Search

An increased total stent length (TSL) might be associated with a higher risk of clinical events; however, in patients with multivessel disease (MVD), a considerable TSL is often required. In patients presenting with acute coronary syndrome and MVD, immediate complete revascularization was associated with shorter TSL in the BIOVASC (Immediate versus staged complete revascularisation in patients presenting with acute coronary syndrome and multivessel coronary disease) Trial. This is a subanalysis of the BIOVASC trial comparing clinical outcomes in patients with either <60 or ≥60 mm TSL. The primary outcome was a composite of all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, any unplanned ischemia driven revascularization, or cerebrovascular events at 2 years after the index procedure. A total of 1,525 patients were enrolled in the BIOVASC trial, of whom 855 had a TSL of ≥60 mm (long TSL). No significant difference was established when comparing patients treated with either long or short TSL in terms of the primary outcome at 2-year follow-up, which occurred in 117 patients (13.7%) in the ≥60 mm group and 69 patients (10.3%) in the <60 mm group (adjusted hazard ratio 1.25, 95% confidence interval 0.92 to 1.69, p = 0.16). Furthermore, no significant differences were observed in the secondary end points. In conclusion, in patients with acute coronary syndrome and MVD, long stenting did not show a significant difference in clinical event rate compared with short stenting., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest Dr. Diletti reports a relation with Erasmus Medical Center that includes funding grants. Dr. Van Mieghem reports a relation with Erasmus Medical Center that includes funding grants, speaking and lecture fees, and travel reimbursement. Dr. den Dekker reports a relation with Erasmus Medical Center that includes funding grants. Dr. Bennett reports a relation with University Hospitals Leuven that includes funding grants. The remaining authors have no competing interests to declare., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Stents are an indispensable tool in the percutaneous treatment of symptomatic coronary artery disease. Yet, stent failure due to restenosis or thrombosis may compromise their clinical benefit, carrying substantial morbidity and mortality. Despite improvements in device design and adjunctive medical treatment, stent failure still occurs during long-term follow-up, suggesting that this may be an issue that persists for many years, perhaps indefinitely. Numerous studies during the last decade have highlighted the previously underappreciated pivotal role of atherosclerosis in stent failure. We review evolving evidence on the role of atherosclerosis in stent restenosis and thrombosis, differentiating between de novo in-stent atherosclerosis development (i.e., neoatherosclerosis) and progression of pre-existing underlying atherosclerosis (i.e., paleoatherosclerosis), a distinction with potentially important clinical implications. We conclude with a concept that provides a unifying pathophysiology for these significant problems in the field of interventional cardiology based on the progression and destabilization of atherosclerosis., (Copyright © 2019 Hellenic Society of Cardiology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: Drug-eluting stents (DES) showed improved efficacy and safety compared with bare-metal stents (BMS), and international guidelines recommend their use as first line treatment. Yet, BMS are still widely used in practice, especially in large coronary vessels. We aimed to compare efficacy and safety of second-generation DES over BMS in large coronary culprit ST-segment elevated myocardial infarction lesions., Methods: We evaluated impact of large coronary stents (maximum size ≥3.50 mm) or smaller stents (<3.50 mm), among 1498 patients with ST-segment elevated myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention, randomly allocated to everolimus-eluting DES or to an equivalent BMS platform in the EXAMINATION trial (Clinical Evaluation of the Xience-V Stent in Acute Myocardial Infarction Trial). Clinical events up to 5 years of follow-up were evaluated., Results: Large coronary stents were used in 683 patients (45.9%). At 5-year follow-up, the crude rate of the primary end point, a composite of all-cause death, any myocardial infarction, or any revascularization, was similar among patients treated with large or smaller coronary stents. The impact of DES versus BMS implantation was consistent irrespective of the stent size both for the primary end point (P int =0.82) and other secondary ischemic end points. Within patients treated with bigger stents, DES implantation was associated to a trend toward a reduction of target lesion (hazard ratio, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.27-1.02; P=0.05) and target vessel revascularization (hazard ratio, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.34-1.03; P=0.066)., Conclusions: Our results do not support the preferential use of BMS for patients with large coronary vessels. DES may warrant improved efficacy irrespective of stent size among patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention., Clinical Trial Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00828087.

Background: New-generation drug-eluting stents (DES) have mostly been investigated in head-to-head non-inferiority trials against early-generation DES and have typically shown similar efficacy and superior safety. How the safety profile of new-generation DES compares with that of bare-metal stents (BMS) is less clear., Methods: We did an individual patient data meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials to compare outcomes after implantation of new-generation DES or BMS among patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. The primary outcome was the composite of cardiac death or myocardial infarction. Data were pooled in a one-stage random-effects meta-analysis and examined at maximum follow-up and a 1-year landmark. Risk estimates are reported as hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% CIs. This study is registered in PROSPERO, number CRD42017060520., Findings: We obtained individual data for 26 616 patients in 20 randomised trials. Mean follow-up was 3·2 (SD 1·8) years. The risk of the primary outcome was reduced in DES recipients compared with BMS recipients (HR 0·84, 95% CI 0·78-0·90, p<0·001) owing to a reduced risk of myocardial infarction (0·79, 0·71-0·88, p<0·001) and a possible slight but non-significant cardiac mortality benefit (0·89, 0·78-1·01, p=0·075). All-cause death was unaffected (HR with DES 0·96, 95% CI 0·88-1·05, p=0·358), but risk was lowered for definite stent thrombosis (0·63, 0·50-0·80, p<0·001) and target-vessel revascularisation (0·55, 0·50-0·60, p<0·001). We saw a time-dependent treatment effect, with DES being associated with lower risk of the primary outcome than BMS up to 1 year after placement. While the effect was maintained in the longer term, there was no further divergence from BMS after 1 year., Interpretation: The performance of new-generation DES in the first year after implantation means that BMS should no longer be considered the gold standard for safety. Further development of DES technology should target improvements in clinical outcomes beyond 1 year., Funding: Bern University Hospital., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: Use of everolimus-eluting stents (EES) has proven to be clinically effective and safe in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction but it remains unclear whether it is cost-effective compared to bare-metal stents (BMS) in the long-term. We sought to assess the cost-effectiveness of EES versus BMS based on the 5-year results of the EXAMINATION trial, from a Spanish health service perspective., Methods: Decision analysis of the use of EES versus BMS was based on the patient-level clinical outcome data of the EXAMINATION trial. The analysis adopted a lifelong time horizon, assuming that long-term survival was independent of the initial treatment strategy after the end of follow-up. Life-expectancy, health-state utility scores and unit costs were extracted from published literature and publicly available sources. Non-parametric bootstrapping was combined with probabilistic sensitivity analysis to co-assess the impact of patient-level variation and parameter uncertainty. The main outcomes were total costs and quality-adjusted life-years. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was expressed as cost per quality-adjusted life-years gained. Costs and effects were discounted at 3%., Results: The model predicted an average survival time in patients receiving EES and BMS of 10.52 and 10.38 undiscounted years, respectively. Over the life-long time horizon, the EES strategy was €430 more costly than BMS (€8,305 vs. €7,874), but went along with incremental gains of 0.10 quality-adjusted life-years. This resulted in an average incremental cost-effectiveness ratio over all simulations of €3,948 per quality-adjusted life-years gained and was below a willingness-to-pay threshold of €25,000 per quality-adjusted life-years gained in 86.9% of simulation runs., Conclusions: Despite higher total costs relative to BMS, EES appeared to be a cost-effective therapy for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients due to their incremental effectiveness. Predicted incremental cost-effectiveness ratios were below generally acceptable threshold values., Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Aims: The aim of this substudy was to determine the five-year correlates of non-TV-related adverse events (AE) in STEMI patients included in the EXAMINATION trial., Methods and Results: The EXAMINATION trial randomised 1,498 STEMI patients to bare metal or everolimus-eluting stent implantation. In this substudy, patients were analysed according to non-TV-related AE, defined as the composite of either non-TV revascularisation (non-TVR) or non-TV-related myocardial infarction (MI). At five-year follow-up, 125 patients (8.3%) exhibited 136 non-TV-related AE (124 [8.3%] non-TVR, 12 [0.8%] non-TV-related MI), accounting for 47.1% of 289 non-fatal cardiac events overall. These patients had a higher incidence of diabetes mellitus (p<0.001), arterial hypertension (p=0.032), previous MI (p=0.073), multivessel disease (p<0.001), and incomplete revascularisation (p=0.049), and a lower rate of ST-segment resolution >70% (p=0.042) as compared to the rest. At Cox analysis, previous MI (HR 1.872, 95% CI: 1.004-3.489; p=0.048), incomplete revascularisation (HR 1.746, 95% CI: 1.029-2.963; p=0.039) and diabetes (HR 1.942, 95% CI: 1.292-2.919; p=0.001) were independent correlates of non-TV-related AE., Conclusions: In STEMI patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention, previous MI, incomplete revascularisation and diabetes resulted in being independent correlates of five-year non-TV-related AE.

Background: Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest (OHCA) and mild therapeutic hypothermia (MTH) have been linked to increased risk of Stent Thrombosis (ST) in comatose survivors who undergo percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). In this sense, there is no formal recommendation about which antiplatelet regimen should be used in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) after OHCA., Aims: To compare the incidence of probable/definite ST and bleeding events between ticagrelor and clopidogrel, in patients with ACS under MTH after an OHCA., Methods and Results: From January 2010 to August 2016, 144 patients underwent MTH after an OHCA. Overall, 114 had an ACS (79%) and 98 (67,3%) were treated with primary PCI and stent implantation. Among them, 61 (62,2%) were treated with clopidogrel, and 32 (32,6%) with ticagrelor. During hospitalization, the incidence of probable or definite ST was significantly higher in patients receiving clopidogrel compared to ticagrelor (11,4% vs. 0%; p: 0.04), and no significant differences in any (28,6% vs. 25%; p: 0.645) or major bleeding (BARC 3 or 5) (11,4% vs. 12,5%; p: 0.685) were found. Hospital mortality did not differ between groups (26,2% vs. 25%; p: 0.862)., Conclusions: In this study, as compared to clopidogrel, ticagrelor was associated with a lower rate of ST, without differences in haemorrhagic events in patients with OHCA for an ACS under MTH. Similarly to other settings, ticagrelor might be a valid alternative to clopidogrel in these patients., (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Treatment of patients with drug-eluting stent (DES) in-stent restenosis (ISR) is particularly challenging. We sought to compare results of drug-eluting balloons in patients with DES-ISR with those in patients with bare-metal stent (BMS) ISR. A pooled analysis of the Restenosis Intra-Stent: Drug-Eluting Balloon versus Everolimus-Eluting Stent IV and V randomized trials was performed. Both trials had identical inclusion and exclusion criteria. Results of drug-eluting balloons in 95 patients with BMS-ISR and 154 patients with DES-ISR were compared. Patients with DES-ISR were more frequently diabetics, presented more often as an acute coronary syndrome and had more severe lesions and more frequently a focal pattern, including edge-ISR. Late angiographic findings (92% of eligible patients), including minimal lumen diameter (1.80 ± 0.6 vs 2.01 ± 0.6 mm, p = 0.001; absolute mean difference 0.21 mm; 95% confidence interval 0.04 to 0.38; p = 0.014) and restenosis rate (19% vs 9.5%, p <0.05) were poorer in DES-ISR. Results were consistent across 10 prespecified subgroups. Moreover, on multiple linear regression analysis, minimal lumen diameter at follow-up remained significantly smaller in patients with DES-ISR after adjusting for potential confounders (adjusted absolute mean difference 0.17 mm; 95% confidence interval 0.04 to 0.41; p = 0.019). Finally, at 1-year clinical follow-up (100% of patients), rates of target vessel revascularization (16% vs 6%, p = 0.02) and of the main combined clinical end point (18% vs 8%, p = 0.03) were significantly higher in patients treated for DES-ISR. In conclusion, this study confirms the efficacy of DEB for patients with ISR. However, the long-term clinical and angiographic results of DEB are poorer in patients with DES-ISR than in those with BMS-ISR. (ClinicalTrials.govIdentifier:NCT01239953&NCT01239940)., (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Data for the safety and efficacy of new-generation drug-eluting stents at long-term follow-up, and specifically in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, are scarce. In the EXAMINATION trial, we compared everolimus-eluting stents (EES) with bare-metal stents (BMS) in an all-comer population with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. In this study, we assessed the 5-year outcomes of the population in the EXAMINATION trial., Methods: In the multicentre EXAMINATION trial, done in Italy, Spain, and the Netherlands, patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive EES or BMS. The random allocation schedule was computer-generated and central randomisation (by telephone) was used to allocate patients in blocks of four or six, stratified by centre. Patients were masked to treatment assignment. At 5 years, we assessed the combined patient-oriented outcome of all-cause death, any myocardial infarction, or any revascularisation. Analysis was by intention to treat. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00828087., Findings: 1498 patients were randomly assigned to receive either EES (n=751) or BMS (n=747). At 5 years, complete clinical follow-up data were obtained for 731 patients treated with EES and 727 treated with BMS (97% of both groups). The patient-oriented endpoint occurred in 159 (21%) patients in the EES group versus 192 (26%) in the BMS group (hazard ratio 0·80, 95% CI 0·65-0·98; p=0·033). This difference was mainly driven by a reduced rate of all-cause mortality (65 [9%] vs 88 [12%]; 0·72, 0·52-0·10; p=0·047)., Interpretation: Our findings should be taken as a point of reference for the assessment of new bioresorbable polymer-based metallic stents or bioresorbable scaffolds in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction., Funding: Spanish Heart Foundation., (Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: To examine the safety and effectiveness of cobalt-chromium everolimus eluting stents compared with bare metal stents., Design: Individual patient data meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Cox proportional regression models stratified by trial, containing random effects, were used to assess the impact of stent type on outcomes. Hazard ratios with 95% confidence interval for outcomes were reported., Data Sources and Study Selection: Medline, Embase, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. Randomised controlled trials that compared cobalt-chromium everolimus eluting stents with bare metal stents were selected. The principal investigators whose trials met the inclusion criteria provided data for individual patients., Primary Outcomes: The primary outcome was cardiac mortality. Secondary endpoints were myocardial infarction, definite stent thrombosis, definite or probable stent thrombosis, target vessel revascularisation, and all cause death., Results: The search yielded five randomised controlled trials, comprising 4896 participants. Compared with patients receiving bare metal stents, participants receiving cobalt-chromium everolimus eluting stents had a significant reduction of cardiac mortality (hazard ratio 0.67, 95% confidence interval 0.49 to 0.91; P=0.01), myocardial infarction (0.71, 0.55 to 0.92; P=0.01), definite stent thrombosis (0.41, 0.22 to 0.76; P=0.005), definite or probable stent thrombosis (0.48, 0.31 to 0.73; P<0.001), and target vessel revascularisation (0.29, 0.20 to 0.41; P<0.001) at a median follow-up of 720 days. There was no significant difference in all cause death between groups (0.83, 0.65 to 1.06; P=0.14). Findings remained unchanged at multivariable regression after adjustment for the acuity of clinical syndrome (for instance, acute coronary syndrome v stable coronary artery disease), diabetes mellitus, female sex, use of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors, and up to one year v longer duration treatment with dual antiplatelets., Conclusions: This meta-analysis offers evidence that compared with bare metal stents the use of cobalt-chromium everolimus eluting stents improves global cardiovascular outcomes including cardiac survival, myocardial infarction, and overall stent thrombosis., (© Valgimigli et al 2014.)

Objectives: This study sought to investigate the relative safety and efficacy of bioabsorbable polymer (BP)-based biolimus-eluting stents (BES) versus durable-polymer (DP)-drug-eluting stents (DES) and bare-metal stents (BMS) by means of a network meta-analysis., Background: Studies have suggested that BP-BES might reduce the risk of stent thrombosis (ST) and late adverse outcomes compared with first-generation DES. However, the relative safety and efficacy of BP-BES versus newer-generation DES coated with more biocompatible DP have not been investigated in depth., Methods: Randomized controlled trials comparing BP-BES versus currently U.S.-approved DES or BMS were searched through MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases. Information on study design, inclusion and exclusion criteria, sample characteristics, and clinical outcomes was extracted., Results: Data from 89 trials including 85,490 patients were analyzed. At 1-year follow-up, BP-BES were associated with lower rates of cardiac death/myocardial infarction (MI), MI, and target vessel revascularization (TVR) than BMS and lower rates of TVR than fast-release zotarolimus-eluting stents. The BP-BES had similar rates of cardiac death/MI, MI, and TVR compared with other second-generation DP-DES but higher rates of 1-year ST than cobalt-chromium everolimus-eluting stents (CoCr-EES). The BP-BES were associated with improved late outcomes compared with BMS and paclitaxel-eluting stents, considering the latest follow-up data available, with nonsignificantly different outcomes compared with other DP-DES although higher rates of definite ST compared with CoCr-EES., Conclusions: In this large-scale network meta-analysis, BP-BES were associated with superior clinical outcomes compared with BMS and first-generation DES and similar rates of cardiac death/MI, MI, and TVR compared with second-generation DP-DES but higher rates of definite ST than CoCr-EES., (Copyright © 2014 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: This study sought to study the efficacy and safety of newer-generation drug-eluting stents (DES) compared with bare-metal stents (BMS) in an appropriately powered population of patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI)., Background: Among patients with STEMI, early generation DES improved efficacy but not safety compared with BMS. Newer-generation DES, everolimus-eluting stents, and biolimus A9-eluting stents, have been shown to improve clinical outcomes compared with early generation DES., Methods: Individual patient data for 2,665 STEMI patients enrolled in 2 large-scale randomized clinical trials comparing newer-generation DES with BMS were pooled: 1,326 patients received a newer-generation DES (everolimus-eluting stent or biolimus A9-eluting stent), whereas the remaining 1,329 patients received a BMS. Random-effects models were used to assess differences between the 2 groups for the device-oriented composite endpoint of cardiac death, target-vessel reinfarction, and target-lesion revascularization and the patient-oriented composite endpoint of all-cause death, any infarction, and any revascularization at 1 year., Results: Newer-generation DES substantially reduce the risk of the device-oriented composite endpoint compared with BMS at 1 year (relative risk [RR]: 0.58; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.43 to 0.79; p = 0.0004). Similarly, the risk of the patient-oriented composite endpoint was lower with newer-generation DES than BMS (RR: 0.78; 95% CI: 0.63 to 0.96; p = 0.02). Differences in favor of newer-generation DES were driven by both a lower risk of repeat revascularization of the target lesion (RR: 0.33; 95% CI: 0.20 to 0.52; p < 0.0001) and a lower risk of target-vessel infarction (RR: 0.36; 95% CI: 0.14 to 0.92; p = 0.03). Newer-generation DES also reduced the risk of definite stent thrombosis (RR: 0.35; 95% CI: 0.16 to 0.75; p = 0.006) compared with BMS., Conclusions: Among patients with STEMI, newer-generation DES improve safety and efficacy compared with BMS throughout 1 year. It remains to be determined whether the differences in favor of newer-generation DES are sustained during long-term follow-up., (Copyright © 2014 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Oral anticoagulation (OAC) is the recommended therapy for patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) because it reduces the risk of stroke and other thromboembolic events. Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) is required after percutaneous coronary intervention and stenting (PCI-S). In patients with AF requiring PCI-S, the association of DAPT and OAC carries an increased risk of bleeding, whereas OAC therapy or DAPT alone may not protect against the risk of developing new ischemic or thromboembolic events., Objective: The MUSICA-2 study will test the hypothesis that DAPT compared with triple therapy (TT) in patients with nonvalvular AF at low-to-moderate risk of stroke (CHADS2 score ≤2) after PCI-S reduces the risk of bleeding and is not inferior to TT for preventing thromboembolic complications., Design: The MUSICA-2 is a multicenter, open-label randomized trial that will compare TT with DAPT in patients with AF and CHADS2 score ≤2 undergoing PCI-S. The primary end point is the incidence of stroke or any systemic embolism or major adverse cardiac events: death, myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis, or target vessel revascularization at 1 year of PCI-S. The secondary end point is the combination of any cardiovascular event with major or minor bleeding at 1 year of PCI-S. The calculated sample size is 304 patients., Conclusions: The MUSICA-2 will attempt to determine the most effective and safe treatment in patients with nonvalvular AF and CHADS2 score ≤2 after PCI-S. Restricting TT for AF patients at high risk for stroke may reduce the incidence of bleeding without increasing the risk of thromboembolic complications., (© 2013.)

Aims: The DIABETES (DIABETes and sirolimus-Eluting Stent) trial is a prospective, multicentre, randomised, controlled trial aimed at demonstrating the efficacy of sirolimus-eluting stent (SES) as compared to bare metal stent (BMS) implantation in diabetic patients. The aim of the present analysis was to assess the five-year clinical follow-up of the patients included in this trial., Methods and Results: One hundred and sixty patients (222 lesions) were included: 80 patients were randomised to SES and 80 patients to BMS. Patients were eligible for the study if they were identified as non-insulin-dependent diabetics (NIDDM) or insulin-dependent diabetics (IDDM), with significant native coronary stenoses in ≥1 vessel. There was a sub-randomisation according to diabetes status. Clinical follow-up was extended up to five years. Five-year clinical follow-up was obtained in 96.2%. Overall, MACE at five years was significantly lower in the SES group as compared with the BMS arm, mainly due to a significant reduction in TLR. There were no significant differences in cardiac death or myocardial infarction (MI). This was also observed in both prespecified subgroups IDDM and NIDDM. In the SES group, the incidence density of definite/probable stent thrombosis was 0.53 per 100 person-years, whereas in the BMS group it was 0.8 per 100 person-years. Independent predictors of MACE were: SES implantation (p<0.001), multivessel stent implantation (p=0.04), and creatinine levels (p=0.001)., Conclusions: Five-year follow-up of the DIABETES trial suggests the effect of SES in reducing TLR is similar in both IDDM and NIDDM. No major safety concerns in terms of ST, MI or mortality were observed.

Assessment of stent strut coverage by optical coherence tomography (OCT) is not standardized. The methodology most commonly used is based on a visual binary qualitative assessment (strut covered or not). However, the influence of magnification (zoom setting) to the inter- and intra-observer agreements has not yet been evaluated. Aim of our study was therefore to evaluate the agreements of this approach, taking into account various zoom settings. 126 struts from 10 selected frames were independently evaluated by four observers using a stepwise approach increasing the zoom setting as following: (1) full view of the lumen (FV), (2) half view of the lumen (HV) and (3) a quarter view of the lumen (QV). Intra- and inter-observer agreements (κ) were assessed. The rate of uncoverage was determined for each strut as the number of times it was defined as uncovered divided by the total number of observations (maximum 12 = 3 zoom settings × 4 analysts) and expressed as percentage. The inter-observer κ values (mean [range]) were 0.32 [0.07-0.63], 0.40 [0.18-0.69] and 0.33 [0.09-0.6], within FV, HV and QV respectively. The intra-observer κ values were 0.60 [0.50-0.70], 0.75 [0.75-0.76] and 0.60 [0.50-0.70], within FV, HV and QV respectively. By increasing zoom setting the κ value of intra-observer agreement was 0.74 [0.58-0.83] (from FV to HV), 0.70 [0.56-0.83] (from HV to QV) and 0.70 [0.37-0.86] (from FV to QV). Overall, the rate of uncoverage was 15.5% [8.3-100%]. The OCT qualitative evaluation of strut coverage has wide inter and intra-observer agreements and is dependent of the zoom setting used during the analysis. A more reproducible approach would be needed to eventually increase the probability to link uncovered struts with clinical events.

Background and Objective: To assess whether there are differences in the rate of restenosis between bare metal stents (BMS) and drug eluting stents (DES) implanted for the treatment of cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV)., Patients and Methods: This retrospective study describes the baseline characteristics, clinical and angiographic evolution of a sample of heart transplant patients treated with coronary stent implantation due to CAV., Results: We analyzed the follow-up of 40 stents (17 BMS and 23 DES). Mean follow-up was 28 ± 18 months (range 12 to 84). The DES group had a lower rate of active smoking, a higher percentage of residual stenosis and an increased use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin receptor blockers. Control angiography was performed in 33 stents (82%). In the BMS group (n=15), 8 restenosis were identified (53%) whereas 2 (11%) were seen in the DES group (n=18) (P=.02)., Conclusion: In this series a lower rate of restenosis was observed in the DES group, attributable to the effect of the drug released locally by the stent., (Copyright © 2011 Elsevier España, S.L. All rights reserved.)

Aims: To evaluate outcomes of the endothelial progenitor cell (EPC) capture stent in patients on chronic anti-vitamin K (AVK) regimen, requiring percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)., Methods and Results: Between February 2007 and February 2008, 78 consecutive patients under chronic AVK treatment undergoing PCI were enrolled in the registry and received an EPC capture stent. The incidence of comorbid conditions was analysed by the Charlson index. Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAT, aspirin and clopidogrel) was prescribed for one month only together with the AVK treatment, after PCI. Major adverse clinical events (MACE) rate, included death, acute myocardial infarction (MI) or target lesion revascularisation (TLR), incidence of stent thrombosis and rate of haemorrhagic events were collected. A?Charlson index >3 was present in 89% of patients. At 14±8 months the cumulative rate of MACE was 22%: 10 deaths (six cardiac deaths), and six TLR. No MI or definitive/probable stent thromboses occurred during follow-up. Four major haemorrhagic episodes occurred during follow-up, all of them after the first month., Conclusions: Patients on AVK treatment represent a highly comorbid population with a high event rate after PCI. The strategy of PCI with an EPC capture stent and short duration of DAT may be used in patients who need a short-term DAT.

We describe two patients in whom stents dislodged from the unexpanded balloon during angioplasty and remained trapped in the coronary tree. In one patient the stent was located in the curvature of the circumflex artery and, in the other patient, it was detected in the distal left main artery. Retrieval of the undeployed stents was accomplished in the first case after advancing a low profile balloon through the stent and, in the second case, after placing a second guidewire exterior to the stent. In both cases, the balloon was inflated distally and the stents were dislodged after pulling the balloon back towards the guiding catheter and then withdrawing the whole system.

Background: Treatment of patients with in-stent restenosis (ISR) remains a challenge. We sought to compare results of sirolimus-eluting stents (SES) with those of bare-metal stents (BMS) in patients with ISR., Methods: The results obtained in the stent arm of two randomized studies were analyzed. The RIBS I study (450 patients with ISR) allocated 224 patients to BMS; the RIBS II study (150 patients with ISR) allocated 76 patients to SES. Complete 1-year follow-up was obtained in all 300 patients treated with stents., Results: Although inclusion/exclusion criteria were identical in the two studies, when compared with patients in the BMS group, patients in the SES arm had more adverse baseline characteristics, more diffuse lesions, and smaller vessels. However, late angiographic findings including in-segment recurrent restenosis rate (11 vs. 38%, P < 0.001), minimal lumen diameter (2.52 vs. 1.63 mm, P < 0.001), and late loss (0.13 vs. 1.04 mm, P < 0.001) were significantly better after SES. The 1-year event-free survival was also significantly improved in the SES group (88 vs. 78%, P < 0.05), as the result of a lower requirement for repeated revascularizations (10.5 vs. 19.6%, P < 0.05). Prespecified subgroup analyses were consistent with the main outcome measures. After adjusting for (a) imbalances in baseline characteristics (restenosis OR 0.11 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.03-0.36]; adverse events hazard ratios (HR) 0.33 [95% CI 0.13-0.84]) and (b) the propensity score (restenosis OR 0.08 [95% CI 0.03-0.28]; adverse events HR 0.24 [95% CI 0.09-0.66]), results of the SES group were superior to those obtained in the BMS group., Conclusions: When compared with BMS, SES improved the long-term clinical and angiographic outcome of patients with ISR., (2008 Wiley-Liss, Inc.)

Objective: To compare the effectiveness and safety of three types of stents (sirolimus eluting, paclitaxel eluting, and bare metal) in people with and without diabetes mellitus., Design: Collaborative network meta-analysis., Data Sources: Electronic databases (Medline, Embase, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials), relevant websites, reference lists, conference abstracts, reviews, book chapters, and proceedings of advisory panels for the US Food and Drug Administration. Manufacturers and trialists provided additional data., Review Methods: Network meta-analysis with a mixed treatment comparison method to combine direct within trial comparisons between stents with indirect evidence from other trials while maintaining randomisation. Overall mortality was the primary safety end point, target lesion revascularisation the effectiveness end point., Results: 35 trials in 3852 people with diabetes and 10,947 people without diabetes contributed to the analyses. Inconsistency of the network was substantial for overall mortality in people with diabetes and seemed to be related to the duration of dual antiplatelet therapy (P value for interaction 0.02). Restricting the analysis to trials with a duration of dual antiplatelet therapy of six months or more, inconsistency was reduced considerably and hazard ratios for overall mortality were near one for all comparisons in people with diabetes: sirolimus eluting stents compared with bare metal stents 0.88 (95% credibility interval 0.55 to 1.30), paclitaxel eluting stents compared with bare metal stents 0.91 (0.60 to 1.38), and sirolimus eluting stents compared with paclitaxel eluting stents 0.95 (0.63 to 1.43). In people without diabetes, hazard ratios were unaffected by the restriction. Both drug eluting stents were associated with a decrease in revascularisation rates compared with bare metal stents in people both with and without diabetes., Conclusion: In trials that specified a duration of dual antiplatelet therapy of six months or more after stent implantation, drug eluting stents seemed safe and effective in people both with and without diabetes.

Background: Wall shear stress (WSS) has been associated with neointimal hyperplasia (NIH) following bare metal stent (BMS) implantation. Drug-eluting stents (DES) almost abolish NIH. Conversely, diabetes mellitus amplifies NIH response. The association between WSS and arterial wall response following DES and BMS implantation in diabetic patients remains to be evaluated., Methods: The study involved 20 diabetic patients randomized to BMS (n = 9) or sirolimus-eluting stent (SES; n = 11) implantation in native coronary arteries. A computational fluid dynamic model applied 3D intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) and two-plane angiographic to measure WSS (Pa). IVUS assessments were performed post-procedure and at 9-months follow-up. The target segment encompassed the stent plus 5 mm distal and proximal edges. A total of 93 subsegments were evaluated: in-stent segments divided in three subsegments (proximal, mid and distal; n = 60) and proximal and distal edges (n = 33)., Results: Stent length was similar between BMS (17.4 +/- 7.3 mm) and SES (19.8 +/- 6.8 mm) groups. NIH was observed in all BMS subsegments (n = 27) versus one subsegment in the SES group (n = 33). WSS ranged from 0.52 to 4.20 Pa in the BMS and from 0.42 to 3.06 Pa in the SES group. There was no correlation between WSS and NIH in either stent group. In addition, there were no correlation between the change of external elastic membrane (EEM) or plaque growth at the edges and WSS., Conclusion: WSS was not associated with NIH after implantation of SES or BMS in diabetic patients. Plaque growth or the change of EEM at the edges were not associated with WSS either.

Background: Whether the two drug-eluting stents approved by the US Food and Drug Administration-a sirolimus-eluting stent and a paclitaxel-eluting stent-are associated with increased risks of death, myocardial infarction, or stent thrombosis compared with bare-metal stents is uncertain. Our aim was to compare the safety and effectiveness of these stents., Methods: We searched relevant sources from inception to March, 2007, and contacted investigators and manufacturers to identify randomised controlled trials in patients with coronary artery disease that compared drug-eluting with bare-metal stents, or that compared sirolimus-eluting stents head-to-head with paclitaxel-eluting stents. Safety outcomes included mortality, myocardial infarction, and definite stent thrombosis; the effectiveness outcome was target lesion revascularisation. We included 38 trials (18,023 patients) with a follow-up of up to 4 years. Trialists and manufacturers provided additional data on clinical outcomes for 29 trials. We did a network meta-analysis with a mixed-treatment comparison method to combine direct within-trial comparisons between stents with indirect evidence from other trials while maintaining randomisation., Findings: Mortality was similar in the three groups: hazard ratios (HR) were 1.00 (95% credibility interval 0.82-1.25) for sirolimus-eluting versus bare-metal stents, 1.03 (0.84-1.22) for paclitaxel-eluting versus bare-metal stents, and 0.96 (0.83-1.24) for sirolimus-eluting versus paclitaxel-eluting stents. Sirolimus-eluting stents were associated with the lowest risk of myocardial infarction (HR 0.81, 95% credibility interval 0.66-0.97, p=0.030 vs bare-metal stents; 0.83, 0.71-1.00, p=0.045 vs paclitaxel-eluting stents). There were no significant differences in the risk of definite stent thrombosis (0 days to 4 years). However, the risk of late definite stent thrombosis (>30 days) was increased with paclitaxel-eluting stents (HR 2.11, 95% credibility interval 1.19-4.23, p=0.017 vs bare-metal stents; 1.85, 1.02-3.85, p=0.041 vs sirolimus-eluting stents). The reduction in target lesion revascularisation seen with drug-eluting stents compared with bare-metal stents was more pronounced with sirolimus-eluting stents than with paclitaxel-eluting stents (0.70, 0.56-0.84; p=0.0021)., Interpretation: The risks of mortality associated with drug-eluting and bare-metal stents are similar. Sirolimus-eluting stents seem to be clinically better than bare-metal and paclitaxel-eluting stents.

Background: The long-term effects of treatment with sirolimus-eluting stents, as compared with bare-metal stents, have not been established., Methods: We performed an analysis of individual data on 4958 patients enrolled in 14 randomized trials comparing sirolimus-eluting stents with bare-metal stents (mean follow-up interval, 12.1 to 58.9 months). The primary end point was death from any cause. Other outcomes were stent thrombosis, the composite end point of death or myocardial infarction, and the composite of death, myocardial infarction, or reintervention., Results: The overall risk of death (hazard ratio, 1.03; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.80 to 1.30) and the combined risk of death or myocardial infarction (hazard ratio, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.81 to 1.16) were not significantly different for patients receiving sirolimus-eluting stents versus bare-metal stents. There was a significant reduction in the combined risk of death, myocardial infarction, or reintervention (hazard ratio, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.34 to 0.54) associated with the use of sirolimus-eluting stents. There was no significant difference in the overall risk of stent thrombosis with sirolimus-eluting stents versus bare-metal stents (hazard ratio, 1.09; 95% CI, 0.64 to 1.86). However, there was evidence of a slight increase in the risk of stent thrombosis associated with sirolimus-eluting stents after the first year., Conclusions: The use of sirolimus-eluting stents does not have a significant effect on overall long-term survival and survival free of myocardial infarction, as compared with bare-metal stents. There is a sustained reduction in the need for reintervention after the use of sirolimus-eluting stents. The risk of stent thrombosis is at least as great as that seen with bare-metal stents., (Copyright 2007 Massachusetts Medical Society.)

Late loss (LL) has been a fundamental angiographic end-point in drug-eluting stents (DES) clinical trials. However, calculation of LL may be affected by a mismatch between post-procedure (PO) and follow-up (FU) sites of the minimal lumen diameter (MLD). Our aims were to investigate the incidence and methodological implications of the relocation of MLD after bare metal (BMS), sirolimus-eluting (SES), and paclitaxel-eluting (PES) stent implantation. Data from DIABETES I and II trials, which involved diabetic patients treated with BMS, SES, and PES, were analyzed. Angiographic data with matched projections between PO and 9-month angiographic FU were included. In-stent, in-lesion, and in-segment analyses included conventional and customized sub-segmental (5-mm/subsegment) methodology. MLD relocation was considered when the sites of MLD shifted a distance >> the intrinsic variability of the method. Conventional LL, site matched LL, maximal LL (MaxLL), and average LL (AvgLL) were calculated. Relationships between various LL and 1-year target lesion revascularization (TLR) were investigated. Post MLD was located distally, outside the stent, in > or =65% of the analyses. At FU, MLD relocation occurred in 70.5% (BMS), 40% (SES), and 35% (PES). MLD shifted > or =11 mm on average, mainly towards the stented segment. MLD relocation still occurred in 42.8% (BMS), 33.7% (SES), and 36.4% (PES), when analysis was restricted to in-stent segment. Among LL measurements, MaxLL showed the best association with TLR rates. Relocation of the MLD is a frequent phenomenon after both BMS and DES, and should be taken into account when calculating LL. Comprehensive LL analyses, including MaxLL and AvgLL, provides a better appraisal of the biological and clinical effectiveness of DES., ((c) 2006 Wiley-Liss, Inc.)

Unlabelled: In-stent restenosis (ISR) has an incidence between 20% and 30% using bare metal stents. ISR late regression phenomenon (ISRLR) has been previously described, but clinical variables related with this phenomenon remain unclear. The aim of the study was to identify the variables related with ISRLR., Methods: We identified from our data base 30 patients between November 1995 and September 2002 that fulfilled the following criteria: 1) Documented ISR at follow-up angiography (CA-1); 2) treated medically; and 3) Referred for a second follow-up angiography (CA-2). at least 3 months after CA-1. ISRLR was defined as a > 0.2 mm increase in MLD between CA-1 and CA-2, calculated as the 2-fold of our inter-observer variability. ISR late progression was defined as a > 0.2 mm decrease in minimum lumen diameter (MLD) between CA-1 and CA-2., Results: At the time of CA-2 only 2 patients (6.7%) had symptoms related with the previously stented vessel. We found a mean MLD of 1.03+/-0.34 mm and 1.54+/-0.48 mm at CA-1 and CA-2 respectively (AMLD = 0.51 +/-0.34 mm; p < 0.001). Twenty four patients (80.0%) had ISRLR. Two variables were related to the presence or absence ISRLR: Current smoking at the time of coronary stenting (70.8% vs 20.0% respectively, p = 0.026) and acute coronary syndrome as clinical indication for coronary stenting (and 83.5% vs 40.0% respectively, p = 0.029)., Conclusion: ISRLR is a frequent phenomenon in patients with ISR treated medically, probably contributing to the benign long-term clinical outcome that has been previously described in patients with asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic ISR. Current smoking at the time of coronary stenting and acute coronary syndrome as clinical indication for coronary stenting are associated with this phenomenon.

Introduction and Objectives: Diabetic patients frequently have small-diameter vessels, which increases their risk of restenosis. The aim of this study was to determine the efficacy of sirolimus-eluting stent implantation in these high-risk patients following percutaneous coronary intervention., Methods: Our study population comprised a subset of 85 diabetic patients from the DIABETES (DIABETes and sirolimus Eluting Stent) trial who had very small vessels, defined as those with a reference diameter < or =2.25 mm. In the 100 lesions treated, 49 sirolimus-eluting stents and 51 bare-metal stents were used. Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors were used as recommended by the protocol and dual antiplatelet therapy was administered for 1 year., Results: Baseline clinical and angiographic characteristics were comparable in the two groups. The patients' mean age was 66 (9) years, 42% were women, and 37% were insulin-dependent. On average, the lesion length was 15.0 (9.0) mm and the reference diameter was 1.9 (0.2) mm. At 9-month follow-up, both late lumen loss and the restenosis rate were significantly lower in the sirolimus-eluting stent group than in the bare-metal stent group, at -0.03 (0.3) mm vs 0.44 (0.5) mm (P< .001), and 9.1% vs 39.1% (P=.001), respectively. These differences were also observed in the subgroup of insulin-dependent patients. At 1-year follow-up, the stent thrombosis rate was 0% in the sirolimus-eluting stent group, whereas two patients in the bare-metal stent group presented with stent thrombosis., Conclusions: Sirolimus-eluting stent implantation in diabetics with very small vessels is safe and effective, even in insulin-dependent patients.

Objectives: The aim of this research was to evaluate the plaque prolapse (PP) phenomenon after bare-metal (BMS) and drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation in patients with diabetes mellitus using 3-dimensional volumetric intravascular ultrasound (IVUS)., Background: Plaque prolapse has been observed in up to 22% of patients treated with BMS. Diabetic patients have a larger atherothrombotic burden and may be more prone to have PP. However, the incidence of PP and its clinical impact after DES implantation is unknown., Methods: Three-dimensional IVUS was performed after intervention and at 9-month follow-up in 168 patients with diabetes (205 lesions) treated with bare BX Velocity stents ((BX Velocity/Sonic, Cordis, Johnson & Johnson) (BMS, n = 65), sirolimus-eluting stents (Cypher, Cordis) (SES, n = 69), and paclitaxel-eluting stents (Taxus, Boston Scientific, Natick, Massachusetts) (PES, n = 71). Intravascular ultrasound data at the sites of PP were compared with stented segments without PP in each lesion. Outcomes were evaluated at 9- and 12-month follow-up., Results: There were 42 sites of PP (BMS = 11, SES = 11, PES = 20, p = NS) in 34 stented segments of 205 (16.6%) lesions. Plaque prolapse was more frequent in the right coronary artery and in chronic total occlusion lesions. Post-procedure PP volume was 1.95 mm3 in BMS, 2.96 mm3 in SES, and 4.53 mm3 in PES. At follow-up, tissue volume increased at PP sites in both BMS and PES, but not after SES. Neointimal proliferation was similar between PP and non-PP sites. Stent thrombosis and restenosis rates were similar between PP and non-PP lesions., Conclusions: The incidence of PP after implantation of new generation tubular stents in patients with diabetes remains high. Drug-eluting stent implantation was not associated with increased risk of PP. Plaque prolapse was not associated with stent thrombosis or increased neointimal proliferation.

Objectives: We sought to assess the effectiveness of sirolimus-eluting stents (SES) in patients with in-stent restenosis (ISR)., Background: Treatment of patients with ISR remains a challenge., Methods: The Restenosis Intrastent: Balloon Angioplasty Versus Elective Sirolimus-Eluting Stenting (RIBS-II) study is a multicenter randomized trial conducted in 150 patients with ISR (76 allocated to SES and 74 to balloon angioplasty [BA]). The primary end point was recurrent restenosis rate at nine months. Secondary end points included prespecified subgroup analysis, lumen volume on intravascular ultrasound (IVUS), and a composite of major clinical events at one year., Results: Angiographic success was obtained in all patients. At 9-month angiographic follow-up (96% of eligible patients) minimal lumen diameter was larger (2.52 mm [interquartile range (IQR) 2.09 to 2.81] vs. 1.54 mm [IQR 0.91 to 2.05]; p < 0.001) and recurrent restenosis rate was lower (11% vs. 39%; p < 0.001) in the SES group. Prespecified subgroup analyses were consistent with the main outcome measure. Lumen volume on IVUS at 9 months was also larger (279 mm3 [IQR 227 to 300] vs. 197 mm3 [IQR 177 to 230]; p < 0.001) in the SES group. At one-year clinical follow-up (100% of patients), the event-free survival (freedom from death, myocardial infarction, and target vessel revascularization) was significantly improved in the SES group (88% vs. 69%; p < 0.004) as the result of a lower requirement for target vessel revascularization (11% vs. 30%; p < 0.003)., Conclusions: In patients with ISR, the use of SES provides superior long-term clinical, angiographic, and IVUS outcome than BA treatment.

Objectives: A predefined intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) substudy was performed to evaluate the vascular effects of sirolimus-eluting stent (SES) versus bare-metal stent (BMS)., Background: The Diabetes and Sirolimus-Eluting Stent (DIABETES) trial is a prospective, multicenter, randomized, controlled trial aimed at demonstrating the efficacy of the SES compared with BMS in diabetic patients., Methods: Serial intravascular ultrasound analyses were performed in 140 lesions (SES = 75; BMS = 65) immediately after stent implantation and at nine-month follow-up. Vessel, luminal, and stent mean areas and volumes were evaluated at both edges and within the stented segment. Qualitative assessment of residual dissections and stent apposition were also performed., Results: Baseline clinical and angiographic characteristics were similar between groups. At 9 months, in-stent neointimal hyperplasia (NIH) mean area and volume were significantly reduced in the SES group (median NIH area 0.01 mm2 [0.0 to 0.1] vs. 2.0 mm2 [1.0 to 2.9] and median NIH volume 0.11 mm3 [0 to 2.1] vs. 35.3 mm3 [16.6 to 62.6]; both p < 0.0001). In the SES group, stent edges evidenced significant increase in lumen dimensions mainly due to significant increase in vessel volume, whereas those of the BMS group presented vessel shrinkage leading to significant lumen reduction. Late acquired incomplete stent apposition was observed in 11 lesions (14.7%) in the SES group and 0 in the BMS group (p = 0.001). At one year, no stent thromboses occurred in malapposed stents., Conclusions: The SES implantation effectively inhibits NIH in diabetic patients. The antirestenotic effect of SES is also appreciated at the stent edges. Late acquired stent malapposition is a frequent phenomenon in diabetic patients treated with SES.

Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) is widely used to optimize stent (ST) implantation. However, its value to guide therapy in challenging cases of in-stent restenosis (ISR) is not well established. We present 3 patients with complex ISR where IVUS interrogation was useful: (a) to readily identify the ST "entry door," (b) to accurately detect ST malapposition, (c) to measure the extent of ST protrusion out from its deployed position, and (d) to guide and optimize therapy. Thus, due to its unique ability to visualize the complete structure of the underlying ST, IVUS constitutes a superb diagnostic tool in patients with ISR, especially in challenging anatomic settings.

Background: Outcomes after percutaneous coronary interventions in diabetic patients are shadowed by the increased rate of recurrence compared with nondiabetic patients., Methods and Results: We conducted a multicenter, randomized trial to demonstrate the efficacy of sirolimus-eluting stents compared with standard stents to prevent restenosis in diabetic patients with de novo lesions in native coronary arteries. The primary end point of the trial was in-segment late lumen loss as assessed by quantitative coronary angiography at 9-month follow-up. The trial was stratified by diabetes treatment status. One hundred sixty patients were randomized to sirolimus-eluting stents (80 patients; 111 lesions) or standard stent implantation (80 patients; 110 lesions). On average, reference diameter was 2.34+/-0.6 mm, lesion length was 15.0+/-8 mm, and 13.1% of lesions were chronic total occlusions. In-segment late lumen loss was reduced from 0.47+/-0.5 mm for standard stents to 0.06+/-0.4 mm for sirolimus stents (P<0.001). Target-lesion revascularization and major adverse cardiac event rates were significantly lower in the sirolimus group (31.3% versus 7.3% and 36.3% versus 11.3%, respectively; both P<0.001). Non-insulin- and insulin-requiring patients demonstrated similar reductions in angiographic and clinical parameters of restenosis after sirolimus-eluting stent implantation. During the 9-month follow-up, stent thrombosis occurred in 2 patients after standard stent implantation. Conversely, this phenomenon was not seen in the sirolimus stent group., Conclusions: This randomized trial demonstrated that sirolimus stent implantation is safe and efficacious in reducing both angiographic and clinical parameters of restenosis compared with standard stents in diabetic patients with de novo coronary stenoses.

Aim: The aim of the study was to evaluate the compromise of side branches when jailed by a coronary stent implanted without balloon predilation., Patients and Methods: 56 patients in which at least a coronary stent was implanted without balloon predilation and covering a side brach (58 stents, 1.04 +/- 0.19 per patient) were studied. The effect of direct coronary stent implantation over side branch flow, as well as the characteristics associated were studied., Results: The main vessel was left anterior descending in 63%, left circumflex in 21%, right coronary in 14%, and left main in one case. An angiographic successful result in the main vessel was obtained in all cases. Coronary flow was TIMI 3, 2, 1, and 0 in 95%, 3%, 0%, and 2% before the procedure, in comparison with 86%, 2%, 3%, and 9% after stent implantation (p = 0.204). The incidence of side branch occlusion was 12% (7/58). In one case, the side branch was dilated across the stent struts, and thus the rate of side branch loss at the end of the procedure was 10% (6/58). In cases of side branch occlusion, there was a more severe stenosis at its origin before stent implantation (30.2 +/-31.3% vs 16.8 +/- 11.1%, p = 0.028). Fifty percent of side branches occluded after direct coronary stent implantation and angiographically re-evaluated at follow-up became patent, and 88% of side branches not affected after stent implantation remained patent at 6.2+/-1.9 months., Conclusion: The rate of side branch occlusion after direct stent implantation in our series was 12%, that is not different from that reported for conventional stent implantation. Thus, the decision of using direct or conventional coronary stenting should not be conditioned by the presence of side branches arising from the target lesion.

Diabetic patients may have aggressive coronary disease with an excessive rate of restenosis and accelerated atherosclerotic progression. This article reviews the different modalities of percutaneous treatment and their results in the diabetic population, from the early days of balloon angioplasty to the current implementation of drug-eluting stents. As restenosis may be virtually eradicated in the near future, plaque progression remains the cornerstone for interventional cardiologists and the medical community. In this regard, attempts to modify life habits, and a more accurate control of the components of the metabolic syndrome should be the main therapeutic objective.

Patients with in-stent restenosis involving the proximal segment of the left anterior descending coronary artery are frequently sent for surgical revascularization. We studied the long-term (3.3 +/- 2.8 years) outcome of 123 patients with in-stent restenosis involving the proximal left anterior descending coronary artery who were treated with a second percutaneous procedure. Cumulative survival rate, probability of being alive and free from surgical revascularization, and probability of being alive and free from new revascularization procedures was 98.3 +/- 1.2%, 92.8 +/- 2.5%, and 82.2 +/- 3.6% at 1 year, and 95.2 +/- 2.5%, 88.5 +/- 3.4%, and 76.9 +/- 4.3% at 3 years, respectively. Thus, in patients with in-stent restenosis involving the proximal left anterior descending artery, a second percutaneous procedure is a feasible and safe long-term strategy, with few patients ultimately requiring surgical revascularization.

Objectives: We compared the risk of stent thrombosis (ST) after drug-eluting stents (DES) versus bare-metal stents (BMS), and tested the hypothesis that the risk of DES thrombosis is related to stent length., Background: Whether DES increase the risk of ST remains unclear. Given the very low restenosis rate after drug-eluting stenting, longer stents are frequently implanted for the same lesion length in comparison to BMS., Methods: We included in a meta-analysis 10 randomized studies comparing DES and BMS. Overall, 5,030 patients were included (2,602 were allocated to DES and 2,428 to BMS). The risk of thrombosis after DES versus BMS was compared, and the relationship between the rate of DES thrombosis and stent length was evaluated., Results: Incidence of ST was not increased in patients receiving DES (0.58% vs. 0.54% for BMS; odds ratio: 1.05; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.51 to 2.15; p = 1.000). The overall rate of ST did not differ significantly between patients receiving sirolimus- or paclitaxel-eluting stents (0.57% vs. 0.58%; p = 1.000). We found a significant relation between the rate of ST and the stented length (Y = -1.455 + 0.121 X; 95% CI for beta: 0.014 to 0.227; R = 0.716; p = 0.031). In patients with DES, mean stented length was longer in those suffering ST (23.4 +/- 8.1 mm vs. 21.3 +/- 4.1 mm, p = 0.025)., Conclusions: Drug-eluting stents do not increase the risk of ST, at least under appropriate anti-platelet therapy. The risk of ST after DES implantation is related to stent length.

Background: Early lumen loss (ELL) may be detected in patients undergoing coronary interventions for in-stent restenosis. This phenomenon may contribute to recurrences. This prospective, randomized study was designed to determine if repeat stent implantation may prevent ELL in patients with in-stent restenosis., Methods: Forty patients were randomized: 20 were allocated to elective stent implantation and 20 to conventional balloon angioplasty. Quantitative coronary angiography and intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) volumetric studies were systematically performed (1) before the procedure, (2) immediately after intervention, and (3) 30 to 60 minutes later., Results: Baseline characteristics were similar in both groups. After the delay time interval (46 +/- 8 minutes), quantitative coronary angiography revealed a significant reduction in minimal lumen diameter (2.2 +/- 0.5 mm vs 1.7 +/- 0.5 mm, P < .001) in the balloon angioplasty arm. Likewise, in this group, IVUS demonstrated a reduction in mean lumen area (7.1 +/- 2 mm2 vs 6.2 +/- 2 mm2 , P < .001) and lumen volume (144 +/- 59 mm3 vs 126 +/- 54 mm3 , P < .001). In 4 of these patients, ELL was severe enough to require further intervention. In the stent arm, however, angiographic data and IVUS mean lumen area (7.7 +/- 3 mm2 vs 7.7 +/- 3 mm2) and lumen volume (161 +/- 72 mm3 vs 160 +/- 69 mm3) remained unchanged after the delay time interval. On multivariate analysis, stent implantation was an independent predictor of the absence of ELL by quantitative coronary angiography and by IVUS. In addition, patients with a larger ELL on IVUS had a lower event-free survival at 1 year (40% vs 79%, log rank P = .003)., Conclusions: This randomized study demonstrates that (1) ELL is frequently detected after treatment of in-stent restenosis with balloon angioplasty, that (2) ELL influences the long-term clinical outcome of these patients, and that (3) repeat stent implantation prevents ELL.

Background: Although patients undergoing coronary stenting routinely receive dual antiplatelet treatment to reduce the risk of stent thrombosis, this undesired event still occurs. A suboptimal response to clopidogrel treatment (low responders) has been suggested to contribute to stent thrombosis. In the present study, platelet function profiles were assessed in patients undergoing coronary stenting receiving a standard 300-mg clopidogrel loading dose with the aim to identify low clopidogrel responders., Materials and Methods: Platelet aggregation was assessed by light transmittance aggregometry following 6 microM ADP stimuli in 48 patients before and 10 min, 4 and 24 h after receiving clopidogrel front-loading. Patients having > or =40% inhibition of platelet aggregation 24 h after clopidogrel administration were defined as normal responders, whereas those having <40% inhibition were low responders. Glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa activation and P-selectin expression were assessed by whole blood flow cytometry following 2 microM ADP stimuli at the same time points. Platelet function profiles were compared between normal and low clopidogrel responders., Results: Twenty-seven patients (56%) were normal responders and 21 (44%) low responders. Baseline GP IIb/IIIa activation was higher in low responders (74.6+/-16.6% vs. 58.2+/-24.5%, p=0.03). Although GP IIb/IIIa activation reduced following clopidogrel front-loading in both groups, it remained increased among low responders at 24 h (58.6+/-21.3% vs. 40.2+/-28.7%, p=0.05) and during the overall study time course (p=0.02). There were no differences in P-selectin expression., Conclusions: A considerable proportion of patients have an early suboptimal response to a 300-mg clopidogrel loading dose. An increased GP IIb/IIIa activation before intervention may identify this group of patients suggesting the use of a more aggressive antithrombotic treatment in these individuals.

Aim: To assess platelet inhibitory effects, interindividual variability in platelet inhibition as well as response to a 600 mg, compared to a standard 300 mg, clopidogrel loading dose (LD) after coronary stenting, Methods and Results: Platelet function profiles were assessed in 50 patients undergoing coronary stenting receiving either a 300 mg (n=27) or 600 mg clopidogrel LD. ADP (6 microM) and collagen (6 microg/mL) induced platelet aggregation, as well as ADP (2 microM) induced glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa activation and P-selectin expression were assessed at baseline and 4, 24, and 48 h following clopidogrel front-loading. A more intense and rapid inhibition of platelet activation (both GP IIb/IIIa activation and P-selectin expression) were achieved using a 600 mg, compared to a 300 mg, LD throughout the entire 48 hours (p<0.001). Although there were no differences in platelet aggregation, overall a 600 mg LD increased the number of clopidogrel responders and this was also achieved earlier compared to a 300 mg LD. A 600 mg LD did not reduce interindividual variability of platelet response., Conclusion: The use of a 600 mg clopidogrel LD in patients undergoing coronary stenting optimises platelet inhibitory effects early after intervention and may provide a more effective protection against early thrombotic complications.

Aims: In patients with in-stent restenosis (ISR) several anatomic subgroups have been identified. ISR affecting the stent edge (EDG) is a poorly characterised subgroup with undefined therapeutic implications. We sought to determine the implications of ISR affecting the stent EDG., Methods and Results: 450 patients included in the "Restenosis Intra-stent: Balloon angioplasty vs elective Stenting" (RIBS) randomized study, were analysed. EDG ISR was predefined in the protocol and the pattern of ISR analysed in a centralized core-lab. Fifty-two patients (12%) had EDG ISR (29 stent group, 23 balloon arm). Patients with EDG ISR had less severe [minimal lumen diameter (MLD) (0.78+/-0.3 vs 0.66+/-0.3 mm, p=0.05)] and shorter lesions (lesion length 10.2+/-6 vs 13.2+/-7 mm, p=0.003). Patients with EDG ISR more frequently required crossover (12% vs 3%, p=0.006) but eventually the immediate angiographic result and the long-term clinical and angiographic outcome was similar to that found in patients without EDG ISR. Patients with EDG ISR treated in the balloon and stent arms had similar baseline characteristics. However, after intervention, the immediate angiographic result was better in the stent arm (MLD 2.79+/-0.4 vs 2.35+/-0.3 mm, p=0.001). This difference persisted at late follow-up: MLD (1.93+/-0.7 vs 1.39+/-0.7 mm, p=0.01), recurrent restenosis (20% vs 50%, p=0.03). In addition, the 1-year event-free survival was significantly better (83% vs 52%, log rank p=0.01; Cox HR 0.28, 95%CI 0.09-0.79) in the stent arm. Moreover, stent implantation was an independent predictor of freedom from target vessel revascularization (HR 0.15, 95%CI 0.03-0.67, p=0.003)., Conclusions: EDG ISR constitutes a specific subgroup with relevant therapeutic implications. In patients with EDG ISR, repeat stent implantation provides better clinical and angiographic outcome than conventional balloon angioplasty.

Objectives: We studied the efficacy of intracoronary brachytherapy (ICB) after successful coronary stenting in diabetic patients with de novo lesions., Background: Intracoronary brachytherapy has proven effective in preventing recurrences in patients with in-stent restenosis. However, the role of ICB for the treatment of de novo coronary stenoses remains controversial., Methods: Ninety-two patients were randomized to either ICB or no radiation after stenting. Primary end points were in-stent mean neointimal area (primary end point of efficacy) and minimal luminal area of the entire vessel segment (primary end point of effectiveness), as assessed by intravascular ultrasound at six-month follow-up. Quantitative coronary angiography analysis was performed at the target, injured, irradiated, and entire vessel segments., Results: At follow-up, the in-stent mean neointimal area was 52% smaller in the ICB group (p < 0.0001). However, there was no difference in the minimal luminal area of the vessel segment (4.5 +/- 2.4 mm2 vs. 4.4 +/- 2.1 mm2). Restenosis rates increased progressively by the analyzed segment in the ICB group: target (7.1% vs. 20.9%, p = 0.07), injured (9.5% vs. 20.9%, p = NS), irradiated (14.3% vs. 20.9%, p = NS), and vessel segment (23.8% vs. 25.6%, p = NS). At one year, 1 cardiac death, 6 myocardial infarctions (MIs) (3 due to late stent thrombosis), and 10 target vessel revascularizations (TVRs) (6 due to the edge effect) occurred in the ICB group, whereas in the nonradiation group, there were 11 TVRs and no deaths or MIs., Conclusions: Intracoronary brachytherapy significantly inhibited in-stent neointimal hyperplasia after stenting in diabetic patients. However, clinically this was counteracted by the occurrence of the edge effect and late stent thrombosis.

Objectives: A meta-analysis of 11 randomized trials was done to compare stenting versus balloon angioplasty (BA) in small coronary vessels., Background: Randomized studies on coronary stenting (CS) in small vessels have yielded controversial results., Methods: Eleven randomized trials on CS versus BA in small vessels, including angiographic re-evaluation at six months, were analyzed., Results: The BeStent (Medtronic Instent, Minneapolis, Minnesota) was used in four studies, the Multi-Link (Guidant, Advanced Cardiovascular Systems Inc., Santa Clara, California) in three trials, and the NIR (Boston Scientific Corp., Boston, Massachusetts), JoStent (Jomed International AB, Helsingborg, Sweden), Tenax (Biotronik, Berlin, Germany), and BioDivysio (Abbott Vascular Devices, Redwood City, California) in the remaining four trials. Overall, 3,541 patients were included (1,672 allocated to BA and 1,869 to stent). The rate of cross-over from balloon to stent in the pooled population was 19%, and unsuccessful stent deployment occurred in 2% of the patients allocated to stent. The pooled rates of restenosis were 25.8% and 34.2% in patients allocated to stent and balloon, respectively (p = 0.003) (risk ratio [RR] 0.77; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.65 to 0.92). A smaller reference vessel diameter at baseline was associated with a higher risk reduction in the restenosis rate (y = -3.551 + 1.826 [x]; p = 0.012). Patients allocated to stent had lower rates of major adverse cardiac events (15.0% vs. 21.8%, p = 0.002; RR 0.70; 95% CI 0.57 to 0.87) and new target vessel revascularizations (12.5% vs. 17.0%, p = 0.004; RR 0.75, 95% CI 0.61 to 0.91)., Conclusions: Elective stenting is superior to provisional stenting in small coronary arteries. This benefit is more evident in smaller coronary arteries.

Background: Clopidogrel combined to aspirin reduces the early risk of stent thrombosis and a clopidogrel pre-treatment strategy is associated with a better outcome. However, in clinical practice such pre-treatment strategy is not always feasible and clopidogrel is frequently not administered until the time of intervention. Aim of the study was to compare platelet function profiles in patients undergoing coronary stenting receiving clopidogrel pre-treatment (75 mg x 2 daily at least 48 hours before intervention) compared to that of patients receiving a 300 mg loading dose at intervention time., Methods: A total of 50 patients were included in whom patients' platelet aggregation (using light transmittance aggregometry) and platelet activation (P-selectin and PAC-1 expression by whole blood flow cytometry) were assessed following ADP stimuli at baseline, and 4 hours and 24 hours following coronary stenting., Results: In the overall study population, 16/50 (32%) patients were pre-treated with clopidogrel and 34/50 (68%) received clopidogrel loading dose at intervention time. Platelet aggregation, as well as P-selectin and PAC-1 expression were significantly lower in clopidogrel pre-treated patients at baseline (p<0.001) and at 4 hours (p<0.01), while they were similarly inhibited 24 hours after intervention. In conclusion, platelet reactivity of patients treated with clopidogrel front loading at intervention time remains significantly higher than that of pre-treated patients in the early hours after coronary stenting. A higher loading dose at intervention time may be warranted to overcome the early risk of thrombotic complications.

We report on a patient presenting with late thrombosis of a stent 15 months after being treated with intracoronary brachytherapy. It occurred 17 days after clopidogrel withdrawal while maintaining treatment with aspirin. At the time of stent thrombosis, evaluation of platelet aggregation was performed, revealing a suboptimal response to aspirin. Pathophysiological insights of aspirin resistance and clinical implications are reviewed., (Copyright 2004 Wiley-Liss, Inc.)