1. Outcomes of Intermediate Risk Karyotype Acute Myeloid Leukemia in First Remission Undergoing Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation Compared With Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation and Chemotherapy Consolidation: A Retrospective, Propensity-score Adjusted Analysis.
- Author
-
Limvorapitak W, Barnett MJ, Hogge DE, Forrest DL, Nevill TJ, Narayanan S, Power MM, Nantel SH, Broady R, Song KW, Toze CL, Mourad YA, Sutherland HJ, Gerrie AS, White J, and Sanford DS
- Subjects
- Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Combined Modality Therapy, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic, Humans, Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute genetics, Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute pathology, Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute therapy, Male, Middle Aged, Prognosis, Propensity Score, Remission Induction, Retrospective Studies, Survival Rate, Transplantation, Autologous, Transplantation, Homologous, Young Adult, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols therapeutic use, Biomarkers, Tumor genetics, Consolidation Chemotherapy mortality, Karyotyping methods, Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute mortality, Stem Cell Transplantation mortality
- Abstract
Introduction: Optimal post-remission therapy (PRT) for intermediate risk acute myeloid leukemia remains an area of ongoing research. We aimed to retrospectively compare outcomes following autologous stem cell transplantation (autoSCT) with allogeneic SCT (alloSCT) and consolidation chemotherapy (CMT) in patients with intermediate-risk karyotype AML in first complete remission., Patients and Methods: We compared overall survival (OS) and leukemia-free survival (LFS) using propensity score (PS)-adjusted analysis of patients receiving PRT with autoSCT, matched sibling (MSD) alloSCT, unrelated/mismatch (UD/MM) alloSCT, and CMT. We included patients diagnosed between 1984 and 2003 (period of autoSCT at our center) in CR1 following induction CMT and received at least 2 consolidative cycles., Results: We identified 190 patients (62 MSD-alloSCT, 18 UD/MM-alloSCT, 30 autoSCT, and 80 CMT). Baseline characteristics were used for PS calculation and were well-balanced after weight adjustment. The median follow-up for patients surviving beyond 1 year was 8.7 years. We excluded 55 patients based on PS calculation. Adjusted multivariate hazard ratio (HR), 95% confidence interval (CI) and P-value for OS, considering CMT as reference, were: MSD-alloSCT (HR, 0.4; 95% CI, 0.2-0.8; P = .009), UD/MM-alloSCT (HR, 1.5; 95% CI, 0.6-3.9; P = .363), and autoSCT (HR, 1.2; 95% CI, 0.5-3.1; P = .666), respectively. Adjusted multivariate HR, 95% CI and P-value for LFS were MSD-alloSCT (HR, 0.3; 95% CI, 0.2-0.6; P < .001), UD/MM-alloSCT (HR, 1.1; 95% CI, 0.4-2.7; P = .854), and autoSCT (HR, 0.8; 95% CI, 0.3-2.2; P = .697), respectively., Conclusion: Patients with intermediate risk-karyotype acute myeloid leukemia who underwent MSD-alloSCT in first complete remission had the best outcomes. There were no survival differences between autoSCT, UD/MM-alloSCT, and CMT. Further study incorporating molecular changes and minimal residual disease status is warranted to select appropriate patients for autoSCT., (Crown Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF