Search

This review focuses on the available data regarding the utility of advanced left ventricular (LV) imaging in aortic stenosis (AS) and its potential impact for optimising the timing of aortic valve replacement. Ejection fraction is currently the only LV parameter recommended to guide intervention in AS. The cut-off value of 50%, recommended for decision-making in asymptomatic patients with AS, is currently under debate. Several imaging parameters have emerged as predictors of disease progression and clinical outcomes in this setting. Global longitudinal LV strain by speckle tracking echocardiography is useful for risk stratification of asymptomatic patients with severe AS and preserved LV ejection fraction. Its prognostic value was demonstrated in these patients, but further work is required to define the best thresholds to aid the decision-making process. The assessment of myocardial fibrosis is the most studied application of cardiac magnetic resonance in AS. The detection of replacement fibrosis by late gadolinium enhancement offers incremental prognostic information in these patients. Clinical implementation of this technique to optimise the timing of aortic valve intervention in asymptomatic patients is currently tested in a randomised trial. The use of T1 mapping techniques can provide an assessment of interstitial myocardial fibrosis and represents an expanding field of interest. However, convincing data in patients with AS is still lacking. All these imaging parameters have substantial potential to influence the management decision in patients with AS in the future, but data from randomised clinical trials are awaited to define their utility in daily practice., Competing Interests: Competing interests: BAP has received research support and lecture honoraria from General Electric Healthcare., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Background: Data regarding the contribution of left atrial (LA) dysfunction to the occurrence of heart failure in patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS) are scarce. The aim of this study was to assess the relationship between LA deformation and symptomatic status in this clinical setting., Methods: A total of 361 consecutive patients with severe AS (aortic valve area [AVA] index ≤ 0.6 cm 2 /m 2 ) referred to the echocardiography laboratory were prospectively screened. Two hundred forty-eight patients with preserved left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (≥50%), in sinus rhythm, and with no more than mild aortic or mitral regurgitation (202 symptomatic and 46 asymptomatic) were enrolled. Asymptomatic status was confirmed by exercise echocardiography or electrocardiography, as clinically indicated. All patients underwent comprehensive echocardiography, including speckle-tracking analysis of LV and LA deformation., Results: No significant differences were found between the two groups regarding age and cardiovascular risk factors. LV ejection fraction and geometric parameters were similar between groups despite higher indexed AVA in asymptomatic patients. In symptomatic patients, brain natriuretic peptide values, average E/e' ratio, and LA size were higher, whereas LV global longitudinal strain and peak LA longitudinal strain and strain rate parameters were lower compared with asymptomatic patients. AVA and peak systolic LA longitudinal strain rate were the only independent correlates of heart failure symptoms (P = .04 and P = .01, respectively)., Conclusions: LA systolic strain rate, in addition to AVA, emerged as an independent correlate of the presence of heart failure in patients with severe AS and preserved LV ejection fraction. The echocardiographic evaluation of LA function by speckle-tracking may become useful for risk stratification in patients with asymptomatic AS, but larger prospective studies are needed., (Copyright © 2018 American Society of Echocardiography. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

In patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS), the presence of pulmonary hypertension (PH) has been linked to a poor prognosis. We aimed to assess the main determinants of PH in patients with severe AS and preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). We prospectively enrolled 108 consecutive patients with isolated severe AS (indexed aortic valve area <0.6 cm 2 /m 2 ) and LVEF >50%, in sinus rhythm. Left atrial (LA) function was assessed using longitudinal deformation parameters (by speckle tracking echocardiography). PH (defined as systolic pulmonary artery pressure >40 mmHg) was present in 20 patients. Patients with severe AS and PH were older (p = 0.05), had higher BNP values (p = 0.05) and a greater degree of LV diastolic dysfunction: higher E/e' and E/A ratios and lower EDT values (p < 0.03 for all) compared to patients without PH. There were no differences between groups regarding AS severity and LV systolic function parameters. Patients with PH had a more impaired LA function: lower septal and lateral late diastolic peak velocity a' (p < 0.001 and p = 0.04 respectively) and lower LA peak longitudinal strain and strain rate parameters (p ≤ 0.005 for all). In multivariable analysis, LA late diastolic longitudinal strain rate was the only independent correlate of PH in our patients (p = 0.04). Patients with isolated severe AS, preserved LVEF and PH had larger LA volumes, a more impaired LA function, and higher LV filling pressures compared to those without PH. LA booster pump function, reflected by late diastolic longitudinal strain rate, emerged as an independent correlate of PH in these patients.

Aims: The present Euro-Filling report aimed at comparing the diagnostic accuracy of the 2009 and 2016 echocardiographic grading algorithms for predicting invasively measured left ventricular filling pressure (LVFP)., Method and Results: A total of 159 patients who underwent simultaneous evaluation of echo estimates of LVFP and invasive measurements of LV end-diastolic pressure (LVEDP) were enrolled at nine EACVI centres. Thirty-nine (25%) patients had a reduced LV ejection fraction (<50%), 77 (64%) were in NYHA ≥ II, and 85 (53%) had coronary artery disease. Sixty-four (40%) patients had elevated LVEDP (≥15 mmHg). Taken individually, all echocardiographic Doppler estimates of LVFP (E/A, E/e', left atrial volume, tricuspid regurgitation jet velocity) were marginally correlated with LVEDP. By using the 2016 recommendations, 65% of patients with normal non-invasive estimate of LVFP had normal LVEDP, while 79% of those with elevated non-invasive LVFP had elevated invasive LVEDP. By using 2009 recommendations, 68% of the patients with normal non-invasive LVFP had normal LVEDP, while 55% of those with elevated non-invasive LVFP had elevated LVEDP. The 2016 recommendations (sensitivity 75%, specificity 74%, positive predictive value 39%, negative predictive value 93%, AUC 0.78) identified slightly better patients with elevated invasive LVEDP (≥ 15 mmHg) as compared with the 2009 recommendations (sensitivity 43%, specificity 75%, positive predictive value 49%, negative predictive value 71%, AUC 0.68)., Conclusion: The present Euro-Filling study demonstrates that the new 2016 recommendations for assessing LVFP non-invasively are fairly reliable and clinically useful, as well as superior to the 2009 recommendations in estimating invasive LVEDP., (Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved. © The Author 2017. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Aortic stenosis has an increasing prevalence in the context of aging population. In these patients non-invasive imaging allows not only the grading of valve stenosis severity, but also the assessment of left ventricular function. These two goals play a key role in clinical decision-making. Although left ventricular ejection fraction is currently the only left ventricular function parameter that guides intervention, current imaging techniques are able to detect early changes in LV structure and function even in asymptomatic patients with significant aortic stenosis and preserved ejection fraction. Moreover, new imaging parameters emerged as predictors of disease progression in patients with aortic stenosis. Although proper standardization and confirmatory data from large prospective studies are needed, these novel parameters have the potential of becoming useful tools in guiding intervention in asymptomatic patients with aortic stenosis and stratify risk in symptomatic patients undergoing aortic valve replacement.This review focuses on the mechanisms of transition from compensatory left ventricular hypertrophy to left ventricular dysfunction and heart failure in aortic stenosis and the role of non-invasive imaging assessment of the left ventricular geometry and function in these patients.