Search

Objectives: To evaluate the use of extension catheters in transradial intervention of complex coronary lesions., Background: Complex percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) via transradial approach remains a challenge for many interventionalists, primarily due to the difficulty in obtaining adequate guide catheter support., Methods: A retrospective case series identified 54 patients who presented for PCI of complex coronary lesions. A lesion was defined as complex if it contained severe calcification, proximal tortuosity, chronic total occlusion, or was located distal to a previously implanted stent. After identifying the complex lesions, a conversion to femoral approach was considered, but an attempt via the transradial approach with the use of an extension catheter was chosen as the initial strategy. Specific cases highlighting this approach are illustrated in detail., Results: The average age of the patients was 72 years old, with male predominance (55%). The success rate of completing the transradial intervention with the help of an extension catheter was 96%. Stent delivery failed due to severe tortuosity and calcification in only 2 cases. The coronary artery involved was either the left anterior descending (n = 25), the left circumflex (n = 10), the right coronary artery (n = 14), or a saphenous vein graft (n = 5). There were no coronary dissections evident from use of the extension catheter., Conclusion: In the treatment of complex coronary lesions via the transradial approach, the use of an extension catheter may assist in improving successful intervention and decrease the frequency of crossover to a femoral approach.

Objective: We sought to study the clinical outcomes of bifurcation stenting in patients who presented with stent thrombosis segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI)., Background: Patients with STEMI are usually excluded from randomized bifurcation studies. There is limited information for bifurcation stenting in this population., Methods: All STEMI patients who were randomized were retrospectively reviewed from DKCRUSH II (double kissing, double crush) database. DKCRUSH II is a multicenter, randomized study of provisional stenting (PS) versus the DK crush stenting techniques. A total of 370 patients with bifurcation lesions were randomized and of this group a total of 63 patients with STEMI were found. This group of STEMI included 30 patients in the PS group and 33 patients in the DK crush stenting group., Results: There were no differences in terms of contrast used, procedure time, and fluoroscopy time. Procedural success rates were 97% in all patients with STEMI, with 100% in the PS group and 94% in the DK crush stenting group. During the procedure, there were two patients with less than TIMI 3 (thrombolysis in myocardial infarction) flow in the main vessel of the DK crush group However, TIMI 3 flow was 100% in the side branch for both groups. Cumulative 12-month major adverse cardiac event (MACE) was 22% in the whole STEMI group, whereas PS and DK crush groups were 23% versus 21%, respectively (P = NS). There were no differences in in-hospital, 6-month, and 12-month MACE in these two groups. At 6 and 12 months, there were two cardiac deaths in the PS group but without statistical significance when compared with the DK crush stenting group (7% vs. 0%, P = NS)., Conclusion: Bifurcation stenting in patients with STEMI is safe and feasible. The immediate and midterm clinical outcomes were comparable between PS and DK crush stenting., (Copyright © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)

Transradial percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has been associated with a lower incidence of major access site related complications. With the increased implementation of transradial approach in complex PCI, stent dislodgement is unavoidable in any interventionalists' career. Stent retrieval is different in a transradial approach as compared to a transfemoral approach because of the former's smaller arterial size. In this review, we outline the different stent retrieval techniques with considerations from transradial access., (Copyright © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.)

Ostial lesions, including aorta-ostial lesions and Medina 001 bifurcation lesions, are known to create difficulty in precise stent placement. There are many techniques used to help in precise ostial stent placement; these include using multiple angiographic views to assist in placement, the use of the Ostial Pro device, the aorta flowing wire technique, Szabo (anchor-wire) techniques, the T-stent and small protrusion (TAP) technique, the cross-over 1-stent technique, and new dedicated ostial stents. In this review, we summarize these different techniques and show that there is no universal technique that allows for perfect ostial stent placement.

Although the provisional stenting technique to treat coronary bifurcation lesions is the preferred method, many bifurcation lesions still require a two-stent technique to optimize the result and clinical outcome. This manuscript summarizes the tips and tricks of bifurcation stenting with cases illustrations. As interventionists are encountering more complex and difficult cases, one may find the tips and tricks in this manuscript helpful in daily practice.