Search

Streamflow forecasts from continental to global scale hydrological models have gained attention, but their performance against operational forecasts at local to regional scales must be evaluated. This study assesses the skill of medium-range, weekly streamflow forecasts for 147 large Brazilian hydropower plants (HPPs) and compares their performance with forecasts issued operationally by the National Electric System Operator (ONS). A continental-scale hydrological model was forced with ECMWF medium-range forecasts, and outputs were corrected using quantile mapping (QM) and autoregressive model approaches. By using both corrections, the percentage of HPPs with skillful forecasts against climatology and persistence for 1–7 days ahead increased substantially for low to moderate (9% to 56%) and high (72% to 94%) flows, while using only the QM correction allowed positive skill mainly for low to moderate flows and for 8–15 days ahead (29% to 64%). Compared with the ONS, the corrected continental-scale forecasts issued for the first week exhibited equal or better performance in 60% of the HPPs, especially for the North and Southeast subsystems, the DJF and MAM months, and for HPPs with less installed capacity. The findings suggest that using simple corrections on streamflow forecasts issued by continental-scale models can result in competitive forecasts even for regional-scale applications. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In this work, the role of initial conditions (ICs) and boundary conditions (BCs) in the predictability of natural flows of large river basins (>1000 km2) in South America using the South American Large Basins Model (MGB-SA) was investigated. We proposed an analysis based on a simple metric: predictability was estimated by the number of days in which the streamflow forecasts performed above a given threshold. The role of ICs was assessed through null precipitation experiments and the role of BCs through climatological rainfall. For experiments with a Kling-Gupta efficiency metric and threshold of 0.95, the study shows that streamflow predictability from the ICs is relatively high (up to 40 days) in the main river reaches of flat-relief basins. The increase in predictability due to climatology-based BCs mostly occurs in areas with high predictability based on ICs. Basins with fast response present low streamflow predictability (up to three days). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Global and regional climate models (GCM and RCM respectively) are the current mathematical tools used to project alterations on precipitation regimes given different greenhouse gases emissions scenarios. However, these models have specific resolutions, physical equations and numerical approaches that provide a diverse set of performances across different regions and spatial–temporal scales. In South America, most hydrological impact studies have used the Eta RCM to yield precipitation projections without a proper uncertainty analysis. It is important to acknowledge its uncertainties prior to any hydrological assessment to adequately support climate change investigations and related water decision making. Therefore, we aim to investigate how Eta extreme precipitation biases vary in different spatial–temporal scales from a hydrological perspective. Thus, we evaluate the extreme precipitation generated by the Eta RCM driven by four different GCMs. It is investigated Eta biases across different temporal (3 hr–5 days) and spatial scales (0.2–1.0°) and how those errors affect river streamflow simulations. It is used local intensity–duration–frequency (IDF) curves and gridded precipitation datasets (MSWEP and ERA5‐Land) as references for Eta assessment. In general, Eta underestimates subdaily extreme precipitation across South America, regardless of the driven GCM. The median bias of a 10‐year return period daily precipitation is −36 mm (1st and 3rd quantiles −58 and −17 mm) compared to MSWEP and −26 mm (1st and 3rd quantiles −45 and −11 mm) compared to ERA5‐Land. However, the relative errors reduce with temporal and spatial aggregation. For example, the average bias of extreme precipitation decreases 8.4 and 5.4 percentage points from 1‐ to 5‐day duration compared to MSWEP and ERA5‐Land, respectively. The negative biases observed for precipitation (≈20%) are propagated to the flood discharges (≈40%), and these errors reduce with the drainage area. In general, there are greater biases in extreme discharges for small basins, but these errors considerably reduce for basins larger than 30,000 km2 compared to MGB‐MSWEP simulations. Compared to MGB‐ERA5‐Land simulations, MGB‐Eta presents relatively similar errors for basins of different sizes, probably due to the high negative bias for not only extreme but average precipitation as well. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We present an assessment of climate change impacts on the hydrologic regime of the 600,000 km Upper Paraguay River basin, located in central South America based on predictions of 20 Atmospheric/Ocean General Circulation Models (AOGCMs). We considered two climate change scenarios from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) and two 30-years time intervals centered at 2030 and 2070. Projected temperature and precipitation anomalies estimated by the AOGCMs for the study site are spatially downscaled. Time series of projected temperature and precipitation were estimated using the delta change approach. These time series were used as input to a detailed coupled hydrologic-hydraulic model aiming to estimate projected streamflow in climate change scenarios at several control points in the basin. Results show that impacts on streamflow are highly dependent on the AOGCM used to obtain the climate predictions. Patterns of temperature increase persist over the entire year for almost all AOGCMs resulting in an increase in the evapotranspiration rate of the hydrological model. The precipitation anomalies show large dispersion, being projected as either an increase or decrease in precipitation rates. Based on these inputs, results from the coupled hydrologic-hydraulic model show nearly one half of projections as increasing river discharge, and other half as decreasing river discharge. If the mean or median of the predictions is considered, no discernible change in river discharge should be expected, despite the dispersion among results of the AOGCMs that reached +/−10 % in the short horizon and +/− 20 % in the long horizon, at several control points. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Digital filters are useful tools for assessing the contribution of groundwater to total river flow. Several of those filters have been proposed in the last decades. One of the last contributions on this subject was given by Ekchardt (2005) who proposed a more general form of a digital baseflow filter and showed that some of the most used filters are special cases of this general form. This new filter has the inconvenience of having two parameters, one of them may be obtained directly from recession analysis, but the other (maximum baseflow index (BFImax)) is routinely estimated by a priori defined values according to the predominant geological characteristics of the drainage basin. In this short communication, we propose a method to estimate BFImax by a backwards filtering operation. The method was applied using data from 15 gauging stations in Brazil, with a varied range of groundwater contribution to streamflow. Results of the new estimation method for the BFImax parameter are coherent with the values which would be adopted by considering geological characteristics of the river basins. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Summary: In this paper, we present a large-scale hydrologic model with a full one-dimensional hydrodynamic module to calculate flow propagation on a complex river network. The model uses the full Saint–Venant equations and a simple floodplain storage model, and therefore is capable of simulating a wide range of fluvial processes such as flood wave delay and attenuation, backwater effects, flood inundation and its effects on flood waves. We present the model basic equations and GIS algorithms to extract model parameters from relatively limited data, which is globally available, such as the SRTM DEM. GIS based algorithms include the estimation of river width and depth using geomorphological relations, river cross section bottom level and floodplain geometry extracted from DEM, etc. We also show a case study on one of the major tributaries of the Amazon, the Purus River basin. A model validation using discharge and water level data shows that the model is capable of reproducing the main hydrological features of the Purus River basin. Also, realistic floodplain inundation maps were derived from the results of the model. Our main conclusion is that it is possible to employ full hydrodynamic models within large-scale hydrological models even using limited data for river geometry and floodplain characterization. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• >350 large hydropower dams have been identified for construction in the Amazon basin. • Climate change will induce large-scale alterations in river hydrology basin-wide. • Frequency of zero hydropower generation increases and full-capacity operation decreases. • Mean hydropower generation decreases by ∼ 30% under worst-case climate change scenario. • Future Amazon hydropower's levelized cost of electricity ($ MWh−1) increases substantially under climate change. Numerous hydropower facilities are under construction or planned in tropical and subtropical rivers worldwide. While dams are typically designed considering historic river discharge regimes, climate change is likely to induce large-scale alterations in river hydrology. Here we analyze how future climate change will affect river hydrology, electricity generation, and economic viability of > 350 potential hydropower dams across the Amazon, Earth's largest river basin and a global hotspot for future hydropower development. Midcentury projections for the RCP 4.5 and 8.5 climate change scenarios show basin-wide reductions of river discharge (means, 13 and 16%, respectively) and hydropower generation (19 and 27%). Declines are sharper for dams in Brazil, which harbors 60% of the proposed projects. Climate change will cause more frequent low-discharge interruption of hydropower generation and less frequent full-capacity operation. Consequently, the minimum electricity sale price for projects to break even more than doubles at many proposed dams, rendering much of future Amazon hydropower less competitive than increasingly lower cost renewable sources such as wind and solar. Climate-smart power systems will be fundamental to support environmentally and financially sustainable energy development in hydropower-dependent regions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• We assess EMOS and ECC to postprocess daily streamflow forecasts in South America. • We used global rainfall data and ECMWF reforecasts as inputs to a continental model. • EMOS substantially improves forecast skill relative to climatology and persistence. • ECC performance is linked to the raw ensemble spread and width of EMOS distribution. • EMOS and ECC postprocessing are promising even with real-time data limitations. Probabilistic hydrological forecasting and ensemble techniques have leveraged streamflow prediction at regional to continental scales up to several weeks in advance. However, ensembles that only account for meteorological forecast uncertainty are typically biased and subject to dispersion errors, thus limiting their use for rational decision-making and optimization systems. Statistical postprocessing is therefore necessary to convert ensemble forecasts into calibrated and sharp predictive distributions, and it should also account for dependencies between lead times to enable realistic forecast trajectories. This work provides a continental-scale assessment of the use of statistical postprocessing on medium-range, ensemble streamflow forecasts over South America (SA). These forecasts were produced through a large-scale hydrologic–hydrodynamic model forced with a global precipitation dataset and ECMWF reforecast data. The Ensemble Model Output Statistics (EMOS) technique was used to generate conditional predictive distributions in 488 locations at each forecast lead time, while the Ensemble Copula Coupling method with the transformation scheme (ECC-T) was applied to derive ensemble traces from EMOS distributions. Postprocessed streamflow forecasts were cross-validated for the period from 1996 to 2014 using a range of verification metrics. Results showed that the skill and reliability of EMOS forecasts substantially improve over the raw ensembles, and that EMOS leads to skillful predictions relative to discharge climatology and persistence forecasts up to 15 days in advance in most locations. Furthermore, EMOS results in predictive distributions that are generally sharper than the climatology. Limitations in depicting autocorrelations of forecast trajectories were observed in rivers for which the raw ensemble spread is very low and EMOS has to largely increase dispersion, especially at short lead times. The study's findings suggest that combining a continental-scale hydrological model with EMOS and ECC-T methods can lead to skillful predictions and realistic ensemble traces in several locations in SA, even if in situ hydrometeorological observations are not available in real time. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]