Search

Purpose: Epilepsy is a common comorbidity in patients with glioblastoma, however, clinical data on status epilepticus (SE) in these patients is sparse. We aimed to investigate the risk factors associated with the occurrence and adverse outcomes of SE in glioblastoma patients., Methods: We retrospectively analysed electronic medical records of patients with de-novo glioblastoma treated at our institution between 01/2006 and 01/2020 and collected data on patient, tumour, and SE characteristics., Results: In the final cohort, 292/520 (56.2 %) patients developed seizures, with 48 (9.4 % of the entire cohort and 16.4 % of patients with epilepsy, PWE) experiencing SE at some point during the course of their disease. SE was the first symptom of the tumour in 6 cases (1.2 %) and the first manifestation of epilepsy in 18 PWE (6.2 %). Most SE episodes occurred postoperatively (n = 37, 77.1 %). SE occurrence in PWE was associated with postoperative seizures and drug-resistant epilepsy. Adverse outcome (in-house mortality or admission to palliative care, 10/48 patients, 20.8 %), was independently associated with higher status epilepticus severity score (STESS) and Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), but not tumour progression. 32/48 SE patients (66.7 %) were successfully treated with first- and second-line agents, while escalation to third-line agents was successful in 6 (12.5 %) cases., Conclusion: Our data suggests a link between the occurrence of SE, postoperative seizures, and drug-resistant epilepsy. Despite the dismal oncological prognosis, SE was successfully treated in 79.2 % of the cases. Higher STESS and CCI were associated with adverse SE outcomes., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: Outside of the work reported in this paper, H.M. Hamer has served on the scientific advisory boards of Arvelle, Bial, Corlieve, Eisai, GW, Novartis, Sandoz, UCB Pharma and Zogenix. He has been part of the speakers’ bureaus of or received unrestricted grants from Amgen, Ad-Tech, Alnylam, Bracco, Desitin, Eisai, GW, Nihon Kohden, Novartis, Pfizer, and UCB Pharma. The remaining authors have no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2023. Published by Elsevier Ltd.)

Objective: Super-refractory status epilepticus (SRSE) is an enduring or recurring SE after 24 h or more of general anesthesia. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of phenobarbital (PB) for the treatment of SRSE., Methods: This retrospective, multicenter study included neurointensive care unit (NICU) patients with SRSE treated with PB between September 2015 and September 2020 from six participating centers of the Initiative of German NeuroIntensive Trial Engagement (IGNITE) to evaluate the efficacy and safety of PB treatment for SRSE. The primary outcome measure was seizure termination. In addition, we evaluated maximum reached serum levels, treatment duration, and clinical complications using a multivariate generalized linear model., Results: Ninety-one patients were included (45.1% female). Seizure termination was achieved in 54 patients (59.3%). Increasing serum levels of PB were associated with successful seizure control (per μg/mL: adjusted odds ratio [adj.OR] = 1.1, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.0-1.2, p < .01). The median length of treatment in the NICU was 33.7 [23.2-56.6] days across groups. Clinical complications occurred in 89% (n = 81) of patients and included ICU-acquired infections, hypotension requiring catecholamine therapy, and anaphylactic shock. There was no association between clinical complications and treatment outcome or in-hospital mortality. The overall average modified Rankin scale (mRS) at discharge from the NICU was 5 ± 1. Six patients (6.6%) reached mRS ≤3, of whom five were successfully treated with PB. In-hospital mortality was significantly higher in patients in whom seizure control could not be achieved., Significance: We observed a high rate in attainment of seizure control in patients treated with PB. Success of treatment correlated with higher dosing and serum levels. However, as one would expect in a cohort of critically ill patients with prolonged NICU treatment, the rate of favorable clinical outcome at discharge from the NICU remained extremely low. Further prospective studies evaluating long-term clinical outcome of PB treatment as well as an earlier use of PB at higher doses would be of value., (© 2023 The Authors. Epilepsia published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International League Against Epilepsy.)

Status epilepticus is characterized by persistent or repetitive seizures which, without successful treatment, can lead to neuronal damage, neurological deficits and death of the patient.While status epilepticus with motor symptoms can usually be clinically diagnosed, nonconvulsive status epilepticus is often clinically overlooked due to its ambiguous semiology, so that electroencephalography (EEG) recording is necessary. The treatment of status epilepticus is performed in four treatment steps, whereby a difficult to treat status epilepticus is present from the third step at the latest and intensive medical care of the patient is necessary. Timely initiation of treatment and sufficient dosage of anticonvulsive medication are decisive for the success of treatment. There is little evidence for the "late" stages of treatment. Intensive medical measures pose the risk of complications that worsen the prognosis. Especially in nonconvulsive status epilepticus, the use of anesthetics must be weighed against possible complications of mechanical ventilation., (© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Medizin Verlag GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature.)

The role of neuroinflammation in the pathophysiology of seizures is increasingly recognized, and the evaluation of potential biochemical markers of inflammatory processes in seizures and status epilepticus (SE), such as C-reactive protein (CRP), has gained attention. The present study assessed the first CRP level obtained in an SE episode regarding its value for SE outcome prediction. Among 362 admissions for SE during the study period, 231 episodes satisfied the inclusion criteria. Higher initial CRP concentrations were independently associated with in-hospital mortality and poor functional outcome at discharge in logistic regression models adjusting for SE severity, severity of SE etiology, and development of treatment refractoriness. Therefore, initial CRP levels may add to the prediction of SE prognosis. The pathomechanisms through which CRP is linked with the prognosis of SE, however, remain to be established., (© 2021 The Authors. Epilepsia published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International League Against Epilepsy.)

Purpose: New antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) are increasingly applied in second-line therapy of status epilepticus (SE). In our study, we analyzed the impact of the choice of second-line AEDs on the course and prognosis of SE., Methods: This retrospective single- center study used data of an 8 year cohort of SE in adults from 2007 to 2014. Based on the year of market introduction with a cutoff at 1990, we classified AEDs as traditional or new. Prescription pattern associated differences in prognosis were measured through univariate and multivariable analysis of 3 endpoints: occurrence of refractory SE (RSE), functional outcome in survivors to discharge (good: mRS at discharge <3 or identical to admission mRS; otherwise poor), and in-hospital mortality., Results: From 362 SE episodes during the study period, 222 episodes were included into the study, among those 150 episodes treated with new and 72 with traditional AEDs. Use of new AEDs increased during the study period. After adjustment for confounders, treatment with new AEDs was on the one hand associated with higher rate of RSE occurrence (OR 1.95, 95 % CI 1.05-3.62, p = 0.03), but, on the other hand, also with better functional outcome at discharge (OR 2.64, 95 % CI 1.16-6.00, p = 0.02), while it was not an independent predictor of in- hospital mortality (OR 0.88, 95 % CI 0.33-2.33, p = 0.80)., Conclusion: Our observation that new AEDs may be associated with a higher rate of RSE development and relatively better functional outcome when adjusted for the premorbid mRS needs confirmation in prospective studies., (Copyright © 2019 British Epilepsy Association. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: Patients in refractory status epilepticus (RSE) may require treatment with continuous intravenous anesthetic drugs (cIVADs) for seizure control. The use of cIVADs, however, was recently associated with poor outcome in status epilepticus (SE), raising the question of whether cIVAD therapy should be delayed for attempts to halt seizures with repeated non-anesthetic antiepileptic drugs. In this study, we aimed to determine the impact of differences in therapeutic approaches on RSE outcome using timing of cIVAD therapy as a surrogate for treatment aggressiveness., Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study over 14 years (n = 77) comparing patients with RSE treated with cIVADs within and after 48 h after RSE onset, and functional status at last follow-up was the primary outcome (good = return to premorbid baseline or modified Rankin Scale score of less than 3). Secondary outcomes included discharge functional status, in-hospital mortality, RSE termination, induction of burst suppression, use of thiopental, duration of RSE after initiation of cIVADs, duration of mechanical ventilation, and occurrence of super-refractory SE. Analysis was performed on the total cohort and on subgroups defined by RSE severity according to the Status Epilepticus Severity Score (STESS) and by the variables contained therein., Results: Fifty-three (68.8%) patients received cIVADs within the first 48 h. Early cIVAD treatment was independently associated with good outcome (adjusted risk ratio [aRR] 3.175, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.273-7.918; P = 0.013) as well as lower chance of both induction of burst suppression (aRR 0.661, 95% CI 0.507-0.861; P = 0.002) and use of thiopental (aRR 0.446, 95% CI 0.205-0.874; P = 0.043). RSE duration after cIVAD initiation was shorter in the early cIVAD cohort (hazard ratio 1.796, 95% CI 1.047-3.081; P = 0.033). Timing of cIVAD use did not impact the remaining secondary outcomes. Subgroup analysis revealed early cIVAD impact on the primary outcome to be driven by patients with STESS of less than 3., Conclusions: Patients with RSE treated with cIVADs may benefit from early initiation of such therapy.

Purpose: Several scoring tools have been developed for the prognostication of outcome after status epilepticus (SE). In this study, we compared the performances of STESS (Status Epilepticus Severity Score), mSTESS (modified STESS), EMSE-EAL (Epidemiology-based Mortality Score in Status Epilepticus- Etiology, Age, Level of Consciousness) and END-IT (Encephalitis-NCSE-Diazepam resistance-Image abnormalities-Tracheal intubation) in predicting in-hospital mortality after SE., Method: Data collected retrospectively from a cohort of 287 patients with SE were used to calculate STESS, mSTESS, EMSE-EAL, and END-IT scores. The differences between the scores' performances were determined by means of area under the ROC curve (AUC) comparisons and McNemar testing., Results: The in-hospital mortality rate was 11.8%. The AUC of STESS (0.628; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.529-0.727) was similar to that of mSTESS (0.620; 95% CI, 0.510-0.731), EMSE-EAL (0.556; 95% CI, 0.446-0.665), and END-IT (0.659; 95% CI, 0.550-0.768; p > .05 for each comparison) in predicting in-hospital mortality. STESS with a cutoff of 3 was found to have lowest specificity and number of correctly classified episodes. EMSE-EAL with a cutoff at 40 had highest specificity and showed a trend towards more correctly classified episodes while sensitivity tended to be low. END-IT with a cutoff of 3 had the most balanced sensitivity-specificity ratio., Conclusions: EMSE-EAL is as easy to calculate as STESS and tended towards higher diagnostic accuracy. Adding information on premorbid functional status to STESS did not enhance outcome prediction. END-IT was not superior to other scores in prediction of in-hospital mortality despite including information of diagnostic work-up and response to initial treatment., (Copyright © 2018 British Epilepsy Association. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Super-refractory status epilepticus (SRSE) represents a challenging medical condition with high morbidity and mortality. In this study, we aimed to establish variables related to SRSE development and outcome., Methods: We retrospectively screened our databases for refractory SE (RSE) and SRSE episodes between January 2001 and January 2015. Baseline demographics, SE characteristics, and variables reflecting the clinical course were compared in order to identify factors independently associated with SRSE occurrence. Within the SRSE cohort, predictors of in-hospital mortality as well as good functional outcome in survivors to discharge were established through univariate and multivariable analyses., Results: A total of 131 episodes were included, among those 46 (35.1%) meeting the criteria of SRSE. Comparison of RSE and SRSE episodes revealed a lower premorbid mRS score (odds ratio (OR) per mRS point, 0.769; p=0.039) and non-convulsive SE (NCSE) in coma (OR, 4.216; p=0.008) as independent predictors of SRSE. SRSE in-hospital mortality was associated with age (OR, 1.091 per increasing year; p=0.020) and worse premorbid functional status (OR, 1.938 per mRS point; p=0.044). Good functional outcome in survivors was independently related to shorter SRSE duration (OR, 0.714 per day; p=0.038)., Conclusion: Better premorbid functional status and NCSE in coma as worst seizure type indicate a role of acute underlying etiologies in the development of SRSE. In-hospital mortality in SRSE is determined by nonmodifiable factors, while functional outcome in survivors depends on seizure duration underscoring the need of achieving rapid seizure termination., (Copyright © 2017 British Epilepsy Association. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Copyright of Der Nervenarzt is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)