finite-sample performance of the proposed estimators. The Demographic and Health Survey from the Democratic Republic of the Congo is then analyzed using the proposed g-formula estimators to assess the effects of bed net use on malaria., Comment: 24 pages, 9 figures

In the analysis of observational studies, inverse probability weighting (IPW) is commonly used to consistently estimate the average treatment effect (ATE) or the average treatment effect in the treated (ATT). The variance of the IPW ATE estimator is often estimated by assuming the weights are known and then using the so-called "robust" (Huber-White) sandwich estimator, which results in conservative standard error (SE) estimation. Here it is shown that using such an approach when estimating the variance of the IPW ATT estimator does not necessarily result in conservative SE estimates. That is, assuming the weights are known, the robust sandwich estimator may be conservative or anti-conservative. Thus confidence intervals of the ATT using the robust SE estimate will not be valid in general. Instead, stacked estimating equations which account for the weight estimation can be used to compute a consistent, closed-form variance estimator for the IPW ATT estimator. The two variance estimators are compared via simulation studies and in a data analysis of the effect of smoking on gene expression.

Marginal structural models fit via inverse probability of treatment weighting are commonly used to control for confounding when estimating causal effects from observational data. When planning a study that will be analyzed with marginal structural modeling, determining the required sample size for a given level of statistical power is challenging because of the effect of weighting on the variance of the estimated causal means. This paper considers the utility of the design effect to quantify the effect of weighting on the precision of causal estimates. The design effect is defined as the ratio of the variance of the causal mean estimator divided by the variance of a naive estimator if, counter to fact, no confounding had been present and weights were not needed. A simple, closed-form approximation of the design effect is derived that is outcome invariant and can be estimated during the study design phase. Once the design effect is approximated for each treatment group, sample size calculations are conducted as for a randomized trial, but with variances inflated by the design effects to account for weighting. Simulations demonstrate the accuracy of the design effect approximation, and practical considerations are discussed.

Individualized treatment rules can lead to better health outcomes when patients have heterogeneous responses to treatment. Very few individualized treatment rule estimation methods are compatible with a multi-treatment observational study with right censored survival outcomes. In this paper we extend policy evaluation methods to the right censored data setting. Existing approaches either make restrictive assumptions about the structure of the data, or use inverse weighting methods that increase the variance of the estimator resulting in decreased performance. We propose a method which uses balanced policy evaluation combined with an imputation approach to remove right censoring. We show that the proposed imputation approach is compatible with a large number of existing survival models and can be used to extend any individualized treatment rule estimation method to the right censored data setting. We establish the rate at which the imputed values converge to the conditional expected survival times, as well as consistency guarantees and regret bounds for the combined balanced policy with imputation approach. In simulation studies, we demonstrate the improved performance of our approach compared to existing methods. We also apply our method to data from the University of North Carolina Center for AIDS Research HIV Clinical Cohort.

Cluster-randomized trials are often conducted to assess vaccine effects. Defining estimands of interest before conducting a trial is integral to the alignment between a study's objectives and the data to be collected and analyzed. This paper considers estimands and estimators for overall, indirect, and total vaccine effects in trials where clusters of individuals are randomized to vaccine or control. The scenario is considered where individuals self-select whether to participate in the trial and the outcome of interest is measured on all individuals in each cluster. Unlike the overall, indirect, and total effects, the direct effect of vaccination is shown in general not to be estimable without further assumptions, such as no unmeasured confounding. An illustrative example motivated by a cluster-randomized typhoid vaccine trial is provided., Comment: 14 pages, 1 figure

Estimating population-level effects of a vaccine is challenging because there may be interference, i.e., the outcome of one individual may depend on the vaccination status of another individual. Partial interference occurs when individuals can be partitioned into groups such that interference occurs only within groups. In the absence of interference, inverse probability weighted (IPW) estimators are commonly used to draw inference about causal effects of an exposure or treatment. Tchetgen Tchetgen and VanderWeele (2012) proposed a modified IPW estimator for causal effects in the presence of partial interference. Motivated by a cholera vaccine study in Bangladesh, this paper considers an extension of the Tchetgen Tchetgen and VanderWeele IPW estimator to the setting where the outcome is subject to right censoring using inverse probability of censoring weights (IPCW). Censoring weights are estimated using proportional hazards frailty models. The large sample properties of the IPCW estimators are derived, and simulation studies are presented demonstrating the estimators' performance in finite samples. The methods are then used to analyze data from the cholera vaccine study.

Accurate power calculations are essential in small studies containing expensive experimental units or high-stakes exposures. Herein, exact power of the Wilcoxon Mann-Whitney rank-sum test of a continuous variable is formulated using a Monte Carlo approach and defining P(X < Y) = p as a measure of effect size, where X and Y denote random observations from two distributions hypothesized to be equal under the null. Effect size p fosters productive communications because researchers understand p = 0.5 is analogous to a fair coin toss, and p near 0 or 1 represents a large effect. This approach is feasible even without background data. Simulations were conducted comparing the exact power approach to existing approaches by Rosner & Glynn (2009), Shieh et al. (2006), Noether (1987), and O'Brien-Castelloe (2006). Approximations by Noether and O'Brien-Castelloe are shown to be inaccurate for small sample sizes. The Rosner & Glynn and Shieh et al. approaches performed well in many small sample scenarios, though both are restricted to location-shift alternatives and neither approach is theoretically justified for small samples. The exact method is recommended and available in the R package wmwpow. KEYWORDS: Mann-Whitney test, Monte Carlo simulation, non-parametric, power analysis, Wilcoxon rank-sum test

Interference occurs when the treatment (or exposure) of one individual affects the outcomes of others. In some settings it may be reasonable to assume individuals can be partitioned into clusters such that there is no interference between individuals in different clusters, i.e., there is partial interference. In observational studies with partial interference, inverse probability weighted (IPW) estimators have been proposed of different possible treatment effects. However, the validity of IPW estimators depends on the propensity score being known or correctly modeled. Alternatively, one can estimate the treatment effect using an outcome regression model. In this paper, we propose doubly robust (DR) estimators which utilize both models and are consistent and asymptotically normal if either model, but not necessarily both, is correctly specified. Empirical results are presented to demonstrate the DR property of the proposed estimators, as well as the efficiency gain of DR over IPW estimators when both models are correctly specified. The different estimators are illustrated using data from a study examining the effects of cholera vaccination in Bangladesh.

Interference occurs between individuals when the treatment (or exposure) of one individual affects the outcome of another individual. Previous work on causal inference methods in the presence of interference has focused on the setting where a priori it is assumed there is 'partial interference,' in the sense that individuals can be partitioned into groups wherein there is no interference between individuals in different groups. Bowers, Fredrickson, and Panagopoulos (2012) and Bowers, Fredrickson, and Aronow (2016) consider randomization-based inferential methods that allow for more general interference structures in the context of randomized experiments. In this paper, extensions of Bowers et al. which allow for failure time outcomes subject to right censoring are proposed. Permitting right censored outcomes is challenging because standard randomization-based tests of the null hypothesis of no treatment effect assume that whether an individual is censored does not depend on treatment. The proposed extension of Bowers et al. to allow for censoring entails adapting the method of Wang, Lagakos, and Gray (2010) for two sample survival comparisons in the presence of unequal censoring. The methods are examined via simulation studies and utilized to assess the effects of cholera vaccination in an individually-randomized trial of 73,000 children and women in Matlab, Bangladesh.

Inferring causal effects from an observational study is challenging because participants are not randomized to treatment. Observational studies in infectious disease research present the additional challenge that one participant's treatment may affect another participant's outcome, i.e., there may be interference. In this paper recent approaches to defining causal effects in the presence of interference are considered, and new causal estimands designed specifically for use with observational studies are proposed. Previously defined estimands target counterfactual scenarios in which individuals independently select treatment with equal probability. However, in settings where there is interference between individuals within clusters, it may be unlikely that treatment selection is independent between individuals in the same cluster. The proposed causal estimands instead describe counterfactual scenarios in which the treatment selection correlation structure is the same as in the observed data distribution, allowing for within-cluster dependence in the individual treatment selections. These estimands may be more relevant for policy-makers or public health officials who desire to quantify the effect of increasing the proportion of treated individuals in a population. Inverse probability-weighted estimators for these estimands are proposed. The large-sample properties of the estimators are derived, and a simulation study demonstrating the finite-sample performance of the estimators is presented. The proposed methods are illustrated by analyzing data from a study of cholera vaccination in over 100,000 individuals in Bangladesh., Comment: 31 pages, 5 figures

This paper considers conducting inference about the effect of a treatment (or exposure) on an outcome of interest. In the ideal setting where treatment is assigned randomly, under certain assumptions the treatment effect is identifiable from the observable data and inference is straightforward. However, in other settings such as observational studies or randomized trials with noncompliance, the treatment effect is no longer identifiable without relying on untestable assumptions. Nonetheless, the observable data often do provide some information about the effect of treatment, that is, the parameter of interest is partially identifiable. Two approaches are often employed in this setting: (i) bounds are derived for the treatment effect under minimal assumptions, or (ii) additional untestable assumptions are invoked that render the treatment effect identifiable and then sensitivity analysis is conducted to assess how inference about the treatment effect changes as the untestable assumptions are varied. Approaches (i) and (ii) are considered in various settings, including assessing principal strata effects, direct and indirect effects and effects of time-varying exposures. Methods for drawing formal inference about partially identified parameters are also discussed., Comment: Published in at http://dx.doi.org/10.1214/14-STS499 the Statistical Science (http://www.imstat.org/sts/) by the Institute of Mathematical Statistics (http://www.imstat.org)

New methods and theory have recently been developed to nonparametrically estimate cumulative incidence functions for competing risks survival data subject to current status censoring. In particular, the limiting distribution of the nonparametric maximum likelihood estimator and a simplified "naive estimator" have been established under certain smoothness conditions. In this paper, we establish the large-sample behavior of these estimators in two additional models, namely when the observation time distribution has discrete support and when the observation times are grouped. These asymptotic results are applied to the construction of confidence intervals in the three different models. The methods are illustrated on two data sets regarding the cumulative incidence of (i) different types of menopause from a cross-sectional sample of women in the United States and (ii) subtype-specific HIV infection from a sero-prevalence study in injecting drug users in Thailand., Comment: 16 pages, 3 figures