Search

Background: Stroke, which is the main element of cerebrovascular disease (CVD), has become the foremost reason for death and disability on a global scale. The systemic inflammation response index (SIRI), a newly developed and comprehensive indicator, has demonstrated promise in forecasting clinical results for diverse ailments. Nevertheless, the uncertainty surrounding the assessment and prediction of clinical outcomes for stroke patients by SIRI persists, and the conflicting findings from the limited studies conducted on this matter further complicate the situation. Consequently, we performed a thorough systematic review and meta-analysis to explore the correlation between SIRI and the clinical results in individuals suffering from stroke., Methods: This research was registered in PROSPERO and carried out following the PRISMA guidelines. A thorough investigation was carried out on PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Scopus databases. Furthermore, we conducted a manual search in Chinese databases, such as China national Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), WanFang, VIP, and China Biology Medicine (CBM). We assessed the potential for bias in the studies included by utilizing the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) tool. Adverse clinical outcomes were the main focus of the study, with secondary endpoints including mortality, the predictive value of SIRI, SIRI values across various endpoints, and clinical parameters associated with subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) in relation to low and high SIRI group., Results: Following rigorous evaluation, a grand total of 22 investigations, encompassing a populace of 12,737 individuals, were considered suitable for incorporation in the final analysis. The findings from our meta-analysis indicate a strong and consistent correlation between elevated SIRI levels and adverse functional outcomes, irrespective of the method used to evaluate unfavorable outcomes. Furthermore, increased SIRI values have a strong correlation with mortality rates in both the short and long term. Besides, SIRI is a useful indicator of the severity of SAH. SIRI demonstrates strong predictive ability in identifying unfavorable outcomes and stroke-related pneumonia (SAP), as higher SIRI values are typically linked to negative endpoints. Nevertheless, the meta-analysis indicated that there was no significant increase in the risk of early neurological deterioration (END) and acute hydrocephalus (AHC) in high SIRI group when comparing to low SIRI., Conclusion: This study could potentially pave the way for groundbreaking insights into the relationship between SIRI and stroke patient outcomes, as it appears to be the first meta-analysis to explore this association. Given the critical role of the inflammatory response in stroke recovery, closely monitoring patients with high SIRI levels could represent a promising strategy for mitigating brain damage post-stroke. Thus, further investigation into SIRI and its impact on clinical outcomes is essential. While our initial findings offer valuable insights into this area, continued research is necessary to fully elucidate the potential of SIRI, ideally through dynamic monitoring and large-scale, multi-center studies. Ultimately, this research has the potential to inform clinical decision-making and improve patient outcomes following stroke., Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/ ; Identifier CRD42023405221., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Objective: Cardiovascular disease (CVD) and cerebrovascular disease are the leading cause of death around the world all the time. A novel marker described as the stress hyperglycemia ratio (SHR) can reflect the acute hyperglycemic status and is associated with poor outcomes in patients with acute illness, such as stroke and myocardial infarction (MI). Our previous study has shown that SHR was strongly related to the clinical outcomes of stroke patients. Nevertheless, the association between SHR and clinical outcomes in patients with CVD is still unclear and controversial. Consequently, in the current study, we analyzed the association of SHR and clinical outcomes in CVD patients by systematic review and meta-analysis., Materials and Methods: We searched the electronic databases to identify SHR studies of patients who met the eligibility criteria for CVD. We performed our study complying with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). We utilized a ten terms tool to assess the potential bias of included studies. Major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCEs), all-cause death, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), and other exciting outcome data were extracted for statistical analysis. Moreover, we used the DerSimonian and Laird random-effects model to perform the meta-analysis and conducted subgroup analyses to identify factors associated with substantial heterogeneity., Results: The study cohort included nine studies comprising 32,292 patients with CVD. Our meta-analysis found that MACCEs in the high SHR group were 1.68 folds compared with that in the low SHR group [odds ratio (OR) 1.68, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.41-2.00, p < 0.00001]. Besides, all-cause death in the high SHR group was 1.52 folds compared with that in the low SHR group (OR 1.52, 95% CI 1.15-2.01, p < 0.00001). Higher SHR meant the lower LVEF (mean difference [MD] -2.03, 95% CI [-3.28-0.79], p = 0.001). The risk of cardiogenic shock and stroke were 2.47 and 1.53 folds in the high SHR group, respectively, compared with the low SHR group. Yet, no statistically significant difference was observed for revascularization (OR 0.88, 95% CI 0.77-1.01, p = 0.08), recurrent MI (OR 1.27, 95% CI 0.69-2.33, p = 0.44), and left ventricular end-diastolic diameter (LVEDD) (MD 0.61, 95% CI [-1.65, 2.87], p = 0.60) between the two groups. Subgroup analyses identified that different study design was associated with heterogeneity about MACCEs and LVEF. Besides, studies from different countries were associated with heterogeneity about all-cause death., Conclusions: Higher SHR significantly increases the occurrence of MACCEs and all-cause death and decreases LVEF. Moreover, Higher SHR means a higher risk of cardiogenic shock and stroke. Nevertheless, SHR had no relationship with revascularization, recurrent MI, and LVEDD. As a novel and non-invasive marker, SHR should be paid more attention to in clinical practice. Future investigation should focus on the diagnostic value of SHR in CVD and the early control of stress hyperglycemia. Although no randomized, double-blind studies have been conducted, the available massive sample studies reflect the actual situation in the clinic and assist clinical decision-making.