Search

Background: The implementation of preventive therapies among patients with stroke remains inadequately explored, especially when compared with patients with myocardial infarction (MI), despite sharing similar vascular risk profiles. We tested the hypothesis that participants with a history of stroke have a worse cardiovascular prevention profile in comparison to participants with MI., Methods and Results: In cross-sectional analyses within the UK Biobank and All of Us Research Program, involving 14 760 (9193 strokes, 5567 MIs) and 7315 (2948 strokes, 4367 MIs) participants, respectively, we evaluated cardiovascular prevention profiles assessing low-density lipoprotein (<100 mg/dL), blood pressure (systolic, <140 mm Hg; and diastolic, <90 mm Hg), statin and antiplatelet use, and a cardiovascular prevention score that required meeting at least 3 of these criteria. The results revealed that, within the UK Biobank, patients with stroke had significantly lower odds of meeting all the preventive criteria compared with patients with MI: low-density lipoprotein control (odds ratio [OR], 0.73 [95% CI, 0.68-0.78]; P <0.001), blood pressure control (OR, 0.63 [95% CI, 0.59-0.68]; P <0.001), statin use (OR, 0.45 [95% CI, 0.42-0.48]; P <0.001), antiplatelet therapy use (OR, 0.30 [95% CI, 0.27-0.32]; P <0.001), and cardiovascular prevention score (OR, 0.42 [95% CI, 0.39-0.45]; P <0.001). Similar patterns were observed in the All of Us Research Program, with significant differences across all comparisons ( P <0.05), and further analysis suggested that the odds of having a good cardiovascular prevention score were influenced by race and ethnicity as well as neighborhood deprivation levels (interaction P <0.05 in both cases)., Conclusions: In 2 independent national cohorts, patients with stroke showed poorer cardiovascular prevention profiles and lower adherence to guideline-directed therapies compared with patients with MI. These findings underscore the need to explore the reasons behind the underuse of secondary prevention in vulnerable stroke survivors.

Background and Objectives: Mounting evidence indicates that hypertension leads to a higher risk of dementia. Hypertension is a highly heritable trait, and a higher polygenic susceptibility to hypertension (PSH) is known to associate with a higher risk of dementia. We tested the hypothesis that a higher PSH leads to worse cognitive performance in middle-aged persons without dementia. Confirming this hypothesis would support follow-up research focused on using hypertension-related genomic information to risk-stratify middle-aged adults before hypertension develops., Methods: We conducted a nested cross-sectional genetic study within the UK Biobank (UKB). Study participants with a history of dementia or stroke were excluded. We categorized participants as having low (≤20th percentile), intermediate, or high (≥80th percentile) PSH according to results of 2 polygenic risk scores for systolic and diastolic blood pressure (BP) generated with data on 732 genetic risk variants. A general cognitive ability score was calculated as the first component of an analysis that included the results of 5 cognitive tests. Primary analyses focused on Europeans, and secondary analyses included all race/ethnic groups., Results: Of the 502,422 participants enrolled in the UKB, 48,118 (9.6%) completed the cognitive evaluation, including 42,011 (8.4%) of European ancestry. Multivariable regression models using systolic BP-related genetic variants indicated that compared with study participants with a low PSH, those with intermediate and high PSH had reductions of 3.9% (β -0.039, SE 0.012) and 6.6% (β -0.066, SE 0.014), respectively, in their general cognitive ability score ( p < 0.001). Secondary analyses including all race/ethnic groups and using diastolic BP-related genetic variants yielded similar results ( p < 0.05 for all tests). Analyses evaluating each cognitive test separately indicated that reaction time, numeric memory, and fluid intelligence drove the association between PSH and general cognitive ability score (all individual tests, p < 0.05)., Discussion: Among nondemented, community-dwelling, middle-aged Britons, a higher PSH is associated with worse cognitive performance. These findings suggest that genetic predisposition to hypertension influences brain health in persons who have not yet developed dementia. Because information on genetic risk variants for elevated BP is available long before the development of hypertension, these results lay the foundation for further research focused on using genomic data for the early identification of high-risk middle-aged adults., (© 2023 American Academy of Neurology.)

Background: Frailty is a prevalent state associated with several aging-related traits and conditions. The relationship between frailty and stroke remains understudied. Here we aim to investigate whether the hospital frailty risk score (HFRS) is associated with the risk of stroke and determine whether a significant association between genetically determined frailty and stroke exists., Design: Observational study using data from All of Us research program and Mendelian Randomization analyses., Methods: Participants from All of Us with available electronic health records were selected for analysis. All of Us began national enrollment in 2018 and is expected to continue for at least 10 years. All of Us is recruiting members of groups that have traditionally been underrepresented in research. All participants provided informed consent at the time of enrollment, and the date of consent was recorded for each participant. Incident stroke was defined as stroke event happening on or after the date of consent to the All of Us study HFRS was measured with a 3-year look-back period before the date of consent for stroke risk. The HFRS was stratified into 4 categories: no-frailty (HFRS=0), low (HFRS ≥1 and <5), intermediate (≥5 and <15), and high (HFRS ≥15). Last, we implemented Mendelian Randomization analyses to evaluate whether genetically determined frailty is associated with stroke risk., Results: Two hundred fifty-three thousand two hundred twenty-six participants were at risk of stroke. In multivariable analyses, frailty status was significantly associated with risk of any (ischemic or hemorrhagic) stroke following a dose-response way: not-frail versus low HFRS (HR, 4.9 [CI, 3.5-6.8]; P <0.001), not-frail versus intermediate HFRS (HR, 11.4 [CI, 8.3-15.7]; P <0.001) and not-frail versus high HFRS (HR, 42.8 [CI, 31.2-58.6]; P <0.001). We found similar associations when evaluating ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke separately ( P value for all comparisons <0.05). Mendelian Randomization confirmed this association by indicating that genetically determined frailty was independently associated with risk of any stroke (OR, 1.45 [95% CI, 1.15-1.84]; P =0.002)., Conclusions: Frailty, based on the HFRS was associated with higher risk of any stroke. Mendelian Randomization analyses confirmed this association providing evidence to support a causal relationship., Competing Interests: Disclosures None.

Background and Objectives: Blood pressure (BP) is often not at goal in stroke survivors, leaving individuals vulnerable to additional vascular events. Given that BP is a highly heritable trait, we hypothesize that a higher polygenic susceptibility to hypertension (PSH) leads to worse BP control in stroke survivors., Methods: We conducted a study within the UK Biobank evaluating persons of European ancestry who survived an ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke. To model the PSH, we created polygenic risk scores (PRSs) for systolic and diastolic BP using 732 genetic variants. We divided the PRSs into quintiles and used linear/logistic regression to test whether higher PSH led to higher observed BP, uncontrolled BP (systolic BP > 140 mm Hg or diastolic BP > 90 mm Hg), and resistant BP (uncontrolled BP despite being on ≥3 antihypertensive drugs). We conducted an independent replication using data from the Vitamin Intervention for Stroke Prevention (VISP) trial., Results: We analyzed 5,940 stroke survivors. When comparing stroke survivors with very low vs very high PSH, the mean systolic BP was 137 (SD 18) vs 143 (SD 20, p < 0.001), the mean diastolic BP was 81 (SD 10) vs 84 (SD 11, p < 0.001), the prevalence of uncontrolled BP was 42.8% vs 57.2% ( p < 0.001), and the prevalence of resistant hypertension was 3.9% vs 11% ( p < 0.001). Results remained significant using multivariable models ( p < 0.001) and were replicated in the VISP study (all tests with p < 0.05)., Discussion: A higher PSH is associated with worse BP control in stroke survivors. These findings point to genetic predisposition as an important determinant of poorly controlled BP in this population., (© 2023 American Academy of Neurology.)

Background: Among prognostic imaging variables, the hematoma volume on admission computed tomography (CT) has long been considered the strongest predictor of outcome and mortality in intracerebral hemorrhage., Aims: To examine whether different features of hematoma shape are associated with functional outcome in deep intracerebral hemorrhage., Methods: We analyzed 790 patients from the ATACH-2 trial, and 14 shape features were quantified. We calculated Spearman's Rho to assess the correlation between shape features and three-month modified Rankin scale (mRS) score, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) to quantify the association between shape features and poor outcome defined as mRS>2 as well as mRS > 3., Results: Among 14 shape features, the maximum intracerebral hemorrhage diameter in the coronal plane was the strongest predictor of functional outcome, with a maximum coronal diameter >∼3.5 cm indicating higher three-month mRS scores. The maximum coronal diameter versus hematoma volume yielded a Rho of 0.40 versus 0.35 ( p  = 0.006), an AUC [mRS>2] of 0.71 versus 0.68 ( p  = 0.004), and an AUC [mRS>3] of 0.71 versus 0.69 ( p  = 0.029). In multiple regression analysis adjusted for known outcome predictors, the maximum coronal diameter was independently associated with three-month mRS (p < 0.001)., Conclusions: A coronal-plane maximum diameter measurement offers greater prognostic value in deep intracerebral hemorrhage than hematoma volume. This simple shape metric may expedite assessment of admission head CTs, offer a potential biomarker for hematoma size eligibility criteria in clinical trials, and may substitute volume in prognostic intracerebral hemorrhage scoring systems.

Importance: The American Heart Association (AHA) Life's Simple 7 (LS7) score captures 7 biological and lifestyle factors associated with promoting cardiovascular health., Objectives: To test whether healthier LS7 profiles are associated with significant brain health benefits in persons without stroke or dementia, and to evaluate whether genomic information can recapitulate the observed LS7., Design, Setting, and Participants: This genetic association study was a nested neuroimaging study within the UK Biobank, a large population-based cohort study in the United Kingdom. Between March 2006 and October 2010, the UK Biobank enrolled 502 480 community-dwelling persons aged 40 to 69 years at recruitment. This study focused on a subset of 35 914 participants without stroke or dementia who completed research brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and had available genome-wide data. All analyses were conducted between March 2021 and March 2022., Exposures: The LS7 (blood pressure, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, hemoglobin A1c, smoking, exercise, diet, and body mass index) profiles were ascertained clinically and genomically. Independent genetic variants known to influence each of the traits included in the LS7 were assessed. The total LS7 score ranges from 0 (worst) to 14 (best) and was categorized as poor (≤4), average (>4 to 9) and optimal (>9)., Main Outcomes and Measures: The outcomes of interest were 2 neuroimaging markers of brain health: white matter hyperintensity (WMH) volume and brain volume (BV)., Results: The final analytical sample included 35 914 participants (mean [SD] age 64.1 [7.6] years; 18 830 [52.4%] women). For WMH, compared with persons with poor observed LS7 profiles, those with average profiles had 16% (β = -0.18; SE, 0.03; P < .001) lower mean volume and those with optimal profiles had 39% (β = -0.39; SE, 0.03; P < .001) lower mean volume. Similar results were obtained using the genomic LS7 for WMH (average LS7 profile: β = -0.06; SE, 0.014; P < .001; optimal LS7 profile: β = -0.08; SE, 0.018; P < .001). For BV, compared with persons with poor observed LS7 profiles, those with average LS7 profiles had 0.55% (β = 0.09; SE, 0.02; P < .001) higher volume, and those with optimal LS7 profiles had 1.9% (β = 0.14; SE, 0.02; P < .001) higher volume. The genomic LS7 profiles were not associated with BV., Conclusions and Relevance: These findings suggest that healthier LS7 profiles were associated with better profiles of 2 neuroimaging markers of brain health in persons without stroke or dementia, indicating that cardiovascular health optimization was associated with improved brain health in asymptomatic persons. Genomic information appropriately recapitulated 1 of these associations, confirming the feasibility of modeling the LS7 genomically and pointing to an important role of genetic predisposition in the observed association among cardiometabolic and lifestyle factors and brain health.

As the number of stroke survivors continues to increase, identification of therapeutic targets for stroke recovery has become a priority in stroke genomics research. The introduction of high-throughput genotyping technologies and novel analytical tools has significantly advanced our understanding of the genetic underpinnings of stroke recovery.