Search

This paper presents a model for the generation of a MAC tag using a stream cipher. The input message is used indirectly to control segments of the keystream that form the MAC tag. Several recent proposals can be considered as instances of this general model, as they all perform message accumulation in this way. However, they use slightly different processes in the message preparation and finalisation phases. We examine the security of this model for different options and against different types of attack, and conclude that the indirect injection model can be used to generate MAC tags securely for certain combinations of options. Careful consideration is required at the design stage to avoid combinations of options that result in susceptibility to forgery attacks. Additionally, some implementations may be vulnerable to side-channel attacks if used in Authenticated Encryption (AE) algorithms. We give design recommendations to provide resistance to these attacks for proposals following this model.

In this paper, we show that stream ciphers with a particular form of ciphertext output function are vulnerable to differential fault attacks using random faults. The CAESAR competition candidates Tiaoxin-346 and AEGIS-128L both fall into this category, and we show that our attack can be used to recover the secret key of Tiaoxin-346 and the entire state of AEGIS-128L with practical complexity. In the case of AEGIS-128L, the attack can be applied in a ciphertext-only scenario. Our attacks are more practical than previous fault attacks on these ciphers, which assumed bit-flipping faults. Although we also consider other ways of mitigating our attacks, we recommend that cipher designers avoid the form of ciphertext output function that we have identified. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]